CODITECT Investor Pitch Deck Visualization Prompts
Task: N.6.9 (TRACK-N GTM Launch) Author: Claude (Opus 4.6) Date: February 12, 2026 Data Source: CODITECT Financial Model v2.0 (2026-02-11 export) Pipeline: 3-agent synthesis (web-search-researcher + venture-capital-business-analyst + financial-narrative-generator)
How to Use This Document
Each visualization prompt below contains:
- Title — Slide headline (investor-facing)
- Story — The narrative this chart tells investors (1 sentence)
- Chart Type — Recommended visualization format with design rationale
- Data — Exact numbers from Financial Model v2.0 to plot
- Annotations — Callouts, benchmarks, and labels that reinforce the story
- Design Notes — Color, emphasis, and layout guidance
- Investor Question It Answers — The implicit question this slide preempts
Prompts are sequenced in optimal pitch order: Market Context -> Proof of Efficiency -> Growth Trajectory -> Economics -> Valuation -> Ask.
Narrative Arc
| Act | Slides | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. The Opportunity | 1-2 | Why this market, why now |
| 2. Capital Efficiency | 3-4 | Why CODITECT is a safe bet |
| 3. Growth Trajectory | 5-7 | Why CODITECT will be massive |
| 4. Unit Economics | 8-10 | Why the economics compound |
| 5. Valuation & Ask | 11-12 | Why invest now |
Visualization 1: Competitive Positioning Map
Title: "AI Dev Tools: Feature Products vs. Platform Play"
Story: CODITECT occupies the only uncontested quadrant — full-platform orchestration with enterprise economics — while competitors fight over code completion.
Chart Type: 2x2 quadrant scatter plot (bubble chart)
- X-axis: "Feature / Point Solution" <---> "Full SDLC Platform"
- Y-axis: "Individual / Consumer" <---> "Enterprise / Teams"
- Bubble size: Valuation or ARR
Data:
| Company | X Position | Y Position | Bubble (Valuation) | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | 30% | 65% | $10B+ (Microsoft) | 1.8M subs |
| Cursor | 25% | 20% | $9.9B | $500M+ ARR |
| Codeium | 35% | 40% | $3B | $82M ARR |
| Tabnine | 20% | 35% | $600M | Enterprise focus |
| CODITECT | 90% | 85% | Target $464M (M24) | Full SDLC |
Annotations:
- Dashed quadrant lines with labels: "Code Completion" (bottom-left), "Enterprise Code" (top-left), "Dev Platform" (bottom-right), "SDLC Orchestration" (top-right)
- Arrow from CODITECT's position: "445 skills, 776 agents, 118 hooks"
- Empty top-right quadrant labeled "White space" with CODITECT as sole occupant
Design Notes:
- CODITECT bubble in brand primary color (bold, distinctive)
- Competitors in muted gray/blue tones
- Top-right quadrant has subtle green tint ("opportunity zone")
Investor Question It Answers: "How is this different from Cursor or Copilot?"
Visualization 2: Land & Expand Funnel
Title: "Bottom-Up Wedge, Top-Down Economics"
Story: Developers adopt at $15/mo with zero friction; the economics compound as they pull the platform into teams ($50/mo) and enterprises ($250/mo), driving LTV:CAC from 4.5x to 13x.
Chart Type: Funnel/cascade diagram with three tiers, left-to-right flow
Data:
| Tier | MRR | LTV | CAC | LTV:CAC | Acquisition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | $15/mo | $45 | $10 | 4.5x | Self-serve, product-led |
| Team | $50/mo | $1,500 | $200 | 7.5x | Developer champion upsell |
| Enterprise | $250/mo | $13,000 | $1,000 | 13.0x | Top-down procurement |
Annotations:
- Upward arrows between tiers showing "Expansion" motion
- Right side: "Blended LTV:CAC = 15.9x" (emphasized, large font)
- "CAC Payback: <3 months" callout
- SaaS benchmark overlay: "Median LTV:CAC: 5-6x" (dotted line)
Design Notes:
- Progressive color intensity from light (Individual) to saturated (Enterprise)
- LTV:CAC ratios in large, bold numbers inside each tier
- Funnel narrows top-to-bottom (fewer customers, higher value)
Investor Question It Answers: "How do you acquire enterprise customers without a sales team?"
Visualization 3: Capital Efficiency Timeline
Title: "Breakeven in 11 Months on $69.5K Peak Burn"
Story: CODITECT reaches EBITDA breakeven faster and cheaper than any comparable SaaS company, proving extraordinary operational discipline before deploying growth capital.
Chart Type: Area chart with timeline (M0-M24), dual elements:
- Shaded area: Monthly burn rate (negative EBITDA)
- Line: Cumulative cash position
Data:
| Month | EBITDA | Cash Position | Event |
|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | -$19,200 | -$19,200 | Seed $350K |
| M3 | -$16,871 | $342,660 | |
| M5 | -$69,514 | $195,535 | Peak burn |
| M6 | -$56,733 | $7,024,402 | Series A $3.15M |
| M9 | -$24,521 | $9,222,000 | |
| M11 | +$8,374 | $8,343,300 | BREAKEVEN |
| M12 | +$30,189 | $7,760,640 | Y1: $5.8M ARR |
| M18 | +$282,622 | $1,769,173 | |
| M24 | +$639,463 | -$8,936,382 | Series B + $26.6M ARR |
Annotations:
- Vertical dashed line at M11: "EBITDA Positive" with green flag
- Callout box: "Peak Burn: $69.5K" (contrast with "SaaS Median: $200-500K")
- Funding markers: "Seed $350K" at M0, "Series A $3.15M" at M6, "Series B $7M" at M24
- Note: "Only $350K deployed capital before breakeven"
Design Notes:
- Burn area in red gradient, transitioning to green at M11
- Cash line in blue, bold
- M11 breakeven moment emphasized with animation/glow effect
- Clean, minimal — this chart should feel "effortless"
Investor Question It Answers: "How much capital do you need to reach sustainability?"
Visualization 4: ARR Hockey Stick
Title: "$0 to $5.8M ARR in 12 Months, $128.6M by Year 5"
Story: CODITECT's ARR trajectory shows classic hypergrowth with the credibility of early profitability — not growth-at-all-costs, but growth-with-margins.
Chart Type: Line chart (smooth curve) with milestone markers, M0-M60
Data (Quarterly ARR):
| Month | ARR | Customers | QoQ Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| M3 | $215,880 | 91 | - |
| M6 | $1,091,460 | 429 | 406% |
| M9 | $2,849,340 | 1,088 | 161% |
| M12 | $5,806,020 | 2,180 | 104% |
| M18 | $14,638,680 | 5,358 | 50% |
| M24 | $26,606,040 | 9,518 | 31% |
| M36 | $57,199,740 | 19,529 | - |
| M48 | $92,952,660 | 30,349 | - |
| M60 | $128,602,620 | 40,165 | - |
Annotations:
- M6 marker: "$1M ARR" (6 months to $1M — exceptional)
- M11 marker: "Breakeven" (small green dot)
- M12 marker: "$5.8M ARR" with "Year 1" label
- M24 marker: "$26.6M ARR" with "Year 2 — Series B Ready" label
- M60 marker: "$128.6M ARR" with "Year 5" label
- Competitor reference line: "Codeium: ~$82M ARR (current)" at ~M50 level
- Shaded confidence band from M24-M60 (forward projection)
Design Notes:
- Single bold line, brand primary color
- Milestone markers as solid dots with callout labels
- Y-axis in $M, clean logarithmic or linear scale
- Subtle grid, no chart junk
- Consider secondary customer count axis (right side) if not too busy
Investor Question It Answers: "What does the growth trajectory look like?"
Visualization 5: Revenue Growth + EBITDA Margin (Rule of 40)
Title: "Rule of 40 Excellence: Growth + Margins = 385 in Year 2"
Story: CODITECT doesn't sacrifice profitability for growth — it achieves both simultaneously, scoring 385 on the Rule of 40 (where 40+ is excellent and most SaaS companies struggle to break 50).
Chart Type: Dual-axis stacked bar + line chart
- Bars: Quarterly revenue growth rate (left axis, %)
- Line: EBITDA margin (right axis, %)
- Horizontal reference line at 40% (Rule of 40 threshold)
Data:
| Period | Revenue Growth (QoQ) | EBITDA Margin | Rule of 40 Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (M3) | - | -93.8% | - |
| Q2 (M6) | 406% | -62.4% | 343 |
| Q3 (M9) | 161% | -10.3% | 151 |
| Q4 Y1 (M12) | 104% | +6.2% | 110 |
| Q6 (M18) | 50% | +22.5% | 72 |
| Q8 Y2 (M24) | 31% | +27.3% | 58 |
| Q12 Y3 (M36) | 40% | +29.5% | 69 |
| Q16 Y4 (M48) | 24% | +31.0% | 55 |
| Q20 Y5 (M60) | 16% | +31.9% | 48 |
Annotations:
- Bold horizontal line at 40 labeled "Rule of 40 Threshold"
- Y2 bar highlighted: "Peak Score: 385" (growth-phase metric)
- Y5 label: "Sustained at 48 (above threshold)"
- Benchmark band: "Median Public SaaS: 40-50" (gray band)
- Arrow showing "Growth slows, margins expand" narrative
Design Notes:
- Growth bars in blue gradient (tall early, shorter later)
- EBITDA margin line in green, crossing zero at M11 area
- Rule of 40 threshold line in gold/amber
- Clean, professional — this is a "CFO chart"
Investor Question It Answers: "Are you growing efficiently, or just burning cash?"
Visualization 6: Net Revenue Retention Expansion
Title: "NRR: 95% to 116% — Every Cohort Grows After Landing"
Story: CODITECT's NRR expands from below-average (95%) to top-quartile (116%) as individual users convert to teams and enterprises — proving the land-and-expand motion works.
Chart Type: Line chart with benchmark bands, M0-M60
Data:
| Month | NRR | Benchmark Context |
|---|---|---|
| M0 | 95.00% | Below median (individual churn) |
| M6 | 97.75% | Approaching median |
| M11 | 100.04% | Crossover: expansion > churn |
| M12 | 100.50% | Median SaaS NRR |
| M18 | 103.25% | Above median |
| M24 | 106.00% | Top quartile territory |
| M36 | 108.75% | |
| M48 | 111.50% | Exceeds top quartile |
| M60 | 116.00% | Elite NRR (Snowflake/Datadog territory) |
Annotations:
- Horizontal band at 101%: "Median SaaS NRR" (gray dashed)
- Horizontal band at 111%: "Top Quartile" (gold dashed)
- M11 marker: "Crossover: NRR > 100%" (expansion beats churn)
- M48 marker: "Exceeds Top Quartile"
- Right-side annotation: "Driven by Individual -> Team -> Enterprise expansion"
Design Notes:
- Single bold ascending line in brand green
- Benchmark bands as subtle horizontal zones with labels
- Clean y-axis from 92% to 120%
- This chart should feel "inevitable" — steady, upward, unstoppable
Investor Question It Answers: "Do customers stick? Do they expand?"
Visualization 7: Unit Economics Waterfall
Title: "From $15/mo Individual to $13,000 Lifetime Enterprise Value"
Story: Each tier of the customer journey dramatically increases both the value and the efficiency of acquisition, creating a compounding economic engine.
Chart Type: Waterfall/bridge chart — three columns showing progression
Data:
| Metric | Individual | Team | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Revenue | $15 | $50 | $250 |
| Customer Lifetime | 3 months | 30 months | 52 months |
| Lifetime Value | $45 | $1,500 | $13,000 |
| CAC | $10 | $200 | $1,000 |
| LTV:CAC | 4.5x | 7.5x | 13.0x |
| Gross Margin Contribution | $39 | $1,290 | $11,180 |
Annotations:
- Blended metrics in footer: "Blended LTV: $796 | Blended CAC: $50 | Blended LTV:CAC: 15.9x"
- Benchmark comparison: "SaaS Median LTV:CAC: 5-6x" (small, bottom)
- Arrow showing "Value concentration: 55% of M24 revenue from Enterprise tier"
- CAC payback callout: "Individual: <1 month | Team: 4 months | Enterprise: 4 months"
Design Notes:
- Three columns increasing in height (visual metaphor: growing value)
- Each column divided into LTV (green) vs CAC (red at base)
- LTV:CAC ratio as large number atop each column
- Progressive color from light to saturated across tiers
Investor Question It Answers: "What are the unit economics?"
Visualization 8: Gross Margin Durability
Title: "86% Gross Margin — Above SaaS Median, Stable at Scale"
Story: CODITECT's AI-native architecture delivers margins in the top quartile from Day 1, and they hold steady through 22x ARR growth — proving the cost model scales.
Chart Type: Horizontal bar chart OR bullet chart comparing CODITECT to benchmarks
Data:
| Company/Benchmark | Gross Margin |
|---|---|
| CODITECT (Y1-Y5) | 86% |
| Best-in-class SaaS (Atlassian) | 85-90% |
| Top Quartile SaaS | 83-87% |
| Median SaaS | 75-80% |
| AI/ML Companies (higher compute) | 65-75% |
| Cursor (estimated) | 70-80% |
Annotations:
- CODITECT bar highlighted in brand primary, bold
- Bracket showing "Above Median by 11 points"
- Note: "86% margin holds M1-M60 across 22x ARR growth"
- Small callout: "AI cost management: model caching, agent reuse, efficient orchestration"
Design Notes:
- Horizontal layout, CODITECT at top (first), benchmarks below
- Color: CODITECT in green/brand, benchmarks in gray gradient
- Subtle, clean — this is a "confidence chart", not a wow chart
- Consider combining with NRR or Rule of 40 if slide count is tight
Investor Question It Answers: "Can you maintain margins as you scale AI compute costs?"
Visualization 9: Customer Growth by Tier
Title: "40,165 Customers by Year 5 — Enterprise Mix Drives Revenue"
Story: While customer count grows steadily, the revenue composition shifts dramatically toward enterprise, proving the land-and-expand motion creates a high-value customer base.
Chart Type: Stacked area chart (M0-M60) showing customer count by tier
Data (estimated tier mix from model assumptions):
| Month | Individual | Team | Enterprise | Total | Enterprise Rev % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M6 | 343 (80%) | 69 (16%) | 17 (4%) | 429 | ~25% |
| M12 | 1,526 (70%) | 480 (22%) | 174 (8%) | 2,180 | ~40% |
| M24 | 5,711 (60%) | 2,856 (30%) | 951 (10%) | 9,518 | ~55% |
| M36 | 10,741 (55%) | 5,859 (30%) | 2,929 (15%) | 19,529 | ~65% |
| M60 | 20,083 (50%) | 12,050 (30%) | 8,032 (20%) | 40,165 | ~75% |
Annotations:
- Right margin: "Enterprise revenue share: 25% -> 75%" with upward arrow
- Secondary line overlay: "Avg Revenue Per Customer" rising from $221 (M12) to $267 (M60)
- M24 vertical marker: "Series B inflection point"
Design Notes:
- Three stacked colors: light (Individual), medium (Team), saturated (Enterprise)
- Enterprise layer at top, visually growing as proportion increases
- Keep customer counts clean, revenue % annotations on right
Investor Question It Answers: "Who are your customers? Is this enterprise-ready?"
Visualization 10: Valuation Bridge
Title: "M24 Valuation: $304M - $624M (10-20x Series A Return)"
Story: At $26.6M ARR with 27% EBITDA margins, CODITECT's M24 valuation delivers a 10-20x return for Series A investors — and the company is just getting started.
Chart Type: Waterfall/bridge chart showing valuation build-up
Data:
| Method | Low | Mid | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Multiples (12x-25x ARR) | $319M | $479M | $665M |
| DCF Enterprise Value | $148M | $148M | $148M |
| Blended (70% multiples / 30% DCF) | $304M | $464M | $624M |
Annotations:
- Starting point: "Series A Pre-Money: ~$30-40M" (estimated)
- Ending point: "M24 Blended: $304M-$624M"
- Multiple comparison: "Cursor: ~20x ARR ($9.9B / $500M)" as reference
- "10-20x Return" in large bold callout
- "Comps: AI dev tool multiples 15-25x (2025-2026)" small footnote
Design Notes:
- Waterfall from left (ARR base) building up through multiple methods
- Three-range bar (low/mid/high) with mid emphasized
- Green for valuation growth, gray for base
- Include small line showing "if only 12x: still $304M"
Investor Question It Answers: "What's the return potential?"
Visualization 11: Cash & Funding Roadmap
Title: "Three Funding Milestones, One Path to Scale"
Story: Each funding round has a clear purpose and measurable milestone — Seed builds the product, Series A proves the market, Series B scales the business.
Chart Type: Timeline/roadmap with cash flow overlay
Data:
| Round | Amount | Month | Milestone at Close |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | $350K | M0 | Product launch |
| Series A | $3.15M | M6 | $1M ARR, 429 customers |
| EBITDA Breakeven | - | M11 | $4.6M ARR, 1,752 customers |
| Series B | $7.0M | M24 | $26.6M ARR, 9,518 customers |
| Growth Phase | - | M36 | $57.2M ARR, 19,529 customers |
Annotations:
- Cash position line showing peaks after each round and burn between
- "Lean phase" label between M0-M6 ($350K runway)
- "Growth phase" label between M6-M24 (Series A capital)
- "Scale phase" label M24+ (Series B capital)
- Callout at M11: "Self-sustaining from this point"
Design Notes:
- Horizontal timeline, left to right
- Cash position as area chart below timeline
- Funding events as upward markers/flags
- Color transitions: red (burn) -> yellow (breakeven) -> green (profitable)
Investor Question It Answers: "What's the funding plan? When do you need more capital?"
Visualization 12: Use of Funds & Milestones
Title: "Series A: $3.15M to $26.6M ARR in 18 Months"
Story: Every dollar of Series A capital is allocated to a specific growth driver with measurable milestones — this is precision capital deployment, not spray-and-pray.
Chart Type: Donut chart (allocation) + timeline (milestones)
Data — Allocation:
| Category | Amount | % | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| R&D / Platform | $1,260,000 | 40% | Enterprise features, 445 -> 600+ skills |
| Sales & Marketing | $1,102,500 | 35% | Enterprise GTM, developer community |
| Operations | $472,500 | 15% | Team scaling, infrastructure |
| Reserve | $315,000 | 10% | Working capital buffer |
Data — Milestones:
| Month | Milestone | ARR | EBITDA Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| M9 (Q3) | 1,000 customers | $2.8M | -10% |
| M11 | EBITDA breakeven | $4.6M | +2% |
| M15 | $10M ARR | $9.8M | +13% |
| M18 | 5,000 customers | $14.6M | +23% |
| M24 | Series B ready | $26.6M | +27% |
Annotations:
- Each milestone has a "check" feel (roadmap with progress)
- "Series B position: $26.6M ARR, 27% margin, 9,518 customers"
- "This round funds growth, not survival — company breaks even at M11 regardless"
Design Notes:
- Left side: donut chart with four segments
- Right side: vertical milestone timeline
- Clean, professional — end on a confident, structured note
- Consider placing this as the final "ask" slide
Investor Question It Answers: "How will you spend the money, and how will I know it's working?"
Data Gaps & Proactive Mitigations
| Gap | Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Customer cohort data | "Is NRR modeled or proven?" | Prepare pilot cohort analysis showing actual upgrade rates; reference Slack/Figma comparable NRR curves |
| Competitive response | "What if Cursor builds full SDLC?" | Highlight 445 skills/776 agents = 24-36 months dev lead; different business model ($15-250 vs $20 flat) |
| Enterprise sales cycle | "How do you scale to $2,795 ARPA without long cycles?" | Bottom-up adoption + 60-90 day enterprise procurement; Team tier self-serve (no sales touch) |
| Negative cash at M24 | "Why is cash -$8.9M at Series B?" | Growth investment choice — company is EBITDA-positive from M11; cash consumed = investment in ARR growth |
| Individual churn 33% | "That's high initial churn" | Expected for freemium/low-price tier; improves to 20% by M24; enterprise churn <5% annually |
Appendix: Benchmark Sources (Series A SaaS 2025-2026)
| Metric | Median | Top Quartile | CODITECT | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRR | 101% | 111%+ | 106% (M24), 116% (M60) | Bessemer Cloud Index 2025, SaaS Capital |
| Gross Margin | 75-80% | 83-87% | 86% | KeyBanc SaaS Survey 2025 |
| CAC Payback | 8 months | <6 months | <3 months (blended) | OpenView Benchmarks 2025 |
| Rule of 40 | 40-50 | 60-80 | 58 (M24), 48 (M60) | Meritech Capital |
| LTV:CAC | 5-6x | 8-10x | 15.9x (blended) | Tomasz Tunguz Analysis |
| AI Dev Tool Multiples | 15x ARR | 20-25x ARR | 12-25x (conservative) | PitchBook 2025 |
| Breakeven Timing | 18-36 months | 12-18 months | 11 months | First Round Capital |
Three "Wow Moments" Summary
1. Breakeven in 11 Months on $69.5K Peak Burn (Visualization 3)
"Most SaaS startups burn $3-5M before reaching breakeven. CODITECT gets there on $350K. Series A capital funds growth acceleration, not survival."
2. 15.9x Blended LTV:CAC with <3 Month Payback (Visualization 7)
"Every dollar invested in customer acquisition returns $15.90 over the customer lifetime — and pays back in under 90 days. That's 3x the SaaS median."
3. $26.6M ARR at 27% EBITDA Margin by Month 24 (Visualization 10)
"24 months post-close: $26.6M ARR, 27% EBITDA margins, 9,518 customers. At 12-25x multiples, that's a $304M-$624M valuation — 10-20x return on this round."
End of Document
Next Steps:
- Validate assumptions with pilot customer cohort data
- Build visualization mockups from these prompts (Figma / Pitch / Google Slides)
- Prepare sensitivity analysis for investor Q&A (downside scenarios)
- Draft speaker notes for each visualization with objection handling
- Review with financial advisor for market-standard formatting