Skip to main content

MASTER-TRACK-INDEX: CODITECT Agent Security Layer

Project: coditect-dev-agent-security SDD Reference: SDD-CODITECT-SEC-001 v1.0.0 Decision: CONDITIONAL GO (Executive Summary, 2026-02-18) Total Progress: 23/169 tasks complete (13.6%)


Track Overview

TrackNameDoneTotalProgressStatus
RResearch & Analysis2323100%Complete
DDevelopment & Engineering0620%Pending
TTesting & Quality0520%Pending
OOperations & Compliance0320%Pending

Track Files

FileTrackDescription
TRACK-R-RESEARCH-ANALYSIS.mdRAll research tasks — 100% complete, evidence: Research pipeline v2.0.0, 23 artifacts
TRACK-D-DEVELOPMENT-ENGINEERING.mdDAll implementation tasks across 7 development sections
TRACK-T-TESTING-QUALITY.mdTUnit, integration, security, performance, and false-positive tests
TRACK-O-OPERATIONS-COMPLIANCE.mdODeployment configuration, SOC 2 evidence, OWASP LLM Top 10 mapping

Development Phase Map

Track D tasks are organized into the five implementation phases from SDD Section 12.1:

PhaseSDD PhaseTrack D SectionsDurationAcceptance Criteria
1Core EnforcementD.1, D.2, D.36 weeksAll PreToolUse calls scanned; BLOCK decisions enforced; audit records written
2Output ScanningD.43 weeksSecrets and PII in tool outputs redacted before returning to agent
3Human ConfirmationD.52 weeksMEDIUM detections pause for human approval; timeout blocks
4Dashboard & AlertingD.64 weeksReal-time dashboard within 200ms; webhook delivery to Slack/Discord confirmed
5Tenant Config & OpsD.73 weeksTenant rule overrides via admin UI; load test confirms 500ms p99 scan under 50 concurrent

Total estimated timeline: 18 weeks


Security Components Summary

Six components derived from SDD-CODITECT-SEC-001 Section 3:

ComponentDevelopment SectionTest SectionEstimated LOC
SecurityGateHookD.1T.1.6–T.1.8, T.2.1–T.2.8~500 Python
PatternEngine + YAML rulesD.2T.1.1, T.1.10–T.1.12, T.3.2–T.3.3~800 Python + 2,000 YAML
RiskAnalyzerD.3.1–D.3.3T.1.2, T.1.13~200 Python
ActionRouterD.3.4–D.3.6T.1.3, T.1.14, T.3.1~150 Python
AuditLoggerD.3.7–D.3.11T.1.4–T.1.5, T.1.16, T.3.6–T.3.7~200 Python
MonitorDashboard + AlertDispatcherD.6T.1.15, T.1.17, T.2.9–T.2.10~1,200 Python + 2,000 TypeScript

Total estimated custom development: ~3,200 LOC Python + ~2,000 LOC TypeScript


Source Research Artifacts

All design tasks derived from three research documents in docs/original-research/:

DocumentPathPurpose
Executive Summarydocs/original-research/executive-summary.mdDecision brief — CONDITIONAL GO recommendation
Software Design Documentdocs/original-research/sdd.mdSDD-CODITECT-SEC-001 — authoritative component specification
Technical Design Documentdocs/original-research/tdd.mdTypeScript interfaces, hook registration, performance characteristics

Research evidence: Research pipeline v2.0.0, 23 artifacts, 2026-02-18


Pattern Library Summary

80+ security rules across five categories derived from three open-source repositories (all MIT licensed):

CategoryRule IDsCountPrimary Source
Prompt InjectionPI-001–PI-01010maxxie114/ClawGuard
Secret DetectionSD-001–SD-01313superglue-ai/clawguardian
PII DetectionPII-001–PII-0055superglue-ai/clawguardian
Destructive CommandsDC-001–DC-055+55+JaydenBeard/clawguard
Path TraversalPT-001–PT-030+30+JaydenBeard/clawguard

Excluded: lauty1505/clawguard — MALWARE (trojanized fork, injected binary payload). Never reference or execute.


Key Architecture Decisions

DecisionChoiceRationale
Fail mode defaultFail-closedScan failure permits exploit bypass if fail-open; SDD Section 1.4
Audit persistence targetorg.db (irreplaceable)Security audit records have same value as architecture decisions; SDD Section 3.6
Rule storage formatYAML files in gitPR review gate for rule changes; rollback via git revert; SDD Section 6.2
Hook priority100 (highest)SecurityGateHook must fire before all other PreToolUse hooks; TDD Section 8.1
CRITICAL action overrideNever overridableHard-coded; tenant cannot downgrade CRITICAL to anything other than BLOCK; SR-02
Pattern evaluation approachStateless synchronous regexThread-safe, deterministic, no async bypass window; SDD Section 1.4

Compliance Coverage

FrameworkCoverageTrack
OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025)7/10 documented, 3 explicit gapsO.3
SOC 2 Type II12 evidence collection tasksO.2
Functional Security Requirements SR-01–SR-088 requirements, all addressed by designO.1.11

Non-Functional Performance Targets

From SDD Section 7.4 — validated by Track T performance tests:

Operationp50 Targetp99 TargetMaximum
Full scan (input, 64KB payload)20ms80ms500ms
Pattern match only5ms25ms100ms
Risk scoring1ms5ms20ms
Audit log write (blocking events)10ms50ms100ms
WebSocket event delivery50ms150ms500ms
Kill switch session termination5,000ms