Skip to main content

AI Governance Framework - Executive Summary

For Leadership and Board Review


Framework Overview

This comprehensive AI Governance Framework provides the policies, standards, and operational guidance required to responsibly develop, deploy, and manage AI systems. The framework is aligned with global regulatory requirements and industry best practices.

Framework at a Glance

AttributeDetails
Version2.0 (Enhanced)
Documents18 integrated artifacts
Compliance CoverageNIST AI RMF 2.0, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001
Target AudiencesSMB and Enterprise organizations
StatusProduction-ready

Document Portfolio

Core Governance Documents (1-10)

#DocumentPurposePrimary Audience
01Operating ModelGovernance structure, bodies, lifecycleExecutives, Program Leads
02Governance CharterAuthority, mandate, decision rightsBoard, Legal
03Risk Classification Matrix4-tier risk scoring systemProject Leads, Risk
04Intake & Registration FormAI system registrationDevelopers, Owners
05Enterprise AI PolicyRules, prohibitions, standardsAll Employees
06System Card TemplateTechnical documentationTechnical Leads
07Algorithmic Impact AssessmentDeep risk assessment (FRIA)Risk, Legal, Ethics
08Implementation Plan30-60-90 day roadmapProgram Management
09GenAI Governance AddendumLLM and agentic AI controlsAI Engineers
10Executive SummaryLeadership overviewExecutives, Board

Extended Compliance Documents (11-18)

#DocumentPurposePrimary Audience
11Gap AnalysisCompliance verificationCompliance, Audit
12Coditect Impact AnalysisPlatform applicationStrategy, Product
13AI-BOM TemplateAI Bill of MaterialsTechnical, Security
14GPAI Compliance FrameworkEU AI Act GPAI requirementsCompliance, Legal
15Third-Party AI Risk ManagementVendor/supply chainProcurement, Security
16Continuous Monitoring StandardOperational monitoringOperations, SRE
17SMB Quick-Start GuideSimplified implementationSMB Leaders
18ISO/IEC 42001 Alignment MatrixCertification mappingQuality, Compliance

Regulatory Compliance Summary

EU AI Act Timeline Readiness

DeadlineRequirementFramework CoverageStatus
Feb 2, 2025Prohibited AI practicesPolicy §3.1 (all 8 practices)✓ Ready
Aug 2, 2025GPAI transparency obligationsGPAI Framework (Doc 14)✓ Ready
Aug 2, 2025AI literacy requirementsImplementation Plan §3.2✓ Ready
Aug 2, 2026High-risk AI conformityFull framework✓ Ready
Aug 2, 2027Legacy system complianceTransition guidance✓ Ready

Standards Alignment

StandardCoverageKey Evidence
NIST AI RMF 2.098%Full function mapping (GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE)
EU AI Act98%All timeline requirements addressed
ISO/IEC 4200195%36/38 Annex A controls mapped
OWASP LLM Top 1095%GenAI Addendum coverage
SPDX 3.0 AI Profile95%AI-BOM template alignment

Governance Structure

Four Governance Bodies

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AI EXECUTIVE BOARD (Quarterly) │
│ Strategic direction, policy approval, major decisions │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
│ AI RISK │ │ DOMAIN │ │ AI ETHICS │
│ REVIEW BOARD │ │ STEWARD FORUM │ │ COMMITTEE │
│ (Weekly) │ │ (Bi-weekly) │ │ (Ad-hoc) │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ Approvals, │ │ Standards, │ │ Ethical │
│ Escalations │ │ Best practice │ │ Reviews │
└───────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └───────────────┘

Decision Rights by Risk Tier

Risk TierApproval AuthorityReview Cycle
LowDomain StewardAnnual
MediumAI Risk OfficerSemi-annual
HighAI Risk Review BoardQuarterly
CriticalAI Executive BoardQuarterly

Risk Classification Framework

Four-Tier System

TierLabelApproval PathControls Required
LowRegister & GoDomain Steward (1-3 days)4 minimum controls
MediumTrust but VerifyAI Risk Officer (5-10 days)8 minimum controls
HighGatekeeper ApprovalRisk Review Board (10-15 days)15 minimum controls
CriticalExecutive MandateExecutive Board (15-20 days)20+ controls

Classification Dimensions

  1. Data Sensitivity (1-4): Public → Restricted
  2. Autonomy Level (1-4): Advisory → Human-out-of-loop
  3. Impact Scope (1-4): Individual → Critical infrastructure
  4. Scale (1-4): <100 users → >10,000 users

Tier = Maximum score across all dimensions


AI Lifecycle Governance

Eight Lifecycle Phases

┌──────────┐   ┌──────────┐   ┌──────────┐   ┌──────────┐
│ 1.INTAKE │──▶│ 2.CLASS- │──▶│ 3.RISK │──▶│ 4.BUILD/ │
│ │ │ IFY │ │ ASSESS │ │ PROCURE │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘

┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ 8.DECOM- │◀──│ 7.MONITOR│◀──│ 6.RELEASE│◀──│ 5.PRE- │
│ MISSION │ │ │ │ │ │ PROD GATE│
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘

Gate Requirements

GateRequired ArtifactsApprover
Pre-ProductionSystem Card, Security Review, AIA (if High-Risk)Per tier
ReleaseAll pre-prod + Monitoring configuredAI Risk Officer
DecommissionData retention plan, Archive documentationSystem Owner

Key Policy Highlights

Prohibited AI Uses (EU AI Act Article 5)

  1. ❌ Social scoring systems
  2. ❌ Subliminal manipulation
  3. ❌ Exploitation of vulnerable groups
  4. ❌ Real-time biometric identification in public spaces
  5. ❌ Emotion recognition in workplace/education
  6. ❌ Biometric categorization (inferring sensitive attributes)
  7. ❌ Untargeted facial recognition database scraping
  8. ❌ Predictive policing based solely on profiling

Enterprise "No Secrets" Rule

Never input into public AI tools:

  • Personal Identifiable Information (PII)
  • Intellectual property or trade secrets
  • Credentials, API keys, passwords
  • Confidential contracts or financial data

GenAI and Agentic AI Controls

Defense-in-Depth Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INPUT GUARDRAILS │
│ • PII scrubbing • Injection detection • Rate limiting │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MODEL LAYER │
│ • System prompts • Temperature controls • Grounding (RAG) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OUTPUT GUARDRAILS │
│ • Toxicity filtering • PII redaction • Format validation │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LOGGING & MONITORING │
│ • Full audit trail • Drift detection • Incident alerting │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Agentic AI Mandatory Controls

ControlRequirement
Action BoundariesExplicit whitelist of permitted actions
Tool AccessApproved tool inventory with parameter validation
Kill SwitchTested shutdown capability
Rate LimitingToken/action budgets
Multi-AgentOrchestrator oversight, cascade prevention
Audit TrailComplete action logging

GPAI Compliance (EU AI Act)

Classification Thresholds

Training ComputeClassificationObligations
< 10²³ FLOPSNot GPAIStandard AI rules
≥ 10²³ FLOPSStandard GPAITransparency requirements
≥ 10²⁵ FLOPSSystemic Risk GPAIFull safety framework

Key GPAI Obligations (Effective Aug 2, 2025)

  1. Maintain technical documentation
  2. Provide downstream provider information
  3. Establish copyright compliance policy
  4. Publish training data summary
  5. (Systemic only) Safety and security framework

Implementation Roadmap

30-60-90 Day Plan

PhaseTimelineKey Deliverables
FoundationDays 1-30Charter approval, Board formation, AI inventory
PilotDays 31-603 pilot use cases, Process testing, Basic tooling
OperationalizeDays 61-90Enforcement gates, Training rollout, First report

Success Metrics

MetricTargetTimeline
AI inventory coverage100%Day 30
Ownership assignment100%Day 60
Ungated high-risk deployments0Day 90
Employee awareness>80%Day 90

Investment Summary

Resource Requirements

CategoryInitial (90 days)Ongoing (Annual)
Personnel1.0-2.0 FTE1.5-3.0 FTE
Tools & Platform$50-100K$30-75K
Training$25-50K$15-25K
External Support$50-75K$25-50K
Total$125-225K$200-350K

ROI Drivers

BenefitImpact
EU AI Act complianceAvoid fines up to 7% global revenue
Incident preventionReduce breach costs ($5M+ average)
Customer trustEnable enterprise sales
Operational efficiencyFaster AI deployment (gated vs. ad-hoc)
Certification readinessISO 42001, SOC 2 + AI

SMB vs. Enterprise Implementation

AspectSMB ApproachEnterprise Approach
GovernanceSingle AI ownerFull board structure
DocumentationSMB Quick-Start + templatesComplete 18-document framework
ToolsSpreadsheets, free toolsGRC platform integration
MonitoringBasic + manual reviewFull observability stack
CertificationSelf-assessmentISO 42001 certification
Timeline30 days to basic compliance90 days to full program

Key Contacts and Governance

RoleResponsibilities
AI Risk OfficerProgram ownership, escalations
Legal CounselRegulatory interpretation, contracts
CISOSecurity reviews, incident response
Privacy OfficerData protection, PIA reviews
Ethics LeadEthical reviews, bias assessment

Appendix: Quick Reference

Document Access

All 18 framework documents are available in the governance repository:

  • Core documents (01-10): Foundation policies and templates
  • Extended documents (11-18): Specialized compliance and guidance
RegulationKey Reference
EU AI Actartificialintelligenceact.eu
NIST AI RMFnist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
ISO 42001iso.org/standard/42001

Framework Update Cycle

  • Quarterly: Regulatory monitoring, minor updates
  • Annual: Full framework review, major updates
  • Ad-hoc: Critical regulatory changes

Approved By:

RoleNameDate
CEO / Executive Sponsor
AI Risk Officer
Legal Counsel
CISO

Document Version: 2.0
Effective Date: 2026-01-15
Next Review: 2027-01-15


CODITECT AI Risk Management Framework

Document ID: AI-RMF-10 | Version: 2.0.0 | Status: Active


AZ1.AI Inc. | CODITECT Platform

Framework Alignment: NIST AI RMF 2.0 | EU AI Act | ISO/IEC 42001


This document is part of the CODITECT AI Risk Management Framework. For questions or updates, contact the AI Governance Office.

Repository: coditect-ai-risk-management-framework Last Updated: 2026-01-15 Owner: AZ1.AI Inc. | Lead: Hal Casteel