Autonomous .Claude Framework 8 Week Implementation Plan
Autonomous .Claude Framework - 8-Week Implementation Plan
From 78% to 100% Autonomous Operation
Version: 1.0.0 Date Created: 2025-11-13 Status: Ready for Execution Target Completion: 8 weeks (January 2026) Total Effort: 320 hours (2 engineers)
Executive Summary
This plan details the step-by-step implementation to transform the .Claude automation framework from 78% complete (human-in-the-loop orchestration) to 100% autonomous operation where agents can discover, communicate with, and coordinate tasks without human intervention.
Current State
- all agents, all commands, 189 skills cataloged
- 7/9 orchestration modules working
- CRITICAL GAP: No inter-agent communication
- Missing: Message Bus, Task Queue, Circuit Breaker, Testing, Monitoring
Target State
- 100% autonomous operation
- Full error resilience with circuit breakers
- Complete observability (metrics, traces, logs, dashboards)
- 80%+ test coverage with CI/CD pipeline
- Production-ready deployment automation
Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomy | 0% (human-in-loop) | 95% | % tasks completed without human |
| Latency | N/A | <5s | Time from enqueue to agent start |
| Throughput | 1 task/min | 100 tasks/min | Tasks completed per minute |
| Reliability | N/A | 99.9% uptime | % time system available |
| Recovery Time | N/A | <60s | Time to recover from failure |
| Agent Utilization | N/A | 70% avg | % time agents busy |
Resource Requirements
Team
- 2x Full-Stack Engineers (Python, async/await, distributed systems)
- 1x DevOps Engineer (part-time, weeks 1-2 and 7-8)
Infrastructure
- RabbitMQ cluster (3 nodes, HA)
- Redis cluster (3 nodes, HA)
- PostgreSQL 15+ (existing)
- S3 bucket (state backups)
- Prometheus + Grafana + Jaeger stack
- Staging environment (mirrors production)
Budget
- Infrastructure: $500/month (8 weeks = $1,000)
- Monitoring tools: $200/month (8 weeks = $400)
- Total: ~$1,400
Timeline Overview (Gantt Chart)
Week 1-2: Phase 1 - Foundation (P0 - CRITICAL)
├─ Week 1
│ ├─ Day 1-2: Infrastructure setup
│ ├─ Day 3-5: Agent Discovery Service
│ └─ Day 5: Unit tests
├─ Week 2
│ ├─ Day 1-4: Message Bus implementation
│ ├─ Day 3-5: Task Queue Manager
│ └─ Day 5: Integration tests
└─ Milestone 1: Agents can discover and communicate
Week 3-4: Phase 2 - Resilience (P0 - CRITICAL)
├─ Week 3
│ ├─ Day 1-2: Circuit Breaker Service
│ ├─ Day 3-4: Retry Policy Engine
│ └─ Day 5: Integration tests
├─ Week 4
│ ├─ Day 1-4: Distributed State Manager
│ └─ Day 5: Stress tests
└─ Milestone 2: System handles failures gracefully
Week 5-6: Phase 3 - Observability (P1 - HIGH)
├─ Week 5
│ ├─ Day 1-3: Metrics Collection (Prometheus)
│ ├─ Day 4-5: Distributed Tracing (Jaeger)
│ └─ Day 5: Dashboard setup
├─ Week 6
│ ├─ Day 1-2: Structured Logging
│ ├─ Day 3-4: Grafana Dashboards
│ └─ Day 5: Alert configuration
└─ Milestone 3: Full observability operational
Week 7-8: Phase 4 - Polish (P1/P2 - MEDIUM)
├─ Week 7
│ ├─ Day 1-3: CLI Integration
│ ├─ Day 4-5: API Documentation
│ └─ Day 5: Deployment automation
├─ Week 8
│ ├─ Day 1-2: Load testing (100+ tasks)
│ ├─ Day 3-4: Performance tuning
│ └─ Day 5: Production deployment
└─ Milestone 4: Production-ready system
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2)
Goal: Core infrastructure for autonomous operation Priority: P0 (CRITICAL - Blocker) Duration: 10 days Effort: 80 hours
Success Criteria
- Agents can discover each other by capability
- Agents can send/receive tasks via message bus
- Tasks enqueued with priority and dependencies
- First autonomous workflow: orchestrator → agent A → agent B → result
- 80%+ unit test coverage for new components
1.1 Infrastructure Setup (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: None Owner: DevOps Engineer
Tasks
-
Task 1.1.1: Install and configure RabbitMQ cluster (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy RabbitMQ 3.12+ on 3 nodes (HA configuration)
- Sub-task: Configure virtual host
/claude-agents - Sub-task: Create admin user with proper permissions
- Sub-task: Enable management plugin for monitoring
- Sub-task: Configure persistent message storage
- Sub-task: Test cluster failover (kill 1 node, verify recovery)
- Acceptance: RabbitMQ cluster operational, management UI accessible at http://localhost:15672
-
Task 1.1.2: Install and configure Redis cluster (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy Redis 7+ on 3 nodes (master-replica setup)
- Sub-task: Enable persistence (AOF + RDB)
- Sub-task: Configure maxmemory policy (allkeys-lru)
- Sub-task: Set up Redis Sentinel for auto-failover
- Sub-task: Test failover (kill master, verify replica promotion)
- Acceptance: Redis cluster operational, can read/write keys, auto-failover works
-
Task 1.1.3: Set up Python development environment (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create virtual environment (Python 3.10+)
- Sub-task: Install dependencies (aio_pika, Redis-py, pybreaker, prometheus_client)
- Sub-task: Install dev dependencies (pytest, pytest-asyncio, pytest-cov, black, mypy)
- Sub-task: Configure pre-commit hooks (black, mypy, tests)
- Acceptance:
pip install -r requirements.txtsucceeds, pre-commit hooks work
-
Task 1.1.4: Create project structure (2 hours)
-
Sub-task: Create directory structure:
.claude/
├── orchestration/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── agent_discovery.py
│ ├── message_bus.py
│ ├── task_queue.py
│ ├── circuit_breaker.py
│ ├── state_manager.py
│ └── monitoring.py
├── tests/
│ ├── unit/
│ ├── integration/
│ └── e2e/
├── config/
│ ├── rabbitmq.yaml
│ ├── redis.yaml
│ └── prometheus.yaml
└── docker/
├── docker-compose.yml
└── Dockerfile -
Sub-task: Create
requirements.txtwith all dependencies -
Sub-task: Create
pyproject.tomlfor build configuration -
Sub-task: Create
.env.examplewith configuration template -
Acceptance: Directory structure matches design, empty Python files importable
-
-
Task 1.1.5: Set up local Docker Compose (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
docker-compose.ymlwith RabbitMQ, Redis, PostgreSQL - Sub-task: Add health checks for all services
- Sub-task: Configure persistent volumes
- Sub-task: Create
make start,make stop,make logscommands - Sub-task: Write README for local development setup
- Acceptance:
docker-compose up -dstarts all services, health checks pass
- Sub-task: Create
Testing
- All services start successfully
- Can connect to RabbitMQ and send/receive messages
- Can read/write to Redis
- Failover tests pass for both RabbitMQ and Redis
1.2 Agent Discovery Service (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 1.1 (Infrastructure Setup) Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 1.2.1: Design Redis schema for agent registry (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Define data structures for Agent, AgentCapability, AgentStatus
- Sub-task: Design Redis keys:
agent:{agent_id}- Hash for agent metadatacapability:{capability_name}- Set of agent_idsagent_status:{status}- Set of agent_ids (AVAILABLE, BUSY, etc.)
- Sub-task: Define TTL strategy (5 minutes for heartbeat)
- Sub-task: Create schema documentation in
docs/redis-schema.md - Acceptance: Schema documented, peer-reviewed, handles 1000+ agents
-
Task 1.2.2: Implement AgentDiscoveryService class (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
agent_discovery.pywith class skeleton - Sub-task: Implement
register_agent()method- Store agent metadata in Redis hash
- Add to capability indexes
- Set TTL for auto-cleanup
- Sub-task: Implement
find_agents_by_capability()method- Query capability index
- Filter by health score and load
- Sort by least loaded
- Sub-task: Implement
get_agent()method (fetch by ID) - Sub-task: Implement
heartbeat()method- Update status and load
- Refresh TTL
- Sub-task: Implement
_is_available()helper method- Check status, health score, load ratio
- Sub-task: Add type hints (mypy strict mode)
- Sub-task: Add docstrings (Google style)
- Acceptance: All methods implemented, type-checked, documented
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.2.3: Add unit tests for AgentDiscoveryService (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Test agent registration
- Register agent, verify Redis keys created
- Verify capability indexes updated
- Verify TTL set correctly
- Sub-task: Test capability matching
- Register multiple agents with overlapping capabilities
- Verify find_agents_by_capability returns correct agents
- Verify sorting by load
- Sub-task: Test health filtering
- Register agents with different health scores
- Verify filtering by min_health_score
- Sub-task: Test load filtering
- Register agents with different loads
- Verify filtering by max_load_ratio
- Sub-task: Test heartbeat and TTL refresh
- Register agent, wait 4 minutes, heartbeat, verify not expired
- Register agent, wait 6 minutes, verify expired (auto-cleanup)
- Sub-task: Test error handling (Redis connection failure)
- Acceptance: 80%+ code coverage, all tests pass
- Sub-task: Test agent registration
-
Task 1.2.4: Create usage examples and documentation (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
examples/agent_discovery_example.py- Show agent registration
- Show capability search
- Show heartbeat loop
- Sub-task: Update
docs/AGENT-DISCOVERY.mdwith:- Architecture overview
- API reference
- Usage examples
- Performance characteristics (handles 10K agents)
- Sub-task: Add inline code examples in docstrings
- Acceptance: Examples run successfully, docs clear and complete
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.2.5: Integration with existing orchestrator.py (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Update
orchestrator.pyto use AgentDiscoveryService - Sub-task: Replace hardcoded agent list with dynamic discovery
- Sub-task: Add agent registration on startup for all all agents
- Sub-task: Add heartbeat loop (every 60 seconds)
- Sub-task: Test agent discovery in real orchestration workflow
- Acceptance: Orchestrator finds agents dynamically, no hardcoded list
- Sub-task: Update
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: Register 100 agents, search by capability, verify performance
- Stress test: 1000 agents, verify queries <100ms
1.3 Message Bus Implementation (4 days, 32 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 1.1 (Infrastructure Setup) Owner: Engineer 2
Tasks
-
Task 1.3.1: Design RabbitMQ exchange and queue topology (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Define exchanges:
agent.tasks(topic) - Route tasks to specific agentsagent.broadcasts(fanout) - Broadcast to all agentsagent.responses(direct) - Point-to-point responses
- Sub-task: Define queue naming convention:
agent.{agent_id}.tasks- One per agentagent.{agent_id}.responses- One per agentorchestrator.priority- High-priority tasks
- Sub-task: Define routing keys:
agent.{agent_id}for tasks{agent_id}.responsefor responses
- Sub-task: Configure priority levels (0-10)
- Sub-task: Document topology in
docs/message-bus-topology.md - Acceptance: Topology documented, supports 100+ agents, handles 1000 msg/sec
- Sub-task: Define exchanges:
-
Task 1.3.2: Implement AgentMessage data class (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
message_bus.pywith AgentMessage dataclass - Sub-task: Add fields: id, from_agent, to_agent, task_id, message_type, payload, correlation_id, timestamp, reply_to
- Sub-task: Add serialization methods (to_dict, from_dict)
- Sub-task: Add validation (non-empty fields, valid UUIDs)
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: AgentMessage serializable to JSON, validated
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.3.3: Implement MessageBus class (12 hours)
- Sub-task: Create MessageBus class skeleton
- Sub-task: Implement
connect()method- Establish robust connection to RabbitMQ
- Declare all exchanges
- Handle connection errors with retry
- Sub-task: Implement
send_task()method- Create AgentMessage
- Publish to task exchange with routing key
- Set priority and delivery mode (persistent)
- Return correlation_id for tracking
- Sub-task: Implement
send_response()method- Create response message
- Publish to response exchange
- Use correlation_id from original message
- Sub-task: Implement
broadcast_event()method- Publish to fanout exchange
- All agents receive event
- Sub-task: Implement
subscribe()method- Declare agent-specific queue
- Bind to task and broadcast exchanges
- Start consuming with callback
- Handle message acknowledgment
- Sub-task: Implement
wait_for_response()method- Wait for message with specific correlation_id
- Timeout after specified seconds
- Return response or raise TimeoutError
- Sub-task: Add connection recovery (reconnect on failure)
- Sub-task: Add graceful shutdown (close connections)
- Acceptance: All methods implemented, connection resilient, graceful shutdown
-
Task 1.3.4: Add unit tests for MessageBus (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Test connection and exchange creation
- Sub-task: Test send_task (verify message published)
- Sub-task: Test send_response (verify correlation_id matches)
- Sub-task: Test broadcast_event (verify all agents receive)
- Sub-task: Test subscribe (verify callback invoked)
- Sub-task: Test wait_for_response (verify timeout)
- Sub-task: Test connection recovery (simulate RabbitMQ restart)
- Sub-task: Test message priority (high priority processed first)
- Sub-task: Mock RabbitMQ with testcontainers or fakeredis
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all tests pass, no flaky tests
-
Task 1.3.5: Create end-to-end message flow example (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
examples/message_bus_example.py- Agent A sends task to Agent B
- Agent B processes and sends response
- Agent A receives response
- Sub-task: Create
examples/broadcast_example.py- One agent broadcasts event
- Multiple agents receive and react
- Sub-task: Update
docs/MESSAGE-BUS.mdwith:- Architecture diagram
- API reference
- Usage examples
- Performance characteristics
- Acceptance: Examples run successfully, docs complete
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.3.6: Integration with orchestrator.py (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Update
orchestrator.pyto use MessageBus - Sub-task: Replace direct agent calls with send_task()
- Sub-task: Add subscribe loop for receiving responses
- Sub-task: Test orchestrator → agent → orchestrator flow
- Acceptance: Orchestrator communicates via message bus, no direct calls
- Sub-task: Update
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: 10 agents sending tasks to each other
- Performance test: 1000 messages/sec sustained throughput
- Reliability test: RabbitMQ restart, verify message delivery resumes
1.4 Task Queue Manager (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 1.1 (Infrastructure Setup) Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 1.4.1: Design task queue data structures (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Define TaskPriority enum (CRITICAL=10, HIGH=7, MEDIUM=5, LOW=3, BACKGROUND=1)
- Sub-task: Define Task dataclass (id, description, agent, status, priority, dependencies, created_at)
- Sub-task: Design Redis data structures:
task:{task_id}- Hash for task metadatatask_queue:ready- Sorted set (priority queue)task_queue:blocked- Set (tasks with unsatisfied dependencies)task_queue:in_progress- Set (running tasks)task:{task_id}:dependencies- Set (task IDs this depends on)task:{task_id}:dependents- Set (task IDs depending on this)
- Sub-task: Document schema in
docs/task-queue-schema.md - Acceptance: Schema supports DAG dependencies, priority ordering, deadlock detection
-
Task 1.4.2: Implement TaskQueueManager class (10 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
task_queue.pywith class skeleton - Sub-task: Implement
enqueue()method- Store task in Redis
- Store dependencies
- Add to ready queue if no dependencies, else blocked queue
- Return task_id
- Sub-task: Implement
dequeue()method- Pop highest priority task from ready queue
- Mark as IN_PROGRESS
- Return Task object
- Sub-task: Implement
complete()method- Update task status to COMPLETED
- Remove from in_progress
- Get dependent tasks
- For each dependent:
- Remove this task from dependencies
- If no remaining dependencies, move to ready queue
- Sub-task: Implement
fail()method- Update task status to FAILED
- Implement retry logic with exponential backoff
- After max retries, mark as FAILED permanently
- Sub-task: Implement
detect_deadlocks()method- Build dependency graph from blocked tasks
- Use DFS to find cycles
- Return list of deadlocked task chains
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: All methods implemented, handles dependencies correctly
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.4.3: Add unit tests for TaskQueueManager (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Test simple enqueue/dequeue
- Enqueue task, dequeue, verify task returned
- Sub-task: Test priority ordering
- Enqueue HIGH, LOW, CRITICAL tasks
- Dequeue, verify CRITICAL comes first
- Sub-task: Test dependencies
- Enqueue task A depends on B
- Verify A in blocked queue
- Complete B, verify A moves to ready queue
- Sub-task: Test dependency chain (A→B→C)
- Complete C, verify B moves to ready
- Complete B, verify A moves to ready
- Sub-task: Test retry logic
- Fail task, verify retry with backoff
- Fail 3 times, verify permanent failure
- Sub-task: Test deadlock detection
- Create circular dependency (A→B→C→A)
- Verify detect_deadlocks() finds cycle
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all edge cases tested
- Sub-task: Test simple enqueue/dequeue
-
Task 1.4.4: Implement deadlock resolution (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
resolve_deadlock()method - Sub-task: Strategy: Remove lowest priority task from cycle
- Sub-task: Log deadlock resolution
- Sub-task: Send notification (optional)
- Sub-task: Test deadlock resolution
- Acceptance: Deadlocks automatically resolved, system doesn't hang
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 1.4.5: Create usage examples and documentation (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
examples/task_queue_example.py- Enqueue tasks with dependencies
- Worker loop: dequeue → process → complete
- Show priority handling
- Sub-task: Update
docs/TASK-QUEUE.mdwith:- Architecture diagram
- API reference
- Dependency examples
- Deadlock detection
- Acceptance: Examples run, docs complete
- Sub-task: Create
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: 100 tasks with complex DAG dependencies
- Performance test: 10,000 tasks enqueued, verify <1s dequeue latency
- Stress test: Deadlock with 50 tasks in cycle, verify resolution
1.5 Phase 1 Integration and Testing (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 Owner: Both Engineers
Tasks
-
Task 1.5.1: Create first autonomous workflow (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Create workflow: Orchestrator → Agent A (code review) → Agent B (documentation) → Orchestrator
- Sub-task: Agent A:
- Registers with AgentDiscoveryService
- Subscribes to MessageBus
- Receives task, executes, publishes result
- Sends sub-task to Agent B via MessageBus
- Sub-task: Agent B:
- Registers with AgentDiscoveryService
- Subscribes to MessageBus
- Receives task, executes, publishes result
- Sub-task: Orchestrator:
- Discovers Agent A via AgentDiscoveryService
- Sends task via MessageBus
- Waits for response
- Logs result
- Sub-task: Test end-to-end without human intervention
- Acceptance: Workflow completes successfully, no human input required
-
Task 1.5.2: Write integration tests (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Test agent discovery + message bus integration
- Register agent, send task via message bus, verify delivery
- Sub-task: Test message bus + task queue integration
- Enqueue task, message bus delivers to agent, agent completes
- Sub-task: Test full stack integration
- Orchestrator → discovery → queue → message bus → agent → response
- Sub-task: Test failure scenarios
- Agent not found, task fails gracefully
- Message bus down, retry works
- Redis down, recover when it comes back
- Acceptance: All integration tests pass, <5s end-to-end latency
- Sub-task: Test agent discovery + message bus integration
-
Task 1.5.3: Performance benchmarking (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Benchmark agent discovery (1000 agents, search time)
- Sub-task: Benchmark message bus (1000 messages/sec throughput)
- Sub-task: Benchmark task queue (10,000 tasks enqueued/dequeued)
- Sub-task: Document results in
docs/PERFORMANCE-BENCHMARKS.md - Acceptance: All benchmarks meet targets (see table in Executive Summary)
-
Task 1.5.4: Code review and refactoring (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Peer review all new code (agent_discovery, message_bus, task_queue)
- Sub-task: Refactor based on feedback
- Sub-task: Ensure consistent code style (run black, mypy)
- Sub-task: Update docstrings and type hints
- Acceptance: All code passes review, mypy strict mode, 100% type coverage
Milestone 1 Completion Checklist
- Agents can discover each other by capability
- Agents can send tasks via message bus
- Tasks auto-queue with dependencies
- First autonomous multi-agent workflow works end-to-end
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration tests: All pass
- Performance benchmarks: Meet targets
Phase 2: Resilience (Weeks 3-4)
Goal: Error handling and recovery Priority: P0 (CRITICAL) Duration: 10 days Effort: 80 hours
Success Criteria
- Circuit breakers prevent cascading failures
- Tasks automatically retry with exponential backoff
- State syncs across nodes (multi-user support)
- System recovers from agent failures within 60 seconds
- Zero data loss during failures
2.1 Circuit Breaker Service (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: Phase 1 complete Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 2.1.1: Install and configure PyBreaker library (1 hour)
- Sub-task: Add
pybreaker==1.0.0to requirements.txt - Sub-task: Install library
- Sub-task: Test basic circuit breaker functionality
- Acceptance: PyBreaker installed, basic example works
- Sub-task: Add
-
Task 2.1.2: Implement AgentCircuitBreaker class (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
circuit_breaker.pywith class skeleton - Sub-task: Implement
get_breaker()method- Create circuit breaker per agent
- Configure fail_max=5 (open after 5 failures)
- Configure timeout_duration=60 (stay open for 60 seconds)
- Exclude TimeoutError from failure count
- Sub-task: Implement
call_agent()method- Call agent function through circuit breaker
- Catch CircuitBreakerError
- Find fallback agent with same capability
- Retry with fallback agent
- Sub-task: Implement
_find_fallback()method- Query AgentDiscoveryService for agents with same capabilities
- Exclude failing agent
- Return least loaded agent
- Sub-task: Implement
get_status()method- Return circuit breaker state (closed, open, half_open)
- Sub-task: Add logging for state transitions
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: All methods implemented, circuit breaker protects agents
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 2.1.3: Add unit tests for AgentCircuitBreaker (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Test circuit opens after 5 failures
- Sub-task: Test circuit stays open for 60 seconds
- Sub-task: Test half_open state (1 request allowed)
- Sub-task: Test fallback agent selection
- Sub-task: Test excluded exceptions (TimeoutError)
- Sub-task: Test get_status() returns correct state
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all edge cases tested
-
Task 2.1.4: Integration with MessageBus and Orchestrator (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Wrap MessageBus.send_task() with circuit breaker
- Sub-task: Wrap agent execution with circuit breaker
- Sub-task: Test cascading failure prevention
- Agent A fails 5 times
- Circuit opens
- Future requests go to fallback agent
- Acceptance: Circuit breaker prevents cascading failures
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: Fail agent 5 times, verify circuit opens, verify fallback works
- Stress test: 1000 requests to failing agent, verify no cascading failure
2.2 Retry Policy Engine (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 2.1 (Circuit Breaker) Owner: Engineer 2
Tasks
-
Task 2.2.1: Design retry policy configuration (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Define RetryPolicy dataclass
- max_retries: int (default 3)
- base_delay: float (default 2.0 seconds)
- max_delay: float (default 60.0 seconds)
- exponential_backoff: bool (default True)
- jitter: bool (default True, adds randomness)
- Sub-task: Define retryable vs non-retryable errors
- Retryable: TimeoutError, ConnectionError, AgentBusyError
- Non-retryable: ValidationError, AuthenticationError, NotFoundError
- Sub-task: Document policy in
docs/RETRY-POLICY.md - Acceptance: Policy documented, covers all error types
- Sub-task: Define RetryPolicy dataclass
-
Task 2.2.2: Implement RetryPolicyEngine class (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
retry_engine.pywith class skeleton - Sub-task: Implement
calculate_delay()method- Calculate exponential backoff: delay = base_delay * (2 ** retry_count)
- Cap at max_delay
- Add jitter: delay * random(0.8, 1.2)
- Sub-task: Implement
should_retry()method- Check retry count < max_retries
- Check error is retryable
- Check circuit breaker not open
- Sub-task: Implement
execute_with_retry()async method- Try executing function
- On failure, check should_retry()
- Calculate delay, wait
- Retry
- Repeat until success or max_retries
- Sub-task: Add retry metrics (count, delay, success/failure)
- Sub-task: Add logging for each retry attempt
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: Retry logic working with exponential backoff + jitter
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 2.2.3: Add unit tests for RetryPolicyEngine (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Test calculate_delay() with exponential backoff
- Retry 0: 2s, Retry 1: 4s, Retry 2: 8s, etc.
- Sub-task: Test max_delay cap (60s)
- Sub-task: Test jitter adds randomness
- Sub-task: Test should_retry() logic
- Retryable error + retry count < max → True
- Non-retryable error → False
- Retry count >= max → False
- Sub-task: Test execute_with_retry()
- Success on first try → No retries
- Fail 2 times, succeed on 3rd → 2 retries
- Fail 4 times → Max retries exceeded
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all tests pass
- Sub-task: Test calculate_delay() with exponential backoff
-
Task 2.2.4: Integration with TaskQueue and MessageBus (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Wrap TaskQueueManager.fail() with retry engine
- Sub-task: Wrap MessageBus.send_task() with retry engine
- Sub-task: Test retry in real workflow
- Agent fails with TimeoutError
- Task retries after 2s, 4s, 8s
- Succeeds on 4th attempt
- Acceptance: Tasks automatically retry on transient failures
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: Simulate transient failure, verify retry succeeds
- Performance test: 100 tasks with retries, verify total time reasonable
2.3 Distributed State Manager (4 days, 32 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: Phase 1 complete Owner: Both Engineers
Tasks
-
Task 2.3.1: Set up AWS S3 bucket for state backups (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create S3 bucket
claude-agent-states - Sub-task: Configure bucket lifecycle policy (delete after 90 days)
- Sub-task: Enable versioning for rollback
- Sub-task: Set up IAM role with s3:PutObject, s3:GetObject permissions
- Sub-task: Test upload/download with boto3
- Acceptance: S3 bucket operational, can upload/download state files
- Sub-task: Create S3 bucket
-
Task 2.3.2: Implement distributed locking with Redis (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Implement
acquire_lock()method- Use Redis SETNX with expiration
- Generate unique lock ID
- Store lock_id locally for release
- Sub-task: Implement
release_lock()method- Only release if we own the lock (check lock_id)
- Use Lua script for atomic check-and-delete
- Sub-task: Implement lock timeout and auto-extension
- Extend lock TTL if operation still running
- Use watchdog thread to auto-extend
- Sub-task: Add deadlock detection (lock held > 5 minutes → force release)
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: Distributed locks prevent concurrent state modifications
- Sub-task: Implement
-
Task 2.3.3: Implement DistributedStateManager class (12 hours)
- Sub-task: Extend existing StateManager class
- Sub-task: Implement
sync_from_cloud()method- Get S3 object metadata (last modified, ETag)
- Compare with local file timestamp
- Download if S3 is newer
- Upload if local is newer
- Sub-task: Implement
sync_to_cloud()method- Upload local state to S3
- Add metadata (project_id, version, updated_at)
- Sub-task: Implement
save_state()override- Acquire distributed lock
- Sync from cloud (get latest)
- Merge changes
- Save locally
- Sync to cloud
- Release lock
- Sub-task: Implement
load_state()override- Sync from cloud first
- Load into memory
- Sub-task: Add conflict resolution (last-write-wins or custom merge)
- Sub-task: Add retry logic for S3 operations
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: State syncs across nodes, no data loss, conflicts resolved
-
Task 2.3.4: Add unit tests for DistributedStateManager (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Test sync_from_cloud()
- S3 newer than local → Download
- Local newer than S3 → Upload
- Sub-task: Test sync_to_cloud()
- Upload state with metadata
- Sub-task: Test distributed lock
- Two nodes try to acquire lock
- Only one succeeds
- Second waits until first releases
- Sub-task: Test concurrent state modifications
- Two nodes save state concurrently
- Verify no data loss
- Verify conflict resolution
- Sub-task: Test S3 failure handling
- S3 down → Retry with backoff
- S3 permanent failure → Fallback to local only
- Sub-task: Mock S3 with moto library
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all concurrency tests pass
- Sub-task: Test sync_from_cloud()
-
Task 2.3.5: Integration with orchestrator.py (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Replace StateManager with DistributedStateManager
- Sub-task: Add sync_from_cloud() on startup
- Sub-task: Add sync_to_cloud() on save
- Sub-task: Test multi-node scenario
- Start orchestrator on Node 1
- Save state
- Start orchestrator on Node 2
- Verify state synced
- Acceptance: Multi-node orchestration works, state synced
Testing
- Unit tests: 80%+ coverage, all pass
- Integration test: 3 nodes concurrently modifying state, verify consistency
- Performance test: 1000 state saves, verify <1s latency per save
- Reliability test: Kill S3 mid-save, verify retry succeeds
2.4 Phase 2 Integration and Testing (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P0 Dependencies: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 Owner: Both Engineers
Tasks
-
Task 2.4.1: Create resilience test scenarios (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Scenario 1 - Agent failure
- Agent crashes mid-execution
- Circuit breaker detects failure
- Task retries with fallback agent
- Verify task completes successfully
- Sub-task: Scenario 2 - RabbitMQ failure
- Kill RabbitMQ mid-workflow
- Message bus reconnects
- Tasks resume from queue
- Verify no message loss
- Sub-task: Scenario 3 - Redis failure
- Kill Redis mid-save
- Distributed lock released
- State recovers from S3
- Verify no data loss
- Sub-task: Scenario 4 - Network partition
- Simulate network partition between nodes
- Verify distributed locks prevent split-brain
- Verify state consistency after partition heals
- Sub-task: Scenario 5 - Cascading failures
- Multiple agents fail simultaneously
- Circuit breakers open
- System degrades gracefully
- Verify no complete system failure
- Acceptance: All resilience tests pass, recovery time <60s
- Sub-task: Scenario 1 - Agent failure
-
Task 2.4.2: Write chaos engineering tests (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Install chaos testing library (pumba, toxiproxy, or chaos-toolkit)
- Sub-task: Create chaos scenarios
- Random agent kills
- Random network delays (100ms-1s)
- Random service restarts
- Sub-task: Run chaos tests for 1 hour
- Sub-task: Verify system self-heals
- Acceptance: System withstands 1 hour of chaos, maintains 99%+ uptime
-
Task 2.4.3: Performance tuning (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Profile circuit breaker overhead (<1ms per call)
- Sub-task: Tune retry delays (balance speed vs load)
- Sub-task: Optimize S3 sync frequency (batch writes)
- Sub-task: Document tuning parameters in
docs/PERFORMANCE-TUNING.md - Acceptance: No performance regression from Phase 1
-
Task 2.4.4: Code review and documentation (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Peer review all Phase 2 code
- Sub-task: Update architecture diagrams with resilience components
- Sub-task: Update
docs/architecture.md - Sub-task: Create runbook for failure recovery in
docs/RUNBOOK.md - Acceptance: All code reviewed, docs updated, runbook tested
Milestone 2 Completion Checklist
- Circuit breakers prevent cascading failures
- Tasks automatically retry (3 attempts with exponential backoff)
- State syncs across nodes via S3
- System recovers from failures within 60 seconds
- Chaos tests pass (1 hour of random failures)
- Zero data loss demonstrated
Phase 3: Observability (Weeks 5-6)
Goal: Visibility into system behavior Priority: P1 (HIGH) Duration: 10 days Effort: 80 hours
Success Criteria
- Real-time metrics visible in Prometheus
- End-to-end distributed tracing in Jaeger
- Structured JSON logs in Loki
- Grafana dashboards operational
- Alerts configured for critical events
3.1 Metrics Collection (Prometheus) (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: Phase 2 complete Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 3.1.1: Install and configure Prometheus (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy Prometheus server
- Sub-task: Configure scrape targets (orchestrator, agents)
- Sub-task: Configure retention (15 days)
- Sub-task: Test Prometheus UI (http://localhost:9090)
- Acceptance: Prometheus operational, scraping metrics
-
Task 3.1.2: Implement SystemMonitor class (12 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
monitoring.pywith class skeleton - Sub-task: Define Prometheus metrics:
tasks_total(Counter) - Total tasks processed (labels: agent, status)task_duration_seconds(Histogram) - Task execution duration (labels: agent)agent_utilization(Gauge) - Agent load / max capacity (labels: agent)circuit_breaker_state(Gauge) - CB state (labels: agent)message_bus_messages_total(Counter) - Messages sent (labels: message_type)task_queue_size(Gauge) - Queue size (labels: queue_name)retry_attempts_total(Counter) - Retry attempts (labels: agent, error_type)
- Sub-task: Implement metric recording methods:
record_task_start(task)record_task_complete(task, duration, status)record_agent_utilization(agent_id, utilization)record_circuit_breaker_state(agent_id, state)record_message_sent(message_type)record_retry_attempt(agent_id, error_type)
- Sub-task: Start Prometheus HTTP server on port 8000
- Sub-task: Add type hints and docstrings
- Acceptance: All metrics defined, recording methods working
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 3.1.3: Instrument existing code with metrics (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Add metrics to TaskQueueManager
- Record enqueue, dequeue, complete, fail events
- Track queue sizes
- Sub-task: Add metrics to MessageBus
- Record messages sent, received
- Track message latency
- Sub-task: Add metrics to AgentCircuitBreaker
- Record circuit state transitions
- Sub-task: Add metrics to RetryPolicyEngine
- Record retry attempts
- Sub-task: Test metrics endpoint (curl http://localhost:8000/metrics)
- Acceptance: All critical paths instrumented, metrics visible
- Sub-task: Add metrics to TaskQueueManager
-
Task 3.1.4: Create Prometheus queries and alerts (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create queries:
- Task success rate:
rate(tasks_total{status="success"}[5m]) - Average task duration:
histogram_quantile(0.95, task_duration_seconds) - Agent utilization:
agent_utilization - Circuit breaker open:
circuit_breaker_state == 1
- Task success rate:
- Sub-task: Create alerts:
- High error rate:
rate(tasks_total{status="failed"}[5m]) > 0.1 - Circuit breaker open:
circuit_breaker_state == 1 - Queue backlog:
task_queue_size > 1000
- High error rate:
- Sub-task: Configure Alertmanager for email/Slack notifications
- Acceptance: Alerts trigger correctly
- Sub-task: Create queries:
Testing
- Metrics endpoint returns valid Prometheus format
- All metrics update in real-time
- Queries return expected values
- Alerts trigger when thresholds exceeded
3.2 Distributed Tracing (Jaeger + OpenTelemetry) (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: 3.1 (Metrics) Owner: Engineer 2
Tasks
-
Task 3.2.1: Install and configure Jaeger (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy Jaeger all-in-one
- Sub-task: Configure storage backend (Elasticsearch or memory)
- Sub-task: Test Jaeger UI (http://localhost:16686)
- Acceptance: Jaeger operational, UI accessible
-
Task 3.2.2: Integrate OpenTelemetry SDK (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Install opentelemetry-api, opentelemetry-sdk, opentelemetry-exporter-jaeger
- Sub-task: Configure TracerProvider with Jaeger exporter
- Sub-task: Create root tracer in SystemMonitor
- Sub-task: Implement trace context propagation
- Add trace_id and span_id to AgentMessage
- Extract context from incoming messages
- Inject context into outgoing messages
- Sub-task: Test trace propagation (send task through 3 agents, verify single trace)
- Acceptance: OpenTelemetry integrated, traces export to Jaeger
-
Task 3.2.3: Instrument code with spans (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Add spans to TaskQueueManager
task_enqueuespantask_dequeuespantask_executionspan (parent span for entire task)
- Sub-task: Add spans to MessageBus
message_sendspanmessage_receivespan
- Sub-task: Add spans to agent execution
agent_executespan (nested under task_execution)- Add span attributes (agent_id, task_id, capabilities)
- Sub-task: Add spans to circuit breaker
circuit_breaker_callspan- Add span events (state transitions)
- Sub-task: Test end-to-end trace (orchestrator → agent A → agent B)
- Acceptance: Complete trace visible in Jaeger, showing all hops
- Sub-task: Add spans to TaskQueueManager
-
Task 3.2.4: Create trace analysis queries (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Query by service (e.g., show all agent A traces)
- Sub-task: Query by operation (e.g., show all task_execution spans)
- Sub-task: Query by duration (e.g., show spans >10s)
- Sub-task: Query by error (e.g., show failed spans)
- Sub-task: Create latency breakdown diagram (where is time spent?)
- Acceptance: Can diagnose performance bottlenecks using traces
-
Task 3.2.5: Document tracing usage (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
docs/DISTRIBUTED-TRACING.md - Sub-task: Add examples of trace queries
- Sub-task: Add troubleshooting guide
- Acceptance: Docs complete, team can use tracing
- Sub-task: Create
Testing
- Traces appear in Jaeger for all operations
- Trace context propagates across agents
- Can trace single request end-to-end
- Latency breakdown accurate
3.3 Structured Logging (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: Phase 2 complete Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 3.3.1: Install and configure Loki (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy Loki and Promtail
- Sub-task: Configure log aggregation from all services
- Sub-task: Test Loki query UI (via Grafana)
- Acceptance: Loki operational, logs visible
-
Task 3.3.2: Implement structured logging (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Install Python-json-logger library
- Sub-task: Create custom logger class
- Output JSON format
- Add context fields (trace_id, span_id, agent_id, task_id)
- Add timestamp, level, message
- Sub-task: Replace all print() statements with logger calls
- Sub-task: Add log levels consistently
- DEBUG: Verbose diagnostics
- INFO: Key events (task started, completed)
- WARNING: Retries, degraded performance
- ERROR: Failures, exceptions
- CRITICAL: System-wide failures
- Sub-task: Test log correlation with traces (same trace_id)
- Acceptance: All logs in JSON format, correlated with traces
-
Task 3.3.3: Create log queries and dashboards (3 hours)
- Sub-task: Query logs by level (e.g., show all ERROR logs)
- Sub-task: Query logs by agent (e.g., show all agent A logs)
- Sub-task: Query logs by trace_id (e.g., show logs for specific request)
- Sub-task: Create log-based alerts (e.g., >10 errors/minute)
- Acceptance: Can search logs efficiently, alerts work
-
Task 3.3.4: Document logging best practices (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
docs/LOGGING.md - Sub-task: Add logging guidelines (what to log, when, at what level)
- Sub-task: Add examples of good log messages
- Acceptance: Docs complete, team follows guidelines
- Sub-task: Create
Testing
- All logs in JSON format
- Logs correlated with traces (trace_id matches)
- Can query logs by level, agent, trace_id
- Log-based alerts trigger correctly
3.4 Grafana Dashboards (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 Owner: Both Engineers
Tasks
-
Task 3.4.1: Install and configure Grafana (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Deploy Grafana
- Sub-task: Add Prometheus data source
- Sub-task: Add Loki data source
- Sub-task: Add Jaeger data source
- Sub-task: Test Grafana UI (http://localhost:3000)
- Acceptance: Grafana operational, data sources connected
-
Task 3.4.2: Create System Overview dashboard (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Add panels:
- Total tasks processed (Counter graph)
- Task success rate (Percentage graph)
- Average task duration (Line graph)
- Agent utilization (Heatmap)
- Circuit breaker states (State timeline)
- Queue sizes (Multi-line graph)
- Sub-task: Add variables (agent filter, time range)
- Sub-task: Add annotations (deployments, incidents)
- Acceptance: Dashboard shows real-time system health
- Sub-task: Add panels:
-
Task 3.4.3: Create Agent Performance dashboard (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Add panels per agent:
- Task throughput
- Error rate
- Average latency
- Circuit breaker state
- Sub-task: Add agent comparison (side-by-side)
- Acceptance: Can compare agent performance
- Sub-task: Add panels per agent:
-
Task 3.4.4: Create Trace Analysis dashboard (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Integrate Jaeger panel
- Sub-task: Show recent traces
- Sub-task: Show slowest traces
- Sub-task: Show error traces
- Acceptance: Can drill into traces from dashboard
-
Task 3.4.5: Configure alerting (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Configure notification channels (email, Slack)
- Sub-task: Create alert rules:
- High error rate (>10%)
- Slow tasks (>30s)
- Circuit breaker open
- Queue backlog (>1000)
- Sub-task: Test alerts (trigger manually)
- Acceptance: Alerts sent to Slack/email
Testing
- All dashboards load without errors
- All panels show live data
- Variables and filters work
- Alerts trigger and notify correctly
3.5 Phase 3 Integration and Testing (0 days, 0 hours)
Priority: P1 Note: Testing is integrated into each section above
Milestone 3 Completion Checklist
- Prometheus scraping metrics from all services
- Jaeger showing end-to-end traces
- Loki aggregating structured logs
- Grafana dashboards operational
- Alerts configured and tested
- Can diagnose issues using observability stack
Phase 4: Polish (Weeks 7-8)
Goal: Production readiness Priority: P1/P2 (MEDIUM) Duration: 10 days Effort: 80 hours
Success Criteria
- System handles 100+ concurrent tasks
- All documentation updated
- CI/CD pipeline complete
- Load tests pass
- Production deployment successful
4.1 CLI Integration (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: Phase 3 complete Owner: Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 4.1.1: Create CLI commands for orchestration (12 hours)
- Sub-task: Add
claude agent listcommand- List all registered agents
- Show status, capabilities, load
- Sub-task: Add
claude agent info <agent-id>command- Show detailed agent info
- Show recent tasks
- Sub-task: Add
claude task submit <task-json>command- Submit task to queue
- Return task_id
- Sub-task: Add
claude task status <task-id>command- Show task status (PENDING, IN_PROGRESS, COMPLETED, FAILED)
- Show result if completed
- Sub-task: Add
claude task listcommand- List all tasks (with filters: status, agent)
- Sub-task: Add
claude queue statuscommand- Show queue sizes (ready, blocked, in_progress)
- Sub-task: Add
claude circuit-breaker statuscommand- Show all circuit breaker states
- Sub-task: Add
claude metricscommand- Show key metrics (task count, success rate, latency)
- Sub-task: Add type hints and help text
- Acceptance: All CLI commands working, help text clear
- Sub-task: Add
-
Task 4.1.2: Add unit tests for CLI (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Test each CLI command
- Sub-task: Test error handling (invalid inputs)
- Sub-task: Test output formatting (JSON, table)
- Acceptance: 80%+ coverage, all tests pass
-
Task 4.1.3: Create CLI usage documentation (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Create
docs/CLI-REFERENCE.md - Sub-task: Add examples for each command
- Sub-task: Add troubleshooting section
- Acceptance: Docs complete, easy to follow
- Sub-task: Create
-
Task 4.1.4: Integration with existing CLI (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Add new commands to existing CLI
- Sub-task: Test backward compatibility
- Acceptance: New commands integrated, no regressions
Testing
- All CLI commands work
- Output format correct
- Error messages helpful
- Integration tests pass
4.2 API Documentation (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: Phase 3 complete Owner: Engineer 2
Tasks
-
Task 4.2.1: Install and configure Sphinx (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Install Sphinx and extensions
- Sub-task: Generate initial docs structure
- Sub-task: Configure auto-build on file change
- Acceptance: Sphinx operational, docs build
-
Task 4.2.2: Generate API documentation (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Add module documentation:
- agent_discovery.py
- message_bus.py
- task_queue.py
- circuit_breaker.py
- retry_engine.py
- state_manager.py
- monitoring.py
- Sub-task: Add class and method documentation
- Sub-task: Add usage examples
- Sub-task: Add architecture diagrams (generated from code)
- Acceptance: Complete API reference generated
- Sub-task: Add module documentation:
-
Task 4.2.3: Create user guides (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Create "Getting Started" guide
- Sub-task: Create "How to Create an Agent" guide
- Sub-task: Create "How to Submit a Task" guide
- Sub-task: Create "Troubleshooting" guide
- Acceptance: Guides complete, easy to follow
-
Task 4.2.4: Publish documentation (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Build HTML docs
- Sub-task: Deploy to GitHub Pages or Read the Docs
- Sub-task: Add link to README
- Acceptance: Docs published, accessible via URL
Testing
- Docs build without errors
- All links work
- Examples run successfully
- Docs render correctly on mobile
4.3 Deployment Automation (3 days, 24 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: Phase 3 complete Owner: DevOps Engineer + Engineer 1
Tasks
-
Task 4.3.1: Create Docker images (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Create Dockerfile for orchestrator
- Sub-task: Create Dockerfile for agents
- Sub-task: Optimize image size (multi-stage builds)
- Sub-task: Add health check endpoints
- Sub-task: Test images locally
- Acceptance: Docker images build, run successfully
-
Task 4.3.2: Create Kubernetes manifests (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Create Deployment for orchestrator
- Sub-task: Create StatefulSet for RabbitMQ, Redis
- Sub-task: Create Services for all components
- Sub-task: Create ConfigMaps for configuration
- Sub-task: Create Secrets for credentials
- Sub-task: Configure resource limits (CPU, memory)
- Sub-task: Configure liveness and readiness probes
- Sub-task: Test on local K8s cluster (minikube or kind)
- Acceptance: K8s manifests deploy successfully
-
Task 4.3.3: Create CI/CD pipeline (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Create GitHub Actions workflow
- Sub-task: Add steps:
- Lint (black, mypy)
- Test (pytest with coverage)
- Build Docker images
- Push to registry
- Deploy to staging
- Run smoke tests
- (Manual approval for production)
- Deploy to production
- Sub-task: Configure secrets (Docker Hub, K8s cluster)
- Sub-task: Test pipeline end-to-end
- Acceptance: CI/CD pipeline working, deploys to staging
-
Task 4.3.4: Create deployment runbook (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Document deployment process
- Sub-task: Document rollback process
- Sub-task: Document scaling process
- Sub-task: Create troubleshooting guide
- Acceptance: Runbook complete, tested
Testing
- Docker images run without errors
- K8s deployments healthy
- CI/CD pipeline deploys successfully
- Rollback works
4.4 Load Testing (2 days, 16 hours)
Priority: P2 Dependencies: 4.3 (Deployment) Owner: Both Engineers
Tasks
-
Task 4.4.1: Install and configure load testing tool (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Install Locust or k6
- Sub-task: Create load test script
- Acceptance: Load testing tool operational
-
Task 4.4.2: Create load test scenarios (6 hours)
- Sub-task: Scenario 1 - Steady load
- 10 tasks/sec for 10 minutes
- Verify system stable
- Sub-task: Scenario 2 - Spike load
- Ramp up from 10 to 100 tasks/sec in 1 minute
- Verify system scales
- Sub-task: Scenario 3 - Stress test
- 1000 concurrent tasks
- Verify system doesn't crash
- Sub-task: Scenario 4 - Soak test
- 50 tasks/sec for 1 hour
- Verify no memory leaks
- Acceptance: All scenarios defined, scripts ready
- Sub-task: Scenario 1 - Steady load
-
Task 4.4.3: Run load tests and collect results (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Run each scenario
- Sub-task: Collect metrics (latency, throughput, error rate)
- Sub-task: Identify bottlenecks
- Sub-task: Document results in
docs/LOAD-TEST-RESULTS.md - Acceptance: Load tests complete, results documented
-
Task 4.4.4: Performance tuning based on results (4 hours)
- Sub-task: Tune RabbitMQ (prefetch count, connection pooling)
- Sub-task: Tune Redis (connection pooling, pipeline batching)
- Sub-task: Tune orchestrator (concurrency limits, queue sizes)
- Sub-task: Re-run load tests, verify improvement
- Acceptance: System meets performance targets (100 tasks/min)
Testing
- Load tests run without errors
- System handles 100+ concurrent tasks
- No performance degradation over time
- Error rate <1%
4.5 Production Deployment and Go-Live (0 days, 0 hours)
Priority: P1 Dependencies: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 Owner: Both Engineers + DevOps
Tasks
-
Task 4.5.1: Pre-deployment checklist (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Verify all tests pass (unit, integration, E2E, load)
- Sub-task: Verify all documentation updated
- Sub-task: Verify monitoring and alerts configured
- Sub-task: Verify rollback plan tested
- Sub-task: Verify team trained on new system
- Acceptance: All checklist items complete
-
Task 4.5.2: Phased rollout (8 hours)
- Sub-task: Phase 1 - Deploy to staging, run smoke tests (1 hour)
- Sub-task: Phase 2 - Route 10% of production traffic to new system (1 hour)
- Sub-task: Monitor for 24 hours, verify metrics (24 hours)
- Sub-task: Phase 3 - Route 50% of production traffic (1 hour)
- Sub-task: Monitor for 24 hours, verify metrics (24 hours)
- Sub-task: Phase 4 - Route 100% of production traffic (1 hour)
- Sub-task: Monitor for 48 hours, verify metrics (48 hours)
- Acceptance: 100% traffic on new system, no errors
-
Task 4.5.3: Deprecate old orchestrator (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Archive old orchestrator.py
- Sub-task: Update all references to use new system
- Sub-task: Remove old code after 30 days (if no issues)
- Acceptance: Old system fully replaced
-
Task 4.5.4: Post-deployment review (2 hours)
- Sub-task: Review metrics (success rate, latency, error rate)
- Sub-task: Collect team feedback
- Sub-task: Document lessons learned
- Sub-task: Create backlog for future improvements
- Acceptance: Review complete, lessons documented
Milestone 4 Completion Checklist
- CLI commands working
- API documentation published
- CI/CD pipeline operational
- Load tests passing
- Production deployment successful
- 100% traffic on new system
- Team trained on new system
Risk Mitigation
Risk Registry
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RabbitMQ performance bottleneck | Medium | High | Load test early (Week 2), optimize or replace with Kafka if needed | Engineer 2 |
| Redis data loss during failover | Low | High | Configure AOF persistence, test failover extensively (Week 4) | DevOps |
| Complex dependency deadlocks | Medium | Medium | Implement deadlock detection (Week 1), alerting (Week 5) | Engineer 1 |
| State sync conflicts (multi-node) | Medium | Medium | Implement robust conflict resolution (Week 4), test thoroughly | Both Engineers |
| Circuit breakers too aggressive | Medium | Low | Tune fail_max and timeout_duration (Week 3), monitor closely (Week 5) | Engineer 1 |
| Observability overhead | Low | Medium | Benchmark overhead (Week 5), disable if >5% impact | Engineer 1 |
| Team not trained on new system | High | High | Create comprehensive docs (Week 7), hands-on training session | Both Engineers |
| Production deployment failure | Medium | Critical | Phased rollout (10%/50%/100%), robust rollback plan | DevOps |
Rollback Plan
If production deployment fails:
-
Immediate Rollback (<5 minutes):
- Route 100% traffic to old system
- Verify old system operational
- Alert team
-
Investigation (1-2 hours):
- Review logs, metrics, traces
- Identify root cause
- Create fix or mitigation
-
Re-deployment:
- Fix issue in staging
- Re-run all tests
- Retry phased rollout
Success Metrics Tracking
Weekly Metrics Report
Create weekly report with these metrics:
| Metric | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomy % | 0% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 95% | 95% |
| Test Coverage % | 0% | 40% | 60% | 75% | 80% | 80% | 85% | 90% | 80% |
| Tasks Completed | 0 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 500 | 1000 | 5000 | 10000 | 10000 |
| Avg Latency (s) | N/A | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | <3 | <5 |
| Error Rate % | N/A | 10% | 5% | 2% | 1% | 0.5% | 0.1% | <0.1% | <1% |
| Uptime % | N/A | 90% | 95% | 98% | 99% | 99.5% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Final Acceptance Criteria
Before marking project complete:
- All 8 milestones achieved
- Autonomy: 95%+ (95+ out of 100 tasks complete without human)
- Latency: <5s task dispatch
- Throughput: 100+ tasks/min sustained
- Reliability: 99.9% uptime over 7 days
- Recovery: <60s from agent failure
- Test Coverage: 80%+ across all components
- Load Test: Handles 1000 concurrent tasks
- Documentation: 100% complete and published
- Team Training: 100% of team trained
Appendix: Command Reference
Development Commands
# Setup
make setup # Install all dependencies
make start # Start all services (Docker Compose)
make stop # Stop all services
# Testing
make test # Run all tests
make test-unit # Run unit tests only
make test-integration # Run integration tests only
make test-e2e # Run end-to-end tests
make test-coverage # Run tests with coverage report
# Code Quality
make lint # Run linters (black, mypy)
make format # Format code (black)
make type-check # Type checking (mypy)
# Development
make dev # Run in development mode (hot reload)
make logs # Tail logs from all services
make shell # Open interactive shell
# Deployment
make build # Build Docker images
make deploy-staging # Deploy to staging
make deploy-prod # Deploy to production
make rollback # Rollback deployment
# Monitoring
make metrics # Open Prometheus
make traces # Open Jaeger
make logs-ui # Open Loki/Grafana
make dashboards # Open Grafana
Appendix: File Manifest
New Files Created (37 files)
Core Orchestration
.claude/orchestration/__init__.py.claude/orchestration/agent_discovery.py.claude/orchestration/message_bus.py.claude/orchestration/task_queue.py.claude/orchestration/circuit_breaker.py.claude/orchestration/retry_engine.py.claude/orchestration/state_manager.py.claude/orchestration/monitoring.py
Tests
.claude/tests/unit/test_agent_discovery.py.claude/tests/unit/test_message_bus.py.claude/tests/unit/test_task_queue.py.claude/tests/unit/test_circuit_breaker.py.claude/tests/unit/test_retry_engine.py.claude/tests/unit/test_state_manager.py.claude/tests/integration/test_autonomous_workflow.py.claude/tests/integration/test_resilience.py.claude/tests/e2e/test_full_system.py
Configuration
.claude/config/rabbitmq.yaml.claude/config/redis.yaml.claude/config/prometheus.yaml.claude/config/grafana/dashboards/system_overview.json.claude/config/grafana/dashboards/agent_performance.json
Docker/K8s
.claude/docker/docker-compose.yml.claude/docker/Dockerfile.orchestrator.claude/docker/Dockerfile.agent.claude/k8s/orchestrator-deployment.yaml.claude/k8s/rabbitmq-statefulset.yaml.claude/k8s/redis-statefulset.yaml
Documentation
.claude/docs/AGENT-DISCOVERY.md.claude/docs/MESSAGE-BUS.md.claude/docs/TASK-QUEUE.md.claude/docs/CIRCUIT-BREAKER.md.claude/docs/RETRY-POLICY.md.claude/docs/DISTRIBUTED-STATE.md.claude/docs/OBSERVABILITY.md.claude/docs/CLI-REFERENCE.md.claude/docs/DEPLOYMENT-RUNBOOK.md
Total: 37 new files, ~15,000 lines of code
Appendix: Dependencies
Python Packages (requirements.txt)
# Core
python>=3.10
# Async
asyncio>=3.4.3
aiohttp>=3.9.0
# Message Bus
aio_pika>=9.3.0
# Redis
redis>=5.0.0
rq>=1.15.0
# Circuit Breaker
pybreaker>=1.0.0
# Monitoring
prometheus-client>=0.19.0
opentelemetry-api>=1.21.0
opentelemetry-sdk>=1.21.0
opentelemetry-exporter-jaeger>=1.21.0
# Logging
python-json-logger>=2.0.7
# State Management
boto3>=1.34.0
# Testing
pytest>=7.4.3
pytest-asyncio>=0.21.1
pytest-cov>=4.1.0
pytest-timeout>=2.2.0
testcontainers>=3.7.1
# Code Quality
black>=23.12.0
mypy>=1.7.1
pylint>=3.0.3
# Documentation
sphinx>=7.2.6
sphinx-rtd-theme>=2.0.0
Infrastructure
- RabbitMQ 3.12+
- Redis 7.0+
- PostgreSQL 15+ (existing)
- Prometheus 2.48+
- Grafana 10.2+
- Jaeger 1.51+
- Loki 2.9+
Document Control
Version History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-11-13 | Orchestrator Agent | Initial plan created |
Next Review: After Phase 1 completion (Week 2)
Status: ✅ Ready for Execution