Cross-Artifact Impact Register
Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-15 Status: Complete — Tracks all 90+ artifacts across 8 documentation directories Purpose: Single source of truth for artifact dependencies, cascade update requirements, and cross-reference integrity
Executive Summary
This impact register tracks 90+ artifacts across the CODITECT Bioscience QMS platform documentation suite. It maps dependencies, identifies cascade update requirements, and flags highest-impact documents to prevent inconsistencies across the codebase.
Recent Expansion: The addition of 14 new B.1/B.2 artifacts (competitive intelligence + GTM strategy) has created 37 new cross-artifact dependencies and 22 cascade update requirements across existing documents.
Critical Finding: Market sizing numbers ($4.35B TAM, $412M SAM, $26.3M Y5 target) now appear in 18+ artifacts and MUST remain synchronized.
Highest-Impact Artifacts:
- 16-prisma-data-model.md — 23 downstream dependents (all technical artifacts)
- market-sizing.md — 18 downstream dependents (all business artifacts)
- gtm-foundation.md — 15 downstream dependents (all GTM/revenue artifacts)
- 19-state-machine-with-guards.md — 12 downstream dependents (workflow artifacts)
- competitive-landscape.md — 11 downstream dependents (positioning artifacts)
1. Complete Artifact Inventory
1.1 Executive Documents (6 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | executive-summary.md | 116 | Executive | Legacy | 4 |
| 02 | executive-summary-updated.md | 157 | Executive | Active | 6 |
| 03 | business-case.md | 281 | Executive | Active | 8 |
| 04 | investor-pitch-data.md | 201 | Executive | Active | 5 |
| 60 | business-model.md | 325 | Business | Active | 12 |
| 61 | one-pager-investor-brief.md | 132 | Executive | Active | 3 |
Key Dependencies: All executive documents depend on market-sizing.md, competitive-landscape.md, and gtm-foundation.md for consistent numbers.
1.2 Market & Competitive Documents (20 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Generated By | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05 | market-opportunity.md | 289 | Market | Manual | 7 |
| 06 | market-opportunity-deep-dive.md | 342 | Market | Manual | 9 |
| 07 | tam-sam-som-analysis.md | 385 | Market | Manual | 8 |
| 08 | competitive-moat-analysis.md | 419 | Market | Manual | 6 |
| 09 | go-to-market-strategy.md | 531 | Market | Manual | 10 |
| 10 | roi-quantification.md | 278 | Market | Manual | 5 |
| — | market-sizing.md | 599 | Market | B.1.1 | 18 |
| — | customer-segmentation.md | 847 | Market | B.1.2 | 11 |
| — | competitive-landscape.md | 1284 | Market | B.1.3 | 11 |
| — | competitive-positioning.md | 951 | Market | B.1.4 | 9 |
| — | competitive-executive-brief.md | 423 | Market | B.1.5 | 4 |
| — | competitive-battlecards.md | 1052 | Market | B.1.6 | 6 |
| — | competitive-monitoring-spec.md | 736 | Market | B.1.7 | 3 |
| — | competitive-feature-matrix.md | 892 | Market | B.1.8 | 7 |
| — | gtm-foundation.md | 870 | GTM | B.2.1 | 15 |
| — | gtm-channels.md | 1088 | GTM | B.2.2 | 8 |
| — | gtm-marketing.md | 1174 | GTM | B.2.3 | 7 |
| — | gtm-customer-success.md | 989 | GTM | B.2.4 | 6 |
| — | gtm-execution-plan.md | 1200 | GTM | B.2.5 | 9 |
| — | gtm-metrics.md | 1475 | GTM | B.2.6 | 8 |
Critical Consistency Requirements:
- TAM/SAM/SOM Numbers: $4.35B / $412M / $26.3M (Y5) must match across 05-07, market-sizing.md, gtm-foundation.md, 60-61
- Pricing Tiers: Startup ($48K), Growth ($120K), Enterprise ($240K), Custom ($500K+) must match across 60, gtm-foundation.md, 71
- Competitor Names: 10 profiled competitors must match across competitive-landscape.md, competitive-feature-matrix.md, competitive-battlecards.md, 08
1.3 Product Documents (2 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | product-roadmap.md | 217 | Product | Active | 8 |
| 62 | unified-execution-plan.md | 420 | Product | Active | 6 |
1.4 Architecture Documents (6 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | sdd.md | 254 | Architecture | Active | 11 |
| 13 | tdd.md | 373 | Architecture | Active | 9 |
| 14 | c4-architecture.md | 341 | Architecture | Active | 7 |
| 15 | mermaid-diagrams.md | 302 | Architecture | Active | 5 |
| 16 | prisma-data-model.md | 731 | Architecture | Active | 23 |
| 17 | e-signature-architecture.md | 504 | Architecture | Active | 8 |
Critical Note: 16-prisma-data-model.md is the highest-impact technical artifact — changes here cascade to all dashboards, API endpoints, and state machines.
1.5 State Machine Documents (2 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | state-machine-specification.md | 428 | State Machine | Active | 8 |
| 19 | state-machine-with-guards.md | 512 | State Machine | Active | 12 |
1.6 Compliance Documents (6 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | regulatory-compliance-matrix.md | 645 | Compliance | Active | 9 |
| 21 | rbac-model.md | 387 | Compliance | Active | 7 |
| 22 | rbac-permissions-matrix.md | 519 | Compliance | Active | 11 |
| 23 | architecture-decision-records.md | 298 | Compliance | Active | 4 |
| 58 | gap-analysis-framework.md | 823 | Compliance | Active | 5 |
| — | compliance-readiness-matrix.md | 412 | Compliance | Active | 6 |
1.7 Agent Documents (3 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | agent-orchestration-mapping.md | 356 | Agents | Active | 4 |
| 25 | agent-orchestration-spec.md | 489 | Agents | Active | 6 |
| 26 | agent-message-contracts.md | 521 | Agents | Active | 5 |
1.8 Reference Documents (5 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | coditect-impact.md | 267 | Reference | Active | 3 |
| 28 | quick-start-guide.md | 189 | Reference | Active | 2 |
| 29 | glossary.md | 745 | Reference | Active | 15 |
| 30 | document-inventory.md | 423 | Reference | Active | 2 |
| 31 | website-plan.md | 531 | Reference | Active | 4 |
1.9 Operations Documents (13 artifacts)
| # | File | Lines | Category | Status | Downstream Deps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | data-architecture.md | 359 | Operations | Active | 8 |
| 64 | security-architecture.md | 421 | Operations | Active | 9 |
| 65 | testing-strategy.md | 433 | Operations | Active | 6 |
| 66 | operational-readiness.md | 541 | Operations | Active | 7 |
| 66b | multi-site-management.md | 378 | Operations | Active | 4 |
| 67 | integration-api-strategy.md | 477 | Operations | Active | 5 |
| 68 | user-experience-journeys.md | 504 | Operations | Active | 6 |
| 69 | versioning-evolution-strategy.md | 511 | Operations | Active | 4 |
| 70 | validation-protocol-templates.md | 492 | Operations | Active | 7 |
| 71 | api-endpoint-specification.md | 687 | Engineering | Active | 12 |
| 72 | deployment-architecture.md | 543 | DevOps | Active | 8 |
| 73 | event-catalog.md | 621 | Engineering | Active | 10 |
| 74 | capa-workflow.md | 589 | Compliance | Active | 9 |
| 75 | audit-readiness-guide.md | 634 | Compliance | Active | 8 |
Total Artifact Count: 90+ documents (including dashboards, prompts, and other supporting files not shown in detail)
2. Dependency Graph
2.1 Foundation Layer (Foundation → Technical)
All technical artifacts depend on these foundational documents:
16-prisma-data-model.md ────────────► ALL technical artifacts (23 deps)
├──► 71-api-endpoint-specification.md
├──► 73-event-catalog.md
├──► 74-capa-workflow.md
├──► 12-sdd.md
├──► 13-tdd.md
├──► 63-data-architecture.md
└──► All 30+ dashboards (.jsx files)
19-state-machine-with-guards.md ───► Workflow artifacts (12 deps)
├──► 71-api-endpoint-specification.md (transitions)
├──► 73-event-catalog.md (state events)
├──► 74-capa-workflow.md (CAPA states)
├──► 18-state-machine-specification.md
└──► All state machine dashboards
22-rbac-permissions-matrix.md ─────► Security artifacts (11 deps)
├──► 71-api-endpoint-specification.md (auth per endpoint)
├──► 74-capa-workflow.md (CAPA permissions)
├──► 75-audit-readiness-guide.md (auditor permissions)
├──► 64-security-architecture.md
└──► All compliance dashboards
2.2 Business Layer (Market Data → Revenue → Financials)
market-sizing.md (B.1.1) ──────────► Business artifacts (18 deps)
\$4.35B TAM ├──► 05-market-opportunity.md
\$412M SAM ├──► 06-market-opportunity-deep-dive.md
\$26.3M Y5 target ├──► 07-tam-sam-som-analysis.md
├──► 60-business-model.md
├──► 61-one-pager-investor-brief.md
├──► 02-executive-summary-updated.md
├──► 03-business-case.md
├──► 04-investor-pitch-data.md
├──► gtm-foundation.md
├──► gtm-execution-plan.md
├──► gtm-metrics.md
└──► All revenue dashboards
gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) ─────────► GTM artifacts (15 deps)
4-tier pricing model ├──► gtm-channels.md
\$48K-\$500K+ ACV ├──► gtm-marketing.md
LTV:CAC 5x target ├──► gtm-customer-success.md
├──► gtm-execution-plan.md
├──► gtm-metrics.md
├──► 09-go-to-market-strategy.md
├──► 60-business-model.md
├──► 66-operational-readiness.md
├──► 71-api-endpoint-specification.md (pricing API)
└──► All revenue dashboards
competitive-landscape.md (B.1.3) ──► Positioning artifacts (11 deps)
10 competitor profiles ├──► competitive-positioning.md
Feature matrix ├──► competitive-feature-matrix.md
Pricing benchmarks ├──► competitive-battlecards.md
├──► competitive-executive-brief.md
├──► competitive-monitoring-spec.md
├──► 08-competitive-moat-analysis.md
├──► gtm-foundation.md (competitive pricing)
├──► gtm-marketing.md (messaging)
└──► All competitive dashboards
2.3 Compliance Layer (Regulatory → Audit → Validation)
20-regulatory-compliance-matrix.md ─► Compliance artifacts (9 deps)
├──► 75-audit-readiness-guide.md
├──► 70-validation-protocol-templates.md
├──► 74-capa-workflow.md (21 CFR 820.90/820.198)
├──► compliance-readiness-matrix.md
└──► All compliance dashboards
17-e-signature-architecture.md ────► Approval artifacts (8 deps)
├──► 71-api-endpoint-specification.md (approval endpoints)
├──► 74-capa-workflow.md (CAPA approvals)
├──► 75-audit-readiness-guide.md (§11.70 compliance)
└──► All signature/approval dashboards
3. Impact Matrix: B.1/B.2 New Artifacts → Existing Artifacts
This section identifies every existing artifact that requires updates due to the 14 new B.1/B.2 artifacts.
3.1 Critical Updates (Changes Meaning or Accuracy)
| Existing Artifact | Impacted By | Required Update | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05-market-opportunity.md | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Update TAM/SAM/SOM to match $4.35B/$412M/$26.3M | P0 | ☐ |
| 06-market-opportunity-deep-dive.md | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Reconcile market data with 12-source triangulation | P0 | ☐ |
| 07-tam-sam-som-analysis.md | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Full replacement or supersession notice | P0 | ☐ |
| 08-competitive-moat-analysis.md | competitive-landscape.md (B.1.3) | Update 10-competitor landscape, add new entrants | P0 | ☐ |
| 09-go-to-market-strategy.md | gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) | Reconcile GTM motion (hybrid sales-led vs. prior strategy) | P0 | ☐ |
| 10-roi-quantification.md | customer-segmentation.md (B.1.2) | Update ROI by segment (startup/growth/enterprise/custom) | P1 | ☐ |
| 60-business-model.md | gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) | Reconcile pricing tiers ($48K/$120K/$240K/$500K+) | P0 | ☐ |
| 60-business-model.md | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Update TAM/SAM/SOM references | P0 | ☐ |
| 61-one-pager-investor-brief.md | All B.1/B.2 artifacts | Comprehensive refresh with new market + GTM data | P1 | ☐ |
| 71-api-endpoint-specification.md | gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) | Add subscription tier validation to pricing endpoints | P1 | ☐ |
| 66-operational-readiness.md | gtm-customer-success.md (B.2.4) | Add customer success cost model ($85K/yr QA Director) | P1 | ☐ |
3.2 Reference Updates (Cross-Reference Additions)
| Existing Artifact | Impacted By | Required Update | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02-executive-summary-updated.md | All B.1/B.2 artifacts | Update competitive landscape + GTM sections | P2 | ☐ |
| 03-business-case.md | market-sizing.md, gtm-foundation.md | Add market sizing + revenue model references | P2 | ☐ |
| 04-investor-pitch-data.md | market-sizing.md, competitive-landscape.md | Update pitch deck data points | P2 | ☐ |
| 11-product-roadmap.md | competitive-feature-matrix.md (B.1.8) | Add competitive feature parity milestones | P2 | ☐ |
| 12-sdd.md | gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) | Reference subscription tier technical requirements | P2 | ☐ |
| 29-glossary.md | All B.1/B.2 artifacts | Add new acronyms: ICP, ACV, NRR, CAC, LTV, G2M | P2 | ☐ |
| 30-document-inventory.md | All B.1/B.2 artifacts | Add 14 new artifacts to inventory | P1 | ☐ |
| 31-website-plan.md | All B.1/B.2 artifacts | Add navigation for Market Intelligence section | P2 | ☐ |
| 62-unified-execution-plan.md | gtm-execution-plan.md (B.2.5) | Reconcile GTM timeline with product timeline | P1 | ☐ |
3.3 Dashboard Resynchronization
| Dashboard | Data Source Change | Required Update | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49-revenue-model-dashboard.jsx | gtm-foundation.md (B.2.1) | Update pricing tiers, ACV, unit economics | P0 | ☐ |
| 47-market-opportunity-dashboard.jsx | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Update TAM/SAM/SOM, CAGR, Y1-Y5 targets | P0 | ☐ |
| 48-tam-sam-som-dashboard.jsx | market-sizing.md (B.1.1) | Full resync with new market data | P0 | ☐ |
| 54-competitive-comparison.jsx | competitive-landscape.md (B.1.3) | Add 10 competitors, feature matrix, pricing | P1 | ☐ |
| 55-competitive-positioning-canvas.jsx | competitive-positioning.md (B.1.4) | Update positioning map coordinates | P1 | ☐ |
| 56-gtm-execution-timeline.jsx | gtm-execution-plan.md (B.2.5) | Add phase-gate milestones | P1 | ☐ |
| 57-customer-success-metrics.jsx | gtm-customer-success.md (B.2.4) | Add NPS, retention, expansion metrics | P1 | ☐ |
3.4 Consistency Reconciliation (Number Synchronization)
| Data Point | Source of Truth | Must Match In | Current Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAM 2026 | market-sizing.md | 05, 06, 07, 60, 61, 47, 48 | ☐ Pending sync |
| SAM 2026 | market-sizing.md | 05, 06, 07, 60, 61, 47, 48 | ☐ Pending sync |
| SOM Y5 Target | market-sizing.md | 60, 61, gtm-foundation.md, gtm-metrics.md | ☐ Pending sync |
| Startup Tier ACV | gtm-foundation.md | 60, 71, 49 | ☐ Pending sync |
| Growth Tier ACV | gtm-foundation.md | 60, 71, 49 | ☐ Pending sync |
| Enterprise Tier ACV | gtm-foundation.md | 60, 71, 49 | ☐ Pending sync |
| Custom Tier ACV | gtm-foundation.md | 60, 71, 49 | ☐ Pending sync |
| LTV:CAC Ratio | gtm-foundation.md | 60, gtm-metrics.md, 49 | ☐ Pending sync |
| Gross Margin | gtm-foundation.md | 60, 66, gtm-metrics.md | ☐ Pending sync |
| Competitor Count | competitive-landscape.md | 08, 54, 55, battlecards, feature-matrix | ☐ Pending sync |
4. B.1/B.2 New Artifact Impact Analysis
4.1 Market Sizing Impact (B.1.1)
Artifact: market-sizing.md (599 lines)
Confidence: HIGH
Methodology: 12-source triangulation, top-down + bottom-up validation
Downstream Impact:
- 18 artifacts reference TAM/SAM/SOM numbers
- 7 dashboards visualize market data
- CRITICAL: All prior market estimates (ranging $1.6B-$31.3B) must be reconciled or deprecated
Cascade Updates Required:
- Replace or supersede 07-tam-sam-som-analysis.md (old analysis)
- Update 05, 06 with new market framework
- Sync 60, 61, 02, 03, 04 executive documents
- Regenerate 47, 48 market dashboards
4.2 Customer Segmentation Impact (B.1.2)
Artifact: customer-segmentation.md (847 lines)
Segments: Startup, Growth, Enterprise, Custom
ICP: FDA-regulated life sciences, 50-5000 employees, cloud-ready
Downstream Impact:
- 11 artifacts reference customer segments
- Pricing strategy in gtm-foundation.md aligned to segments
- ROI calculations in 10-roi-quantification.md must segment
Cascade Updates Required:
- Update 10-roi-quantification.md with per-segment ROI
- Align 60-business-model.md customer taxonomy
- Update 68-user-experience-journeys.md with segment personas
4.3 Competitive Landscape Impact (B.1.3)
Artifact: competitive-landscape.md (1284 lines)
Competitors Profiled: 10 (Veeva, MasterControl, Greenlight Guru, TrackWise, ETQ, ComplianceQuest, Qualio, Arena, AssurX, Siemens)
Data: Feature matrix, pricing, market share, SWOT, funding
Downstream Impact:
- 11 artifacts reference competitive data
- 4 dashboards visualize competitive positioning
- Messaging strategy in gtm-marketing.md depends on differentiation
Cascade Updates Required:
- Update 08-competitive-moat-analysis.md with new competitor data
- Regenerate 54-competitive-comparison.jsx dashboard
- Sync competitive-battlecards.md, competitive-feature-matrix.md
- Update gtm-marketing.md messaging based on competitive gaps
4.4 GTM Foundation Impact (B.2.1)
Artifact: gtm-foundation.md (870 lines)
GTM Motion: Hybrid Sales-Led Enterprise + PLG evaluation
Pricing: 4-tier SaaS ($48K-$500K+ ACV)
Unit Economics: LTV:CAC >5x (Y1), 75-82% gross margin, 6-12mo payback
Downstream Impact:
- 15 artifacts reference revenue model or pricing
- All GTM artifacts (B.2.2-B.2.6) depend on this foundation
- API specification must validate subscription tiers
Cascade Updates Required:
- Reconcile 60-business-model.md pricing tiers
- Update 71-api-endpoint-specification.md pricing/subscription endpoints
- Sync 09-go-to-market-strategy.md with hybrid sales-led motion
- Regenerate 49-revenue-model-dashboard.jsx
- Update 66-operational-readiness.md cost model
4.5 GTM Execution Plan Impact (B.2.5)
Artifact: gtm-execution-plan.md (1200 lines)
Timeline: 18-month phased rollout (Design Partner → Pilot → Scale)
Phase Gates: 9 milestones from DP selection to $4.2M ARR
Downstream Impact:
- 9 artifacts reference GTM timeline
- Product roadmap must align with GTM phases
- Operational readiness must match GTM hiring plan
Cascade Updates Required:
- Reconcile 11-product-roadmap.md with GTM timeline
- Update 62-unified-execution-plan.md to merge product + GTM
- Sync 66-operational-readiness.md hiring timeline
- Generate 56-gtm-execution-timeline.jsx dashboard
5. Gap Closure Status (from Prompt 78)
This section tracks the 28 gaps identified in artifact 58-gap-analysis-framework.md and their resolution status across the 90+ artifact suite.
5.1 Security & Compliance Gaps (G01-G15)
| Gap | Description | Addressed By | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G01 | Credential Vault Integration | 64-security-architecture.md §4, 72 §6 | ✅ | Vault API spec |
| G02 | §11.70 Cryptographic Signature Binding | 17-e-signature-architecture.md | ✅ | HMAC + PKI |
| G03 | Audit Trail Hash Chain | 73-event-catalog.md §4.2 | ✅ | SHA-256 chain |
| G04 | Agent Message Signing | 64-security-architecture.md §6 | ✅ | Ed25519 signing |
| G05 | §11.100(b) Re-Authentication | 64-security-architecture.md §2 | ✅ | Session timeout |
| G06 | Personnel Training Integration | 75-audit-readiness-guide.md §2 | ⚠️ | Reference only |
| G07 | Written Policies & Accountability | 75-audit-readiness-guide.md §6 | ⚠️ | Template only |
| G08 | FDA Compliance Completeness | 75-audit-readiness-guide.md §3 | ✅ | Full CFR map |
| G09 | PHI Detection Scanner | 73-event-catalog.md §4.4 | ✅ | Event-driven scan |
| G10 | HIPAA Break-Glass Emergency | 64-security-architecture.md §2 | ✅ | Emergency access |
| G11 | Session Management & Auto-Logoff | 64-security-architecture.md §2 | ✅ | 15min timeout |
| G12 | HIPAA Completeness | 75-audit-readiness-guide.md §4 | ✅ | Full §164.312 |
| G13 | SIEM Integration | 64-security-architecture.md, 72 §7 | ✅ | Datadog + Splunk |
| G14 | Incident Response WO Generation | 66-operational-readiness.md §9 | ✅ | Auto-WO trigger |
| G15 | Access Deprovisioning | 64-security-architecture.md §3, 75 §4 | ✅ | Automated revoke |
5.2 CAPA & Risk Management (G16)
| Gap | Description | Addressed By | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G16 | Risk Assessment & CAPA | 74-capa-workflow.md | ✅ | Full 589-line artifact |
5.3 Technical Gaps (G17-G18)
| Gap | Description | Addressed By | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G17 | Optimistic Locking | 71-api-endpoint-specification.md §2.4 | ✅ | version field |
| G18 | Dependency DAG Cycle Detection | 71-api §5.2 | ✅ | hasCycles field |
5.4 Scaling & Optimization Gaps (G19-G26)
| Gap | Description | Addressed By | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G19 | Partial Master WO Completion | Not yet addressed | ☐ | Phase G deferred |
| G20 | Vendor WO Timeout & Escalation | Not yet addressed | ☐ | Phase G deferred |
| G21 | Vendor Coordination Portal | 67-integration-api-strategy.md | ⚠️ | Partial reference |
| G22 | Vendor IQ/OQ/PQ Upload | 70-validation-protocol-templates.md §8 | ✅ | Upload workflow |
| G23 | Experience & Certification Expiry | 73-event-catalog.md §6.2 | ✅ | Expiry event |
| G24 | Batch WO Creation | 71-api future roadmap | ⚠️ | Noted, not spec'd |
| G25 | Schedule Constraint Solver | Not addressed | ☐ | Phase G deferred |
| G26 | Resource Optimization | Not addressed | ☐ | Phase G deferred |
5.5 Meta Gaps (G27-G28)
| Gap | Description | Addressed By | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G27 | Artifact Gap Status Updates | This document (B.3.1) | ✅ | §5 gap closure |
| G28 | Dashboard Data Sync | §3.3, §6 above | ⚠️ | Identified, not fixed |
Summary: 20/28 fully specified (71%), 5/28 partially addressed (18%), 3/28 deferred to Phase G (11%)
6. Finalization Checklist (Execute After All Generation Complete)
6.1 Data Consistency Pass
- TAM/SAM/SOM numbers consistent across: 05, 06, 07, market-sizing.md, 60, 61, 47, 48, 49, gtm-foundation.md, gtm-metrics.md
- Pricing tiers ($48K/$120K/$240K/$500K+) consistent across: 60, gtm-foundation.md, 71, 49
- Competitor names (10 profiled) consistent across: 08, competitive-landscape.md, competitive-feature-matrix.md, competitive-battlecards.md, 54, 55
- Customer segments (Startup/Growth/Enterprise/Custom) consistent across: customer-segmentation.md, gtm-foundation.md, 10, 60, 68
- Role names consistent across: 21, 22, 71, 74, 75
- State names consistent across: 18, 19, 34, 37, 71, 73
- Entity names consistent across: 16, 35, 36, 71, 73, 74
6.2 Cross-Reference Integrity
- Every artifact's "Cross-Reference" or "Referenced By" section includes all new B.1/B.2 dependencies
- No artifact references a non-existent artifact number
- All "Superseded" or "Deprecated" artifacts are clearly marked
- All B.1/B.2 artifacts have
generated_byandreferenced_byfrontmatter
6.3 Dashboard Data Sync
- All JSX dashboards reflect current artifact data (not stale pre-B.1/B.2 data)
- Market dashboards (47, 48) show $4.35B TAM, $412M SAM, $26.3M Y5
- Revenue dashboard (49) shows 4-tier pricing model
- Competitive dashboards (54, 55) show 10 competitors
- GTM dashboard (56) shows 18-month phased execution plan
6.4 Glossary Completeness
- Every acronym in B.1/B.2 artifacts appears in 29-glossary.md
- New terms: ICP, ACV, NRR, CAC, LTV, G2M, PLG, SMB, MM, ENT
- Version number updated, total term count updated
6.5 Inventory & Navigation
- 30-document-inventory.md reflects all 90+ artifacts (including B.1/B.2)
- 31-website-plan.md includes navigation for "Market Intelligence" section
- B.1/B.2 artifacts have proper category tags (market, gtm, competitive)
- All artifacts have proper
type,component_type,version,statusfrontmatter
6.6 Meta-Prompt Validation
- Prompt templates reference correct artifact numbers (not stale references)
- B.1/B.2 generation prompts in
prompts/directory are marked complete - This impact register (B.3.1) is marked as authoritative source for dependencies
7. Known Technical Debt
| Item | Description | Effort | Priority | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stale TAM/SAM numbers | Artifacts 05-07 have inconsistent market sizing vs. market-sizing.md | M | P0 | TBD |
| Duplicate pricing models | 60-business-model.md vs. gtm-foundation.md have overlapping pricing sections | S | P1 | TBD |
| Dashboard-artifact coupling | Dashboards hardcode data; no automated sync from markdown | L | P2 | TBD |
| Competitor count variance | 08-competitive-moat-analysis.md mentions 8 competitors, competitive-landscape.md has 10 | S | P1 | TBD |
| GTM strategy reconciliation | 09-go-to-market-strategy.md pre-dates gtm-foundation.md; motion may differ | M | P0 | TBD |
| Missing JSX for B.1/B.2 | New artifacts (market-sizing, competitive-landscape, gtm-*) have no dedicated dashboards | L | P2 | TBD |
| G19, G20, G24-G26 gaps | 5 Phase G gaps deferred — no artifacts address these | L | P3 | Phase G |
8. Highest-Impact Artifacts (Change Amplification)
These artifacts have the most downstream dependents. Changes here require broad cascade updates:
Tier 1: Critical Infrastructure (20+ dependents)
| Artifact | Dependents | Impact Scope |
|---|---|---|
| 16-prisma-data-model.md | 23 | ALL technical artifacts, dashboards, API specs |
| market-sizing.md | 18 | ALL business/financial artifacts, exec docs, dashboards |
Tier 2: Major Components (10-19 dependents)
| Artifact | Dependents | Impact Scope |
|---|---|---|
| gtm-foundation.md | 15 | GTM strategy, revenue model, pricing, unit economics |
| 19-state-machine-with-guards.md | 12 | Workflow artifacts, API transitions, event catalog |
| competitive-landscape.md | 11 | Positioning, messaging, pricing, feature matrix |
| 22-rbac-permissions-matrix.md | 11 | Security, compliance, API auth, dashboards |
| customer-segmentation.md | 11 | Pricing, ROI, GTM, personas, journeys |
| 71-api-endpoint-specification.md | 12 | All API consumers, frontend, integrations |
Tier 3: Moderate Impact (6-9 dependents)
| Artifact | Dependents | Impact Scope |
|---|---|---|
| 20-regulatory-compliance-matrix.md | 9 | Compliance artifacts, audit readiness, CAPA |
| competitive-positioning.md | 9 | Messaging, battlecards, GTM, dashboards |
| gtm-execution-plan.md | 9 | Product roadmap, hiring, ops readiness |
| 73-event-catalog.md | 10 | Event-driven architecture, agents, audit trails |
| 74-capa-workflow.md | 9 | Compliance, data model, state machine, RBAC |
Change Management Recommendation: Any change to Tier 1-2 artifacts MUST trigger a cascade update review using this impact register.
9. Dependency Validation Rules
9.1 Automated Checks (Proposed)
These checks should be automated via pre-commit hooks or CI/CD:
- Dollar Amount Format: All dollar amounts use
\$(backslash-dollar), not$ - TAM/SAM/SOM Consistency: Grep all artifacts for TAM/SAM/SOM, ensure they match market-sizing.md
- Pricing Tier Consistency: Grep for pricing tiers ($48K, $120K, $240K, $500K), ensure they match gtm-foundation.md
- Competitor Name Consistency: Grep for competitor names, ensure count and spelling match competitive-landscape.md
- Cross-Reference Integrity: Parse
referenced_byfrontmatter, ensure no dangling references - Artifact Count: Count all .md files, ensure 30-document-inventory.md matches
9.2 Manual Review Triggers
These changes require manual impact assessment:
- Market sizing change (TAM/SAM/SOM) → Review all 18 dependent artifacts
- Pricing tier change → Review 60, 71, gtm-foundation.md, dashboards
- Data model change (16-prisma-data-model.md) → Review all 23 technical artifacts
- State machine change (19) → Review workflow artifacts, API, event catalog
- Competitor addition/removal → Review all competitive artifacts + dashboards
10. Usage Instructions
10.1 When to Consult This Register
- Before modifying any Tier 1-2 artifact — check downstream impact
- After adding a new artifact — update inventory, add dependency edges
- During context compaction recovery — this is your source of truth for what's connected
- Before generating dashboards — ensure data sources are current
- During investor pitch prep — verify number consistency across exec docs
10.2 How to Update This Register
-
After adding a new artifact:
- Add to §1 inventory with line count, category, status
- Add dependency edges to §2 dependency graph
- Calculate downstream dependents
- Add to §7 technical debt if any gaps created
-
After modifying a high-impact artifact:
- Identify all downstream dependents from §8
- Create cascade update tickets
- Track completion in §6 finalization checklist
-
After closing a gap:
- Update §5 gap closure status
- Mark with ✅ and evidence
10.3 Maintenance Cadence
- Weekly: Update §6 finalization checklist progress
- Monthly: Validate dependency graph accuracy
- Quarterly: Audit for stale references, update technical debt
- Per-release: Full consistency pass across all artifacts
11. Appendix: Artifact Numbering Convention
The CODITECT Bioscience QMS platform uses a legacy sequential numbering system (01-75+) alongside semantic naming for new B.1/B.2 artifacts.
Legacy Numbered Artifacts: 01-75 (assigned chronologically) Semantic Named Artifacts: market-sizing.md, competitive-landscape.md, gtm-foundation.md, etc. (B.1/B.2 generation)
Future Recommendation: Transition to semantic naming for all new artifacts to improve discoverability. Numbers are hard to remember; market-sizing.md is self-documenting.
This register is the single source of truth for artifact dependencies and cascade update requirements. After any context compaction, read this document first to understand what needs updating.
Copyright 2026 AZ1.AI Inc. All rights reserved. Developer: Hal Casteel, CEO/CTO Product: CODITECT-BIO-QMS | Part of the CODITECT Product Suite Classification: Internal - Confidential