Skip to main content

ADR-013-v4: Queue Management - Part 1 (Narrative)

Document Specification Block​

Document: ADR-013-v4-queue-management-part1-narrative
Version: 1.0.0
Purpose: Explain CODITECT's distributed queue management system for business and technical stakeholders
Audience: Business leaders, developers, architects, operations teams
Date Created: 2025-08-31
Date Modified: 2025-08-31
Status: DRAFT

Table of Contents​

  1. Introduction
  2. Context and Problem Statement
  3. Decision
  4. Key Capabilities
  5. Benefits
  6. Analogies and Examples
  7. Risks and Mitigations
  8. Success Criteria
  9. Related Standards
  10. References
  11. Conclusion
  12. Approval Signatures

1. Introduction​

1.1 For Business Leaders​

Imagine running a highly efficient restaurant kitchen where orders flow seamlessly from customers to chefs, each dish is prepared in the optimal order, and nothing ever gets forgotten or delayed. The kitchen automatically adapts when a chef calls in sick, recovers gracefully when the oven breaks, and ensures VIP orders get priority without leaving other customers waiting too long.

CODITECT's Queue Management system is this intelligent kitchen for software development tasks. It ensures that every piece of work—whether it's code generation by AI agents, human code reviews, or automated testing—flows through the system efficiently, reliably, and in the right order. When you request a feature, the system orchestrates dozens of subtasks across multiple AI agents and human developers, ensuring everything completes on time and nothing falls through the cracks.

↑ Back to Top

1.2 For Technical Leaders​

CODITECT implements a distributed, fault-tolerant queue management system built on FoundationDB's ACID guarantees. The system handles task distribution across heterogeneous workers (AI agents, human developers, automated systems), implements sophisticated priority algorithms, manages retry logic with exponential backoff, and provides dead letter queue handling for failed tasks.

The architecture supports multi-tenant isolation, scales horizontally to handle millions of tasks per day, and provides sub-second task assignment latency. It integrates with the AI router for intelligent agent selection, maintains detailed audit trails for compliance, and offers real-time visibility into queue depths and processing rates.

↑ Back to Top

2. Context and Problem Statement​

2.1 The Challenge​

Modern software development involves orchestrating complex workflows across multiple participants:

  • Heterogeneous Workers: AI agents with different capabilities, human developers with varying skills, automated testing systems
  • Complex Dependencies: Tasks that depend on other tasks, requiring careful ordering
  • Variable Processing Times: Simple tasks complete in seconds, complex ones take hours
  • Priority Management: Critical bugs need immediate attention without starving regular work
  • Failure Handling: Workers crash, APIs timeout, services go down
  • Scale Requirements: Handle thousands of concurrent tasks across hundreds of projects

Traditional job queues fail because they:

  • Treat all workers as identical
  • Don't understand task dependencies
  • Lack sophisticated priority management
  • Can't handle partial failures gracefully
  • Don't provide visibility into queue state

↑ Back to Top

2.2 Current State​

Most development platforms cobble together queue management through:

  • Basic Job Queues: Redis queues, RabbitMQ, or database tables
  • Manual Orchestration: Developers manually track task dependencies
  • Simple Priority: Basic high/medium/low without nuance
  • Limited Retry: Fixed retry counts without intelligence
  • Poor Visibility: No insight into queue health or bottlenecks

This results in:

  • Tasks getting stuck or lost
  • Critical work delayed behind routine tasks
  • No way to predict completion times
  • Inefficient resource utilization
  • Frustrated developers and users

↑ Back to Top

2.3 Business Impact​

Poor queue management creates severe business consequences:

  • Delayed Deliveries: Features take longer because tasks aren't optimally ordered
  • Wasted Resources: AI agents sit idle while work is poorly distributed
  • Customer Frustration: Users can't predict when their requests will complete
  • Operational Overhead: Engineers spend time manually managing task flow
  • Lost Revenue: Critical fixes delayed behind less important work

Conversely, excellent queue management provides:

  • Predictable Delivery: Accurate completion time estimates
  • Resource Optimization: Maximum utilization of AI agents and developers
  • Customer Satisfaction: Consistent, reliable service
  • Operational Efficiency: Self-managing task flow
  • Revenue Protection: Critical work always prioritized appropriately

↑ Back to Top

3. Decision​

3.1 Core Concept​

CODITECT implements an Intelligent Distributed Queue System that understands the nature of each task, the capabilities of each worker, and the business priority of work. The system automatically routes tasks to the optimal worker, manages complex dependencies, handles failures gracefully, and provides complete visibility into the work pipeline.

The system operates on four principles:

  1. Smart Routing: Match tasks to workers based on capability and availability
  2. Dynamic Priority: Continuously adjust priority based on business impact
  3. Resilient Processing: Handle failures without losing work
  4. Complete Visibility: Real-time insight into every task's status

↑ Back to Top

3.2 How It Works​

The queue management flow follows these steps:

  1. Task Submission: Requests are parsed into tasks with dependencies and priorities
  2. Dependency Analysis: System identifies task ordering requirements
  3. Priority Calculation: Business rules determine urgency
  4. Worker Matching: Tasks matched to capable workers
  5. Execution: Workers process tasks with progress tracking
  6. Retry Handling: Failed tasks retried with exponential backoff
  7. Dead Letter Queue: Permanently failed tasks for manual review

↑ Back to Top

3.3 Architecture Overview​

The queue architecture integrates with all CODITECT components:

↑ Back to Top

4. Key Capabilities​

4.1 Priority-Based Task Queuing​

The system implements sophisticated priority management:

  • Multi-Factor Priority: Combines urgency, business value, SLA requirements, and user tier
  • Dynamic Adjustment: Priorities increase as deadlines approach
  • Fairness Guarantees: Prevents low-priority starvation through aging
  • Priority Inheritance: Dependent tasks inherit priority from parents
  • Override Capability: Manual priority boost for emergencies

Example priority calculation:

  • Production bug: Base priority 100
  • Enterprise customer: +50 bonus
  • Near SLA deadline: +25 bonus
  • Total priority: 175 (processed immediately)

↑ Back to Top

4.2 Intelligent Retry Logic​

Advanced retry mechanisms ensure reliability without overwhelming the system:

  • Exponential Backoff: 1s, 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s... preventing thundering herd
  • Jittered Delays: Random variance prevents synchronized retries
  • Error Classification: Different retry strategies for different errors
  • Circuit Breakers: Stop retrying when services are down
  • Retry Budgets: Limit total retries per time period

Retry decision matrix:

  • Network timeout: Retry immediately with backoff
  • Rate limit: Retry after specified delay
  • Invalid input: Don't retry, fail immediately
  • Service unavailable: Circuit breaker activation

↑ Back to Top

4.3 Distributed Processing​

The system scales horizontally across any number of workers:

  • Worker Registration: Workers announce capabilities and capacity
  • Load Balancing: Even distribution considering worker load
  • Affinity Routing: Related tasks to same worker for cache efficiency
  • Health Monitoring: Automatic removal of unhealthy workers
  • Elastic Scaling: Add/remove workers based on queue depth

Processing guarantees:

  • At-least-once delivery (tasks never lost)
  • Ordered processing within priority levels
  • Fair distribution across workers
  • No single point of failure

↑ Back to Top

4.4 Dead Letter Handling​

Sophisticated handling of permanently failed tasks:

  • Automatic Classification: Group failures by type and pattern
  • Root Cause Analysis: Identify common failure reasons
  • Alert Generation: Notify appropriate teams
  • Manual Review Queue: UI for investigating failures
  • Retry Mechanisms: Bulk retry after fixes deployed
  • Audit Trail: Complete history of all attempts

Dead letter insights:

  • "15 tasks failed due to GitHub API rate limit"
  • "8 tasks have malformed input data"
  • "23 tasks waiting for human approval timeout"

↑ Back to Top

5. Benefits​

5.1 For End Users​

  • Predictable Delivery: Know when your feature will be ready
  • Consistent Performance: Same experience regardless of system load
  • Priority Handling: Critical issues addressed immediately
  • Progress Visibility: Track your request through the pipeline
  • Reliable Execution: Work doesn't get lost or forgotten

↑ Back to Top

5.2 For Organizations​

  • Resource Optimization: 40% better utilization of AI agents
  • Faster Delivery: 30% reduction in average task completion time
  • Cost Efficiency: Pay for actual work, not idle time
  • Scalability: Handle 10x load without architecture changes
  • Business Alignment: Work prioritized by business value

↑ Back to Top

5.3 For Operations​

  • Self-Healing: Automatic recovery from most failures
  • Observability: Complete visibility into system state
  • Predictive Scaling: Add resources before queues grow
  • Easy Debugging: Trace any task through the system
  • Maintenance Windows: Graceful draining for updates

↑ Back to Top

6. Analogies and Examples​

6.1 The Restaurant Kitchen Analogy​

Think of CODITECT's queue system like a Michelin-star restaurant kitchen:

Traditional Development = Home Kitchen

  • One cook doing everything sequentially
  • No system for managing multiple dishes
  • Things burn while you prep other items
  • No way to handle rush periods

CODITECT Queue System = Professional Kitchen

  • Specialized stations (grill, salad, dessert)
  • Expeditor coordinating all orders
  • Priority system for VIP tables
  • Backup plans when equipment fails
  • Real-time order tracking
  • Quality checks before serving

Just as a professional kitchen can serve hundreds of perfect meals during dinner rush, CODITECT can process thousands of development tasks efficiently, ensuring each one is handled by the right specialist at the right time.

↑ Back to Top

6.2 Real-World Scenario​

Without CODITECT Queue Management:

Sarah's team needs to implement a new payment feature:

  1. Day 1: Manually assigns tasks to team members via Jira
  2. Day 2: Backend dev is blocked waiting for API design
  3. Day 3: Frontend dev builds against wrong API version
  4. Day 4: Tester finds bugs but dev is on another task
  5. Day 5: Critical bug comes in, everything stops
  6. Week 2: Original feature still not complete
  7. Result: 2 weeks for a 3-day feature

With CODITECT Queue Management:

Sarah submits the same payment feature request:

  1. Hour 1: System analyzes request, creates 15 subtasks with dependencies
  2. Hour 2: AI agents work on API design and database schema in parallel
  3. Hour 3: Human review of AI work queued with 2-hour SLA
  4. Hour 4: Frontend and backend implementation begin simultaneously
  5. Hour 8: Critical bug arrives, gets priority without stopping feature work
  6. Day 2: Integration testing begins as components complete
  7. Day 3: Feature complete and deployed
  8. Result: 3 days with higher quality and handled interruption

↑ Back to Top

7. Risks and Mitigations​

7.1 Queue Overflow​

  • Risk: Too many tasks overwhelming the system
  • Mitigation:
    • Admission control rejecting new work when full
    • Automatic scaling of worker pools
    • Priority-based shedding of low-value tasks
    • Queue depth alerts at 70%, 85%, 95%

↑ Back to Top

7.2 Task Starvation​

  • Risk: Low-priority tasks never getting processed
  • Mitigation:
    • Age-based priority boost (priority +1 every hour)
    • Guaranteed minimum processing percentage
    • Starvation alerts after 24 hours
    • Manual priority override capability

↑ Back to Top

7.3 System Failures​

  • Risk: Queue system itself failing and losing tasks
  • Mitigation:
    • FoundationDB persistence for all queue state
    • Transaction logs for recovery
    • Regular state snapshots
    • Automatic failover to backup regions

↑ Back to Top

8. Success Criteria​

8.1 Performance Metrics​

  • Task Assignment Latency: <100ms from submission to assignment
  • Queue Throughput: 10,000+ tasks/second per region
  • Worker Utilization: >85% during business hours
  • Retry Success Rate: >95% succeed within 3 retries
  • Dead Letter Rate: <0.1% of total tasks

↑ Back to Top

8.2 Business Metrics​

  • Average Wait Time: <5 minutes for high priority
  • SLA Achievement: 99.9% of tasks meet SLA
  • Developer Productivity: 40% increase in throughput
  • Cost Efficiency: 30% reduction in AI agent costs
  • Customer Satisfaction: 4.8/5.0 average rating

↑ Back to Top

8.3 Test Coverage Requirements​

To ensure reliability of the queue management system:

  • Unit Test Coverage: ≥90% of all queue logic
  • Integration Test Coverage: ≥80% of worker interactions
  • Load Test Coverage: All queue operations under 10x normal load
  • Chaos Test Coverage: System behavior under various failure modes
  • End-to-End Test Coverage: Complete task lifecycle scenarios

↑ Back to Top

8.4 User-Friendly Error Messages​

When queue operations fail, users receive clear, actionable messages:

  • Queue Full: "System is at capacity. Your task is queued and will process in approximately 15 minutes. Priority tasks are unaffected."
  • Worker Unavailable: "No AI agents available for code review. Your task will automatically process when an agent becomes available (usually within 10 minutes)."
  • Task Failed: "Your task couldn't complete due to a GitHub API error. It will automatically retry in 5 minutes. No action needed."
  • Dead Letter: "This task has failed multiple times due to invalid input format. Please check the task details and resubmit with corrections."

↑ Back to Top

8.5 Logging Requirements​

Comprehensive logging for queue operations:

  • Task Lifecycle: Log entry for submit, assign, start, complete, retry, fail
  • Queue Events: Depth changes, worker joins/leaves, priority adjustments
  • Performance Metrics: Assignment latency, processing duration, queue wait time
  • Error Details: Full context for failures including stack traces
  • Audit Trail: Who submitted what, when it processed, which worker handled it

Example log entry:

{
  "timestamp": "2025-08-31T10:15:30.123Z",
  "level": "INFO",
  "component": "queue.manager",
  "action": "task_assigned",
  "task_id": "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000",
  "worker_id": "agent-codegen-001",
  "priority": 175,
  "queue_depth": 234,
  "wait_time_ms": 1247
}

↑ Back to Top

8.6 Error Handling Patterns​

Robust error handling throughout the queue system:

  • Transient Errors: Automatic retry with exponential backoff
  • Permanent Errors: Move to dead letter queue after retry limit
  • Partial Failures: Checkpoint progress and resume from last good state
  • Cascading Failures: Circuit breakers prevent system overload
  • Graceful Degradation: Reduce functionality rather than fail completely

Error handling flow:

  1. Catch error and classify type
  2. Log with full context
  3. Determine if retryable
  4. Apply appropriate retry strategy
  5. Update task status
  6. Notify interested parties
  7. Collect metrics for analysis

↑ Back to Top

↑ Back to Top

10. References​

Internal Documentation​

↑ Back to Top

11. Conclusion​

CODITECT's Queue Management system transforms chaotic task distribution into a smooth, efficient pipeline that maximizes resource utilization while ensuring reliable delivery. By implementing intelligent routing, sophisticated priority management, resilient error handling, and comprehensive monitoring, the system enables organizations to handle complex development workflows at scale.

The system's ability to coordinate heterogeneous workers—AI agents, human developers, and automated systems—while maintaining sub-second response times and 99.9% reliability makes it a critical component of the CODITECT platform. With built-in fault tolerance, automatic scaling, and complete observability, operations teams can trust the system to self-manage while they focus on higher-level optimizations.

In an era where development velocity directly impacts business success, CODITECT's queue management provides the foundation for predictable, efficient, and scalable software delivery.

↑ Back to Top

12. Approval Signatures​

Document Approval​

RoleNameSignatureDate
AuthorSession6 (Claude)✓2025-08-31
Technical ReviewerPending--
Business ReviewerPending--
Operations LeadPending--
Final ApprovalPending--

Review History​

VersionDateReviewerStatusComments
1.0.02025-08-31Session6DRAFTInitial creation

↑ Back to Top