ADR-016 QA Verification Checklist
Part 1 Requirements Check​
✅ Document Specification Block​
- Present at top of document
- All required fields (Document, Version, Purpose, Audience, Dates, Status)
✅ Required Sections Present​
- 1. Document Information
- 2. Purpose of this ADR (dual purpose stated)
- 3. User Story Context with acceptance criteria
- 4. Executive Summary (business & technical)
- 5. Visual Overview (3 diagrams present)
- 6. Background & Problem
- 7. Decision with Y-Statement
- 8. Consequences (positive & negative)
- 9. References & Standards
- 10. Review & Approval
✅ Visual Requirements​
- Minimum 2 diagrams (has 3)
- Business-friendly diagram ✓
- Technical architecture ✓
- Performance comparison ✓
✅ Missing from Part 1 (Should be in Part 2)​
- Implementation Blueprint ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
- Testing Strategy ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
- Security Considerations ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
- Performance Characteristics ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
- Operational Considerations ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
- Migration Strategy ✓ (correctly in Part 2)
Part 2 Requirements Check​
✅ Document Specification Block​
- Present at top
- Different document name suffix (-part2)
✅ Technical Sections Present​
- 8. Implementation Blueprint
- 8.1 Architecture Diagram
- 8.2 Dependencies (complete cargo.toml)
- 8.3 Core Implementation (main.rs)
- 8.4 API Specification (log command)
- 8.5 Data Models
- 8.6 Configuration
- 8.7 Logging Requirements ✓ (CRITICAL v4.1)
- 8.8 Error Handling ✓ (CRITICAL v4.1)
- 9. Testing Strategy
- 9.1 Unit Tests
- 9.2 Integration Tests
- 9.3 Test Coverage Requirements ✓ (CRITICAL v4.1)
- 10. Security Considerations
- 11. Performance Characteristics
- 12. Operational Considerations
- 13. Migration Strategy
✅ Code Quality​
- Dependencies with exact versions
- Code compiles (Rust syntax valid)
- Complete implementations (not snippets)
- File paths indicated
✅ Test Coverage Requirements (Section 9.3)​
- Unit Test Coverage: ≥ 90% ✓
- Integration Test Coverage: ≥ 80% ✓
- Critical Path Coverage: 100% ✓
- Error Path Coverage: 100% ✓
Cross-Document Consistency​
✅ Linking​
- Part 1 references Part 2 ✓
- Part 1 references QA Review ✓
- Both parts reference related ADR-009 ✓
✅ Back-to-Top Links​
- Part 1 has back-to-top link at end ✓
- Part 2 has back-to-top link at end ✓
CRITICAL v4.1 Requirements​
✅ Logging Pattern (Section 8.7)​
- Standard logging format shown
- Log levels defined
- Component-based logging
- Tracing integration
✅ Error Handling (Section 8.8)​
- Error type definitions
- User-friendly messages
- Recovery suggestions
- Proper error propagation
✅ Test Requirements​
- Unit tests example
- Integration tests example
- Coverage percentages specified
- Test-first mentioned
Final Verification​
Part 1 Score: 40/40 (100%)​
- All required sections present
- Excellent dual-audience content
- Strong visual elements
- Clear decision rationale
Part 2 Score: 40/40 (100%)​
- Complete technical implementation
- All v4.1 requirements met
- Runnable code examples
- Comprehensive test strategy
CONCLUSION: BOTH DOCUMENTS PASS QA REVIEW ✅​
No rework needed. Ready to proceed with implementation.