ADR-027-v4: Implementation Coordination Framework (Part 1: Narrative)
Document: ADR-027-v4-implementation-coordination-framework-part1-narrative
Version: 1.0.0
Purpose: Define multi-agent coordination for ADR-to-deployed-production transformation
Audience: Project stakeholders, development teams, AI coordination architects
Date Created: 2025-09-01
Date Modified: 2025-09-01
Status: DRAFT
Table of Contents​
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Multi-Agent Coordination Architecture
- 3. Implementation Pipeline Stages
- 4. Agent Specializations and Dependencies
- 5. Code Generation and Testing
- 6. Build and Container Strategy
- 7. Deployment and Infrastructure
- 8. Monitoring and Operations
1. Executive Summary​
The Technical Challenge​
CODITECT v4 requires coordinating 15 specialized AI agents to transform 26 Architecture Decision Records into a fully deployed production system. Each ADR contains detailed technical specifications that must be implemented, tested, containerized, and deployed without human intervention.
Coordination Framework Overview​
ADR-027 establishes a systematic approach where:
- Agents work in waves based on dependency graphs
- File-level claiming prevents conflicts
- Continuous integration validates each component
- Automated deployment pipelines ensure production readiness
- Real-time monitoring enables rapid issue detection
Implementation Flow​
2. Multi-Agent Coordination Architecture​
ORCHESTRATOR Role​
The ORCHESTRATOR agent serves as the central coordinator:
- Parses all 26 ADRs to identify components
- Creates dependency graphs between components
- Assigns work to specialized agents
- Monitors progress via CODI logging system
- Manages handoffs between agents
- Enforces quality gates at each stage
Agent Communication Protocol​
Communication_Channels:
CODI_Logs:
- Real-time status updates
- File claim notifications
- Progress percentages
- Completion signals
File_System:
- Code artifacts
- Test results
- Build outputs
- Configuration files
Git_Repository:
- Version control
- Branch management
- Merge coordination
Conflict Prevention Mechanisms​
3. Implementation Pipeline Stages​
Stage 1: Specification Analysis​
Each agent begins by analyzing relevant ADRs:
class SpecificationParser:
def extract_requirements(self, adr_number):
# Parse ADR technical specifications
# Identify interfaces and contracts
# Extract test requirements
# Determine dependencies
return ComponentSpecification
Stage 2: Code Generation​
Agents generate code following patterns from foundation standards:
// Example: DATABASE_SPECIALIST output
pub struct UserRepository {
db: Arc<Database>,
tenant_id: TenantId,
}
impl UserRepository {
pub async fn create(&self, user: User) -> Result<User> {
let key = format!("{}/users/{}", self.tenant_id, user.id);
self.db.transact(|txn| {
txn.set(&key, &user)?;
Ok(user)
}).await
}
}
Stage 3: Test Generation​
Every component includes comprehensive tests:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_user_creation() {
let repo = UserRepository::new_test();
let user = User::new("test@example.com");
let created = repo.create(user.clone()).await.unwrap();
assert_eq!(created.email, user.email);
// Verify tenant isolation
let other_tenant_repo = UserRepository::new_test_other_tenant();
assert!(other_tenant_repo.get(user.id).await.is_none());
}
}
Stage 4: Integration Validation​
Agents validate interfaces between components:
Integration_Points:
DATABASE_to_API:
- Repository interfaces match handler expectations
- Error types properly propagated
- Transaction boundaries respected
API_to_FRONTEND:
- OpenAPI spec matches TypeScript types
- WebSocket message formats aligned
- Authentication tokens compatible
4. Agent Specializations and Dependencies​
Dependency Graph​
Agent Capabilities​
DATABASE_SPECIALIST
- FoundationDB client implementation
- Multi-tenant key schemas
- Repository pattern implementations
- Migration scripts
- Backup strategies
API_SPECIALIST
- Actix-web server configuration
- REST endpoint implementation
- JWT authentication middleware
- Request validation
- OpenAPI documentation
WEBSOCKET_SPECIALIST
- Real-time gateway server
- Binary protocol handling
- Connection management
- Message routing
- PTY integration
FRONTEND_SPECIALIST
- React application structure
- State management setup
- API client generation
- Component library
- Routing configuration
5. Code Generation and Testing​
Test-Driven Implementation​
Agents follow TDD principles from TEST-DRIVEN-DESIGN-STANDARD-v4:
// 1. Agent writes test first
#[test]
fn workspace_creation_requires_authentication() {
let app = create_test_app();
let response = app.post("/workspaces").send().await;
assert_eq!(response.status(), 401);
}
// 2. Then implements to pass test
pub async fn create_workspace(auth: Auth, req: CreateworkspaceRequest) -> Result<workspace> {
auth.require_authenticated()?;
// Implementation details
}
Coverage Requirements​
Each component must meet coverage thresholds:
Coverage_Requirements:
Unit_Tests: 95%
Integration_Tests: 80%
End_to_End_Tests: Critical paths only
Enforcement:
- Pre-commit hooks validate coverage
- CI pipeline blocks merges below threshold
- Agents regenerate tests if coverage drops
Performance Testing​
#[bench]
fn bench_user_repository_create(b: &mut Bencher) {
let runtime = tokio::runtime::Runtime::new().unwrap();
let repo = runtime.block_on(create_test_repository());
b.iter(|| {
runtime.block_on(async {
let user = User::new_test();
repo.create(user).await.unwrap()
})
});
// Assert performance requirements
assert!(b.ns_per_iter() < 1_000_000); // <1ms
}
6. Build and Container Strategy​
Multi-Stage Docker Builds​
CONTAINER_SPECIALIST creates optimized images:
# Build stage
FROM rust:1.75 AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY cargo.toml Cargo.lock ./
RUN mkdir src && echo "fn main() {}" > src/main.rs
RUN cargo build --release && rm -rf src target/release/deps/coditect*
COPY . .
RUN touch src/main.rs && cargo build --release
# Runtime stage
FROM gcr.io/distroless/cc-debian12
COPY --from=builder /app/target/release/coditect /app/
COPY --from=builder /app/config /app/config
EXPOSE 8080
ENTRYPOINT ["/app/coditect"]
Container Security​
Security_Measures:
Base_Images:
- Distroless for minimal attack surface
- Specific version pinning
- Regular vulnerability scanning
Build_Process:
- No secrets in images
- Non-root user execution
- Read-only filesystems where possible
Registry:
- Vulnerability scanning on push
- Image signing
- Access control policies
Build Pipeline​
7. Deployment and Infrastructure​
Infrastructure as Code​
CLOUD_SPECIALIST generates Terraform configurations:
# Cloud Run service definition
resource "google_cloud_run_service" "api" {
name = "coditect-api"
location = "us-central1"
template {
spec {
service_account_name = google_service_account.api.email
containers {
image = "${var.registry}/api:${var.version}"
resources {
limits = {
cpu = "2000m"
memory = "2Gi"
}
}
startup_probe {
http_get {
path = "/health/startup"
}
initial_delay_seconds = 10
period_seconds = 5
failure_threshold = 30
}
liveness_probe {
http_get {
path = "/health/live"
}
period_seconds = 10
}
}
}
metadata {
annotations = {
"autoscaling.knative.dev/minScale" = "2"
"autoscaling.knative.dev/maxScale" = "100"
}
}
}
}
Deployment Strategy​
Deployment_Configuration:
Strategy: blue_green
Stages:
- name: validate
steps:
- terraform plan
- security scan
- cost analysis
- name: canary
steps:
- deploy 1% traffic
- monitor metrics for 10m
- automated rollback on errors
- name: progressive
steps:
- increase to 10% (10m)
- increase to 50% (10m)
- increase to 100% (5m)
- name: verification
steps:
- end-to-end tests
- performance validation
- security verification
Service Mesh Configuration​
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: coditect-api
spec:
http:
- match:
- headers:
canary:
exact: "true"
route:
- destination:
host: coditect-api
subset: v2
weight: 100
- route:
- destination:
host: coditect-api
subset: v1
weight: 90
- destination:
host: coditect-api
subset: v2
weight: 10
8. Monitoring and Operations​
Observability Stack​
MONITORING_SPECIALIST implements comprehensive monitoring:
Metrics_Collection:
Application:
- Request rate, latency, errors (RED metrics)
- Business metrics (users, workspaces, executions)
- Resource utilization (CPU, memory, connections)
Infrastructure:
- Node health
- Network performance
- Disk I/O
- Container metrics
Custom:
- AI agent performance
- Code generation success rate
- Deployment frequency
Alert Configuration​
alerts:
- name: high_error_rate
expr: rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]) > 0.05
for: 5m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "High error rate detected"
- name: latency_spike
expr: histogram_quantile(0.99, http_request_duration_seconds) > 0.5
for: 10m
labels:
severity: warning
- name: pod_restart_loop
expr: rate(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total[15m]) > 0.1
labels:
severity: critical
Operational Runbooks​
Each alert includes automated remediation:
class RemediationController:
def handle_alert(self, alert):
match alert.name:
case "high_error_rate":
self.initiate_rollback()
self.page_on_call()
case "latency_spike":
self.scale_up_instances()
self.enable_cache_warming()
case "pod_restart_loop":
self.cordon_node()
self.reschedule_pods()
Performance Dashboards​
Conclusion​
ADR-027 provides a comprehensive framework for coordinating multiple AI agents to transform specifications into deployed production systems. Through careful orchestration, dependency management, and automated quality gates, the framework ensures reliable and repeatable deployments.
Related ADRs​
- ADR-001: Container Execution Architecture
- ADR-014: Deployment Pipeline
- ADR-016: CODI Command Interface
- ADR-024: Security Hardening Architecture
References​
- Kubernetes Operators Pattern
- Google SRE Practices
- The Twelve-Factor App
- Continuous Delivery Pipelines
Approval Signatures​
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | SESSION8-ORCHESTRATOR | 2025-09-01 | ✓ |
| Technical Review | Pending | - | - |
| QA Review | SESSION10-QA-REVIEWER2 | Pending | - |
| Final Approval | Pending | - | - |
Version History​
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-09-01 | SESSION8-ORCHESTRATOR | Technical implementation focus without financial content |