Skip to main content

CODITECT Agent Optimization Strategy

Date: 2025-09-22
Author: ORCHESTRATOR-SESSION-2025-09-21
Purpose: Define minimum viable and optimal agent configurations for CODITECT v4

🎯 Executive Summary​

The CODITECT agent ecosystem must balance comprehensive coverage with practical maintainability. This document defines three configuration levels: Minimum Viable, Standard Production, and Optimal Enterprise.

📊 Agent Configuration Levels​

1. Minimum Viable Configuration (MVC)​

Purpose: Enable core CODITECT development with essential agents only
Use Case: Small teams, MVPs, rapid prototyping

Core CODITECT Agents (10 required)​

All 10 core agents are essential:

  1. orchestrator - Coordination is mandatory
  2. rust-developer - Backend implementation
  3. frontend-developer - UI development
  4. database-specialist - FoundationDB expertise
  5. cloud-architect - Infrastructure design
  6. security-specialist - Security requirements
  7. testing-specialist - 95% coverage mandate
  8. monitoring-specialist - Observability
  9. qa-reviewer - ADR compliance (40/40)
  10. ai-specialist - AI integration

Essential CODITECT Sub-Agents (15 minimum)​

Architecture & Design (3):
  - coditect-architect
  - coditect-api-designer
  - coditect-multi-tenant-designer

Development (4):
  - coditect-rust-dev
  - coditect-actix-expert
  - coditect-fdb-designer
  - coditect-error-handler

Testing & Quality (3):
  - coditect-test-engineer
  - coditect-adr-reviewer
  - coditect-integration-tester

Operations (3):
  - coditect-codi-expert
  - coditect-monitoring-engineer
  - coditect-security-architect

Real-time (2):
  - coditect-websocket-architect
  - coditect-event-streaming

Total MVC: 25 agents (10 core + 15 sub-agents)

2. Standard Production Configuration​

Purpose: Full production capability with good coverage
Use Case: Most production deployments, growing teams

All Core Agents (10) +​

Standard Sub-Agents (35 total)​

Architecture & Design (6):
  - All MVC agents +
  - coditect-event-architect
  - coditect-microservice-designer
  - coditect-migration-architect

Development (8):
  - All MVC agents +
  - coditect-async-specialist
  - coditect-performance-optimizer
  - coditect-wasm-developer
  - coditect-trait-designer

Database (6):
  - All MVC agents +
  - coditect-transaction-optimizer
  - coditect-index-strategist
  - coditect-cache-designer

Testing (6):
  - All MVC agents +
  - coditect-performance-tester
  - coditect-security-tester
  - coditect-coverage-analyst

Infrastructure (5):
  - All MVC agents +
  - coditect-cloud-run-expert
  - coditect-ci-cd-architect

Frontend (4):
  - coditect-react-expert
  - coditect-typescript-specialist
  - coditect-state-manager
  - coditect-ui-architect

Total Standard: 45 agents (10 core + 35 sub-agents)

3. Optimal Enterprise Configuration​

Purpose: Maximum capability for large-scale enterprise deployments
Use Case: Large teams, complex requirements, multiple products

All Core Agents (10) +​

All Sub-Agents (75 total)​

Includes everything in Standard plus:

  • Advanced security agents
  • Specialized optimization agents
  • Compliance and audit agents
  • AI/ML integration agents
  • Migration specialists
  • Documentation experts
  • Incident response team

Total Optimal: 85 agents (10 core + 75 sub-agents)

📈 Scaling Strategy​

Phase-Based Growth Path​

Growth Triggers​

MVC → Standard Triggers:

  • Team size > 5 developers
  • Multiple concurrent features
  • Production deployment
  • Performance requirements
  • Security audit requirements

Standard → Optimal Triggers:

  • Team size > 20 developers
  • Multiple products/tenants
  • Compliance requirements
  • Complex integrations
  • Global deployment

🎯 Agent Efficiency Metrics​

Agent Utilization Targets​

High Utilization (>80% usage):

  • orchestrator
  • rust-developer
  • coditect-architect
  • coditect-test-engineer
  • coditect-adr-reviewer

Medium Utilization (40-80%):

  • frontend-developer
  • database-specialist
  • security-specialist
  • Most specialized sub-agents

Low Utilization (<40%):

  • Highly specialized agents
  • Incident response agents
  • Migration specialists

Cost-Benefit Analysis​

MVC Configuration:
  Setup Time: 1 week
  Maintenance: 2 hours/week
  Coverage: 70% of use cases
  ROI: Immediate

Standard Configuration:
  Setup Time: 1 month
  Maintenance: 8 hours/week
  Coverage: 95% of use cases
  ROI: 2-3 months

Optimal Configuration:
  Setup Time: 3 months
  Maintenance: 20 hours/week
  Coverage: 99.9% of use cases
  ROI: 6-12 months

📊 Resource Requirements​

MVC Resources​

  • Development Time: 40 hours setup
  • Compute: 4 CPU, 16GB RAM
  • Storage: 100GB
  • Maintenance: 1 part-time person

Standard Resources​

  • Development Time: 160 hours setup
  • Compute: 8 CPU, 32GB RAM
  • Storage: 500GB
  • Maintenance: 1 full-time person

Optimal Resources​

  • Development Time: 480 hours setup
  • Compute: 16+ CPU, 64GB+ RAM
  • Storage: 2TB+
  • Maintenance: 2-3 full-time people

🚀 Implementation Recommendations​

Start with MVC​

  1. Week 1: Deploy all 10 core agents
  2. Week 2: Add 15 essential sub-agents
  3. Week 3: Integration testing
  4. Week 4: Production deployment

Expand to Standard​

  1. Month 2: Add development agents
  2. Month 3: Add testing agents
  3. Month 4: Add infrastructure agents

Scale to Optimal​

  1. Quarter 3: Add specialized agents
  2. Quarter 4: Add compliance agents
  3. Year 2: Complete optimal set

📈 Success Metrics​

MVC Success Criteria​

  • ✅ All core workflows functional
  • ✅ 70% developer satisfaction
  • ✅ 1-day feature turnaround
  • ✅ 95% test coverage achieved
  • ✅ ADR compliance maintained

Standard Success Criteria​

  • ✅ All MVC criteria +
  • ✅ 90% developer satisfaction
  • ✅ 4-hour feature turnaround
  • ✅ Zero production incidents
  • ✅ Full security compliance

Optimal Success Criteria​

  • ✅ All Standard criteria +
  • ✅ 95% developer satisfaction
  • ✅ 1-hour feature turnaround
  • ✅ Proactive issue prevention
  • ✅ Industry-leading velocity

💡 Key Insights​

The 80/20 Rule​

  • 80% of value comes from 20% of agents
  • Core 10 + Essential 15 = 25 agents
  • These 25 handle most daily tasks

Diminishing Returns​

  • MVC → Standard: 2x agents, 1.5x capability
  • Standard → Optimal: 2x agents, 1.2x capability
  • Optimize for your actual needs

Maintenance Burden​

  • Each agent requires updates
  • More agents = more complexity
  • Balance coverage with maintainability

🎯 Recommendations​

For Startups/Small Teams​

Use MVC Configuration

  • Fast setup, low maintenance
  • Covers essential workflows
  • Grow as needed

For Growing Companies​

Use Standard Configuration

  • Good coverage/complexity balance
  • Room for specialization
  • Proven production ready

For Enterprises​

Use Optimal Configuration

  • Maximum capability
  • Handle any scenario
  • Justify with scale

📝 Conclusion​

The optimal number of CODITECT agents depends on your specific needs:

  • Minimum Viable: 25 agents for core functionality
  • Standard Production: 45 agents for comprehensive coverage
  • Optimal Enterprise: 85 agents for maximum capability

Start small, measure utilization, and grow based on actual needs. The modular design allows incremental expansion without disrupting existing workflows.

Remember: More agents ≠ better outcomes. The right agents for your use case = optimal productivity.