Knowledge Base Maintenance & Relevance Strategy
Comprehensive strategy for maintaining, updating, and ensuring the long-term relevance of the Coditect knowledge base as it grows over time.
Table of Contents​
- Overview
- Automated Update Strategies
- Relevance Scoring & Decay
- Quality Control Mechanisms
- Archival & Pruning Strategy
- Version-Aware Context Management
- Continuous Learning Pipeline
- Metrics & Monitoring
Overview​
The knowledge base contains 115,000+ lines of development history and growing. Without proper maintenance, it risks becoming:
- Stale: Outdated solutions that no longer apply
- Noisy: Too much irrelevant information
- Slow: Performance degradation with size
- Misleading: Old patterns conflicting with new best practices
This document outlines strategies to keep the knowledge base fresh, relevant, and performant.
Automated Update Strategies​
1. Session Auto-Capture​
Automatically capture and index development sessions:
class SessionAutoCapture:
def __init__(self):
self.capture_triggers = {
'session_end': self.capture_on_session_end,
'milestone_reached': self.capture_on_milestone,
'error_resolved': self.capture_on_resolution,
'pattern_detected': self.capture_on_pattern
}
async def capture_on_session_end(self, session):
"""Capture when a development session ends"""
if session.duration > timedelta(minutes=30):
summary = await self.generate_session_summary(session)
# Extract learnings
learnings = {
'problems_encountered': session.errors,
'solutions_applied': session.solutions,
'decisions_made': session.decisions,
'code_created': session.code_artifacts
}
# Add to KB with session context
await self.kb.add_session_learning(
session_id=session.id,
summary=summary,
learnings=learnings,
auto_captured=True
)
async def capture_on_resolution(self, error, solution):
"""Capture when errors are resolved"""
# Verify solution actually worked
if solution.verified and solution.tests_pass:
await self.kb.add_learning({
'problem': error.signature,
'solution': solution.implementation,
'category': 'debugging',
'auto_captured': True,
'verification': solution.verification_method
})
2. Agent Learning Hooks​
Integrate learning capture into agent workflows:
class AgentLearningHook {
constructor(private kb: KnowledgeBase) {
this.setupHooks();
}
private setupHooks() {
// Before action
Agent.beforeAction(async (action) => {
action.context = await this.kb.getRelevantContext(action);
});
// After action
Agent.afterAction(async (action, result) => {
if (result.success && result.learnings) {
await this.capturelearning(action, result);
}
});
// On error
Agent.onError(async (error, context) => {
await this.captureFailure(error, context);
});
}
private async captureLearning(action: Action, result: Result) {
const learning = {
trigger: action.type,
context: action.context,
approach: action.implementation,
outcome: result.outcome,
metrics: result.metrics,
reusable: this.assessReusability(action, result)
};
await this.kb.addAutomatedLearning(learning);
}
}
3. Git Hook Integration​
Capture learnings from commit messages and PR descriptions:
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/post-commit
# Extract commit message
COMMIT_MSG=$(git log -1 --pretty=%B)
COMMIT_HASH=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
# Parse for learning indicators
if [[ $COMMIT_MSG =~ "fix:" ]] || [[ $COMMIT_MSG =~ "solve:" ]]; then
# Extract problem/solution
python3 scripts/extract_learning_from_commit.py \
--commit "$COMMIT_HASH" \
--message "$COMMIT_MSG" \
--auto-add-to-kb
fi
Relevance Scoring & Decay​
1. Multi-Factor Relevance Scoring​
class RelevanceScorer:
def calculate_relevance(self, entry, query_context):
"""
Multi-factor relevance scoring:
- Temporal relevance (recency)
- Version compatibility
- Solution success rate
- Usage frequency
- Community validation
"""
# Base similarity score
base_score = self.vector_similarity(entry.embedding, query_context.embedding)
# Temporal decay (5% per day, configurable by category)
days_old = (datetime.now() - entry.timestamp).days
decay_rate = self.get_decay_rate(entry.category)
temporal_factor = (1 - decay_rate) ** days_old
# Version compatibility
version_factor = self.calculate_version_compatibility(
entry.version,
query_context.current_version
)
# Success rate (how often this solution worked)
success_factor = entry.success_count / (entry.usage_count + 1)
# Usage frequency (popular solutions score higher)
usage_factor = min(1.0, entry.usage_count / 100)
# Community validation (upvotes, confirmations)
validation_factor = self.calculate_validation_score(entry)
# Weighted combination
final_score = (
base_score * 0.3 +
temporal_factor * 0.2 +
version_factor * 0.2 +
success_factor * 0.15 +
usage_factor * 0.1 +
validation_factor * 0.05
)
return {
'score': final_score,
'factors': {
'base': base_score,
'temporal': temporal_factor,
'version': version_factor,
'success': success_factor,
'usage': usage_factor,
'validation': validation_factor
}
}
def get_decay_rate(self, category):
"""Different decay rates for different categories"""
decay_rates = {
'security': 0.02, # Security issues decay slowly
'debugging': 0.05, # Standard decay
'implementation': 0.07, # Implementation patterns decay faster
'ui_patterns': 0.10, # UI trends decay quickly
'architecture': 0.03 # Architecture decisions decay slowly
}
return decay_rates.get(category, 0.05)
2. Dynamic Relevance Adjustment​
class DynamicRelevanceAdjuster:
async def adjust_relevance(self):
"""Periodically adjust relevance based on usage patterns"""
# Track which entries are actually helpful
usage_stats = await self.kb.get_usage_statistics()
for entry_id, stats in usage_stats.items():
entry = await self.kb.get_entry(entry_id)
# Boost entries that are frequently helpful
if stats.helpful_count > stats.not_helpful_count:
boost = stats.helpful_count / (stats.total_usage + 1)
entry.relevance_boost = min(1.5, 1 + boost)
else:
# Demote entries that aren't helpful
entry.relevance_boost = 0.8
# Update version-specific relevance
if self.is_version_deprecated(entry.version):
entry.version_penalty = 0.5
await self.kb.update_entry(entry)
Quality Control Mechanisms​
1. Automated Validation​
class QualityValidator:
def __init__(self):
self.validators = {
'code': CodeValidator(),
'solution': SolutionValidator(),
'pattern': PatternValidator()
}
async def validate_entry(self, entry):
"""Validate entry before adding to KB"""
# 1. Check for duplicates
if await self.is_duplicate(entry):
return ValidationResult(
valid=False,
reason="Duplicate entry detected"
)
# 2. Validate content quality
content_validation = self.validate_content_quality(entry)
if not content_validation.passed:
return content_validation
# 3. Verify solution if applicable
if entry.has_solution:
solution_validation = await self.validators['solution'].validate(
entry.solution
)
if not solution_validation.passed:
return solution_validation
# 4. Check code examples
if entry.code_example:
code_validation = await self.validators['code'].validate(
entry.code_example
)
if not code_validation.passed:
return code_validation
return ValidationResult(valid=True)
def validate_content_quality(self, entry):
"""Ensure content meets quality standards"""
# Minimum content length
if len(entry.content) < 50:
return ValidationResult(False, "Content too short")
# Must have clear problem statement
if not self.has_clear_problem_statement(entry):
return ValidationResult(False, "Unclear problem statement")
# Must have actionable solution
if entry.has_solution and not self.is_solution_actionable(entry.solution):
return ValidationResult(False, "Solution not actionable")
# No sensitive information
if self.contains_sensitive_info(entry):
return ValidationResult(False, "Contains sensitive information")
return ValidationResult(True)
2. Peer Review System​
class PeerReviewSystem:
async def submit_for_review(self, entry, author_agent):
"""Submit high-impact entries for peer review"""
# Determine if review needed
if self.requires_review(entry):
review_request = {
'entry': entry,
'author': author_agent,
'reviewers': self.select_reviewers(entry),
'deadline': datetime.now() + timedelta(hours=24)
}
# Send to reviewers
reviews = await self.collect_reviews(review_request)
# Aggregate feedback
consensus = self.build_consensus(reviews)
if consensus.approved:
entry.peer_reviewed = True
entry.quality_score = consensus.quality_score
return await self.kb.add_reviewed_entry(entry)
else:
return self.request_revisions(entry, consensus.feedback)
def requires_review(self, entry):
"""Determine if entry needs peer review"""
return (
entry.category in ['architecture', 'security'] or
entry.complexity > 4 or
entry.impacts_core_system or
'breaking_change' in entry.tags
)
Archival & Pruning Strategy​
1. Intelligent Archiving​
class IntelligentArchiver:
def __init__(self):
self.archive_policies = {
'age_based': self.archive_by_age,
'relevance_based': self.archive_by_relevance,
'version_based': self.archive_by_version,
'usage_based': self.archive_by_usage
}
async def run_archival_process(self):
"""Run periodic archival process"""
candidates = await self.identify_archive_candidates()
for entry in candidates:
# Check if entry should be preserved
if self.should_preserve(entry):
await self.mark_as_historical_reference(entry)
continue
# Determine archival tier
tier = self.determine_archive_tier(entry)
if tier == 'cold':
# Move to cold storage (compressed, slow access)
await self.move_to_cold_storage(entry)
elif tier == 'warm':
# Keep accessible but deprioritized
await self.move_to_warm_storage(entry)
elif tier == 'delete':
# Safe to remove
await self.safe_delete(entry)
def determine_archive_tier(self, entry):
"""Determine appropriate archival tier"""
# Never delete security or architecture decisions
if entry.category in ['security', 'architecture']:
return 'warm'
# Cold storage for old but occasionally useful
if entry.age_days > 180 and entry.recent_usage_count > 0:
return 'cold'
# Delete if old, unused, and low relevance
if (entry.age_days > 365 and
entry.recent_usage_count == 0 and
entry.relevance_score < 0.3):
return 'delete'
return 'warm'
2. Smart Consolidation​
class SmartConsolidator:
async def consolidate_patterns(self):
"""Consolidate similar patterns into best practices"""
# Find clusters of similar solutions
clusters = await self.find_solution_clusters()
for cluster in clusters:
# Analyze effectiveness of each variant
effectiveness = self.analyze_cluster_effectiveness(cluster)
# Create consolidated best practice
best_practice = self.synthesize_best_practice(
cluster,
effectiveness
)
# Add new consolidated entry
await self.kb.add_best_practice(best_practice)
# Archive individual entries
for entry in cluster.entries:
entry.superseded_by = best_practice.id
await self.archive_entry(entry)
def synthesize_best_practice(self, cluster, effectiveness):
"""Create consolidated best practice from cluster"""
return {
'title': f"Best Practice: {cluster.common_problem}",
'problem': cluster.common_problem,
'solution': self.merge_effective_solutions(
cluster.solutions,
effectiveness
),
'variants': self.document_variants(cluster),
'evidence': {
'success_rate': effectiveness.average_success_rate,
'usage_count': sum(e.usage_count for e in cluster.entries),
'consolidated_from': [e.id for e in cluster.entries]
},
'category': 'best_practice',
'auto_generated': True
}
Version-Aware Context Management​
1. Version Compatibility Tracking​
class VersionCompatibilityTracker:
def __init__(self):
self.version_map = self.build_version_compatibility_map()
async def tag_version_compatibility(self, entry):
"""Tag entries with version compatibility info"""
# Extract version indicators
versions = self.extract_version_info(entry)
# Test compatibility if possible
if entry.has_code:
compatibility = await self.test_compatibility(
entry.code_example,
versions
)
else:
compatibility = self.infer_compatibility(entry, versions)
entry.compatibility = {
'verified_versions': compatibility.verified,
'likely_compatible': compatibility.likely,
'incompatible': compatibility.incompatible,
'breaking_changes': compatibility.breaking_changes
}
return entry
def calculate_version_relevance(self, entry, current_version):
"""Calculate relevance based on version compatibility"""
if current_version in entry.compatibility['verified_versions']:
return 1.0
elif current_version in entry.compatibility['likely_compatible']:
return 0.8
elif self.is_forward_compatible(entry, current_version):
return 0.6
else:
# Apply penalty for version mismatch
version_distance = self.calculate_version_distance(
entry.latest_compatible_version,
current_version
)
return max(0.1, 1.0 - (version_distance * 0.1))
2. Migration Path Documentation​
class MigrationPathDocumenter:
async def document_migration_paths(self):
"""Document how solutions evolve across versions"""
# Find solution evolution patterns
evolution_chains = await self.find_solution_evolution_chains()
for chain in evolution_chains:
migration_guide = {
'problem': chain.common_problem,
'evolution': []
}
# Document each version's approach
for version, solution in chain.version_solutions.items():
migration_guide['evolution'].append({
'version': version,
'solution': solution,
'migration_from_previous': self.extract_migration_steps(
chain.get_previous_version(version),
version
),
'breaking_changes': self.identify_breaking_changes(
chain.get_previous_version(version),
version
)
})
await self.kb.add_migration_guide(migration_guide)
Continuous Learning Pipeline​
1. Feedback Loop Integration​
class FeedbackLoopIntegrator:
def __init__(self):
self.feedback_channels = {
'explicit': self.handle_explicit_feedback,
'implicit': self.handle_implicit_feedback,
'performance': self.handle_performance_feedback
}
async def process_feedback(self, feedback):
"""Process various types of feedback"""
handler = self.feedback_channels[feedback.type]
await handler(feedback)
# Update entry metadata
entry = await self.kb.get_entry(feedback.entry_id)
entry.feedback_score = self.calculate_feedback_score(entry)
# Trigger re-evaluation if score drops
if entry.feedback_score < 0.5:
await self.trigger_entry_review(entry)
async def handle_implicit_feedback(self, feedback):
"""Learn from usage patterns"""
# Track solution application
if feedback.action == 'solution_applied':
await self.track_solution_application(feedback)
# Track search refinements
elif feedback.action == 'search_refined':
await self.learn_search_patterns(feedback)
# Track abandonment
elif feedback.action == 'result_abandoned':
await self.track_abandonment(feedback)
2. Pattern Evolution Tracking​
class PatternEvolutionTracker:
async def track_pattern_evolution(self):
"""Track how patterns evolve over time"""
patterns = await self.kb.get_all_patterns()
for pattern in patterns:
# Find variations of this pattern
variations = await self.find_pattern_variations(pattern)
# Analyze evolution
evolution = self.analyze_pattern_evolution(pattern, variations)
# Update pattern metadata
pattern.evolution_stage = evolution.stage
pattern.trending_direction = evolution.direction
pattern.superseding_patterns = evolution.superseding
# Alert on significant changes
if evolution.is_significant_change:
await self.alert_pattern_change(pattern, evolution)
Metrics & Monitoring​
1. Knowledge Base Health Metrics​
class KnowledgeBaseHealthMonitor:
def calculate_health_metrics(self):
"""Calculate overall KB health metrics"""
metrics = {
# Coverage metrics
'problem_coverage': self.calculate_problem_coverage(),
'solution_success_rate': self.calculate_solution_success_rate(),
'knowledge_gaps': self.identify_knowledge_gaps(),
# Quality metrics
'average_relevance_score': self.calculate_avg_relevance(),
'peer_review_rate': self.calculate_review_rate(),
'validation_pass_rate': self.calculate_validation_rate(),
# Usage metrics
'query_success_rate': self.calculate_query_success(),
'avg_results_usefulness': self.calculate_usefulness(),
'knowledge_reuse_rate': self.calculate_reuse_rate(),
# Maintenance metrics
'stale_entry_percentage': self.calculate_staleness(),
'archive_efficiency': self.calculate_archive_efficiency(),
'update_frequency': self.calculate_update_frequency()
}
metrics['overall_health'] = self.calculate_overall_health(metrics)
return metrics
2. Performance Monitoring​
class PerformanceMonitor:
async def monitor_performance(self):
"""Monitor KB performance metrics"""
performance = {
# Query performance
'avg_query_time': await self.measure_query_performance(),
'p95_query_time': await self.measure_query_p95(),
'cache_hit_rate': await self.calculate_cache_hit_rate(),
# Storage efficiency
'storage_size': await self.measure_storage_size(),
'compression_ratio': await self.calculate_compression_ratio(),
'index_efficiency': await self.measure_index_efficiency(),
# Growth metrics
'growth_rate': await self.calculate_growth_rate(),
'entry_velocity': await self.calculate_entry_velocity(),
'quality_trend': await self.calculate_quality_trend()
}
# Alert on degradation
if performance['avg_query_time'] > self.query_time_threshold:
await self.alert_performance_degradation(performance)
return performance
3. Automated Maintenance Scheduling​
class MaintenanceScheduler:
def __init__(self):
self.maintenance_tasks = {
'hourly': ['cache_refresh', 'usage_tracking'],
'daily': ['relevance_adjustment', 'feedback_processing'],
'weekly': ['pattern_consolidation', 'quality_review'],
'monthly': ['archival_process', 'version_compatibility_check'],
'quarterly': ['major_consolidation', 'schema_optimization']
}
async def run_scheduled_maintenance(self):
"""Run maintenance tasks based on schedule"""
current_time = datetime.now()
for frequency, tasks in self.maintenance_tasks.items():
if self.should_run(frequency, current_time):
for task in tasks:
try:
await self.run_maintenance_task(task)
await self.log_maintenance_completion(task)
except Exception as e:
await self.handle_maintenance_failure(task, e)
Implementation Roadmap​
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2)​
- Implement relevance scoring system
- Set up automated capture hooks
- Create quality validation framework
Phase 2: Automation (Weeks 3-4)​
- Deploy feedback loop integration
- Implement pattern recognition
- Set up monitoring dashboards
Phase 3: Intelligence (Weeks 5-6)​
- Deploy smart consolidation
- Implement predictive relevance
- Create maintenance scheduler
Phase 4: Optimization (Weeks 7-8)​
- Performance tuning
- Storage optimization
- Advanced archival strategies
Conclusion​
Maintaining knowledge base relevance requires:
- Automated Capture: Continuously learn from development activities
- Smart Scoring: Multi-factor relevance that adapts over time
- Quality Control: Validate and review high-impact knowledge
- Intelligent Archival: Keep KB size manageable without losing value
- Version Awareness: Track compatibility across system evolution
- Continuous Learning: Improve through feedback loops
- Active Monitoring: Track health and performance metrics
This strategy ensures the knowledge base remains a valuable, performant resource that grows smarter over time rather than just larger.