Post-Security Review Critical Path Analysis
Date: 2025-11-24 Context: Infrastructure deployment complete, security hardening planned Purpose: Define optimal path from infrastructure → working application → production security
Executive Summary
Current State:
- ✅ Infrastructure: 100% complete (GKE, Cloud SQL, Redis, VPC, Secret Manager, Cloud KMS)
- ❌ Application: 0% deployed (no backend running on GKE)
- ❌ Security Hardening: 0% implemented (current score: 35/100, target: 95/100)
Critical Decision: Deploy backend application first, then layer security hardening.
Timeline: 5-6 days total
- Days 1-2: Backend deployment and functionality testing
- Days 3-4: Security hardening (7 layers)
- Day 5: Verification and documentation
Rationale: Faster path to working MVP, easier debugging, incremental security implementation with lower risk of over-engineering before testing real traffic patterns.
📊 Infrastructure Status Review
✅ Completed Infrastructure (Deployed 2025-11-24)
Total Deployment Time: 12 minutes 40 seconds
| Component | Status | Configuration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| GKE Cluster | ✅ Running | coditect-citus-dev (us-central1, 3 zones) | Container orchestration |
| Node Pool | ✅ Active | Auto-scaling 1-5 nodes (n1-standard-2, preemptible) | Compute capacity |
| Cloud SQL | ✅ Operational | PostgreSQL 16, db-custom-2-7680, Regional HA | License and tenant data |
| Redis | ✅ Active | 6GB BASIC tier, RDB persistence | Session tracking, atomic seat counting |
| VPC Network | ✅ Configured | Private subnets with Cloud NAT | Network isolation |
| Secret Manager | ✅ Populated | 9 secrets stored | Secure credential storage |
| Cloud KMS | ✅ Tested | RSA-4096 asymmetric signing | License tamper-proofing |
| Firewall Rules | ✅ Active | Health checks, SSH, HTTPS, GKE webhooks | Network security |
Monthly Cost: ~$310/month (dev environment with cost optimizations)
Kubernetes Access:
gcloud container clusters get-credentials coditect-citus-dev \
--region us-central1 \
--project coditect-citus-prod
🎯 Critical Path Analysis
Current Blocker Identification
Primary Blocker: No application deployed to infrastructure
- GKE cluster is running but empty (no workloads)
- Database and Redis are ready but unused
- Ingress IP exists (34.8.51.57) but not configured for licenses.coditect.ai
- Cannot test license flow without backend
Secondary Concern: Security posture inadequate for production
- Current security score: 35/100 (target: 95/100)
- No Cloud Armor WAF (DDoS vulnerable)
- No rate limiting (abuse vulnerable)
- No edge authentication (unrestricted access)
Decision Point: Which blocker to address first?
🔍 Critical Path Options Analysis
Option A: Application First, Security Second (RECOMMENDED)
Timeline:
Day 1-2: Deploy Backend Application
├── Hour 1-4: Create Kubernetes manifests (Deployment, Service, ConfigMap)
├── Hour 5-6: Build and push Docker image to Artifact Registry
├── Hour 7-10: Deploy to GKE, troubleshoot, verify pods running
├── Hour 11-12: Configure basic ingress for licenses.coditect.ai
└── Hour 13-16: End-to-end testing (license acquisition, heartbeat, release)
Day 3-4: Security Hardening (7 Layers)
├── Day 3 AM: Cloud Armor WAF (8 hours)
│ ├── Deploy OpenTofu security policy
│ ├── OWASP Top 10 protection rules
│ ├── Rate limiting (100 req/min per IP)
│ └── Geo-blocking (US/EU allowlist)
├── Day 3 PM: Backend Security + Ingress (5 hours)
│ ├── Connection draining and session affinity
│ ├── Host-based routing (shared IP deployment)
│ └── SSL certificate management
└── Day 4: Kubernetes NetworkPolicy + Application Security (5 hours)
├── Pod isolation and default deny policies
├── Django JWT middleware
└── Multi-tenant row-level isolation
Day 5: Verification
├── End-to-end integration tests
├── Load testing (100+ concurrent users)
├── Security audit and penetration testing
└── Documentation and runbooks
Advantages:
- ✅ Faster Time-to-Value: Working MVP in 2 days vs 4 days
- ✅ Easier Debugging: Separate application issues from security issues
- ✅ Risk Reduction: Validate architecture with real traffic before hardening
- ✅ Iterative Security: Can adjust security based on observed patterns
- ✅ Team Velocity: Unblocks testing and integration work immediately
Trade-offs:
- ⚠️ Temporary Security Gap: 2-day window with minimal security (acceptable in dev environment)
- ⚠️ Potential Rework: May need to adjust security if application patterns differ from assumptions
Risk Mitigation:
- Deploy to dev environment only (not production)
- Limit access to known IPs during initial testing
- Run security scan immediately after deployment
- Implement logging and monitoring from day 1
Option B: Security First, Application Second (NOT RECOMMENDED)
Timeline:
Day 1-3: Full Security Hardening
├── Cloud Armor WAF (8 hours)
├── Backend Security Policy (2 hours)
├── Unified Ingress (3 hours)
├── Kubernetes NetworkPolicy (2 hours)
├── Application security preparation (3 hours)
└── Data layer and observability (remaining time)
Day 4-5: Deploy Backend to Hardened Environment
├── Create Kubernetes manifests
├── Build and push Docker image
├── Deploy to GKE
└── Debug issues (harder due to security layers)
Day 6: Integration Testing and Fixes
Advantages:
- ✅ Maximum Security: Protected from day 1
- ✅ Compliance: Meets security requirements immediately
Disadvantages:
- ❌ Slower Time-to-Value: 4-5 days to working system vs 2 days
- ❌ Complex Debugging: Hard to separate security issues from application issues
- ❌ Over-Engineering Risk: May configure security for patterns that don't match reality
- ❌ Blocked Progress: Cannot test or iterate until everything is ready
- ❌ Higher Failure Risk: All-or-nothing approach with no incremental validation
✅ Recommended Path: Option A
Justification
1. Development Environment Context
- This is a dev environment, not production
- Can afford brief security gap for faster iteration
- Real production will have full security from day 1
2. Architectural Validation
- Need to validate license flow works as designed
- Traffic patterns inform security configuration
- Database schema may need adjustments based on real usage
3. Team Efficiency
- Frontend and integration work can start immediately once backend is deployed
- Parallel work streams (backend testing + security hardening documentation)
- Reduces risk of context switching
4. Risk Management
- Security hardening is well-documented (120+ tasks in tasklist.md)
- Can implement security quickly once backend is stable
- Easier to debug application vs debugging application + security simultaneously
📋 Phase 1: Backend Deployment (Days 1-2)
Prerequisites Check
Required Files (check existence):
-
Dockerfilein backend repository -
requirements.txtwith all dependencies - Database migration scripts
- Environment configuration templates
GCP Setup:
# Verify access
gcloud auth list
gcloud config get-value project # Should be coditect-citus-prod
# Configure kubectl
gcloud container clusters get-credentials coditect-citus-dev \
--region us-central1 \
--project coditect-citus-prod
# Verify cluster
kubectl get nodes # Should show 3 nodes
Task 1: Create Kubernetes Manifests (4 hours)
Location: submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend/k8s/ (or create if not exists)
Files to Create:
1.1 ConfigMap (configmap.yaml)
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: license-api-config
namespace: default
data:
DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE: "license_platform.settings.production"
ALLOWED_HOSTS: "licenses.coditect.ai,34.8.51.57"
CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS: "https://licenses.coditect.ai,https://api.coditect.ai"
DATABASE_HOST: "10.x.x.x" # Cloud SQL private IP
DATABASE_PORT: "5432"
DATABASE_NAME: "coditect"
REDIS_HOST: "10.x.x.x" # Redis private IP
REDIS_PORT: "6378"
REDIS_DB: "0"
KMS_KEY_NAME: "projects/PROJECT_ID/locations/LOCATION/keyRings/KEYRING/cryptoKeys/KEY"
1.2 Secret (reference from Secret Manager)
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: license-api-secrets
namespace: default
type: Opaque
data:
DATABASE_PASSWORD: <base64> # Get from Secret Manager
REDIS_AUTH_STRING: <base64> # Get from Secret Manager
DJANGO_SECRET_KEY: <base64> # Get from Secret Manager
Better Approach: Use Workload Identity + Secret Manager CSI driver (implement in Phase 2)
1.3 Deployment (deployment.yaml)
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: license-api
namespace: default
labels:
app: license-api
version: v1
spec:
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: license-api
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: license-api
version: v1
spec:
serviceAccountName: license-api-sa # For Workload Identity
containers:
- name: django
image: gcr.io/coditect-citus-prod/license-api:latest
imagePullPolicy: Always
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
name: http
protocol: TCP
env:
- name: DATABASE_PASSWORD
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: license-api-secrets
key: DATABASE_PASSWORD
- name: REDIS_AUTH_STRING
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: license-api-secrets
key: REDIS_AUTH_STRING
envFrom:
- configMapRef:
name: license-api-config
resources:
requests:
cpu: 250m
memory: 512Mi
limits:
cpu: 1000m
memory: 1Gi
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/live
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 30
periodSeconds: 10
timeoutSeconds: 5
failureThreshold: 3
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/ready
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 5
timeoutSeconds: 3
failureThreshold: 3
1.4 Service (service.yaml)
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: license-api
namespace: default
labels:
app: license-api
spec:
type: ClusterIP
selector:
app: license-api
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 8000
protocol: TCP
name: http
1.5 Ingress (ingress.yaml)
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: license-api-ingress
namespace: default
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.allow-http: "false"
kubernetes.io/ingress.global-static-ip-name: coditect-ai-ip # Shared IP
networking.gke.io/managed-certificates: license-api-ssl
spec:
rules:
- host: licenses.coditect.ai
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: license-api
port:
number: 80
---
apiVersion: networking.gke.io/v1
kind: ManagedCertificate
metadata:
name: license-api-ssl
namespace: default
spec:
domains:
- licenses.coditect.ai
Validation:
kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f k8s/
Task 2: Build and Push Docker Image (2 hours)
Check for Dockerfile:
cd submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend
ls -la Dockerfile
If Dockerfile doesn't exist, create it:
# Dockerfile for Django License API
FROM python:3.11-slim
# Set environment variables
ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 \
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 \
PIP_NO_CACHE_DIR=1 \
PIP_DISABLE_PIP_VERSION_CHECK=1
# Install system dependencies
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \
postgresql-client \
libpq-dev \
gcc \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
# Create app directory
WORKDIR /app
# Copy requirements and install
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
# Copy application code
COPY . .
# Run database migrations on startup
RUN python manage.py collectstatic --noinput
# Expose port
EXPOSE 8000
# Run gunicorn
CMD ["gunicorn", "license_platform.wsgi:application", "--bind", "0.0.0.0:8000", "--workers", "4", "--timeout", "60", "--access-logfile", "-", "--error-logfile", "-"]
Build and Push:
# Authenticate Docker to GCR
gcloud auth configure-docker gcr.io
# Build image
docker build -t gcr.io/coditect-citus-prod/license-api:latest .
# Test locally first
docker run -p 8000:8000 \
-e DATABASE_HOST=localhost \
-e DATABASE_PASSWORD=test \
gcr.io/coditect-citus-prod/license-api:latest
# Push to Google Container Registry
docker push gcr.io/coditect-citus-prod/license-api:latest
Task 3: Deploy to GKE (4 hours)
Deployment Commands:
# Create namespace (if needed)
kubectl create namespace default # Usually already exists
# Apply manifests in order
kubectl apply -f k8s/configmap.yaml
kubectl apply -f k8s/secret.yaml # Or use Secret Manager
kubectl apply -f k8s/deployment.yaml
kubectl apply -f k8s/service.yaml
kubectl apply -f k8s/ingress.yaml
# Monitor deployment
kubectl rollout status deployment/license-api
kubectl get pods -l app=license-api
kubectl get svc license-api
kubectl get ingress license-api-ingress
Troubleshooting:
# Check pod logs
kubectl logs -l app=license-api --tail=100 -f
# Describe pod for events
kubectl describe pod -l app=license-api
# Check service endpoints
kubectl get endpoints license-api
# Test service internally
kubectl run -it --rm debug --image=curlimages/curl --restart=Never -- \
curl http://license-api/health/live
Common Issues:
- ImagePullBackOff: Check GCR permissions, image exists
- CrashLoopBackOff: Check logs, database connectivity, migrations
- Pending Pods: Check resource availability, node selectors
- Ingress not working: Wait 5-10 minutes for provisioning, check DNS
Task 4: Configure DNS and SSL (1 hour)
DNS Configuration:
# Get ingress IP (should be 34.8.51.57 - shared IP)
kubectl get ingress license-api-ingress
# Add DNS A record
# licenses.coditect.ai → 34.8.51.57
Using Cloudflare (if applicable):
- Log into Cloudflare dashboard
- Select coditect.ai domain
- Add A record:
licenses→34.8.51.57 - Set to "DNS only" (orange cloud off) for Google-managed SSL
- Wait for propagation (1-5 minutes)
SSL Certificate:
- ManagedCertificate will auto-provision (5-15 minutes)
- Check status:
kubectl describe managedcertificate license-api-ssl - Wait for
Status: Active
Task 5: End-to-End Testing (4 hours)
Health Check:
curl https://licenses.coditect.ai/health/live
curl https://licenses.coditect.ai/health/ready
License Acquisition Flow:
# 1. Register user (if not using Identity Platform yet)
curl -X POST https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/auth/register \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email":"test@example.com","password":"SecurePass123!"}'
# 2. Login and get JWT
curl -X POST https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/auth/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email":"test@example.com","password":"SecurePass123!"}'
# 3. Acquire license
JWT_TOKEN="<from login>"
curl -X POST https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/licenses/acquire \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"license_key":"test-key-123","hardware_id":"test-hw-456"}'
# 4. Send heartbeat
curl -X POST https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/licenses/heartbeat \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"session_id":"<from acquire>"}'
# 5. Release license
curl -X POST https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/licenses/release \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"session_id":"<from acquire>"}'
Database Verification:
# Connect to Cloud SQL via proxy
cloud_sql_proxy -instances=coditect-citus-prod:us-central1:coditect-citus-dev=tcp:5432 &
# Check data
psql -h localhost -U app_user -d coditect
SELECT * FROM licenses;
SELECT * FROM sessions;
SELECT * FROM tenants;
Redis Verification:
# Connect to Redis
redis-cli -h <REDIS_PRIVATE_IP> -p 6378 -a <AUTH_STRING>
# Check session keys
KEYS session:*
GET session:<session_id>
# Check seat counts
GET tenant:<tenant_id>:active_seats
📋 Phase 2: Security Hardening (Days 3-4)
Reference: See /docs/project-management/tasklist-with-checkboxes.md for complete 120+ task list.
High-Level Security Phases
Day 3 Morning: Layer 1 - Cloud Armor WAF (8 hours)
Objective: Deploy Cloud Armor security policy with comprehensive protection.
Key Tasks:
- Create OpenTofu module for Cloud Armor (
opentofu/modules/cloud-armor/) - Configure geo-blocking (US/EU allowlist: US, CA, GB, DE, FR, NL, SE, DK, NO, FI)
- Set up rate limiting (100 req/min per IP, 10-minute ban)
- Implement OWASP Top 10 rules (SQLi, XSS, malicious IPs, scanners)
- Enable adaptive protection (ML-based DDoS detection)
- Deploy with
tofu apply - Attach to backend service
- Test blocking rules
Deliverable: Cloud Armor policy deployed and active.
Day 3 Afternoon: Layers 2-3 - Backend Security + Unified Ingress (5 hours)
Layer 2: Backend Security Policy
- Connection draining (300s)
- Session affinity (CLIENT_IP)
- Health check optimization
- Cloud Logging integration
Layer 3: Unified Ingress
- Update ingress for host-based routing
licenses.coditect.ai→ Django License APIapi.coditect.ai→ FastAPI Cloud IDE (existing)
- Shared IP configuration (34.8.51.57)
- SSL certificate per hostname
- Cloud Armor policy attachment
Deliverable: Unified ingress with security policies.
Day 4: Layers 4-5 - Kubernetes Security + Application Hardening (5 hours)
Layer 4: Kubernetes NetworkPolicy
# Default deny all ingress
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-deny-ingress
spec:
podSelector: {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
# Allow license-api ingress from ingress controller only
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: license-api-allow-ingress
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: license-api
policyTypes:
- Ingress
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
name: ingress-nginx
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8000
Layer 5: Django Application Security
- JWT authentication middleware
- CSRF protection (Django built-in)
- Multi-tenant row-level security (django-multitenant)
- XSS protection (template auto-escaping)
- SQL injection prevention (ORM, no raw SQL)
Deliverable: Pod isolation + application-level security.
Layers 6-7: Data Security + Observability (Included Throughout)
Layer 6: Data Layer Security
- Cloud KMS license signing (already tested ✅)
- CMEK encryption at rest (already configured ✅)
- TLS 1.3 for all transit (GKE default ✅)
- Database encryption (Cloud SQL default ✅)
Layer 7: Observability & Incident Response
- Cloud Logging (already enabled ✅)
- Prometheus metrics export (add in deployment)
- Alerting rules (create in Phase 2)
- Incident response runbooks (document)
📋 Phase 3: Verification & Production Readiness (Day 5)
Integration Testing
End-to-End Flow:
# Automated test script
./tests/integration/test_license_flow.sh
Load Testing:
# Use Apache Bench or k6
ab -n 10000 -c 100 https://licenses.coditect.ai/api/v1/licenses/acquire
# Or k6
k6 run tests/load/license_acquisition.js
Expected Results:
- 99.9% success rate
- p95 latency <500ms
- No rate limit errors at 80 req/min
- Rate limit blocks at >100 req/min
Security Audit
Automated Scans:
# OWASP ZAP
docker run -t owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py \
-t https://licenses.coditect.ai
# Nikto
nikto -h https://licenses.coditect.ai
# SSL Labs
curl -X POST "https://api.ssllabs.com/api/v3/analyze?host=licenses.coditect.ai"
Manual Checks:
- Test SQL injection attempts (should be blocked by Cloud Armor + ORM)
- Test XSS attempts (should be blocked by Cloud Armor + Django escaping)
- Test rate limiting bypass attempts
- Test geo-blocking (VPN to non-allowed country)
- Test DDoS simulation (gradually increase to 1000+ req/s)
Documentation Updates
Files to Update:
README.md- Add deployment instructionsdocs/guides/DEPLOYMENT-GUIDE.md- Complete deployment walkthroughdocs/reference/API-REFERENCE.md- Document all endpointsdocs/security/SECURITY-POSTURE.md- Document achieved security scoredocs/workflows/INCIDENT-RESPONSE.md- Runbooks for common incidents
📊 Success Metrics
Application Metrics (Phase 1)
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Success | 100% pods healthy | kubectl get pods |
| Health Check | 200 OK | curl /health/live |
| License Acquisition | <1s p95 latency | Load test results |
| Database Connectivity | 100% success | Integration tests |
| Redis Connectivity | 100% success | Integration tests |
| SSL Certificate | Active, valid | curl -v https://licenses.coditect.ai |
Security Metrics (Phase 2)
| Metric | Current | Target | Achievement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security Score | 35/100 | 95/100 | +171% |
| Cloud Armor WAF | ❌ Missing | ✅ Deployed | DDoS protection |
| Rate Limiting | ❌ Missing | ✅ 100 req/min | Abuse prevention |
| Geo-Blocking | ❌ Open | ✅ US/EU only | Attack surface reduction |
| Authentication | ❌ Optional | ✅ JWT required | Access control |
| Network Isolation | ❌ Open | ✅ NetworkPolicy | Lateral movement prevention |
| Encryption | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Full stack | Data protection |
| Audit Logging | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Comprehensive | Forensics capability |
Operational Metrics (Phase 3)
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime | 99.9% | GCP monitoring |
| Error Rate | <0.1% | Application logs |
| Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) | <5 min | Alerting system |
| Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) | <15 min | Incident logs |
| Load Capacity | 100+ concurrent users | Load test |
🚧 Known Risks and Mitigation
Phase 1 Risks
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docker image build fails | High (blocks deployment) | Low | Test build locally first, fix dependencies |
| Database migrations fail | High (blocks functionality) | Medium | Review migrations, test on staging DB first |
| Ingress provisioning slow | Medium (delays testing) | Medium | Provision ManagedCertificate early, wait 15 min |
| DNS propagation delay | Low (minor delay) | High | Use DNS checker, wait 5-10 min |
Phase 2 Risks
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Armor blocks legitimate traffic | High (breaks functionality) | Medium | Test rules carefully, monitor logs, adjust thresholds |
| NetworkPolicy too restrictive | High (breaks pod communication) | Medium | Test incrementally, start with logging mode |
| SSL certificate renewal fails | Medium (HTTPS outage) | Low | Use GCP-managed certs, set up alerting |
| Rate limiting too aggressive | Medium (legitimate users blocked) | Medium | Start conservative (100 req/min), adjust based on metrics |
🎯 Decision Points
Critical Decisions Required
Decision 1: Django vs FastAPI Backend?
- CLAUDE.md references suggest Django backend exists
- Verify which framework is actually implemented
- Action: Check
submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend/for framework
Decision 2: Identity Platform Now or Later?
- Full security plan includes Identity Platform OAuth2
- Can defer to Phase 3 if using JWT-only initially
- Recommendation: Defer to Phase 3, use Django JWT for Phase 1-2
Decision 3: Production Deployment Timeline?
- This analysis assumes dev environment deployment
- Production requires additional approvals, testing
- Recommendation: Complete dev deployment + security, then plan production
📝 Next Actions
Immediate (Next 1 Hour)
- ✅ Document created - This critical path analysis
- ⏸️ Check backend repository - Verify Dockerfile, framework, current state
- ⏸️ Review Kubernetes manifests - Check if any exist in backend repo
- ⏸️ Get approval - Confirm Option A approach with stakeholder
Short Term (Next 24 Hours)
- ⏸️ Create Kubernetes manifests - Deployment, Service, ConfigMap, Ingress
- ⏸️ Build Docker image - Test locally, push to GCR
- ⏸️ Deploy to GKE - Apply manifests, monitor rollout
- ⏸️ Configure DNS - Add A record for licenses.coditect.ai
- ⏸️ Verify functionality - End-to-end license flow test
Medium Term (Days 2-5)
- ⏸️ Security hardening - Implement all 7 layers (120+ tasks)
- ⏸️ Integration testing - Automated test suite
- ⏸️ Load testing - Validate performance under load
- ⏸️ Security audit - OWASP ZAP, Nikto, manual pentesting
- ⏸️ Documentation - Update all guides, runbooks, API docs
📚 References
Related Documents
- tasklist-with-checkboxes.md - 120+ security hardening tasks
- license-platform-security-hardening.md - Complete security guide (38KB)
- security-index.md - Comprehensive security index with 2024-2025 standards
- security-manifest.md - Security documentation inventory
- critical-path-analysis.md - Original critical path (pre-infrastructure)
- gap-analysis.md - Current vs target state analysis
- implementation-status.md - Detailed implementation tracking
External Resources
- OpenTofu Docs: https://opentofu.org/docs/
- GKE Docs: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs
- Cloud Armor Docs: https://cloud.google.com/armor/docs
- Django Security Checklist: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/howto/deployment/checklist/
🏁 Conclusion
Recommendation: Proceed with Option A (Application First, Security Second)
Timeline Summary:
- Days 1-2: Deploy backend application to GKE, verify functionality
- Days 3-4: Implement 7-layer security hardening (120+ tasks)
- Day 5: Integration testing, security audit, documentation
Key Advantages:
- Faster time to working MVP (2 days vs 4 days)
- Easier debugging (separate concerns)
- Lower risk (incremental validation)
- Better security configuration (informed by real traffic patterns)
Next Step: Check backend repository structure and begin Kubernetes manifest creation.
Document Control:
- Version: 1.0
- Created: 2025-11-24
- Author: Claude Code + Hal Casteel
- Status: Final Recommendation
- Review Date: 2025-11-25 (after Phase 1 completion)