Skip to main content

CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform - Project Plan

Document Version: 1.0 Created: 2025-11-18 Status: Ready for Implementation Duration: 12 weeks (Phase 2-3) Budget: $107,520 (engineering + infrastructure) Team: 2 Full-Stack Engineers, 1 DevOps Engineer (part-time)


Project Overview

Purpose

Implement the CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform - a multi-tenant SaaS platform that transforms git repositories (checkpoints, conversations, tasks) into an interactive, searchable, AI-powered intelligence platform with enterprise-grade security.

Strategic Value

  • Executive Leadership: 80% reduction in status meeting time (10h/week → 2h/week)
  • Engineering Teams: 90% faster context discovery (1 hour → 5 minutes)
  • Auditors: 80% reduction in audit preparation time (40 hours → 8 hours)
  • Business: 108% ROI Year 1, 1,165% ROI Year 2

Architecture Highlights

  • Git-First: Database is derived view, git is source of truth
  • Multi-Tenant: PostgreSQL RLS for database-level tenant isolation
  • Semantic Search: ChromaDB vector embeddings for AI-powered discovery
  • Cloud-Native: GCP Cloud Run serverless architecture
  • Enterprise Security: RBAC (6 roles), comprehensive audit logging, SOC 2 ready

Implementation Phases

Phase 0: Foundation Complete ✅ (Weeks 1-2)

Status: ✅ COMPLETE

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Software Design Document (67,000 words)
  • ✅ C4 Architecture Diagrams (9 diagrams)
  • ✅ Architecture Decision Records (8 ADRs, 40/40 quality scores)
  • ✅ Database schema (PostgreSQL + ChromaDB + Redis)
  • ✅ Proof-of-concept (1,601 messages, interactive timeline)

Phase 1: Infrastructure & Core Backend (Weeks 3-6)

Goal: Production-ready backend infrastructure with authentication, multi-tenancy, and core CRUD APIs.

Duration: 4 weeks Team: 2 Full-Stack Engineers, 1 DevOps Engineer Budget: $40,000

Week 3: Infrastructure Setup

Deliverables:

  • GCP project provisioning (Cloud SQL, Cloud Run, Cloud Storage, Memorystore)
  • Terraform infrastructure-as-code (dev, staging, prod environments)
  • PostgreSQL database deployed with RLS policies
  • Redis (Memorystore) deployed for caching
  • CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions) for automated deployment
  • Environment configuration (.env templates, secrets management)

Agent Orchestration:

# Use devops-engineer agent for infrastructure setup
Task(
subagent_type="codi-devops-engineer",
prompt="Deploy complete GCP infrastructure for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow deployment/INFRASTRUCTURE-PLAN.md. Use Terraform for IaC. Deploy: Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL 15), Cloud Memorystore (Redis 7), Cloud Storage bucket, Cloud Run services (placeholder). Set up GitHub Actions CI/CD. Output: Working infrastructure + deployment documentation."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All GCP services provisioned and accessible
  • Terraform state managed in GCS backend
  • CI/CD pipeline deploys successfully to staging
  • Database migrations run automatically
  • Secrets managed via GCP Secret Manager
  • Infrastructure cost: <$200/month for dev environment

Week 4: Core Backend & Authentication

Deliverables:

  • FastAPI project structure (backend/)
  • SQLAlchemy 2.0 models (organizations, users, organization_members)
  • Pydantic v2 schemas for request/response validation
  • OAuth2 + JWT authentication system
  • User registration, login, logout, token refresh endpoints
  • Password hashing (Argon2) and validation
  • Email verification workflow
  • Session management (Redis-backed)
  • Unit tests (80% coverage target)

Agent Orchestration:

# Use rust-expert-developer for backend (adapts to Python/FastAPI)
Task(
subagent_type="rust-expert-developer",
prompt="Implement FastAPI authentication system for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/AUTH-SPEC.md. Create: User registration with Argon2 hashing, JWT access tokens (1h) + refresh tokens (7d), OAuth2 password flow, email verification, session management (Redis). Include: SQLAlchemy models, Pydantic schemas, 15+ unit tests. Target: 80% test coverage."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Users can register with email + password
  • Login returns JWT access token + refresh token
  • Token refresh works without re-authentication
  • Email verification required for account activation
  • Passwords hashed with Argon2 (cost: 16)
  • All auth tests passing (15+ tests)
  • API documentation auto-generated (FastAPI /docs)

Week 5: Multi-Tenancy & RBAC

Deliverables:

  • Organization CRUD APIs (create, read, update, delete)
  • Organization member invitation system (email invites)
  • Role-based access control (6 roles: Owner, Admin, Member, Viewer, Auditor, Executive)
  • Permission enforcement decorator @require_permission()
  • PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS) policies enforced
  • Organization membership management endpoints
  • Audit logging for all administrative actions
  • Integration tests for multi-tenant isolation

Agent Orchestration:

# Use multi-tenant-architect agent for RLS implementation
Task(
subagent_type="multi-tenant-architect",
prompt="Implement multi-tenant architecture with RLS for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/MULTI-TENANT-SPEC.md. Create: Organization CRUD APIs, member invitation system, RBAC with 6 roles (Owner/Admin/Member/Viewer/Auditor/Executive), @require_permission decorator, PostgreSQL RLS policies on all tables. Test: Cross-tenant isolation (20+ tests). Target: Zero cross-tenant data leaks."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Organizations can be created, updated, deleted
  • Users can be invited to organizations (email workflow)
  • RBAC enforced at API level (decorator-based)
  • RLS policies prevent cross-tenant data access
  • All administrative actions logged to audit_log table
  • Integration tests verify tenant isolation (100% pass rate)
  • Performance: Queries with RLS <100ms (p95)

Week 6: Project & Checkpoint APIs

Deliverables:

  • Project CRUD APIs (create, read, update, delete)
  • Checkpoint CRUD APIs (create, read, update, delete)
  • Message CRUD APIs (read only - synced from git)
  • Task CRUD APIs (read, update status)
  • Pagination support (cursor-based for large datasets)
  • Filtering & sorting (by date, focus area, status)
  • API rate limiting (100 requests/minute per user)
  • API documentation with examples

Agent Orchestration:

# Use senior-architect agent for API design
Task(
subagent_type="senior-architect",
prompt="Implement core CRUD APIs for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/API-SPEC.md. Create: Project APIs (CRUD), Checkpoint APIs (CRUD), Message APIs (read-only), Task APIs (read + update status). Include: Pagination (cursor-based), filtering (date, focus area, status), sorting, rate limiting (100 req/min). Add: 25+ integration tests, OpenAPI documentation. Target: p95 latency <100ms."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All CRUD operations working for projects, checkpoints
  • Messages read-only (will be synced from git)
  • Tasks can be updated (status changes tracked)
  • Pagination works with 1000+ records
  • Filtering and sorting functional
  • Rate limiting enforced (429 status code)
  • Integration tests passing (25+ tests)
  • API latency p95 <100ms

Phase 2: Git Sync & Search (Weeks 7-9)

Goal: Automated git synchronization pipeline and semantic search capabilities.

Duration: 3 weeks Team: 2 Full-Stack Engineers Budget: $30,000

Week 7: Git Ingestion Pipeline

Deliverables:

  • Git sync service (FastAPI background tasks)
  • Repository cloning and pull automation
  • JSONL parser (unique_messages.jsonl)
  • JSON parser (checkpoint_index.json)
  • Markdown parser (CHECKPOINTS/*.md)
  • SHA-256 deduplication logic
  • Git commit SHA verification
  • Sync event logging (sync_events table)
  • Idempotent sync (can run multiple times safely)
  • Error handling and retry logic

Agent Orchestration:

# Use orchestrator to coordinate git sync implementation
Task(
subagent_type="orchestrator",
prompt="Coordinate git ingestion pipeline implementation for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/GIT-SYNC-SPEC.md. Coordinate these agents: (1) senior-architect for service design, (2) rust-expert-developer for parser implementation, (3) database-architect for sync logic. Deliverables: Git clone/pull automation, JSONL/JSON/Markdown parsers, SHA-256 deduplication, git commit verification, idempotent sync, error handling. Target: Process 1,601 messages in <60 seconds."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Sync service can clone and pull repositories
  • All three export formats parsed correctly
  • Messages deduplicated by SHA-256 hash
  • Git commit SHA stored for verification
  • Sync completes in <60s for 1,601 messages
  • Sync can run multiple times (idempotent)
  • Errors logged and retried (3 attempts)
  • Unit tests for all parsers (100% pass rate)

Week 8: GitHub Webhook Integration

Deliverables:

  • GitHub webhook endpoint (/api/webhooks/github)
  • Webhook signature verification (HMAC-SHA256)
  • Automatic sync triggered on git push
  • Background job queue (Celery + Redis)
  • Webhook event logging
  • Retry logic for failed syncs
  • Webhook configuration documentation
  • Integration tests for webhook flow

Agent Orchestration:

# Use devops-engineer agent for webhook setup
Task(
subagent_type="codi-devops-engineer",
prompt="Implement GitHub webhook integration for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/WEBHOOK-SPEC.md. Create: POST /api/webhooks/github endpoint, HMAC-SHA256 signature verification, automatic sync trigger on push event, Celery task queue (Redis backend), webhook event logging, retry logic (3 attempts). Test: End-to-end webhook flow. Target: Push → sync complete in <30 seconds."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Webhook endpoint receives GitHub push events
  • Signature verification prevents unauthorized requests
  • Sync triggered automatically within 5 seconds
  • Sync runs in background (non-blocking)
  • Failed syncs retried 3 times with exponential backoff
  • All webhook events logged to sync_events table
  • Integration tests verify end-to-end flow
  • Latency: push → sync start <5s, sync complete <30s

Week 9: Semantic Search (ChromaDB)

Deliverables:

  • ChromaDB deployment (Cloud Run container)
  • Embedding generation service (OpenAI text-embedding-3-small)
  • Background job for embedding sync (Celery task)
  • ChromaDB collection setup with metadata filtering
  • Semantic search API (/api/search/semantic)
  • Full-text search API (/api/search/full-text)
  • Hybrid search API (/api/search/hybrid)
  • Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) for result merging
  • Search result relevance scoring
  • Performance testing (100 concurrent searches)

Agent Orchestration:

# Use ai-specialist agent for embedding generation
Task(
subagent_type="ai-specialist",
prompt="Implement semantic search with ChromaDB for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow backend/docs/SEARCH-SPEC.md. Create: ChromaDB deployment (Cloud Run), OpenAI embedding generation (text-embedding-3-small, 1536 dims), Celery background job for batch embedding, metadata filtering (organization_id), 3 search APIs (semantic, full-text, hybrid), Reciprocal Rank Fusion merging. Test: 100 concurrent searches. Target: p95 latency <500ms."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • ChromaDB deployed and accessible
  • Embeddings generated for all messages (1,601+)
  • Semantic search returns relevant results without exact keywords
  • Full-text search uses PostgreSQL tsvector
  • Hybrid search combines both (RRF merging)
  • Metadata filtering enforces tenant isolation
  • Search latency p95 <500ms for 100 concurrent users
  • Cost: <$20/month for OpenAI embeddings

Phase 3: Frontend & Analytics (Weeks 10-12)

Goal: Production-ready React frontend with interactive timeline, search UI, and executive dashboards.

Duration: 3 weeks Team: 1 Frontend Engineer, 1 Full-Stack Engineer Budget: $30,000

Week 10: Frontend Foundation

Deliverables:

  • Next.js 14 project setup (TypeScript + App Router)
  • Chakra UI component library integration
  • Authentication pages (login, register, verify email, forgot password)
  • Protected route middleware
  • JWT token management (localStorage + refresh flow)
  • API client (React Query + Axios)
  • Error boundary and error handling
  • Responsive layout (mobile, tablet, desktop)
  • Unit tests for components (Vitest + Testing Library)

Agent Orchestration:

# Use frontend-react-typescript-expert agent
Task(
subagent_type="frontend-react-typescript-expert",
prompt="Create Next.js 14 frontend foundation for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow frontend/docs/FRONTEND-SPEC.md. Setup: TypeScript + App Router, Chakra UI, auth pages (login/register/verify/forgot password), protected routes, JWT management (localStorage + refresh), React Query API client, error boundaries, responsive layout. Include: 20+ component tests (Vitest). Target: 100% TypeScript strict mode, WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Next.js app runs locally (npm run dev)
  • Auth pages fully functional (login, register, etc.)
  • Protected routes redirect to login if unauthenticated
  • JWT tokens refreshed automatically before expiry
  • API client handles errors gracefully
  • Responsive design works on all screen sizes
  • Component tests passing (20+ tests)
  • TypeScript strict mode enabled (zero errors)

Week 11: Timeline & Search UI

Deliverables:

  • Interactive timeline visualization (calendar view)
  • Year → Month → Week → Day drill-down navigation
  • Checkpoint detail page (messages, tasks, metadata)
  • Search interface (3 modes: semantic, full-text, hybrid)
  • Search filters (date range, focus area, role, tools)
  • Search result highlighting
  • Infinite scroll pagination
  • Loading states and skeleton screens
  • E2E tests (Playwright)

Agent Orchestration:

# Use orchestrator to coordinate frontend features
Task(
subagent_type="orchestrator",
prompt="Coordinate timeline and search UI implementation for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow frontend/docs/TIMELINE-SPEC.md and SEARCH-SPEC.md. Coordinate: (1) frontend-react-typescript-expert for timeline calendar view (year/month/week/day drill-down), (2) senior-architect for checkpoint detail page, (3) frontend-react-typescript-expert for search UI (3 modes: semantic/full-text/hybrid), filters, infinite scroll. Include: 15+ E2E tests (Playwright). Target: Timeline load <1s, search <500ms."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Timeline displays all checkpoints in calendar format
  • Drill-down navigation works smoothly
  • Checkpoint detail page shows all messages and tasks
  • Search returns relevant results in all 3 modes
  • Filters work correctly (date, focus area, etc.)
  • Search highlights matching keywords
  • Infinite scroll loads more results automatically
  • E2E tests passing (15+ tests)
  • Timeline load time <1s, search latency <500ms

Week 12: Executive Dashboard & Production Launch

Deliverables:

  • Executive dashboard page
  • Real-time metrics (messages/day, active projects, velocity)
  • Activity heatmap (GitHub-style contribution graph)
  • Focus area breakdown (pie/bar charts)
  • Export functionality (CSV, JSON, PDF reports)
  • User settings page (profile, organization management)
  • Admin panel (user management, role assignment)
  • Production deployment (Cloud Run)
  • Performance monitoring (GCP Monitoring)
  • Production smoke tests

Agent Orchestration:

# Use orchestrator for final production push
Task(
subagent_type="orchestrator",
prompt="Coordinate production launch for CODITECT Project Intelligence Platform. Follow deployment/PRODUCTION-LAUNCH-PLAN.md. Coordinate: (1) frontend-react-typescript-expert for executive dashboard (metrics, heatmap, charts, exports), (2) senior-architect for admin panel, (3) devops-engineer for Cloud Run deployment, (4) monitoring-specialist for GCP Monitoring setup. Deliverables: Working dashboard, deployed app, monitoring alerts, smoke tests. Target: 99.9% uptime, <1s page load."
)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Executive dashboard displays all metrics correctly
  • Charts and heatmaps render without lag
  • Export functionality generates correct CSV/JSON/PDF
  • User settings page allows profile updates
  • Admin panel works for user/role management
  • Production deployment successful (frontend + backend)
  • Monitoring dashboards configured (latency, errors, uptime)
  • Smoke tests passing in production
  • Performance: p95 page load <1s, API latency <200ms

Multi-Agent Orchestration Strategy

Agent Roles & Responsibilities

PhasePrimary AgentSupporting AgentsCoordination Method
Infrastructurecodi-devops-engineerdatabase-architect, security-specialistSequential execution
Authenticationrust-expert-developersecurity-specialistDirect implementation
Multi-Tenancymulti-tenant-architectdatabase-architect, security-specialistOrchestrated coordination
CRUD APIssenior-architectdatabase-architect, codi-test-engineerDirect implementation
Git Syncorchestratorsenior-architect, rust-expert-developer, database-architectMulti-agent coordination
Webhookscodi-devops-engineersecurity-specialistDirect implementation
Semantic Searchai-specialistdatabase-architect, monitoring-specialistDirect implementation
Frontend Foundationfrontend-react-typescript-expertsenior-architectDirect implementation
Timeline & Search UIorchestratorfrontend-react-typescript-expert, senior-architectMulti-agent coordination
Production LaunchorchestratorAll agentsMulti-agent coordination

Orchestration Patterns

Pattern 1: Direct Agent Invocation (Simple Tasks)

# Single agent completes entire task
Task(
subagent_type="<agent_name>",
prompt="<clear task description with acceptance criteria>"
)

Pattern 2: Sequential Agent Chain (Dependent Tasks)

# Agent A → Agent B → Agent C (sequential)
# Week 3: Infrastructure
Task(subagent_type="codi-devops-engineer", prompt="Step 1: Deploy GCP infrastructure")
# Wait for completion, then:
Task(subagent_type="database-architect", prompt="Step 2: Apply database schema")
# Wait for completion, then:
Task(subagent_type="security-specialist", prompt="Step 3: Configure security policies")

Pattern 3: Orchestrated Coordination (Complex Tasks)

# Orchestrator coordinates multiple agents in parallel/sequence
Task(
subagent_type="orchestrator",
prompt="""
Coordinate <feature> implementation with these agents:
1. <agent_1> for <task_1>
2. <agent_2> for <task_2>
3. <agent_3> for <task_3>

Coordination strategy: <parallel/sequential>
Deliverables: <list>
Acceptance criteria: <criteria>
"""
)

Quality Gates

Phase 1 Completion Criteria

  • All infrastructure deployed and accessible
  • Authentication system working end-to-end
  • Multi-tenancy with RLS verified (zero cross-tenant leaks)
  • CRUD APIs operational for all resources
  • Test coverage ≥80% for backend code
  • API documentation complete and accurate
  • Performance: API latency p95 <100ms

Phase 2 Completion Criteria

  • Git sync pipeline operational (webhook triggered)
  • Sync completes in <60s for 1,601 messages
  • Semantic search returns relevant results
  • Hybrid search combines full-text + semantic correctly
  • Search latency p95 <500ms for 100 concurrent users
  • Embedding generation cost <$20/month
  • Background jobs processing without delays

Phase 3 Completion Criteria

  • Frontend deployed to production (Cloud Run)
  • Timeline visualization fully functional
  • Search UI works in all 3 modes
  • Executive dashboard displays real-time metrics
  • E2E tests passing (100% pass rate)
  • Performance: page load p95 <1s
  • Production uptime 99.9% (first 30 days)
  • Zero critical security vulnerabilities

Risk Management

High-Priority Risks

RiskProbabilityImpactMitigation Strategy
RLS performance degradationMediumHighImplement indexed RLS policies, query optimization, read replicas
ChromaDB scaling issuesMediumMediumUse Cloud Run auto-scaling, batch embeddings, rate limiting
GitHub webhook reliabilityLowHighImplement retry logic, fallback polling, sync event monitoring
Budget overrunLowHighWeekly cost monitoring, alerts at 80% budget, auto-scale limits
Timeline delaysMediumMedium20% time buffer, parallel agent execution, daily standups

Mitigation Actions

RLS Performance:

  • Create composite indexes on (organization_id, created_at)
  • Use EXPLAIN ANALYZE to identify slow queries
  • Deploy read replicas for reporting queries
  • Implement Redis caching for frequently accessed data

ChromaDB Scaling:

  • Start with Cloud Run (0-10 instances auto-scale)
  • Monitor memory usage (target: <80% utilization)
  • Batch embeddings (100 messages at a time)
  • Rate limit search API (10 requests/second per user)

Webhook Reliability:

  • Verify HMAC signature on every webhook
  • Log all webhook events to sync_events table
  • Retry failed syncs 3 times (exponential backoff)
  • Implement fallback polling (every 15 minutes)

Success Metrics

Technical Metrics (Month 3)

MetricTargetCurrentStatus
API Latency (p95)<100msTBD⏸️
Search Latency (p95)<500msTBD⏸️
Uptime99.9%TBD⏸️
Test Coverage≥80%TBD⏸️
Page Load (p95)<1sTBD⏸️
Database Query (p95)<100msTBD⏸️

Adoption Metrics (Month 6)

User TypeTarget Weekly UsageCurrentStatus
Executive Leadership100% (4/4)TBD⏸️
Senior Leadership80% (12/15)TBD⏸️
Auditors100% (all audits)TBD⏸️
Team Members60% (30/50)TBD⏸️

Business Metrics (Year 1)

MetricTargetCurrentStatus
Total Users200TBD⏸️
ARR$96,000TBD⏸️
NPS≥50TBD⏸️
Churn Rate<5%/yearTBD⏸️
Time Savings80% (executives)TBD⏸️

Budget Breakdown

Engineering Costs

RoleRateWeeksTotal
Full-Stack Engineer #1$2,500/week12 weeks$30,000
Full-Stack Engineer #2$2,500/week12 weeks$30,000
DevOps Engineer (part-time)$2,000/week6 weeks$12,000
Total Engineering$72,000

Infrastructure Costs (Year 1)

ServiceMonthlyYear 1Notes
Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL)$180$2,160db-n1-standard-2, HA
Cloud Run (Backend)$120$1,4402-10 instances
Cloud Run (Frontend)$60$7201-5 instances
Cloud Memorystore (Redis)$80$9605GB HA cluster
Cloud Storage$20$2401TB exports
ChromaDB (Cloud Run)$60$7201-3 instances
Load Balancer$20$240SSL termination
OpenAI Embeddings$20$240text-embedding-3-small
Monitoring & Logging$40$480GCP native
Total Infrastructure$600$7,200

Total Budget

CategoryAmount
Engineering (12 weeks)$72,000
Infrastructure (Year 1)$7,200
Contingency (20%)$15,840
Total Year 1$95,040

Note: Budget excludes Phase 1 (architecture - already complete).


Delivery Schedule

Weekly Milestones

WeekPhaseMilestoneAgent(s)Deliverable
3InfrastructureGCP deploymentcodi-devops-engineerWorking infrastructure
4Core BackendAuthenticationrust-expert-developerLogin/register working
5Multi-TenancyRBAC + RLSmulti-tenant-architectTenant isolation verified
6CRUD APIsProject/Checkpoint APIssenior-architectCRUD operations working
7Git SyncIngestion pipelineorchestratorSync from git working
8WebhooksGitHub integrationcodi-devops-engineerAuto-sync on push
9Semantic SearchChromaDBai-specialistSearch working
10FrontendNext.js foundationfrontend-react-typescript-expertAuth pages working
11UI FeaturesTimeline + SearchorchestratorTimeline + search UI
12ProductionDashboard + DeployorchestratorProduction launch

Checkpoint Reviews

Week 6 Review: Phase 1 Complete

  • Infrastructure operational
  • Authentication working
  • Multi-tenancy verified
  • CRUD APIs functional
  • GO/NO-GO Decision: Proceed to Phase 2

Week 9 Review: Phase 2 Complete

  • Git sync pipeline operational
  • Semantic search working
  • Performance targets met
  • GO/NO-GO Decision: Proceed to Phase 3

Week 12 Review: Production Launch

  • Frontend deployed
  • Dashboard operational
  • Production smoke tests passing
  • GO/NO-GO Decision: Public beta launch

Next Steps

Immediate Actions (This Week)

  1. Read Complete Documentation

    • Review all ADRs in docs/adrs/
    • Read software-design-document-project-intelligence.md
    • Study database-architecture-project-intelligence.md
  2. Environment Setup

    • Set up GCP project (coditect-project-intelligence-prod)
    • Configure GitHub repository secrets
    • Create service accounts for deployment
    • Set up local development environment
  3. Kickoff Meeting

    • Team introduction
    • Architecture walkthrough
    • Tool access provisioning
    • First sprint planning (Week 3)

Week 3 Kickoff (Phase 1 Start)

  1. Daily Standups: 9:00 AM EST (15 minutes)
  2. Progress Tracking: tasklist-with-checkboxes.md
  3. Checkpoint: Friday EOD - Infrastructure deployed
  4. Blockers: Escalate to project lead immediately

Contact & Escalation

Project Lead: TBD Technical Lead: TBD DevOps Lead: TBD

Escalation Path:

  1. Blocker → Technical Lead (same day)
  2. Risk → Project Lead (within 24 hours)
  3. Budget concern → CFO/CEO (within 48 hours)

Status: ⏸️ READY FOR KICKOFF Next Milestone: Week 3 - Infrastructure Setup Last Updated: November 18, 2025 Repository: https://github.com/coditect-ai/coditect-project-intelligence Owner: AZ1.AI INC