Skip to main content

Practical Deployment-Aware Reorganization Plan

Date: 2025-11-26 Status: PROPOSED (NOT EXECUTING YET) Priority: P0 - Don't Break Production Execution Time: 4-6 hours (phased over 2 weeks for safety)


Executive Summary

Goal: Reorganize 46 submodules to clarify deployed vs. development components WITHOUT breaking production systems.

Approach: Incremental, phased migration with comprehensive safety checks.

Key Principle: SAFETY FIRST - Every phase includes rollback plan and production verification.


Core Philosophy: Progressive Disclosure

Current Problem: All 46 submodules appear equally important.

Solution: Organize by proximity to production:

  1. Tier 0: Deployed products (must never break)
  2. Tier 1: Supporting infrastructure (critical dependencies)
  3. Tier 2: Active development (important but not deployed)
  4. Tier 3: Research/content (safe to reorganize)

Phase 0: Preparation (No Changes, 2 hours)

Objectives

  • Backup everything
  • Document current state
  • Create rollback procedures
  • Get stakeholder approval

Tasks

Task 1: Complete Backup

# Backup master repo
cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/
tar -czf coditect-rollout-master-backup-$(date +%Y%m%d).tar.gz coditect-rollout-master/

# Verify backup
tar -tzf coditect-rollout-master-backup-*.tar.gz | head -20

Task 2: Document Current Deployment State

# Capture current git status
cd coditect-rollout-master
git submodule status > docs/reorganization-plan/00-CURRENT-SUBMODULE-STATE.txt
git remote -v >> docs/reorganization-plan/00-CURRENT-SUBMODULE-STATE.txt

Task 3: Verify Production Deployments

# Check coditect.ai IDE
curl -I https://coditect.ai
curl -I https://coditect.ai/theia

# Check workflow.coditect.ai
curl -I https://workflow.coditect.ai

# Document GKE state
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces > docs/reorganization-plan/00-GKE-PRODUCTION-STATE.txt
kubectl get ingress --all-namespaces >> docs/reorganization-plan/00-GKE-PRODUCTION-STATE.txt

Task 4: Create Rollback Script

# Create rollback script
cat > scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh <<'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
# Rollback to pre-reorganization state
set -e

echo "Rolling back to backup..."
cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/

# Find latest backup
BACKUP=$(ls -t coditect-rollout-master-backup-*.tar.gz | head -1)
echo "Using backup: $BACKUP"

# Extract to temporary location
tar -xzf "$BACKUP" -C /tmp/

# Move current to safety
mv coditect-rollout-master coditect-rollout-master-FAILED

# Restore backup
mv /tmp/coditect-rollout-master coditect-rollout-master

echo "Rollback complete. Original at coditect-rollout-master-FAILED/"
EOF

chmod +x scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh

Task 5: Stakeholder Approval Checklist

Required Approvals:

  • Technical Lead: Hal Casteel
  • Review reorganization plan
  • Confirm backup procedures
  • Approve phased migration strategy

Deliverables

  • ✅ Complete backup created
  • ✅ Current state documented
  • ✅ Production verified operational
  • ✅ Rollback script tested
  • ✅ Stakeholder approval obtained

Phase 1: Documentation Updates (No Moves, 1 hour)

Objectives

  • Update README files with deployment status
  • Add DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md to each submodule
  • Fix documentation discrepancies
  • NO file moves, NO git operations beyond documentation

Safety Level: 🟢 GREEN (Documentation only, cannot break production)

Tasks

Task 1.1: Update Deployed Product READMEs

Submodules to Update:

  1. cloud-backend/README.md
  2. cloud-ide/README.md
  3. labs-workflow/README.md

Changes:

  • Add prominent "PRODUCTION STATUS" badge
  • Add deployment URL
  • Clarify deployed vs. development status

Example for cloud-ide/README.md:

# coditect-cloud-ide

**🚀 PRODUCTION DEPLOYED** - https://coditect.ai
**Status**: Production Operational (Build #32)
**Priority**: P0 - Production Critical
**Category**: cloud → products (planned reorganization)

## ⚠️ PRODUCTION WARNING
This repository powers the live CODITECT IDE at https://coditect.ai.
Changes must be tested thoroughly before deployment.

[Rest of README continues...]

Task 1.2: Create DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md for All Submodules

Template:

# Deployment Status

**Repository**: [submodule-name]
**Deployment Status**: [DEPLOYED/SUPPORTING/DEVELOPMENT/RESEARCH/DOCUMENTATION]
**Priority**: [P0/P1/P2/P3]
**Category**: [current] → [proposed reorganization]

## Production Information

**Deployed Product**: [product name or N/A]
**URL**: [https://... or N/A]
**Infrastructure**: [GKE/Cloud Run/Static/N/A]
**Dependencies**: [list of dependent submodules]

## Safety Considerations

**Breaking Changes Impact**: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/None]
**Rollback Procedure**: [describe]
**Deployment Verification**: [how to verify deployment]

## Reorganization Plan

**Current Location**: `submodules/[category]/[name]`
**Proposed Location**: `[new location]`
**Migration Phase**: [Phase X]
**Estimated Downtime**: [0 min/planned maintenance/N/A]

---
**Last Updated**: 2025-11-26

Apply to: All 46 submodules (automated script recommended)

Task 1.3: Fix Documentation Discrepancies

Priority Issue: cloud-backend README claims FastAPI, but it's Django!

Fix:

cd submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend

# Update README.md to reflect Django reality
# Replace FastAPI references with Django/DRF
# Update technology stack section
# Add note about hybrid architecture (Django + FastAPI)

Updated Section:

## Technology Stack

**Primary Framework**: Django 5.2 + Django REST Framework
**Multi-Tenancy**: django-multitenant
**Database**: PostgreSQL (Cloud SQL)
**Authentication**: JWT (SimpleJWT)
**API Documentation**: drf-spectacular (Swagger/ReDoc)

**Note**: This project uses Django for the multi-tenant platform (user registration,
licensing, payment). FastAPI may be used for specific high-performance endpoints.

Deliverables

  • ✅ All deployed product READMEs updated with PRODUCTION status
  • ✅ DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md created for all 46 submodules
  • ✅ Documentation discrepancies fixed (FastAPI vs Django)

Verification

# Verify all READMEs updated
grep -l "PRODUCTION DEPLOYED" submodules/*/README.md

# Verify DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md created
find submodules -name "DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md" | wc -l
# Should output: 46

Phase 2: Create New Directory Structure (No Moves, 30 min)

Objectives

  • Create proposed directory structure
  • DO NOT move any submodules yet
  • Validate structure readability
  • Get final approval before moves

Safety Level: 🟢 GREEN (Creating empty directories, cannot break anything)

Proposed Structure

coditect-rollout-master/
├── products/ # Deployed customer-facing products
│ ├── coditect-ide/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move cloud/coditect-cloud-ide here)
│ ├── workflow-analysis/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move labs/coditect-labs-workflow here)
│ └── README.md # Directory explanation

├── platform/ # Core platform (Phase 1 deployment)
│ ├── multi-tenant/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move cloud/coditect-cloud-backend here)
│ ├── license-server/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move ops/coditect-ops-license here)
│ └── README.md

├── infrastructure/ # Deployment infrastructure
│ ├── gcp-terraform/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move cloud/coditect-cloud-infra here)
│ └── README.md

├── framework/ # Distributed intelligence
│ ├── core/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move core/coditect-core-framework here)
│ └── README.md

├── services/ # Backend microservices (future)
│ ├── admin-dashboard/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move cloud/coditect-cloud-frontend here)
│ └── README.md

├── development/ # In-progress features
│ ├── dev-tools/ # PLACEHOLDER (will consolidate dev/* here)
│ └── README.md

├── research/ # Experimental/POC
│ ├── labs/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move labs/* except workflow here)
│ └── README.md

├── content/ # Documentation & marketing
│ ├── documentation/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move docs/* here)
│ ├── marketing/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move gtm/* here)
│ ├── legal/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move docs/coditect-legal here)
│ └── README.md

├── archive/ # Historical reference
│ ├── coditect-v4/ # PLACEHOLDER (will move labs/coditect-labs-v4-archive here)
│ └── README.md

└── submodules/ # ORIGINAL (keep temporarily for rollback safety)
└── (all current submodules remain here untouched)

Tasks

Task 2.1: Create Directory Structure

cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master

# Create top-level directories
mkdir -p products
mkdir -p platform
mkdir -p infrastructure
mkdir -p framework
mkdir -p services
mkdir -p development
mkdir -p research
mkdir -p content/documentation content/marketing content/legal
mkdir -p archive

# Create placeholder README files
# (prevents confusion about empty directories)

Task 2.2: Create Explanatory README.md Files

Example: products/README.md:

# Deployed Products

This directory contains customer-facing deployed products currently live in production.

## Production Products

### coditect-ide (https://coditect.ai)
**Status**: ✅ PRODUCTION OPERATIONAL (Build #32)
**Priority**: P0 - Production Critical
**Technology**: Eclipse Theia 1.65, React 18, Rust, FoundationDB
**Original Location**: `submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-ide`

Browser-based IDE with multi-LLM AI integration. Primary product of CODITECT platform.

### workflow-analysis (https://workflow.coditect.ai)
**Status**: ✅ PRODUCTION LIVE
**Priority**: P0 - Production Critical
**Technology**: FastAPI, React 18, Anthropic Claude (8 AI agents)
**Original Location**: `submodules/labs/coditect-labs-workflow`

AI-powered workflow analysis platform for business process optimization.

---

**⚠️ CRITICAL**: Any changes to products in this directory affect live production systems.
Always test thoroughly and follow deployment procedures.

(Create similar READMEs for platform/, infrastructure/, framework/, etc.)

Deliverables

  • ✅ New directory structure created (empty placeholders)
  • ✅ Explanatory README.md in each top-level directory
  • ✅ Original submodules/ directory untouched (safety)

Verification

# Verify structure created
tree -L 1 /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master/

# Should show:
# products/, platform/, infrastructure/, framework/, services/,
# development/, research/, content/, archive/, submodules/ (original)

Phase 3: Move Deployed Products (HIGH RISK, 2 hours)

Objectives

  • Move 3 deployed product submodules to products/
  • Update .coditect symlinks
  • Verify deployments still work
  • PAUSE after each move for verification

Safety Level: 🔴 RED (Affects production, requires careful execution)

Pre-Flight Checklist

  • Backup completed
  • Rollback script tested
  • Production verified operational
  • Stakeholder approval obtained
  • Deployment team on standby

Move Sequence (One at a time, verify between each)

Move 1: workflow-analysis (LOWEST RISK)

Rationale: Workflow analysis tool is lowest risk - separate deployment, no critical dependencies.

Steps:

cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master

# Move submodule
git mv submodules/labs/coditect-labs-workflow products/workflow-analysis

# Update .gitmodules
# BEFORE:
# [submodule "submodules/labs/coditect-labs-workflow"]
# path = submodules/labs/coditect-labs-workflow
# url = https://github.com/coditect-ai/coditect-labs-workflow.git
#
# AFTER:
# [submodule "products/workflow-analysis"]
# path = products/workflow-analysis
# url = https://github.com/coditect-ai/coditect-labs-workflow.git

# Update submodule registration
git submodule sync
git submodule update

# Verify .coditect symlink
cd products/workflow-analysis
ls -la .coditect
# Should point to: ../../../.coditect (needs update to ../../.coditect)

# Fix symlink
rm .coditect
ln -s ../../.coditect .coditect

# Verify symlink works
ls -la .coditect/agents/
# Should show agents directory

# Commit
cd ../..
git add .gitmodules products/workflow-analysis
git commit -m "refactor: Move coditect-labs-workflow to products/workflow-analysis

BREAKING CHANGE: Submodule path changed
- FROM: submodules/labs/coditect-labs-workflow
- TO: products/workflow-analysis
- Reason: Clarify production deployment status

.coditect symlink updated to reflect new location.

Testing:
- Symlink verified functional
- Production deployment: NOT AFFECTED (uses container images, not file paths)

Rollback: Use scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh if issues occur"

Verification:

# 1. Verify git operations
git submodule status | grep workflow-analysis
# Should show: [commit-hash] products/workflow-analysis (branch)

# 2. Verify symlink
ls -la products/workflow-analysis/.coditect
# Should point to ../../.coditect

# 3. Verify production still works
curl -I https://workflow.coditect.ai
# Should return: HTTP/1.1 200 OK (or appropriate status)

# 4. Wait 10 minutes, verify no issues

If Successful: Proceed to Move 2. If Failed: Execute rollback, investigate issue.


Move 2: multi-tenant (MEDIUM RISK)

Rationale: Django backend is critical but well-isolated deployment.

Steps:

cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master

# Move submodule
git mv submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend platform/multi-tenant

# Update .gitmodules
# Update path: submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend → platform/multi-tenant

git submodule sync
git submodule update

# Fix .coditect symlink
cd platform/multi-tenant
rm .coditect .claude
ln -s ../../.coditect .coditect
ln -s .coditect .claude

# Verify
ls -la .coditect/agents/

# Commit
cd ../..
git add .gitmodules platform/multi-tenant
git commit -m "refactor: Move coditect-cloud-backend to platform/multi-tenant

BREAKING CHANGE: Submodule path changed
- FROM: submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-backend
- TO: platform/multi-tenant
- Reason: Clarify platform vs product distinction

.coditect and .claude symlinks updated.

Testing:
- Symlinks verified functional
- Production deployment: NOT AFFECTED

Rollback: Use scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh if issues occur"

Verification:

# Verify git
git submodule status | grep multi-tenant

# Verify symlinks
ls -la platform/multi-tenant/.coditect
ls -la platform/multi-tenant/.claude

# Wait 10 minutes, monitor production

Move 3: coditect-ide (HIGHEST RISK - PRIMARY PRODUCT)

Rationale: Primary product, most critical, move LAST after testing procedures with other 2 moves.

Timing: WAIT 24-48 hours after Moves 1 & 2 to ensure stability.

Steps:

cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master

# Move submodule
git mv submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-ide products/coditect-ide

# Update .gitmodules
git submodule sync
git submodule update

# Fix .coditect symlink
cd products/coditect-ide
rm .coditect .claude
ln -s ../../.coditect .coditect
ln -s .coditect .claude

# Verify
ls -la .coditect/agents/

# Commit
cd ../..
git add .gitmodules products/coditect-ide
git commit -m "refactor: Move coditect-cloud-ide to products/coditect-ide

BREAKING CHANGE: Submodule path changed
- FROM: submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-ide
- TO: products/coditect-ide
- Reason: Emphasize primary product status

.coditect and .claude symlinks updated.

Testing:
- Symlinks verified functional
- Production deployment: NOT AFFECTED (uses GKE StatefulSet)

Rollback: Use scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh if issues occur"

Verification:

# Verify git
git submodule status | grep coditect-ide

# Verify symlinks
ls -la products/coditect-ide/.coditect
ls -la products/coditect-ide/.claude

# CRITICAL: Verify production
curl -I https://coditect.ai
curl -I https://coditect.ai/theia

# Check GKE pods
kubectl get pods -n coditect-app -l app=coditect-combined-hybrid

# Wait 24 hours, monitor for any issues

Deliverables

  • ✅ 3 deployed product submodules moved to products/
  • ✅ .coditect and .claude symlinks updated
  • ✅ Production verified operational after each move
  • ✅ Git history preserved (git mv)

Phase 4: Move Supporting Infrastructure (MEDIUM RISK, 1 hour)

Objectives

  • Move infrastructure and framework submodules
  • Verify deployments still function
  • Update documentation references

Safety Level: 🟡 YELLOW (Important infrastructure, careful execution)

Moves

Move 4.1: cloud-infra → infrastructure/gcp-terraform

git mv submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-infra infrastructure/gcp-terraform
# Update .gitmodules, symlinks, commit

Move 4.2: ops-license → platform/license-server

git mv submodules/ops/coditect-ops-license platform/license-server
# Update .gitmodules, symlinks, commit

Move 4.3: core-framework → framework/core

git mv submodules/core/coditect-core-framework framework/core
# Update .gitmodules, symlinks, commit

Verification After Each Move

# Verify symlinks
ls -la [new-path]/.coditect

# Verify production
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
curl -I https://coditect.ai
curl -I https://workflow.coditect.ai

Phase 5: Move Development/Research (LOW RISK, 1 hour)

Objectives

  • Reorganize development and research submodules
  • Consolidate related projects
  • Archive historical reference

Safety Level: 🟢 GREEN (No production impact)

Moves

Development Tools:

mkdir -p development/dev-tools
git mv submodules/dev/coditect-analytics development/dev-tools/analytics
git mv submodules/dev/coditect-automation development/dev-tools/automation
git mv submodules/dev/coditect-cli development/dev-tools/cli
# ... etc for all dev/*

Research:

mkdir -p research/labs
git mv submodules/labs/coditect-labs-agent-standards research/labs/agent-standards
git mv submodules/labs/coditect-labs-agents-research research/labs/agents-research
# ... etc for all labs/* except workflow (already moved)

Content:

mkdir -p content/documentation content/marketing content/legal
git mv submodules/docs/coditect-docs-blog content/documentation/blog
git mv submodules/gtm/coditect-gtm-strategy content/marketing/strategy
git mv submodules/docs/coditect-legal content/legal/
# ... etc

Archive:

git mv submodules/labs/coditect-labs-v4-archive archive/coditect-v4

Deliverables

  • ✅ All development/research/content submodules reorganized
  • ✅ Historical archives moved to archive/
  • ✅ No production impact

Phase 6: Cleanup & Documentation (30 min)

Objectives

  • Remove empty submodules/ directory structure
  • Update all documentation references
  • Create migration guide
  • Final verification

Tasks

Task 6.1: Remove Empty Directories

# After all submodules moved
cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master

# Remove empty category directories
rmdir submodules/cloud submodules/labs submodules/dev submodules/docs \
submodules/gtm submodules/market submodules/ops submodules/core

# Remove submodules/ if completely empty
rmdir submodules/ || echo "Still has files, investigate"

Task 6.2: Update Documentation References

Files to Update:

  • README.md (master)
  • docs/project-management/PROJECT-PLAN.md
  • docs/project-management/TASKLIST.md
  • All CLAUDE.md files

Example Update:

# BEFORE
Submodule Location: `submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-ide`

# AFTER
Submodule Location: `products/coditect-ide`
(Migrated from `submodules/cloud/coditect-cloud-ide` on 2025-11-26)

Task 6.3: Create Migration Guide

File: docs/reorganization-plan/05-MIGRATION-GUIDE.md

Contents:

  • Summary of changes
  • New directory structure
  • How to update local clones
  • Troubleshooting common issues

Task 6.4: Final Verification Checklist

Production Systems:

Git Repository:

  • All submodules registered correctly
  • All .coditect symlinks functional
  • Git history preserved
  • No broken references in documentation

Developer Experience:

  • README files updated
  • DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md in all submodules
  • Migration guide published
  • Team notified of changes

Deliverables

  • ✅ Empty directories removed
  • ✅ All documentation references updated
  • ✅ Migration guide published
  • ✅ Final verification checklist complete

Rollback Procedures

Scenario 1: Production Break During Phase 3

Symptoms: Production site down, pods failing, deployment errors

Action:

# Immediate rollback
cd /Users/halcasteel/PROJECTS/coditect-rollout-master
./scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh

# Verify production restored
curl -I https://coditect.ai

# Investigate issue before retrying

Symptoms: .coditect agents not working, commands failing

Action:

# Fix symlinks in moved submodule
cd [new-submodule-path]
rm .coditect .claude
ln -s ../../.coditect .coditect
ln -s .coditect .claude

# Verify
ls -la .coditect/agents/

Scenario 3: Git Submodule Corruption

Symptoms: git submodule commands failing, detached HEAD states

Action:

# Reset submodule
git submodule update --init --recursive

# If still failing, rollback
./scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh

Communication Plan

Before Migration

Email to Team:

Subject: CODITECT Submodule Reorganization - Scheduled Nov 26-30

Team,

We will be reorganizing the coditect-rollout-master repository submodules
to clarify deployed vs. development components.

IMPACT:
- Production deployments: NO DOWNTIME expected
- Development workflows: Submodule paths will change
- Timeline: Nov 26-30 (phased, incremental)

WHAT TO DO:
- Do NOT pull from master between Nov 26-30 unless instructed
- Wait for "Reorganization Complete" notification before resuming work
- Backup your local work before pulling after reorganization

ROLLBACK PLAN:
- Comprehensive backup created
- Automated rollback script tested
- Each phase verified before proceeding

DOCUMENTATION:
- See docs/reorganization-plan/04-PRACTICAL-REORGANIZATION-PLAN.md
- Questions: Contact Hal Casteel

Thank you,
CODITECT Platform Team

During Migration

Status Updates (after each phase):

Subject: CODITECT Reorganization - Phase [X] Complete

Phase [X] Status: ✅ COMPLETE
- [List of moves completed]
- Production verified operational
- No issues detected

Next Phase: [Phase X+1] - Starting [timestamp]

After Migration

Completion Notification:

Subject: CODITECT Reorganization - COMPLETE

The submodule reorganization is complete.

CHANGES:
- 46 submodules reorganized into logical categories
- products/ - Deployed customer-facing products
- platform/ - Core platform services
- infrastructure/ - Deployment infrastructure
- framework/ - CODITECT intelligence framework
- development/ - In-progress features
- research/ - Experimental projects
- content/ - Documentation and marketing
- archive/ - Historical reference

ACTION REQUIRED:
1. Pull latest changes: git pull
2. Update submodules: git submodule update --init --recursive
3. Verify your work: Check that your active branches still work
4. Review docs/reorganization-plan/05-MIGRATION-GUIDE.md

ROLLBACK AVAILABLE:
- Backup preserved at: [backup location]
- Rollback script: scripts/rollback-reorganization.sh
- Valid for 30 days

Thank you for your patience during this transition.

CODITECT Platform Team

Timeline Summary

PhaseDescriptionDurationRisk LevelDowntime
0Preparation2 hours🟢 GREEN0 min
1Documentation Updates1 hour🟢 GREEN0 min
2Create New Structure30 min🟢 GREEN0 min
3Move Deployed Products2 hours🔴 RED0 min (if successful)
4Move Infrastructure1 hour🟡 YELLOW0 min
5Move Dev/Research1 hour🟢 GREEN0 min
6Cleanup & Documentation30 min🟢 GREEN0 min
TOTAL8 hours0 min expected

Phased Over: 2 weeks (24-48 hour verification pauses between high-risk phases)


Success Criteria

Technical Success

  • ✅ All 46 submodules successfully moved
  • ✅ All .coditect symlinks functional
  • ✅ Git history preserved
  • ✅ Production systems operational (0 downtime)
  • ✅ No broken documentation references

Operational Success

  • ✅ Team can continue development without disruption
  • ✅ Deployment processes still work
  • ✅ New structure improves clarity
  • ✅ Onboarding time reduced for new developers

Business Success

  • ✅ Production deployments clearly identified
  • ✅ Development vs. production separation obvious
  • ✅ Infrastructure dependencies documented
  • ✅ Risk of accidental production changes reduced

Post-Migration Actions

Week 1

  • Monitor production systems for any issues
  • Collect team feedback on new structure
  • Update any missed documentation references
  • Refine DEPLOYMENT-STATUS.md templates based on feedback

Week 2

  • Archive backup (keep for 30 days)
  • Update CI/CD pipelines with new paths
  • Create new developer onboarding guide
  • Document lessons learned

Month 1

  • Assess clarity improvements (survey team)
  • Identify any remaining organizational issues
  • Plan Phase 2 optimizations (if needed)

Conclusion

This reorganization plan prioritizes safety and incremental change over speed.

Key Principles:

  1. Never break production
  2. Verify after each change
  3. Maintain rollback capability
  4. Communicate clearly with team
  5. Document everything

Next Steps:

  1. ✅ Review this plan with stakeholders
  2. ⏳ Get approval to proceed
  3. ⏳ Execute Phase 0 (Preparation)
  4. ⏳ Begin phased migration (Nov 26-30)

Status: PLAN READY FOR REVIEW Confidence: HIGH (comprehensive safety measures) Risk Assessment: LOW (incremental, well-planned, rollback-ready)


Generated: 2025-11-26 Author: Claude Code (Deployment-Focused Reorganization Planning)