CODITECT Agentic AI Educational Platform
Complete Document Inventory and Content Framework
Version: 1.0
Date: January 2025
Purpose: Framework for deep web site and blogging platform educating CODITECT community on agentic systems
Origin: Clinical dialogue research (Zhi et al. 2025) abstracted to general-purpose applications
Executive Summary
This inventory catalogs 39 artifacts produced from comprehensive research on agentic AI paradigms. While the foundational research focused on clinical dialogue systems, the architectural patterns, workflows, and design principles transfer directly to enterprise automation, research synthesis, financial services, legal compliance, and any domain requiring autonomous AI systems.
Key Insight: Healthcare's extreme regulatory and safety constraints produced the most rigorous agentic architectures available. These battle-tested patterns provide CODITECT with a competitive advantage when implementing enterprise automation.
Document Categories
| Category | Count | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic Analysis | 6 | Executive and technical deep-dives |
| Interactive Visualizations | 6 | React-based educational components |
| Research References | 1 | Academic grounding and citations |
| C4 Architecture Diagrams | 5 | System architecture at multiple levels |
| Workflow Diagrams | 5 | Paradigm-specific execution flows |
| Dataflow Diagrams | 6 | System component interactions |
| Supporting Diagrams | 4 | Comparisons, sequences, states, decisions |
| Total | 39 | Complete educational framework |
Part 1: Strategic Analysis Documents
Core Documentation Suite
| # | Document | File | Description | Purpose | Target Audience |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Executive Summary | 01-executive-summary.md | High-level overview of the four agentic paradigms (LSR, GS, EP, VE) with key findings, strategic implications, and implementation priorities | C-suite and decision-maker briefing on agentic AI landscape | Executives, Product Leaders, Investors |
| 02 | Four Paradigms Deep Dive | 02-four-paradigms-deep-dive.md | Comprehensive analysis of each paradigm including knowledge sources, agency objectives, planning strategies, iteration mechanisms, risk profiles, and use cases | Technical understanding of paradigm selection and trade-offs | Architects, Technical Leads, Senior Engineers |
| 03 | Technical Components Reference | 03-technical-components-reference.md | Detailed breakdown of five core components (Planning, Memory, Action, Collaboration, Evolution) with implementation patterns per paradigm | Engineering reference for building agentic systems | Engineers, DevOps, Platform Teams |
| 04 | CODITECT Impact Analysis | 04-coditect-impact-analysis.md | Strategic assessment of how each paradigm maps to CODITECT's work automation platform, including positioning opportunities and competitive differentiation | Product strategy and roadmap planning | Product Management, Strategy, Sales Enablement |
| 05 | General-Purpose Agentic Designs | 05-general-purpose-agentic-designs.md | Abstraction of clinical patterns to enterprise, research, financial, and legal domains with concrete implementation guidance | Cross-industry application of agentic patterns | Solutions Architects, Consultants, Partners |
| 06 | Quick Reference Card | 06-quick-reference-card.md | One-page decision matrix for paradigm selection based on auditability, action requirements, process definition, and risk tolerance | Rapid paradigm selection during design sessions | All Technical Roles |
Document Specifications
| Document | Word Count | Reading Time | Complexity | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Summary | ~2,500 | 10 min | Low | Quarterly |
| Four Paradigms Deep Dive | ~8,000 | 30 min | High | Semi-annually |
| Technical Components Reference | ~6,000 | 25 min | High | Monthly |
| CODITECT Impact Analysis | ~4,000 | 15 min | Medium | Quarterly |
| General-Purpose Designs | ~5,000 | 20 min | Medium | Semi-annually |
| Quick Reference Card | ~800 | 3 min | Low | As needed |
Part 2: Interactive Visualizations (JSX)
React Component Library
| # | Visualization | File | Description | Purpose | Interactive Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07 | Paradigm Taxonomy | 07-paradigm-taxonomy-visual.jsx | Two-axis taxonomy visualization (Knowledge Source × Agency Objective) with four quadrants representing LSR, GS, EP, VE paradigms | Visual understanding of paradigm positioning and trade-offs | Hover states, expandable details, trade-off explanations, research citations |
| 08 | Technical Components | 08-technical-components-visual.jsx | Five-component architecture explorer (Planning, Memory, Action, Collaboration, Evolution) with paradigm-specific implementations | Component-level understanding of agentic systems | Component selector, paradigm filter, comparison tables, integration flow diagram |
| 09 | Domain Abstraction | 09-domain-abstraction-visual.jsx | Multi-layer abstraction flow from clinical origins through abstract principles to enterprise and research applications | Understanding cross-domain transfer patterns | Layer navigation, concept mapping table, transfer pattern matrix, real-world examples |
| 10 | Multi-Agent Collaboration | 10-multi-agent-collaboration-visual.jsx | Five topology patterns (Single, Hierarchical, Distributed, Pipeline, Hybrid) with coordination mechanisms and failure modes | Multi-agent system design and topology selection | Topology selector, visual diagrams, pros/cons comparison, failure mode table |
| 11 | Evolution Mechanisms | 11-evolution-mechanisms-visual.jsx | Five evolution approaches (Reflexion, Continual Learning, Meta-Learning, Workflow Tuning, Agentic Memory) with timeline and comparisons | Understanding agent learning and adaptation | Timeline visualization, mechanism selector, flow diagrams, paradigm integration mapping |
| 12 | Decision Framework | 12-decision-framework-visual.jsx | Interactive decision tree for paradigm selection based on four key questions with research-grounded recommendations | Guided paradigm selection for specific use cases | Decision tree navigation, confidence scores, component recommendations, quick reference grid |
Visualization Specifications
| Visualization | Components | State Variables | Research Sources | Tailwind Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradigm Taxonomy | 4 quadrants | hoveredQuadrant, selectedParadigm, showDetails | Zhi 2025, Ali & Dornaika 2025 | ~150 |
| Technical Components | 5 components × 4 paradigms | selectedComponent, selectedParadigm, showComparison | Yao 2024, ACM TOIS 2025 | ~200 |
| Domain Abstraction | 4 layers × 6 concepts | activeLayer, selectedConcept, showMapping | Zhi 2025, Stanford 2024 | ~180 |
| Multi-Agent Collaboration | 5 topologies | selectedTopology, showMechanisms, showFailures | Tran 2025, MAR 2024 | ~220 |
| Evolution Mechanisms | 5 mechanisms | selectedMechanism, timelineView, showComparison | Shinn 2023, A-Mem 2025 | ~200 |
| Decision Framework | 4-question tree | currentQuestion, answers, recommendation | Multiple surveys | ~160 |
Part 3: Research References
| # | Document | File | Description | Purpose | Citation Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Research References | 13-research-references.md | Comprehensive bibliography of 40+ primary sources organized by category (surveys, planning, memory, multi-agent, tools, enterprise, evaluation, safety) | Academic grounding and further reading | 400+ papers referenced |
Reference Categories
| Category | Source Count | Key Papers | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foundational Surveys | 3 | Zhi 2025, Ali & Dornaika 2025, MDPI 2025 | Core taxonomy and paradigm definitions |
| Planning Mechanisms | 5 | ReAct, Reflexion, MAR, ToT, Focused ReAct | Strategic planning implementation |
| Memory Systems | 5 | ACM TOIS survey, A-Mem, MemRL, Agent Workflow Memory | Memory architecture design |
| Multi-Agent Systems | 5 | Tran 2025, MetaGPT, AutoAgents, ReConcile | Collaboration topology selection |
| Tool Integration | 4 | Stanford framework, τ-bench, ChemCrow, Toolformer | Tool system design |
| Enterprise Applications | 4 | IBM 2025, MCP, Production metrics | Real-world deployment |
| Evaluation Benchmarks | 4 | SWE-bench, GAIA, HumanEval, AgentBench | Quality assurance |
| Safety and Governance | 3 | Governance models, Security challenges | Risk management |
Part 4: C4 Architecture Diagrams
System Architecture at Four Levels
| # | Diagram | File | C4 Level | Description | Purpose | Key Elements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4-01 | Context Diagram | c4-01-context-agentic-system.mermaid | Level 4 (Context) | System boundary showing users (End User, Administrator, Developer) and external systems (Knowledge Bases, Enterprise Systems, LLM Providers, Monitoring) | Understanding system scope and external dependencies | 3 user types, 4 external system categories, bidirectional data flows |
| C4-02 | Container Diagram | c4-02-container-agentic-platform.mermaid | Level 3 (Container) | Major deployable units including API Gateway, Agent Orchestrator, Planning Engine, four paradigm runtimes, Memory Layer, and Action Layer | High-level technical architecture decisions | 12 containers, 4 paradigm implementations, memory tiers, tool integration |
| C4-03 | Component Diagram | c4-03-component-agent-runtime.mermaid | Level 2 (Component) | Agent runtime internals showing paradigm selector, planning components (CoT, ToT, QDG, CM, PM), iteration components, and execution components | Detailed design of agent core | 15 components, paradigm-specific routing, iteration loops |
| C4-04 | Code Diagram | c4-04-code-agent-classes.mermaid | Level 1 (Code) | Class structure showing Agent interface, four paradigm implementations, PlanningEngine, MemoryManager, ToolManager, and Orchestrator | Implementation blueprint for developers | 10 classes, inheritance hierarchy, dependency relationships |
| C4-05 | Hybrid Architecture | c4-05-hybrid-architecture.mermaid | Component (Hybrid) | Multi-paradigm routing architecture with intelligent routing layer, parallel paradigm execution, coordination layer, and quality assurance | Production hybrid system design | Risk assessment, audit checking, conflict resolution, compliance verification |
C4 Diagram Specifications
| Diagram | Nodes | Edges | Subgraphs | Styling | GitHub Compatible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Context | 8 | 9 | 3 | 5 colors | ✓ |
| Container | 15 | 24 | 6 | 12 colors | ✓ |
| Component | 16 | 22 | 5 | 13 colors | ✓ |
| Code | 10 | 18 | 0 (classDiagram) | N/A | ✓ |
| Hybrid | 24 | 32 | 7 | 18 colors | ✓ |
Part 5: Workflow Diagrams
Paradigm-Specific Execution Flows
| # | Diagram | File | Paradigm | Description | Purpose | Key Phases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WF-01 | LSR Chain-of-Thought | workflow-01-lsr-chain-of-thought.mermaid | Latent Space Reasoner | Creative synthesis workflow with multiple reasoning paths and self-consistency voting | Understanding zero-shot creative reasoning | Input → Planning → Reasoning (3 paths) → Aggregation → Output |
| WF-02 | GS Evidence Chain | workflow-02-gs-evidence-chain.mermaid | Grounded Synthesizer | Evidence-based synthesis with query decomposition, multi-source retrieval, validation, and gap-filling iteration | Understanding grounded knowledge retrieval | Decomposition → Retrieval → Validation → Synthesis → Iteration |
| WF-03 | EP Reflexion Loop | workflow-03-ep-reflexion.mermaid | Emergent Planner | Autonomous planning with cognitive mapping, tree-of-thought exploration, execution loop, and self-reflection | Understanding adaptive autonomous planning | Cognitive Mapping → Planning → Execution → Reflexion → Memory |
| WF-04 | VE Protocol Execution | workflow-04-ve-protocol-execution.mermaid | Verifiable Executor | Protocol-driven execution with state management, error handling, and audit logging | Understanding compliant workflow automation | Protocol Matching → State Management → Execution → Audit |
| WF-05 | Enterprise Automation | workflow-05-enterprise-automation.mermaid | VWA Pattern | Complete enterprise workflow with multiple triggers, workflow routing, integrations, approvals, and monitoring | Enterprise process automation design | Trigger → Intake → Workflow Engine → Integrations → Approvals → Monitoring |
Workflow Diagram Specifications
| Diagram | Nodes | Decision Points | Loops | Error Paths | SLA Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSR CoT | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GS Evidence | 18 | 1 | 1 (gap-fill) | 0 | 0 |
| EP Reflexion | 18 | 3 | 2 (exec, reflect) | 1 | 0 |
| VE Protocol | 20 | 5 | 1 (retry) | 3 | 0 |
| Enterprise | 27 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Part 6: Dataflow Diagrams
System Component Interactions
| # | Diagram | File | System | Description | Purpose | Data Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF-01 | Memory System | dataflow-01-memory-system.mermaid | Memory Architecture | Multi-layer memory with parametric, short-term, long-term, and audit layers, plus retrieval system | Memory system design and implementation | Conversations, tool results, reflections, observations → encoded memories |
| DF-02 | Hierarchical Multi-Agent | dataflow-02-multi-agent-hierarchical.mermaid | Multi-Agent (Hierarchical) | Orchestrator-led delegation to specialist teams (Research, Analysis, Execution) with shared communication | Hierarchical team coordination design | Tasks → sub-tasks → results → aggregated response |
| DF-03 | Distributed Debate | dataflow-03-multi-agent-debate.mermaid | Multi-Agent (Distributed) | Peer-to-peer debate with initial positions, critique rounds, revision, and consensus building | Distributed reasoning and consensus | Positions → critiques → revised positions → votes → consensus |
| DF-04 | Tool Execution | dataflow-04-tool-execution.mermaid | Action System | Tool orchestration with registry, validation, sandboxing, categorized tools, and result processing | Tool system architecture | Action plans → tool requests → sandboxed execution → validated results |
| DF-05 | Evolution and Learning | dataflow-05-evolution-learning.mermaid | Evolution System | Agent learning from experience through reflexion, strategy evolution, workflow evolution, and meta-learning | Continuous improvement design | Outcomes, feedback → insights → updated policies, protocols, heuristics |
| DF-06 | Domain Abstraction | dataflow-06-domain-abstraction.mermaid | Cross-Domain | Transfer from clinical domain through abstract principles to enterprise and research applications | Cross-industry pattern transfer | Clinical concepts → abstract principles → domain-specific implementations |
Dataflow Diagram Specifications
| Diagram | Source Types | Transform Steps | Storage Types | Output Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | 4 | 3 (encode, index, link) | 4 layers | 3 (context, citations, history) |
| Hierarchical | 1 | 5 (decompose, route, execute, collect, merge) | 3 (message bus, shared memory, event queue) | 1 |
| Distributed | 1 | 4 rounds (position, critique, revise, vote) | 0 | 3 (consensus, confidence, dissent) |
| Tool Execution | 1 | 6 (select, validate, schedule, sandbox, execute, transform) | 3 tool categories | 2 (result, log) |
| Evolution | 4 | 7 (analyze, extract, reflect, update, optimize, test, generalize) | 3 memory types | 3 (policies, protocols, heuristics) |
| Domain Abstraction | 6 clinical concepts | 1 (POMDP formalization) | 0 | 12 (6 per domain) |
Part 7: Supporting Diagrams
Comparison, Sequence, State, and Decision Diagrams
| # | Diagram | File | Type | Description | Purpose | Key Insights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP-01 | RAG vs Agentic | comparison-01-rag-vs-agentic.mermaid | Comparison Flowchart | Side-by-side architecture comparison showing RAG's linear flow vs Agentic's modular, iterative approach | Understanding when to upgrade from RAG to Agentic | 5 key differences: single-pass vs iterative, retrieval-only vs action-capable, stateless vs stateful, fixed vs adaptive, no learning vs continuous evolution |
| SEQ-01 | Agentic Flow | sequence-01-agentic-flow.mermaid | Sequence Diagram | Complete task execution showing interactions between User, Orchestrator, Planner, Memory, Agent, Tool Manager, External System, and Audit Log | Understanding runtime interactions | 7 participants, execution loop with success/failure branches, memory updates |
| STT-01 | Agent Lifecycle | state-01-agent-lifecycle.mermaid | State Machine | Agent states (Idle, Planning, Reasoning, ActionSelection, ToolExecution, Observation, StateUpdate, GoalCheck, Reflection, MemoryUpdate, Complete, Error, Recovery, Failed) with transitions | Understanding agent state management | 14 states, human escalation path, error recovery loop |
| DEC-01 | Paradigm Selection | decision-01-paradigm-selection.mermaid | Decision Tree | Four-question decision tree for paradigm selection with hybrid recommendations | Rapid paradigm selection | 6 questions, 4 pure paradigm endpoints, 2 hybrid recommendations |
Supporting Diagram Specifications
| Diagram | Mermaid Type | Elements | Decision Points | Educational Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAG vs Agentic | flowchart | 20 nodes | 0 | High (common question) |
| Agentic Flow | sequenceDiagram | 7 participants, ~20 messages | 2 (success/failure) | High (runtime understanding) |
| Agent Lifecycle | stateDiagram-v2 | 14 states | 8 transitions | Medium (state machine) |
| Paradigm Selection | flowchart | 14 nodes | 6 questions | Very High (decision support) |
Part 8: Cross-Reference Matrix
Document Relationships
| Document | Prerequisites | Builds Upon | Leads To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01-Executive Summary | None | None | 02-Deep Dive, 04-Impact |
| 02-Four Paradigms | 01-Executive | 01-Executive | 03-Technical, Workflows |
| 03-Technical Components | 02-Paradigms | 02-Paradigms | Dataflows, C4 Diagrams |
| 04-CODITECT Impact | 01-Executive | 01, 02 | 05-General Purpose |
| 05-General Purpose | 02-Paradigms | 02, 04 | All Industry Applications |
| 06-Quick Reference | All above | All | Decision Support |
| 07-12 Visualizations | 02-Paradigms | 02, 03 | Interactive Learning |
| 13-References | None | None | Deep Research |
| C4 Diagrams | 03-Technical | 03 | Implementation |
| Workflows | 02-Paradigms | 02 | Process Design |
| Dataflows | 03-Technical | 03 | System Design |
Audience Journey Map
| Audience | Entry Point | Core Path | Advanced Topics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | 01-Summary → 04-Impact | 06-Quick Ref → Decision-01 | None |
| Product Manager | 01-Summary → 04-Impact | 05-General → Workflows | 02-Paradigms |
| Solutions Architect | 02-Paradigms → C4-01,02 | 03-Technical → All Workflows | Dataflows, C4-03,04,05 |
| Engineer | 03-Technical → C4-03,04 | Dataflows → Sequence-01 | 13-References |
| Data Scientist | 02-Paradigms → 07-Taxonomy | 11-Evolution → DF-05 | 13-References |
| Sales/Marketing | 01-Summary → 04-Impact | 05-General → Quick Ref | Visualizations |
Part 9: Suggested Additional Documentation
Based on the current research foundation, the following additional documents would strengthen the CODITECT educational platform:
Priority 1: Implementation Guides (High Impact)
| # | Suggested Document | Description | Purpose | Estimated Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Paradigm Selection Playbook | Step-by-step guide for choosing paradigms based on 20+ use case scenarios with decision matrices and example implementations | Reduce time-to-decision for architects | 3-4 days |
| A2 | Memory System Implementation Guide | Detailed technical guide for implementing multi-layer memory with vector stores, knowledge graphs, and audit trails | Enable robust memory architecture | 4-5 days |
| A3 | Tool Integration Cookbook | Collection of 15-20 tool integration patterns (API, Database, Document, Compute) with code examples and error handling | Accelerate tool system development | 5-6 days |
| A4 | Multi-Agent Orchestration Patterns | Implementation guide for 5 topologies (Single, Hierarchical, Distributed, Pipeline, Hybrid) with Python/TypeScript code | Enable multi-agent deployments | 4-5 days |
| A5 | Reflexion and Evolution Playbook | Guide to implementing self-improvement mechanisms including Reflexion, A-Mem, and workflow tuning | Enable learning agents | 3-4 days |
Priority 2: Industry Vertical Guides (Market Expansion)
| # | Suggested Document | Industry | Description | Key Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Financial Services Agentic Guide | Finance | Paradigm application for trading, compliance, risk, customer service | Compliance automation (VE), Market analysis (GS), Advisory (LSR) |
| B2 | Legal Services Agentic Guide | Legal | Contract analysis, due diligence, compliance monitoring, research | Contract review (GS), Due diligence (EP), Compliance (VE) |
| B3 | Healthcare Operations Guide | Healthcare | Non-clinical applications: scheduling, billing, supply chain, HR | Scheduling (VE), Claims (GS+VE), Supply chain (EP) |
| B4 | Manufacturing Agentic Guide | Manufacturing | Quality control, predictive maintenance, supply chain, safety | Quality (VE), Maintenance (EP), Supply (GS+EP) |
| B5 | Professional Services Guide | Consulting | Research, proposal generation, project management, knowledge management | Research (GS), Proposals (LSR+GS), PM (VE) |
Priority 3: Technical Deep Dives (Engineering Excellence)
| # | Suggested Document | Topic | Description | Target Audience |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | LLM Provider Integration Guide | Integration | Patterns for Claude, GPT-4, Llama, Mistral with fallback, load balancing, and cost optimization | Platform Engineers |
| C2 | Observability and Monitoring Guide | Operations | Metrics, traces, logs for agentic systems with alerting and debugging patterns | DevOps, SRE |
| C3 | Security and Governance Framework | Security | Authentication, authorization, audit, compliance for agentic systems | Security Engineers |
| C4 | Performance Optimization Guide | Performance | Latency reduction, throughput optimization, caching strategies | Performance Engineers |
| C5 | Testing Agentic Systems | Quality | Unit, integration, and evaluation testing patterns for agents | QA Engineers |
Priority 4: Business and Strategy Documents (Market Positioning)
| # | Suggested Document | Topic | Description | Target Audience |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | ROI Calculator Methodology | Business Case | Framework for calculating agentic AI ROI with industry benchmarks | Sales, Finance |
| D2 | Competitive Landscape Analysis | Strategy | Comparison of agentic platforms (LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, etc.) | Product, Strategy |
| D3 | Implementation Roadmap Template | Planning | Phased rollout template from pilot to enterprise scale | Project Managers |
| D4 | Change Management Guide | Adoption | Human factors in agentic AI adoption with training curricula | HR, Training |
| D5 | Case Study Template | Marketing | Standardized format for documenting customer success stories | Marketing, Sales |
Priority 5: Interactive Learning Modules (Platform Engagement)
| # | Suggested Document | Format | Description | Learning Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Paradigm Selection Simulator | JSX Interactive | Scenario-based learning game for paradigm selection | Confident paradigm selection |
| E2 | Agent Builder Sandbox | JSX + API | Visual agent configuration with live testing | Hands-on agent design |
| E3 | Memory System Visualizer | JSX Interactive | Interactive memory flow demonstration | Memory architecture understanding |
| E4 | Multi-Agent Debugger | JSX + API | Visual debugging tool for agent interactions | Debugging proficiency |
| E5 | Workflow Designer | JSX Interactive | Drag-and-drop workflow builder with export | Workflow design capability |
Part 10: Content Strategy Recommendations
Blog Series Structure
| Series | Posts | Cadence | Target Audience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic Fundamentals | 8 posts (one per document 01-06, plus intro/summary) | Weekly | General technical audience |
| Paradigm Deep Dives | 4 posts (one per paradigm) | Bi-weekly | Architects, Senior Engineers |
| Industry Applications | 5 posts (one per vertical) | Monthly | Industry practitioners |
| Technical How-Tos | 10 posts (implementation patterns) | Weekly | Engineers |
| Case Studies | Ongoing | As available | Decision makers |
SEO Keyword Targets
| Primary Keywords | Secondary Keywords | Long-tail Keywords |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic AI | AI agents | How to build AI agents |
| LLM agents | Autonomous AI | Agentic AI vs RAG |
| AI automation | Multi-agent systems | Enterprise AI automation |
| Work automation | AI workflow | AI workflow automation tools |
| CODITECT | AI orchestration | Best AI orchestration platform |
Content Distribution Strategy
| Channel | Content Type | Frequency | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website | Full documents, visualizations | Continuous | Authority |
| Blog | Adapted articles, tutorials | 2-4/week | Traffic |
| Insights, infographics | Daily | Awareness | |
| YouTube | Visualization walkthroughs | Weekly | Engagement |
| GitHub | Code examples, diagrams | Continuous | Developer adoption |
| Newsletter | Summaries, updates | Weekly | Retention |
Part 11: Technical Requirements
Visualization Hosting Requirements
| Requirement | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| React Version | 18.x+ | Hooks required |
| Tailwind CSS | 3.x | Core utilities only |
| Mermaid.js | 10.x+ | GitHub rendering |
| Build System | Vite or Next.js | For JSX compilation |
| CDN | Cloudflare or Vercel | For static assets |
Documentation Platform Requirements
| Requirement | Options | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Static Site Generator | Docusaurus, GitBook, Nextra | Docusaurus (React-native) |
| Search | Algolia, Typesense | Algolia DocSearch |
| Analytics | Plausible, PostHog | PostHog (product analytics) |
| Comments | Giscus, Utterances | Giscus (GitHub-based) |
| Versioning | Git-based | Semantic versioning |
Appendix A: File Manifest
Complete File Listing
/outputs/
├── Strategic Documents (Markdown)
│ ├── 01-executive-summary.md
│ ├── 02-four-paradigms-deep-dive.md
│ ├── 03-technical-components-reference.md
│ ├── 04-coditect-impact-analysis.md
│ ├── 05-general-purpose-agentic-designs.md
│ └── 06-quick-reference-card.md
│
├── Interactive Visualizations (JSX)
│ ├── 07-paradigm-taxonomy-visual.jsx
│ ├── 08-technical-components-visual.jsx
│ ├── 09-domain-abstraction-visual.jsx
│ ├── 10-multi-agent-collaboration-visual.jsx
│ ├── 11-evolution-mechanisms-visual.jsx
│ └── 12-decision-framework-visual.jsx
│
├── Research References
│ └── 13-research-references.md
│
├── C4 Architecture Diagrams (Mermaid)
│ ├── c4-01-context-agentic-system.mermaid
│ ├── c4-02-container-agentic-platform.mermaid
│ ├── c4-03-component-agent-runtime.mermaid
│ ├── c4-04-code-agent-classes.mermaid
│ └── c4-05-hybrid-architecture.mermaid
│
├── Workflow Diagrams (Mermaid)
│ ├── workflow-01-lsr-chain-of-thought.mermaid
│ ├── workflow-02-gs-evidence-chain.mermaid
│ ├── workflow-03-ep-reflexion.mermaid
│ ├── workflow-04-ve-protocol-execution.mermaid
│ └── workflow-05-enterprise-automation.mermaid
│
├── Dataflow Diagrams (Mermaid)
│ ├── dataflow-01-memory-system.mermaid
│ ├── dataflow-02-multi-agent-hierarchical.mermaid
│ ├── dataflow-03-multi-agent-debate.mermaid
│ ├── dataflow-04-tool-execution.mermaid
│ ├── dataflow-05-evolution-learning.mermaid
│ └── dataflow-06-domain-abstraction.mermaid
│
├── Supporting Diagrams (Mermaid)
│ ├── comparison-01-rag-vs-agentic.mermaid
│ ├── sequence-01-agentic-flow.mermaid
│ ├── state-01-agent-lifecycle.mermaid
│ └── decision-01-paradigm-selection.mermaid
│
└── Inventory
└── 14-document-inventory.md (this document)
Total Artifact Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Files | 39 |
| Markdown Documents | 7 |
| JSX Visualizations | 6 |
| Mermaid Diagrams | 20 |
| This Inventory | 1 |
| Total Lines of Code | ~8,000 |
| Total Words | ~35,000 |
| Research Papers Referenced | 400+ |
| Primary Sources Cited | 40+ |
Appendix B: Suggested Implementation Timeline
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-4)
| Week | Deliverables | Resources |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deploy existing 39 documents to staging | 1 engineer |
| 2 | Set up documentation platform (Docusaurus) | 1 engineer |
| 3 | Integrate visualizations with platform | 1 engineer |
| 4 | Launch MVP site with core documents | 1 engineer, 1 content |
Phase 2: Enhancement (Weeks 5-8)
| Week | Deliverables | Resources |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Create A1-A2 (Playbook, Memory Guide) | 2 engineers |
| 6 | Create A3-A4 (Tool Cookbook, Multi-Agent) | 2 engineers |
| 7 | Launch blog series (Fundamentals) | 1 content |
| 8 | Create A5 (Evolution Playbook) | 1 engineer |
Phase 3: Expansion (Weeks 9-12)
| Week | Deliverables | Resources |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Create B1-B2 (Finance, Legal guides) | 2 content |
| 10 | Create B3-B4 (Healthcare, Manufacturing) | 2 content |
| 11 | Create B5 (Professional Services) | 1 content |
| 12 | Launch industry vertical landing pages | 1 engineer, 1 content |
Phase 4: Maturity (Weeks 13-16)
| Week | Deliverables | Resources |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Create C1-C2 (Integration, Observability) | 2 engineers |
| 14 | Create C3-C4 (Security, Performance) | 2 engineers |
| 15 | Create C5 (Testing) | 1 engineer |
| 16 | Full platform launch with all content | Full team |
Document generated from agentic AI research analysis. Last updated: January 2025.