Skip to main content

FP&A Platform — Artifact Gap Analysis v2.0

Status Update

Completed Artifacts (Session 2)

IDArtifactStatus
GAP-001Test Strategy Document✅ Created
GAP-002Data Dictionary✅ Created
GAP-007AI Model Cards✅ Created
GAP-011Disaster Recovery Plan✅ Created

Remaining Critical Gaps

Batch 1: Engineering Critical (Create Now)

IDArtifactCriticalityImpact if Missing
GAP-003API Contracts (OpenAPI 3.0)CRITICALNo contract-first development, integration failures, inconsistent APIs
GAP-008Prompt Engineering PlaybookCRITICALInconsistent AI behavior, no version control, compliance gaps
GAP-012Monitoring & Alerting SpecCRITICALBlind to incidents, SLA breaches undetected, no observability
GAP-015Security SpecificationCRITICALUnmitigated threats, compliance failures, breach risk

Batch 2: Architecture Critical (Create Next)

IDArtifactCriticalityImpact if Missing
GAP-004Event CatalogHIGHEvent-driven architecture undocumented, coupling risks
GAP-005State Machine DiagramsHIGHWorkflow transitions unclear, edge cases missed
GAP-006Database Migration StrategyHIGHSchema changes break production, no rollback
GAP-009ML Pipeline SpecificationHIGHTraining undefined, model drift unmonitored

Batch 3: Operations Critical

IDArtifactCriticalityImpact if Missing
GAP-013Runbook/Operations GuideHIGHTribal knowledge, inconsistent incident response
GAP-016Data Classification MatrixCRITICALPII/PHI handling inconsistent, compliance violations
GAP-017Incident Response PlaybookHIGHBreach response ad-hoc, regulatory notification delayed

Newly Identified Gaps

Category 7: Developer Experience (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-024Developer Onboarding GuideMEDIUMSlow ramp-up, inconsistent setup, knowledge silos
GAP-025Code Standards & Style GuideMEDIUMInconsistent code, review friction, maintainability
GAP-026API Versioning StrategyHIGHBreaking changes, client compatibility issues
GAP-027Error Handling StandardsHIGHInconsistent errors, poor debugging, user confusion
GAP-028Logging StandardsHIGHUnstructured logs, debugging impossible, compliance gaps

Category 8: Architecture Governance (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-029Domain Model (DDD)HIGHBounded contexts unclear, coupling, wrong abstractions
GAP-030Event Storming DocumentationHIGHBusiness processes undocumented, wrong event design
GAP-031Architecture Fitness FunctionsMEDIUMQuality degradation undetected, technical debt accumulation
GAP-032Technical Debt RegisterMEDIUMDebt untracked, prioritization impossible

Category 9: Release Engineering (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-033Release Management ProcessHIGHChaotic releases, rollback undefined, risk management gaps
GAP-034Feature Flag StrategyMEDIUMAll-or-nothing releases, no gradual rollout, testing in prod impossible
GAP-035Deprecation PolicyMEDIUMBreaking changes surprise users, migration undefined

Category 10: Performance Engineering (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-036Performance BenchmarksHIGHNo baselines, regression undetected, SLA undefined
GAP-037Load Testing ScenariosHIGHCapacity unknown, month-end failures
GAP-038Capacity Planning ModelMEDIUMOver/under provisioning, cost overruns

Category 11: Cost Management (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-039Cloud Cost Optimization GuideMEDIUMRunaway costs, inefficient resource usage
GAP-040Token Economics ModelHIGHAI costs unpredictable, budget overruns

Category 12: Customer-Facing (Missing)

IDArtifactCriticalityWhy Missing Hurts
GAP-041SLA DefinitionsHIGHCustomer expectations undefined, disputes
GAP-042Customer Onboarding PlaybookMEDIUMSlow time-to-value, churn risk
GAP-043Support Escalation MatrixMEDIUMInconsistent support, customer frustration

Priority Execution Order

Immediate (This Session)

  1. GAP-008: Prompt Engineering Playbook — Foundation for all AI agents
  2. GAP-015: Security Specification — Required for compliance
  3. GAP-012: Monitoring & Alerting Spec — Required for operations
  4. GAP-004: Event Catalog — Required for event-driven architecture
  5. GAP-016: Data Classification Matrix — Required for compliance

Next Session

  1. GAP-003: API Contracts (OpenAPI 3.0)
  2. GAP-005: State Machine Diagrams
  3. GAP-029: Domain Model (DDD)
  4. GAP-033: Release Management Process
  5. GAP-036: Performance Benchmarks

Prompts for Immediate Artifacts

PROMPT GAP-008: Prompt Engineering Playbook

You are a senior AI engineer creating a comprehensive prompt engineering playbook for a multi-agent FP&A platform.

Create a PROMPT ENGINEERING PLAYBOOK covering:

1. AGENT SYSTEM PROMPTS
For each agent type, provide complete production-ready system prompts:

A. ORCHESTRATOR AGENT
- Role: Central coordinator routing tasks to specialized agents
- Capabilities: Task classification, context management, escalation
- Constraints: Must respect compliance gates, human checkpoints
- Output format: Structured routing decisions

B. RECONCILIATION AGENT
- Role: Bank reconciliation specialist
- Capabilities: Match suggestion, exception analysis, reporting
- Constraints: 85% confidence threshold, audit trail requirements
- Output format: Match recommendations with explanations

C. VARIANCE ANALYSIS AGENT
- Role: FP&A analyst for budget vs actual analysis
- Capabilities: Variance calculation, driver identification, commentary
- Constraints: Materiality thresholds, executive audience
- Output format: Narrative paragraphs with data support

D. FORECASTING AGENT
- Role: Financial forecaster
- Capabilities: Model selection, scenario analysis, confidence intervals
- Constraints: Historical data requirements, assumption documentation

E. COMPLIANCE MONITORING AGENT
- Role: Internal auditor for control testing
- Capabilities: Control testing, evidence collection, finding documentation
- Constraints: Framework-specific requirements (SOX, HIPAA, etc.)

2. PROMPT PATTERNS WITH EXAMPLES
- Chain-of-Thought (CoT) with financial examples
- Few-Shot Learning for format standardization
- ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) for tool use
- Self-Consistency for high-stakes decisions
- Tree-of-Thought for complex analysis

3. TOOL DEFINITIONS (complete schemas)
- database_query: SQL execution
- calculate: Mathematical operations
- fetch_external: API calls
- generate_report: Template population
- request_approval: Human checkpoint

4. GUARDRAILS AND VALIDATION
- Input validation schemas
- Output validation rules
- Confidence thresholds
- Token budget management
- Hallucination prevention

5. VERSION CONTROL STRATEGY
- Prompt versioning (semantic)
- A/B testing framework
- Rollback procedures
- Change documentation

6. EVALUATION METRICS
- Task completion rate
- Factual accuracy
- User satisfaction
- Token efficiency
- Latency

Output: Production-ready playbook with complete prompt templates.

PROMPT GAP-015: Security Specification

You are a security architect creating a comprehensive security specification for an AI-first FP&A platform handling financial data in regulated industries.

Create a SECURITY SPECIFICATION covering:

1. THREAT MODEL
A. Threat Actors
- External (opportunistic, targeted, nation-state)
- Internal (malicious, negligent)
- Third-party (supply chain, integration partners)

B. Attack Vectors (prioritized)
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application
- API-specific attacks
- AI/ML-specific attacks (prompt injection, data poisoning)
- Supply chain attacks
- Social engineering

2. SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
- Defense in depth layers
- Zero trust implementation
- Network segmentation
- Service mesh security

3. AUTHENTICATION & AUTHORIZATION
- OAuth2/OIDC implementation
- MFA requirements by role
- API key management
- Service-to-service auth
- Session management
- OpenFGA integration details

4. DATA PROTECTION
- Encryption at rest (AES-256)
- Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3)
- Field-level encryption for PII/PHI
- Key management (KMS)
- Key rotation schedule
- Data masking for non-prod

5. APPLICATION SECURITY
- Secure coding standards
- Input validation
- Output encoding
- CSRF/XSS protection
- SQL injection prevention
- Dependency management

6. AI/ML SECURITY
- Prompt injection prevention
- Model access controls
- Training data protection
- Inference logging
- Output sanitization

7. COMPLIANCE CONTROLS MAPPING
- SOX technical controls
- HIPAA technical safeguards
- FDA 21 CFR Part 11
- LGPD requirements
- SOC 2 criteria

8. SECURITY TESTING
- SAST tools and thresholds
- DAST tools and thresholds
- Penetration testing scope
- Bug bounty program
- Security review process

9. INCIDENT RESPONSE
- Classification matrix
- Response procedures
- Forensics capabilities
- Breach notification timelines

Output: Complete security specification with implementation details.

PROMPT GAP-012: Monitoring & Alerting Specification

You are an SRE architect designing comprehensive monitoring and alerting for an AI-first FP&A platform.

Create a MONITORING & ALERTING SPECIFICATION covering:

1. OBSERVABILITY PILLARS
A. Metrics (Prometheus)
- Infrastructure metrics (CPU, memory, disk, network)
- Application metrics (request rate, latency, errors)
- Business metrics (transactions, reconciliations, forecasts)
- AI metrics (inference latency, token usage, confidence)

B. Logs (Loki/ELK)
- Log levels and usage
- Structured logging format
- Log retention policies
- PII redaction rules

C. Traces (OpenTelemetry/Jaeger)
- Distributed tracing setup
- Trace sampling strategy
- Trace retention

2. SERVICE LEVEL OBJECTIVES (SLOs)
- Availability targets by tier
- Latency targets by endpoint
- Error budget policy
- SLI definitions

3. ALERTING RULES
For each service, define:
- Alert name and description
- PromQL/query expression
- Thresholds (warning, critical)
- Severity classification
- Runbook link
- Routing (PagerDuty, Slack)

4. DASHBOARDS
- Executive dashboard (SLA compliance)
- Engineering dashboard (service health)
- On-call dashboard (incidents)
- AI/ML dashboard (model performance)
- Cost dashboard (resource usage)

5. ANOMALY DETECTION
- Baseline establishment
- Deviation thresholds
- Seasonal adjustments

6. ALERT MANAGEMENT
- Severity levels (P1-P4)
- Escalation policies
- On-call schedules
- Alert suppression rules
- Maintenance windows

7. HEALTH CHECKS
- Liveness probes
- Readiness probes
- Dependency checks
- Synthetic monitoring

Output: Complete specification with Prometheus rules, Grafana dashboards, and alert definitions.

PROMPT GAP-004: Event Catalog

You are an architect documenting the event-driven architecture for an AI-first FP&A platform.

Create an EVENT CATALOG covering:

1. EVENT OVERVIEW
- Event-driven architecture patterns used
- Message broker (Kafka) configuration
- Event schema registry
- Event versioning strategy

2. DOMAIN EVENTS (complete list)

A. Accounting Domain
- JournalEntryCreated
- JournalEntryApproved
- JournalEntryPosted
- JournalEntryReversed
- PeriodClosed
- PeriodReopened
- TrialBalanceGenerated

B. Reconciliation Domain
- ReconciliationSessionStarted
- BankTransactionsImported
- MatchSuggested
- MatchConfirmed
- MatchRejected
- ExceptionCreated
- ExceptionResolved
- ReconciliationCompleted

C. Planning Domain
- BudgetCreated
- BudgetApproved
- ForecastGenerated
- ScenarioCreated
- VarianceCalculated

D. Integration Domain
- ConnectionEstablished
- SyncStarted
- SyncCompleted
- SyncFailed
- DataTransformed

E. AI/Agent Domain
- AgentSessionStarted
- AgentTaskAssigned
- AgentToolCalled
- AgentCheckpointCreated
- HumanApprovalRequested
- HumanApprovalReceived
- AgentSessionCompleted

F. Compliance Domain
- ControlTestExecuted
- EvidenceCollected
- FindingCreated
- FindingRemediated
- ComplianceReportGenerated

3. EVENT SCHEMAS (CloudEvents format)
For each event:
- Event type (namespaced)
- Source
- Subject
- Data schema (JSON Schema)
- Required fields
- Optional fields
- Example payload

4. EVENT FLOWS
- Key business process flows as event sequences
- Saga patterns for distributed transactions
- Compensation events

5. CONSUMERS AND PRODUCERS
- Which services produce each event
- Which services consume each event
- Consumer group strategy

6. EVENT STORAGE
- Retention policies
- Replay capabilities
- Dead letter queues

Output: Complete event catalog with schemas and flow diagrams.

PROMPT GAP-016: Data Classification Matrix

You are a data governance specialist creating a data classification matrix for an AI-first FP&A platform handling financial and personal data.

Create a DATA CLASSIFICATION MATRIX covering:

1. CLASSIFICATION LEVELS (4 tiers)
- PUBLIC: Freely shareable
- INTERNAL: Business use only
- CONFIDENTIAL: Sensitive business data
- RESTRICTED: Regulated/highly sensitive

2. COMPLETE DATA INVENTORY
Map every data element to classification:

A. User Data
- Authentication credentials
- Profile information
- Contact details
- Preferences

B. Financial Data
- Journal entries
- Account balances
- Forecasts
- Budgets
- Bank transactions

C. Operational Data
- Audit logs
- System logs
- AI agent sessions
- Integration credentials

D. Analytical Data
- Reports
- Dashboards
- ML model outputs

3. HANDLING REQUIREMENTS BY LEVEL
- Storage requirements
- Encryption requirements
- Access control requirements
- Transmission requirements
- Retention requirements
- Disposal requirements

4. REGULATORY MAPPINGS
- PII fields → GDPR/CCPA/LGPD
- PHI fields → HIPAA
- Financial fields → SOX
- Audit fields → FDA 21 CFR 11

5. ACCESS CONTROL MATRIX
- Role-based access by classification level
- Segregation of duties requirements
- Approval workflows

6. LABELING AND TAGGING
- Database column tags
- API response headers
- Document labels
- Log redaction rules

7. DATA FLOW DIAGRAMS
- How classified data moves through system
- Cross-boundary controls
- Third-party data sharing

Output: Complete classification matrix with field-level mappings.