Government & Public Sector
Agentic AI Implementation Guide
Document ID: B6-GOVT-PUBLIC-SECTOR
Version: 1.0
Category: Industry Vertical
Sector Overview
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Decision Velocity | Slow (procurement, policy) |
| Compliance Burden | Very High (FISMA, FedRAMP, state regulations) |
| Data Sensitivity | High (PII, national security) |
| Legacy Systems | Extensive (COBOL, mainframes) |
| Budget Cycles | Annual, rigid |
| Stakeholder Complexity | Very High (elected officials, citizens, unions) |
Primary Use Cases
1. Citizen Services (GS + VE)
Application: Automated response to citizen inquiries
Paradigm: GS (retrieval) + VE (compliance)
Flow:
1. Citizen submits inquiry (web/phone/email)
2. GS retrieves relevant policies, procedures, eligibility
3. VE ensures response follows agency guidelines
4. Human review for complex/sensitive cases
5. Response delivered with required disclosures
Compliance: ADA accessibility, language requirements
ROI Metrics:
- 60% reduction in response time
- 40% reduction in call center volume
- 85% citizen satisfaction maintained
2. Grants Management (VE)
Application: Grant application processing and compliance monitoring
Protocol: GRANTS_PROCESSING_V1
Step 1: Application Intake
- Extract application data
- Validate completeness
- Assign tracking number
Step 2: Eligibility Screening
- Check entity eligibility (SAM.gov)
- Verify certifications
- Confirm match requirements
Step 3: Technical Review
- Score against criteria
- Flag discrepancies
- Generate review summary
Step 4: Compliance Check
- Verify budget alignment
- Check for conflicts
- Document findings
Step 5: Recommendation
- Generate funding recommendation
- Route for approval
- Create audit record
Compliance: 2 CFR 200, agency-specific requirements
3. Procurement Assistance (GS)
Application: Helping vendors navigate procurement process
Paradigm: GS
Knowledge Base:
- FAR/DFAR regulations
- Agency supplements
- Past solicitations
- Award histories
Capabilities:
- Explain procurement requirements
- Identify relevant contract vehicles
- Guide proposal preparation
- Answer compliance questions
Guardrails:
- No bid/no-bid recommendations
- No pricing guidance
- Disclosure of AI use
4. Policy Analysis (GS + LSR)
Application: Analyzing proposed regulations and legislation
Phase 1 (GS): Research
- Retrieve relevant statutes
- Find precedent policies
- Identify stakeholder positions
- Gather impact data
Phase 2 (LSR): Synthesis
- Summarize key provisions
- Identify implementation challenges
- Propose alternatives
- Draft briefing materials
Output: Policy brief with citations
5. Benefits Administration (VE)
Application: Processing benefit applications
Protocol: BENEFITS_DETERMINATION
Required: Complete audit trail, decision rationale
Step 1: Identity Verification
- Validate identity documents
- Cross-reference databases
- Flag discrepancies
Step 2: Eligibility Determination
- Apply eligibility rules
- Calculate benefit amounts
- Document all decisions
Step 3: Quality Assurance
- Automated consistency checks
- Sample for human review
- Track error rates
Compliance: Privacy Act, program-specific regulations
Compliance Framework
FedRAMP Considerations
| Requirement | Agentic Implementation |
|---|---|
| Data residency | US-based LLM providers or on-premise |
| Access control | PIV/CAC integration, MFA |
| Audit logging | Immutable, 7-year retention |
| Incident response | 72-hour reporting capability |
| Continuous monitoring | Automated security scanning |
FISMA Controls (Selected)
| Control Family | Agentic Relevance |
|---|---|
| AC (Access Control) | Agent authentication, authorization |
| AU (Audit) | Action logging, review procedures |
| CA (Assessment) | Agent testing, validation |
| CM (Configuration) | Agent versioning, change control |
| IA (Identification) | User/agent identity management |
| SC (System Protection) | Input validation, output filtering |
Privacy Act Compliance
REQUIREMENTS FOR PII HANDLING:
1. System of Records Notice (SORN)
- Document agent access to PII
- Publish in Federal Register if new system
2. Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
- Assess agent use of PII
- Document safeguards
- Review annually
3. Minimum Necessary
- Agent retrieves only required PII
- Context windows minimized
- Outputs filtered
4. Individual Rights
- Access request handling
- Amendment procedures
- Accounting of disclosures
Implementation Considerations
Procurement Path
Option 1: Existing Contract Vehicles
- GSA Schedule 70 (IT)
- NASA SEWP
- Agency BPAs
Option 2: New Procurement
- RFI for market research
- RFP with AI-specific evaluation criteria
- Pilot program authority
Option 3: Other Transaction Authority (OTA)
- Faster procurement for prototypes
- Available at some agencies
Change Management
Government-Specific Challenges:
- Union considerations
- Political sensitivity
- Public scrutiny
- Long approval chains
Mitigation:
- Early stakeholder engagement
- Transparency about AI use
- Gradual rollout
- Human oversight emphasis
ROI Framework
Quantifiable Benefits
| Metric | Typical Improvement |
|---|---|
| Processing time | 50-70% reduction |
| Error rates | 30-50% reduction |
| Citizen wait times | 40-60% reduction |
| Staff reallocation | 20-40% to higher-value work |
Mission Impact
| Outcome | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Service accessibility | 24/7 availability |
| Equity | Consistent treatment across cases |
| Transparency | Decision explanation capability |
| Accountability | Complete audit trails |
Case Example: Benefits Processing
Agency: State workforce agency
Challenge: 6-week backlog in unemployment claims
Solution: VE agent for initial eligibility determination
Implementation:
- VE agent processes 70% of straightforward claims
- Complex cases routed to human adjudicators
- Full audit trail for all decisions
- Citizens can request human review
Results:
- Backlog cleared in 4 weeks
- 65% of claims processed same-day
- Error rate reduced 35%
- Appeals rate unchanged (validation of quality)
- Staff focused on complex cases and fraud detection
Document maintained by CODITECT Public Sector Team