Education & EdTech

Agentic AI Implementation Guide

Document ID: B8-EDUCATION-EDTECH
Version: 1.0
Category: Industry Vertical

---

Sector Overview

Characteristic	Description
User Diversity	K-12, Higher Ed, Corporate, Lifelong
Regulatory Environment	FERPA, COPPA, accessibility requirements
Personalization Need	Critical for learning outcomes
Assessment Sensitivity	High stakes, integrity concerns
Accessibility Requirements	ADA, Section 508
Budget Constraints	Often limited, ROI scrutiny

---

Primary Use Cases

1. Intelligent Tutoring (GS + EP)

Application: Personalized learning assistant

Paradigm: GS (content retrieval) + EP (adaptive learning)

Learning Loop:
1. Assess current knowledge state
2. Present appropriate challenge
3. Evaluate response
4. Provide feedback
5. Adapt difficulty
6. Repeat

Knowledge Base:
- Curriculum standards (Common Core, state)
- Learning objectives by grade/subject
- Prerequisite maps
- Common misconceptions
- Scaffolded explanations

Adaptation Strategy:

class AdaptiveTutor:
    def select_next_problem(self, student):
        mastery = student.mastery_estimates
        
        # Zone of proximal development
        target_difficulty = student.current_level + 0.2
        
        # Find problems at target difficulty
        candidates = self.problem_bank.filter(
            difficulty=target_difficulty,
            prerequisites_met=mastery,
            not_recently_seen=True
        )
        
        # Vary problem types
        return self.select_for_variety(candidates)

Guardrails:

• Never provide direct answers without teaching
• Encourage productive struggle
• Recognize frustration, adjust approach
• Flag students needing human intervention

2. Automated Grading & Feedback (GS + VE)

Application: Essay and assignment evaluation

Paradigm: GS (rubric application) + VE (consistency)

Process:
1. Parse submission
2. Apply rubric criteria
3. Generate detailed feedback
4. Calculate score
5. Provide improvement suggestions
6. Log for review

Rubric Application:
- Retrieve rubric for assignment
- Evaluate each criterion
- Cite specific evidence from submission
- Compare to exemplars
- Document rationale

Feedback Quality:

GOOD FEEDBACK:
"Your thesis statement clearly states your position 
on renewable energy. However, paragraph 2 would benefit 
from a specific statistic to support your claim about 
cost reduction. Consider citing the DOE report mentioned 
in your research."

AVOID:
"Good job!" (too vague)
"This is wrong." (not constructive)

3. Curriculum Development (LSR + GS)

Application: Creating educational content

Phase 1 (GS): Standards Alignment
- Map to learning standards
- Identify prerequisite knowledge
- Review existing materials
- Find gaps in coverage

Phase 2 (LSR): Content Creation
- Generate lesson plans
- Create practice problems
- Develop assessments
- Design activities

Quality Checks:
- Age-appropriate language
- Cultural sensitivity
- Accessibility compliance
- Pedagogical soundness

4. Student Support Services (GS)

Application: Academic advising and support

Knowledge Base:
- Degree requirements
- Course catalogs
- Academic policies
- Support resources
- Financial aid information

Capabilities:
- Answer policy questions
- Generate degree audits
- Recommend courses
- Identify at-risk indicators
- Connect to resources

Privacy Considerations:

FERPA COMPLIANCE:

Permitted:
- Directory information (with consent)
- Aggregated, de-identified data
- Student's own records (to them)

Prohibited:
- Sharing education records without consent
- Disclosing to third parties
- Retaining beyond necessity

Implementation:
- Session-scoped context only
- No persistent storage of student data
- Audit all record access

5. Administrative Automation (VE)

Application: Enrollment, registration, records

Protocol: ENROLLMENT_PROCESSING

Step 1: Application Review
- Verify completeness
- Validate documents
- Check eligibility

Step 2: Decision Support
- Apply admission criteria
- Generate recommendation
- Flag for human review if complex

Step 3: Communication
- Generate decision letters
- Send appropriate notifications
- Schedule next steps

Compliance: FERPA, state regulations

---

Age-Appropriate Design

K-12 Considerations

Grade Level	Design Principles
K-5	Simple language, visual feedback, heavy scaffolding
6-8	More autonomy, growth mindset messaging, peer comparison avoided
9-12	Career relevance, self-directed options, critical thinking emphasis

COPPA Compliance (Under 13)

REQUIREMENTS:

1. Parental Consent
   - Verifiable consent before collection
   - Notice of data practices
   - Opt-out mechanism

2. Data Minimization
   - Collect only what's necessary
   - No behavioral advertising
   - Limited retention

3. Security
   - Reasonable data protection
   - Confidentiality maintained
   - Secure deletion when complete

---

Accessibility Requirements

WCAG 2.1 AA Compliance

Principle	Agentic Implementation
Perceivable	Alt text for visuals, captions, text alternatives
Operable	Keyboard navigation, no time limits, skip options
Understandable	Clear language, consistent navigation, error identification
Robust	Screen reader compatible, standard formats

Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

Multiple Means of:

ENGAGEMENT
- Choice in topics/approaches
- Self-regulation support
- Relevance to interests

REPRESENTATION
- Text, audio, visual options
- Clarification of vocabulary
- Multiple examples

ACTION & EXPRESSION
- Multiple response formats
- Scaffolded composition
- Progress monitoring

---

ROI Framework

Learning Outcomes

Metric	Typical Improvement
Assessment scores	10-25% improvement
Time to mastery	20-40% reduction
Engagement rates	30-50% increase
Completion rates	15-30% improvement

Operational Efficiency

Area	Typical Savings
Grading time	50-70% reduction
Advising load	40-60% deflection
Content development	30-50% faster
Administrative tasks	60-80% automation

Cost Per Student Impact

Traditional Model:
- Instructor ratio: 1:30
- Support staff ratio: 1:200
- Cost per student: $X

With Agentic AI:
- Instructor ratio: 1:50 (AI handles routine)
- Support staff ratio: 1:500
- Cost per student: $X - 25%

While improving:
- Personalization
- Response time
- Availability (24/7)

---

Implementation Priorities

Phase 1: Support & Efficiency (Weeks 1-6)

1. FAQ automation
2. Policy inquiries
3. Basic tutoring Q&A

Phase 2: Learning Enhancement (Weeks 7-14)

1. Adaptive practice
2. Automated feedback
3. Progress tracking

Phase 3: Personalization (Weeks 15-24)

1. Learning path optimization
2. Early intervention
3. Content generation

---

Document maintained by CODITECT Education Practice