CODITECT Use Case Catalog

Enterprise Transformation Scenarios by Industry & Persona

Use Case Framework

Each use case follows the structure:

Scenario: What the user is trying to accomplish
Traditional Approach: How it's done today
Coditect Approach: How Coditect transforms it
Impact: Quantified improvement

PART 1: Healthcare & Life Sciences

HC-DEV-01: HIPAA-Compliant Patient Portal

Persona: Engineering Lead, Healthcare IT

Scenario: Build patient portal with secure messaging, appointment scheduling, and medical records access—all HIPAA compliant.

Traditional Approach:

4-6 months development cycle
Separate compliance review (2-4 weeks)
Manual BAA documentation
Access control matrix creation (40+ hours)
Penetration testing coordination

Coditect Approach:

input: "Build patient portal with HIPAA-compliant secure messaging, 
        appointment scheduling, and medical records access"

agents_activated:
  architect:
    - System design with PHI data flow mapping
    - Access control architecture
    - Encryption requirements specification
    
  developer:
    - Production code with HIPAA safeguards
    - Audit logging built-in
    - Breach notification hooks
    
  compliance:
    - HIPAA compliance matrix (automatic)
    - BAA template generation
    - Security control documentation
    - Risk assessment artifacts

output: Complete system + all compliance documentation
timeline: 2-3 weeks

Impact: 4-6 months → 2-3 weeks (8-12x improvement)

HC-DEV-02: FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Validation

Persona: Quality Assurance Director, MedTech

Scenario: Validate software system for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance including electronic signatures, audit trails, and system controls.

Traditional Approach:

6-12 month validation project
External consultants ($200K-$500K)
Manual IQ/OQ/PQ protocol creation
Traceability matrix development (100+ hours)
Remediation cycles

Coditect Approach:

input: "Generate FDA 21 CFR Part 11 validation package for [system]"

agents_activated:
  compliance:
    - Electronic signature requirements mapping
    - Audit trail gap analysis
    - System access control verification
    
  documentation:
    - IQ protocol generation
    - OQ protocol generation  
    - PQ protocol generation
    - Traceability matrix (automatic)
    - Validation summary report

output: Complete validation package, audit-ready
timeline: 4-6 weeks

Impact: $200K-$500K project → Platform feature; 6-12 months → 4-6 weeks

HC-OPS-01: Design History File (DHF) Maintenance

Persona: Regulatory Affairs Manager, Medical Device

Scenario: Maintain FDA-required Design History File with every design change, verification, and validation activity.

Traditional Approach:

4-8 hours per design change
Manual document assembly
Version control challenges
Traceability gaps during audits
Last-minute scramble before submissions

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /dhf-update

input: "Design change: Updated sensor calibration algorithm 
        per CAPA-2024-042"

agents_activated:
  documentation:
    - DHF entry generation
    - Design input/output linkage
    - Verification evidence collection
    - Traceability matrix update
    
  compliance:
    - Risk analysis impact assessment
    - CAPA cross-reference
    - Previous version archival

output: Complete DHF entry with full traceability
timeline: 30 minutes (automatic)

Impact: 4-8 hours → 30 minutes per change; audit-ready continuously

HC-BIZ-01: Healthcare RFP Response

Persona: Business Development Director, Healthcare IT Vendor

Scenario: Respond to hospital system RFP requiring detailed HIPAA compliance, integration specifications, and security documentation.

Traditional Approach:

5-7 days assembly time
Pull from fragmented document sources
Compliance section creation (16+ hours)
Technical review cycles
Last-minute formatting

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /proposal-draft

input: "RFP response for [Hospital System] - EHR integration 
        with HIPAA compliance requirements"

agents_activated:
  research:
    - Customer-specific requirements extraction
    - Competitive positioning analysis
    - Pricing optimization
    
  documentation:
    - Executive summary generation
    - Technical approach section
    - HIPAA compliance matrix
    - Integration architecture diagrams
    - Security control mappings
    
  business:
    - Pricing model optimization
    - Win theme development
    - Differentiator highlighting

output: Complete proposal draft, compliance-ready
timeline: 4-8 hours

Impact: 5-7 days → 4-8 hours (10x improvement)

PART 2: Financial Services & Fintech

FIN-DEV-01: SOX-Compliant Financial Reporting Module

Persona: VP Engineering, Fintech Platform

Scenario: Build financial reporting module with SOX-compliant controls, audit trails, and segregation of duties.

Traditional Approach:

3-4 months development
External SOX consultant ($150K+)
Control documentation (80+ hours)
Multiple audit cycles
Remediation iterations

Coditect Approach:

input: "Build financial reporting module with SOX compliance - 
        segregation of duties, change management controls, 
        audit trail requirements"

agents_activated:
  architect:
    - Control framework design
    - Segregation of duties matrix
    - Change management workflow
    
  developer:
    - Code with SOX controls embedded
    - Audit logging (automatic)
    - Approval workflow implementation
    
  compliance:
    - Control documentation
    - Test of design artifacts
    - Test of effectiveness framework
    - Auditor-ready evidence package

output: Complete module + SOX documentation
timeline: 3-4 weeks

Impact: 3-4 months → 3-4 weeks; $150K+ consulting → Platform feature

FIN-DEV-02: PCI-DSS Payment Integration

Persona: Security Architect, Payment Processor

Scenario: Implement payment processing integration meeting PCI-DSS requirements including encryption, tokenization, and access controls.

Traditional Approach:

4-6 months implementation
PCI QSA assessment ($50K-$100K)
Manual SAQ completion
Penetration testing coordination
Remediation cycles

Coditect Approach:

input: "Payment integration with PCI-DSS compliance - 
        card data tokenization, encryption at rest/transit, 
        access control requirements"

agents_activated:
  architect:
    - Data flow with cardholder data isolation
    - Tokenization architecture
    - Network segmentation design
    
  developer:
    - Secure implementation (PCI patterns)
    - Encryption implementation
    - Access control enforcement
    
  compliance:
    - SAQ section mapping
    - Control evidence generation
    - Penetration test scope definition
    - Remediation tracking framework

output: Compliant implementation + PCI artifacts
timeline: 4-6 weeks

Impact: 4-6 months → 4-6 weeks; audit artifacts automatic

FIN-OPS-01: Regulatory Reporting Automation

Persona: Chief Compliance Officer, Bank

Scenario: Automate regulatory reporting workflows including data aggregation, validation, and submission preparation.

Traditional Approach:

Manual data aggregation (40+ hours/month)
Validation spreadsheets
Version control challenges
Last-minute corrections
Submission delays

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /regulatory-report

input: "Generate [Report Type] for [Period] with validation"

agents_activated:
  data_ops:
    - Data aggregation from sources
    - Validation rule execution
    - Anomaly detection
    - Reconciliation checks
    
  documentation:
    - Report generation
    - Supporting schedules
    - Variance explanations
    - Submission checklist
    
  compliance:
    - Control attestation
    - Evidence package
    - Audit trail documentation

output: Submission-ready report package
timeline: Hours (vs. days)

Impact: 40+ hours/month → Automated; error rates reduced 90%+

FIN-BIZ-01: Competitive Intelligence Dashboard

Persona: Head of Strategy, Fintech Startup

Scenario: Continuous competitive monitoring across pricing, features, market positioning, and regulatory positioning.

Traditional Approach:

Quarterly manual research (2-3 weeks)
Stale by publication
Inconsistent coverage
No regulatory angle

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /competitive-scan

input: "Competitive analysis: [Competitor List] - 
        pricing, features, regulatory positioning"

agents_activated:
  research:
    - Multi-source intelligence gathering
    - Pricing structure analysis
    - Feature comparison matrix
    - Regulatory positioning assessment
    
  analysis:
    - SWOT synthesis
    - Battlecard generation
    - Win/loss pattern identification
    - Market trend extraction
    
  documentation:
    - Executive summary
    - Detailed comparison matrix
    - Actionable recommendations

output: Comprehensive competitive package
timeline: Continuous (real-time updates available)

Impact: Quarterly → Continuous; 2-3 weeks → Hours

PART 3: Cross-Industry Use Cases

GEN-DEV-01: Legacy System Modernization

Persona: CTO, Enterprise

Scenario: Modernize legacy monolith to microservices while maintaining regulatory compliance and operational continuity.

Traditional Approach:

12-24 month transformation
$2M-$10M project cost
High failure risk (60%+)
Compliance gap during transition
Business disruption

Coditect Approach:

input: "Modernize [Legacy System] to microservices - 
        maintain [Compliance Framework] throughout migration"

agents_activated:
  architect:
    - Domain boundary analysis
    - Strangler fig pattern design
    - Data migration strategy
    - Compliance continuity plan
    
  developer:
    - Service extraction (incremental)
    - API gateway implementation
    - Data synchronization layer
    - Feature flag management
    
  compliance:
    - Continuous compliance validation
    - Migration audit trail
    - Rollback documentation
    - Regulatory notification drafts

output: Incremental migration + continuous compliance
timeline: Phased (50% faster than traditional)

Impact: 12-24 months → 6-12 months; compliance gaps → Continuous validation

GEN-OPS-01: SOP Generation & Management

Persona: Operations Director, Regulated Enterprise

Scenario: Generate, maintain, and version-control Standard Operating Procedures across the organization.

Traditional Approach:

Manual authoring (8-16 hours per SOP)
Version control via filenames
Inconsistent formatting
Review bottlenecks
Training material disconnect

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /sop-generate

input: "Generate SOP for [Process] - 
        regulatory framework [FDA/HIPAA/SOC2]"

agents_activated:
  documentation:
    - Process analysis
    - Step-by-step procedure generation
    - Decision tree creation
    - Exception handling documentation
    
  compliance:
    - Regulatory requirement mapping
    - Control point identification
    - Training requirement specification
    - Review workflow setup
    
  training:
    - Quick reference card generation
    - Training assessment questions
    - Competency checklist

output: Complete SOP package + training materials
timeline: 1-2 hours (vs. 8-16 hours)

Impact: 8-16 hours → 1-2 hours per SOP; integrated training materials

GEN-OPS-02: Audit Preparation Package

Persona: Internal Audit Manager, Enterprise

Scenario: Prepare comprehensive evidence package for external audit (SOC2, FDA, financial).

Traditional Approach:

2-4 weeks scramble
Evidence hunting across systems
Gap discovery during prep
Last-minute remediation
Stress and overtime

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /audit-prep

input: "Prepare [Audit Type] evidence package for [Scope]"

agents_activated:
  compliance:
    - Control inventory validation
    - Evidence mapping to requirements
    - Gap identification
    - Remediation prioritization
    
  documentation:
    - Evidence package assembly
    - Control narrative generation
    - Testing documentation
    - Management assertion drafts
    
  data_ops:
    - Evidence extraction automation
    - Screenshot/log collection
    - Population sampling
    - Exception documentation

output: Audit-ready evidence package
timeline: Real-time (continuous readiness)

Impact: 2-4 weeks → Real-time readiness; audit findings reduced 80%+

GEN-BIZ-01: Board Meeting Preparation

Persona: Chief of Staff, Executive Team

Scenario: Prepare board meeting materials including operational metrics, strategic updates, and compliance status.

Traditional Approach:

1-2 weeks preparation
Data gathering from multiple sources
Slide assembly and formatting
Multiple review cycles
Last-minute updates

Coditect Approach:

slash_command: /board-prep

input: "Board meeting package for [Date] - 
        operational metrics, strategic initiatives, compliance status"

agents_activated:
  data_ops:
    - KPI aggregation
    - Trend analysis
    - Variance explanations
    - Benchmark comparisons
    
  documentation:
    - Executive summary generation
    - Slide content drafting
    - Appendix compilation
    - Speaking notes
    
  business:
    - Strategic narrative alignment
    - Risk/opportunity highlighting
    - Action item tracking
    - Decision request framing

output: Complete board package
timeline: 1-2 days (vs. 1-2 weeks)

Impact: 1-2 weeks → 1-2 days; consistent quality every meeting

Use Case Selection Guide

By Primary Pain Point

Pain Point	Recommended Use Cases
Slow development cycles	HC-DEV-01, FIN-DEV-01, GEN-DEV-01
Compliance documentation burden	HC-DEV-02, HC-OPS-01, GEN-OPS-01
Audit preparation stress	FIN-OPS-01, GEN-OPS-02
Slow RFP responses	HC-BIZ-01
Competitive intelligence gaps	FIN-BIZ-01
Legacy modernization risk	GEN-DEV-01

By Industry

Industry	Primary Use Cases
Healthcare IT	HC-DEV-01, HC-BIZ-01, GEN-OPS-01
Medical Devices	HC-DEV-02, HC-OPS-01
Banking/Finance	FIN-DEV-01, FIN-OPS-01, GEN-OPS-02
Fintech	FIN-DEV-02, FIN-BIZ-01
Cross-Industry	GEN-DEV-01, GEN-OPS-01, GEN-OPS-02

Use Case Catalog v1.0 | January 2026 AZ1.AI Inc.

Enterprise Transformation Scenarios by Industry & Persona​

Use Case Framework​

PART 1: Healthcare & Life Sciences

HC-DEV-01: HIPAA-Compliant Patient Portal​

HC-DEV-02: FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Validation​

HC-OPS-01: Design History File (DHF) Maintenance​

HC-BIZ-01: Healthcare RFP Response​

PART 2: Financial Services & Fintech

FIN-DEV-01: SOX-Compliant Financial Reporting Module​

FIN-DEV-02: PCI-DSS Payment Integration​

FIN-OPS-01: Regulatory Reporting Automation​

FIN-BIZ-01: Competitive Intelligence Dashboard​

PART 3: Cross-Industry Use Cases

GEN-DEV-01: Legacy System Modernization​

GEN-OPS-01: SOP Generation & Management​

GEN-OPS-02: Audit Preparation Package​

GEN-BIZ-01: Board Meeting Preparation​

Use Case Selection Guide

By Primary Pain Point​

By Industry​

Enterprise Transformation Scenarios by Industry & Persona

Use Case Framework

HC-DEV-01: HIPAA-Compliant Patient Portal

HC-DEV-02: FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Validation

HC-OPS-01: Design History File (DHF) Maintenance

HC-BIZ-01: Healthcare RFP Response

FIN-DEV-01: SOX-Compliant Financial Reporting Module

FIN-DEV-02: PCI-DSS Payment Integration

FIN-OPS-01: Regulatory Reporting Automation

FIN-BIZ-01: Competitive Intelligence Dashboard

GEN-DEV-01: Legacy System Modernization

GEN-OPS-01: SOP Generation & Management

GEN-OPS-02: Audit Preparation Package

GEN-BIZ-01: Board Meeting Preparation

By Primary Pain Point

By Industry