CODITECT Development Studio v2.0 - Executive Summary
Date: 2026-01-31
Status: Architecture Complete, Ready for Implementation
Investment: $707K (14 weeks, 8 engineers)
Target Launch: May 2026
1. Vision
CODITECT Development Studio v2.0 is a browser-based IDE with unified persistent workspaces where multiple AI agents (Claude, Gemini, Codex, Kimi) collaborate in real-time on shared codebases.
The Problem with v1.0
- ❌ 4 separate ephemeral sandboxes with 30-min timeouts
- ❌ Cold starts of 5-10 seconds
- ❌ Complex external routing
- ❌ Data loss on timeout
- ❌ Poor multi-agent collaboration
The v2.0 Solution
- ✅ 1 persistent workspace with 8-hour sessions
- ✅ Zero cold start - always warm
- ✅ In-workspace coordination - agents share context
- ✅ GCS FUSE persistence - never lose work
- ✅ SQLite + JSONL - ACID + audit trail
2. Architecture at a Glance
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLIENT LAYER │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ CODITECT Development Studio │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Multi- │ │ Workspace │ │ │
│ │ │ Agent │ │ Timeline + │ │ │
│ │ │ Chat │ │ File Explorer │ │ │
│ │ └──────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ WebSocket / HTTPS
┌──────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ EDGE LAYER (Cloudflare) │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ │
│ │ CDN │ │ WAF │ │ Workers │ │ Durable Objects │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ (API) │ │ (Workspace Registry)│ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └─────────────────────┘ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ PERSISTENT COMPUTE LAYER │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ UNIFIED PERSISTENT WORKSPACE │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Claude │ │ Gemini │ │ Kimi │ │ Codex │ │ │
│ │ │ Agent │ │ Agent │ │ Agent │ │ Agent │ │ │
│ │ │ (editing) │ │ (waiting) │ │ (analyzing) │ │ (indexing) │ │ │
│ │ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ Shared: task queue, file locks, message bus, SQLite cluster │ │
│ │ │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
│ gcsfuse (bidirectional sync)
┌───────────────────────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GCS PRIMARY STORAGE │
│ Bucket: coditect-workspaces-{org-id} │
│ ├── organizations/{org-id}/teams/{team-id}/users/{user-id}/workspaces/{id}/ │
│ │ ├── projects/ ← Code repositories (FUSE mounted) │
│ │ ├── databases/ ← SQLite files (~9GB per 1K users) │
│ │ ├── sessions/ ← JSONL archives │
│ │ └── vector-store/ ← Embeddings │
│ └── [R2 MIRROR - Cross-region hot cache] │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
3. Key Innovations
3.1 Unified Persistent Workspace
| Aspect | Before (v1.0) | After (v2.0) |
|---|---|---|
| Containers | 4 ephemeral sandboxes | 1 persistent workspace |
| Lifetime | 30 minutes | 8+ hours, renewable |
| Cold Start | 5-10 seconds | 0 seconds |
| Coordination | External routing | In-workspace orchestrator |
3.2 SQLite Database Cluster
- 6 databases per workspace: sessions, messages, artifacts, parsed_sessions, agent_metrics, workspace_idx
- WAL mode for performance and durability
- GCS sync every 30 seconds for disaster recovery
- Query interface via WebSocket for real-time UI
3.3 Session JSONL Archive
- Append-only event log for complete audit trail
- Event types: file_edit, agent_message, tool_call, checkpoint, agent_state_change
- GCS persistence every 5 seconds
- Stream replay for session timeline
3.4 Multi-Agent Coordination
- File locks prevent concurrent edits
- Task queue per agent with priority
- Message bus for agent-to-agent communication
- Shared context reduces token waste
4. Business Case
4.1 Value Proposition
| Stakeholder | Benefit | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Developers | Never lose work, instant sessions | 10× productivity gain |
| Teams | Real-time collaboration | 4× faster delivery |
| Enterprises | Complete audit trail | Compliance ready |
| Platform | Simplified architecture | 50% less ops overhead |
4.2 Cost Analysis
Infrastructure Cost (@ 1,000 users)
| Component | v1.0 | v2.0 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compute | $1,200 | $4,200 | +250% |
| Storage (GCS) | $200 | $1,460 | +630% |
| Storage (R2) | $150 | $355 | +137% |
| Observability | $150 | $1,800 | +1100% |
| TOTAL | $3,200 | $9,500 | +197% |
Target after Phase 5 optimization: $6,500 (+103%)
ROI Calculation
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Development cost | $707K |
| Monthly savings per developer | 10 hours × $100/hr = $1,000 |
| Annual savings per developer | $12,000 |
| Break-even | 59 developers |
| Payback period | 6 months @ 100 developers |
4.3 Competitive Advantage
| Feature | CODITECT v2.0 | GitHub Copilot | Cursor | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent collaboration | ✅ 4 agents | ❌ 1 | ❌ 1 | ❌ 1 |
| Persistent sessions | ✅ 8+ hours | ❌ Stateless | ❌ Stateless | ❌ Stateless |
| Zero cold start | ✅ < 1s | N/A | ⚠️ ~5s | N/A |
| Complete audit trail | ✅ JSONL | ❌ Limited | ❌ Limited | ⚠️ Partial |
| Self-hosted option | ✅ GKE | ❌ Cloud only | ❌ Cloud only | ✅ Enterprise |
5. Implementation Timeline
5.1 14-Week Roadmap
Week: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
Phase 1: Foundation (Infrastructure, SQLite, GCS FUSE)
[═══════════════════]
Phase 2: Agents (Orchestrator, 4 adapters, locks)
[═══════════════════]
Phase 3: Frontend (Multi-agent UI, timeline, locks)
[══════════]
Phase 4: Migration (v1.0 → v2.0, zero downtime)
[══════]
Phase 5: Optimization (Performance, cost, GA)
[══════]
Milestones:
● M0 (Week 4): Foundation complete
● M1 (Week 7): Agents working
● M2 (Week 9): Frontend complete
● M3 (Week 11): Migration complete
● M4 (Week 14): GA launch
5.2 Team Requirements
| Role | Count | Duration | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform Lead | 1 | 14 weeks | $84K |
| Backend Engineers | 3 | 14 weeks | $252K |
| Frontend Engineers | 2 | 14 weeks | $168K |
| DevOps Engineer | 1 | 14 weeks | $84K |
| QA Engineer | 1 | 14 weeks | $84K |
| TOTAL | 8 | 14 weeks | $672K |
6. Risk Assessment
6.1 Critical Risks
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCS FUSE latency | Medium | High | R2 hot mirror, local caching, GKE fallback |
| Cost overrun | Medium | High | Auto-sleep, aggressive optimization in Phase 5 |
| SQLite corruption | Low | Critical | WAL + GCS sync, automated backups, checksums |
| Migration data loss | Low | Critical | Extensive testing, blue-green deployment, instant rollback |
6.2 Mitigation Investment
| Mitigation | Cost | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| GKE Autopilot backup | $5K | Week 1 |
| Load testing infrastructure | $10K | Week 12 |
| Security audit | $15K | Week 13 |
| Migration tooling | $20K | Week 10 |
7. Success Metrics
7.1 Technical KPIs
| Metric | Target | Current (v1.0) |
|---|---|---|
| Workspace startup | < 30s | 5-10s (per sandbox) |
| Workspace reconnect | < 1s | 5-10s |
| Agent task start | < 500ms | 2-3s (routing) |
| File lock acquisition | < 100ms | N/A |
| Availability | 99.9% | 99.5% |
| Data durability | 99.999% | 99.9% |
7.2 Business KPIs
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Cost per user @ 1K | <$7/month |
| Developer satisfaction | > 4.0/5 |
| Feature adoption | > 80% use multi-agent |
| Migration completion | 100% of v1.0 users |
| Revenue impact | +$500K ARR in Year 1 |
8. Recommendation
8.1 Go/No-Go Decision
| Criteria | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture validated | ✅ | All documents complete, reviewed |
| Technical feasibility | ✅ | GCS FUSE + SQLite proven pattern |
| Budget approved | ⏳ | $707K requested |
| Team allocated | ⏳ | 8 engineers needed |
| Timeline acceptable | ✅ | 14 weeks to GA |
Recommendation: PROCEED with Phase 1 (Foundation)
8.2 Immediate Next Steps
- Architecture Review Board approval (Week 0)
- Budget allocation (Week 0)
- Team assignment (Week 0)
- Week 1 Kickoff (Infrastructure, GCS setup)
8.3 Decision Points
| Week | Decision | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Week 2 | GCS FUSE performance | Continue / Pivot to GKE |
| Week 4 | SQLite cluster stability | Continue / Simplify schema |
| Week 7 | Agent coordination | Continue / Reduce to 2 agents |
| Week 11 | Migration readiness | Proceed / Delay GA |
9. Document Index
Architecture Documents
| Document | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ADR-XXX-unified-persistent-architecture.md | Architecture decision | ✅ Complete |
| CODITECT-UNIFIED-PERSISTENT-ARCHITECTURE.md | System architecture | ✅ Complete |
| moe-agents-c4-architecture-v2.md | C4 model (C4→C1) | ✅ Complete |
Design Documents
| Document | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-SDD-v2.md | System design | ✅ Complete |
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-TDD-v2.md | Technical design | ✅ Complete |
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-ARDS-v2.md | Requirements | ✅ Complete |
Planning Documents
| Document | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|
| IMPLEMENTATION-ROADMAP-v2.0.md | 14-week plan | ✅ Complete |
| CODITECT-REVISED-ECONOMIC-MODEL.md | Cost analysis | ✅ Complete |
Legacy Documents (v1.0 - Superseded)
| Document | Note |
|---|---|
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-SDD.md | Superseded by v2 |
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-TDD.md | Superseded by v2 |
| CODITECT-THIN-CLIENT-ARDS.md | Superseded by v2 |
| moe-agents-c4-architecture.md | Superseded by v2 |
10. Contact
| Role | Name | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Lead | TBD | Technical decisions |
| Product Manager | TBD | Feature prioritization |
| Engineering Manager | TBD | Team coordination |
| DevOps Lead | TBD | Infrastructure |
Document Status: Final - Ready for executive review
Next Review: Architecture Review Board, Week 0
Approved By: _________________ Date: _______