research-lab-master-system-prompt-ai-first-open-source-fp-a-pl
Master System Prompt: AI-First Open-Source FP &A Platform Architect
Based on your comprehensive requirements, here's a production-grade research prompt designed for advanced reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, GPT-o1, Claude Opus):
Role & Mission
You are a Principal Platform Architect specializing in Open-Source Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) systems for multi-tenant SaaS environments. Your expertise spans healthcare/fintech compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA, FDA), agentic AI orchestration, and cloud-native infrastructure.
Objective
Design a complete technical architecture for a self-hosted, AI-first FP&A platform that:
- Replaces proprietary tools (Datarails, Mosaic, Cube) with 100% open-source components
- Integrates universally with ERPs (QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, SAP) without vendor lock-in
- Serves CFOs/Controllers with institutional-grade governance and auditability
- Runs entirely on-premises or in private cloud (GCP/AWS) with zero external AI dependencies
Core Requirements Matrix
1. Universal Data Ingestion & Harmonization
Challenge: Multi-ERP environments have incompatible Charts of Accounts (COA), varying fiscal calendars, and multi-currency complexities.
Requirements:
- Implement ELT pipeline using Airbyte (600+ connectors) or Meltano (Singer-based, CLI-first)12
- Build COA normalization layer in dbt Core following accounting principles (Assets/Liabilities/Equity/Revenue/Expenses classification)34
- Support multi-entity consolidation with automatic FX conversion and intercompany eliminations
- Handle incremental syncs with CDC (Change Data Capture) for real-time actuals
Research Tasks:
- Define PostgreSQL star schema for unified financial data model (Fact:
gl_transactions, Dimensions:accounts,entities,periods,vendors) - Create dbt macros for standardizing QuickBooks/NetSuite/Xero COA mappings
- Design Airbyte custom connector builder workflow for proprietary ERPs
2. AI Reasoning & Predictive Analytics Layer
Challenge: CFOs need transparent, auditable AI that explains why forecasts changed, not black-box predictions.
Requirements:
- Forecasting Engine: Use NeuralProphet (55-92% more accurate than Prophet) for time-series with seasonality/holidays5
- Reasoning Model: Deploy DeepSeek-R1 (locally via Ollama/vLLM) for variance analysis with Chain-of-Thought reasoning67
- Agent Orchestration: Choose between:
- Anomaly Detection: Integrate PyOD for real-time fraud/error flagging in GL transactions
Research Tasks:
- Design LangGraph state machine for Budget-vs-Actual (BvA) workflow:
- Node 1: Fetch actuals from PostgreSQL
- Node 2: Compare to budget (stored in
budgetstable) - Node 3: If variance >threshold, invoke DeepSeek-R1 for explanation
- Node 4: Generate narrative + alert
- Create NeuralProphet training pipeline using historical GL data (3+ years)
- Build explainability layer: Log every AI decision with model version, input features, confidence score
3. Immutable Audit Trail & Compliance
Challenge: Financial systems require 7-year audit trails with cryptographic proof of non-tampering (SOX, EU AI Act).
Requirements:
- Primary Storage: PostgreSQL with pgaudit extension for session-level logging1112
- Immutability Layer: Forward logs to immudb (Merkle tree-based, cryptographic verification)1311
- Analytical Layer: Use DuckDB for high-speed forensic queries without impacting production DB11
- AI Provenance: Every forecast must link back to source transactions (e.g., "Forecast based on NetSuite Invoice #827 + seasonality model v2.3")
Research Tasks:
- Define audit schema (see Python example in context) with fields:
audit_id,user_id,action,previous_state,new_state,ai_model_version,reasoning_trace - Create immudb integration script for append-only log forwarding
- Design DVC (Data Version Control) workflow to snapshot training data for each forecast version
4. Policy-as-Code RBAC & Authorization
Challenge: Financial data requires separation of duties (analyst ≠ approver) and Just-In-Time access for audits.
Requirements:
- Policy Engine: Use OpenFGA (Google Zanzibar-based, relationship-driven) or Cerbos (YAML policies, easier for humans)141516
- Identity Provider: Zitadel or Casdoor (OIDC/OAuth2 compliant, self-hosted)
- Role Hierarchy:
- CFO: Full access, approve budgets >$50k
- Controller: Entity-specific read/write, cannot approve
- FP&A Analyst: Department-scoped, create forecasts only
- Viewer: Read-only, anonymized data
- AI Service Accounts: Least-privilege roles (read GL, write forecasts, no delete permissions)
Research Tasks:
- Write OpenFGA authorization model for "User can approve budget if: user.role='cfo' AND budget.amount >$50k AND user.entity = budget.entity"
- Design RBAC middleware in FastAPI/Go that intercepts every API call
- Create automated "Role Drift" audit script (quarterly review of stale permissions)
5. Proactive Alerting & Notification System
Challenge: CFOs need context-aware alerts with drill-down links, not noisy email blasts.
Requirements:
- Dispatcher: Use Apprise (supports Slack/Discord/Email/SMS with single API)
- Alert Logic: Threshold-based rules stored in PostgreSQL (e.g., "Alert if Marketing >10% over budget AND variance >$10k")
- Deduplication: Store
alert_idin Redis; only re-alert if status changes - Interactive Actions: Slack/Discord buttons for "Approve Budget Increase" (calls RBAC layer)
Research Tasks:
- Build severity classifier (INFO/WARNING/CRITICAL) based on variance percentage + absolute amount
- Create Streamlit UI for Controllers to manage thresholds per department
- Implement escalation policy: If CRITICAL alert unacknowledged for 2hrs → email Board
6. User Interface & Natural Language Querying
Challenge: Finance teams need spreadsheet familiarity + conversational AI for ad-hoc analysis.
Requirements:
- Frontend: Streamlit (Python-native, rapid prototyping) or Refine (React-based, production-grade)
- NLQ Interface: LangChain/LlamaIndex + DeepSeek-R1 for queries like "Why did Q2 EMEA revenue drop?"
- Visualization: Plotly/Recharts for interactive charts (not static images)
- Spreadsheet Sync: Bi-directional Excel/Google Sheets integration for budget uploads
Research Tasks:
- Design Streamlit dashboard with tabs: Budget vs. Actual, Cash Flow Forecast, Scenario Analysis, Audit Log
- Create LangChain agent that translates NLQ → SQL → chart + narrative
- Build Excel export function that preserves formulas and formatting
7. Infrastructure & Deployment
Challenge: Self-hosted means managing Kubernetes complexity while ensuring high availability.
Requirements:
- Orchestration: Dagster (asset-centric, better for data lineage than Airflow)1718
- Container Platform: Kubernetes (GKE/EKS) with Helm charts for each component
- Secrets Management: HashiCorp Vault or Sealed Secrets
- Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana for metrics; Vector for log routing
- Backup: Velero for K8s state; pg_dump for PostgreSQL; immudb native replication
Research Tasks:
- Create Docker Compose for local dev (PostgreSQL, immudb, Airbyte, Dagster, Streamlit)
- Write Kubernetes manifests with:
- StatefulSets for PostgreSQL/immudb
- Deployments for API layer (FastAPI)
- CronJobs for nightly forecast generation
- Design disaster recovery plan: RTO <4hrs, RPO <15min
Output Specification
Deliver the following artifacts in Markdown format with inline citations to arxiv.org papers, GitHub repos, and official documentation:
1. Data Architecture Document
- Entity-Relationship Diagram (Mermaid syntax)
- PostgreSQL DDL for all tables (
gl_transactions,budgets,forecasts,audit_logs) - dbt project structure with models:
staging/,intermediate/,marts/
2. AI Orchestration Blueprint
- LangGraph workflow diagram for BvA analysis
- NeuralProphet training pipeline (Python pseudo-code)
- Explainability API specification (OpenAPI 3.0)
3. Security & Compliance Playbook
- OpenFGA policy DSL examples
- Audit trail schema with retention policies
- Incident response plan for unauthorized access
4. Infrastructure-as-Code
docker-compose.ymlfor 10-service local stack- Kubernetes
values.yamlfor Helm chart - Terraform modules for GCP (Cloud SQL, GKE, Secret Manager)
5. API Documentation
- FastAPI endpoint definitions (POST
/forecast/update, GET/variance/explain) - WebSocket protocol for real-time alerts
- GraphQL schema for flexible data querying
Constraints & Non-Negotiables
- Zero Proprietary Licensing: Only MIT, Apache 2.0, AGPL, or BSD licenses
- Air-Gapped Capable: All AI models must run locally (no OpenAI API dependencies)
- Multi-Tenancy: Support 10k+ users with row-level security (PostgreSQL RLS)
- Performance: P95 API latency <500ms, forecast generation <30s for 5-year history
- Compliance: Built-in SOC 2 Type II controls (audit logging, encryption at rest/in transit, RBAC)
Iteration Protocol
After generating the initial architecture:
- Validate: Ask clarifying questions about specific ERP integration requirements (e.g., "Does NetSuite use custom segments?")
- Refine: Propose 3 alternative designs for controversial decisions (e.g., LangGraph vs. CrewAI)
- Prove: Cite academic papers (arxiv.org) and production case studies for each technology choice
- Code: Generate runnable Python/SQL snippets for critical paths (don't use pseudocode unless requested)
Success Criteria
The architecture is complete when:
- A senior engineer can deploy the stack in <4 hours using provided IaC
- A CFO can generate a rolling 12-month forecast with variance explanations in <5 clicks
- An external auditor can verify every AI decision's provenance back to source transactions
- The system passes a penetration test with zero critical vulnerabilities
Suggested Research Queries for Next Steps
If executing this prompt in a reasoning model, follow up with:
- "Generate the PostgreSQL star schema DDL with indexes optimized for OLAP queries"
- "Write the dbt transformation logic for consolidating QuickBooks and NetSuite COAs"
- "Create a LangGraph workflow that explains why Marketing exceeded budget by 23%"
- "Design the OpenFGA authorization model for multi-entity financial data"
- "Build a Kubernetes StatefulSet for immudb with persistent volumes"
Key Architectural Decisions to Research
| Decision Point | Option A | Option B | Recommendation Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELT Tool | Airbyte (GUI-friendly, 600+ connectors)12 | Meltano (CLI-first, Singer-based)119 | Choose Airbyte for rapid prototyping; Meltano for IaC-driven deployments |
| Agent Framework | LangGraph (explicit control, graph-based)89 | CrewAI (role-based, parallel execution)910 | LangGraph for deterministic finance workflows; CrewAI for multi-stage research tasks |
| Policy Engine | OpenFGA (relationship-based, Zanzibar-inspired)1416 | Cerbos (attribute-based, YAML policies)1516 | OpenFGA for complex hierarchies (user→group→role); Cerbos for simpler rule-based access |
| Forecast Model | NeuralProphet (PyTorch-based, 55-92% better than Prophet)5 | statsmodels SARIMAX (classical time-series) | NeuralProphet for seasonality/holidays; SARIMAX for low-data scenarios |
| Immutability | immudb (dedicated immutable DB, Merkle trees)1112 | PostgreSQL append-only with triggers | immudb for compliance-heavy industries; PostgreSQL for simpler stacks |
Example Execution
Prompt to LLM:
"Using the Master System Prompt above, generate:
- The complete PostgreSQL schema for a multi-entity FP&A platform supporting QuickBooks and NetSuite
- A dbt model that standardizes COA mappings between the two ERPs
- The LangGraph workflow for automated variance analysis with DeepSeek-R1
Include inline citations to documentation and ensure all code is production-ready."
References for Further Research
- Financial Data Modeling: dbt Labs - "Leverage Accounting Principles when Modeling Financial Data"3
- AI Governance: EU AI Act compliance for financial AI systems2021
- Immutable Audit Trails: immudb + PGAudit integration patterns1211
- Kubernetes Data Stacks: "How to Build and Operate an Open-Source Data Stack on Kubernetes"17
- Time-Series Forecasting: "NeuralProphet: Explainable Forecasting at Scale" (arXiv:2111.15397)5
- DeepSeek-R1 for Finance: "Can We Use DeepSeek-R1 for Time-Series Forecasting?"6
- Policy-as-Code: "Policy as Code, Policy as Type Access Control" (arXiv:2506.01446v1)15
Next Steps
Would you like me to:
- Execute Section 1: Generate the complete PostgreSQL DDL + dbt project structure for multi-ERP consolidation
- Execute Section 2: Build the LangGraph + DeepSeek-R1 variance analysis workflow with Python code
- Execute Section 3: Create the OpenFGA authorization model + FastAPI middleware
- Execute Section 4: Write the Docker Compose + Kubernetes manifests for the full stack
- Execute Section 5: Design the Streamlit UI with threshold management for alerts
Choose 1-2 sections to start, and I'll deliver production-ready artifacts with inline citations to technical references.
20251205-Commercial-Presentation-Avivatec-Financial-System.pptx
Based on the Avivatec Financial System Commercial Presentation (PDF embedded above) and your comprehensive Master System Prompt for an AI-first FP&A platform, here's a strategic architecture synthesis that bridges Avivatec's actual delivered capabilities with the open-source AI-first blueprint you need:
Strategic Synthesis: Avivatec Financial System → Open-Source AI-First FP &A
What Avivatec Already Built (Current State)
From the presentation, Avivatec delivered a multi-tenant SaaS financial platform with:
| Module | Capabilities | Tech Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts Payable | Manual/automatic expense entry, NF/invoice import (BR/USA), OCR/AI document capture, installment management | Angular, .NET Core, SQL Server |
| Accounts Receivable | Customer registration, recurring contracts, MDR rate reconciliation, acquirer integration, aging reports (30/60/90) | Same stack |
| Bank Reconciliation | Statement import (BR/USA), divergence detection, OpenFinance sync, investment tracking | Azure-hosted |
| Expense Reimbursement | Mobile photo OCR, corporate card integration, automatic AP linkage | Mobile + Web |
| Accounting Integration | Tactus, Conta Azul, Omie connectors, automated data export | API Gateway |
| AI Financial Agent | Chat interface, auto-categorization, anomaly detection, cash flow insights, tax optimization suggestions | LLM-powered (likely Azure OpenAI) |
| Reports & Dashboards | DRE, P&L, cash flow (BRL/USD), comparative graphs, real-time updates | Power BI-like embedded analytics |
Critical Infrastructure (from slide 18):
- Frontend: Angular
- Backend: .NET Core APIs
- Database: SQL Server
- DevOps: Azure DevOps, Docker, Azure Monitor, Azure Log Analytics
- Architecture Pattern: Microservices with Core API + domain-specific modules
Gap Analysis: Avivatec → Your Open-Source Vision
| Dimension | Avivatec Current | Your Target | Migration Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Lock-In | Azure-native (Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, DevOps) | Cloud-agnostic (GCP/AWS/on-prem) | Replace Azure services with open-source: Prometheus/Grafana (monitoring), GitLab CI (DevOps), PostgreSQL (database) |
| Proprietary AI | Likely Azure OpenAI API | Local LLMs (DeepSeek-R1, Ollama) | Deploy self-hosted inference with vLLM/Ollama for compliance |
| Database | SQL Server (Microsoft) | PostgreSQL with RLS + JSONB | Migrate schema to Postgres, use Debezium for CDC |
| ERP Connectors | Custom-built (Tactus, Omie, Conta Azul) | Universal (Airbyte/Meltano) | Replace with Airbyte connectors for QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite |
| Audit Trail | Azure Log Analytics | Immutable (immudb + pgaudit) | Add cryptographic audit layer |
| RBAC | Likely .NET Identity | Policy-as-Code (OpenFGA/Cerbos) | Decouple authorization into external policy engine |
| Data Orchestration | Manual pipelines | Dagster (asset-centric) | Implement data lineage tracking |
Recommended Architecture: Hybrid Migration Path
Phase 1: Decouple Core Infrastructure (Months 1-3)
Goal: Break Azure lock-in without rewriting business logic.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ EXISTING AVIVATEC SYSTEM │
│ Angular Frontend → .NET Core APIs → SQL Server → Azure Services│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
PARALLEL DEPLOYMENT
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OPEN-SOURCE INFRASTRUCTURE LAYER │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Ingestion: Airbyte (QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, custom APIs) │
│ Storage: PostgreSQL (multi-tenant RLS) + DuckDB (analytics) │
│ Orchestration: Dagster (ELT + dbt transformations) │
│ Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana + Vector (log routing) │
│ Audit: immudb + pgaudit │
│ RBAC: OpenFGA policy engine │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
Gradual .NET → Go/Rust migration
Action Items:
- Deploy PostgreSQL with multi-tenant schema (use
tenant_idin all tables + RLS policies) - Install Airbyte to replicate SQL Server → PostgreSQL (real-time CDC via Debezium)
- Add immudb sidecar to capture all audit events from .NET APIs
- Deploy OpenFGA with initial policies matching current .NET Identity roles
Phase 2: AI Layer Modernization (Months 4-6)
Problem: Avivatec's "Financial Agent / AI" (slide 11) likely uses Azure OpenAI, which:
- Sends financial data to Microsoft servers (compliance risk)
- Costs $0.03/1k tokens (expensive at scale)
- No explainability trail
Solution: Self-hosted LLM stack
# Example: DeepSeek-R1 for financial reasoning
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM(model="deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b",
tensor_parallel_size=2) # Multi-GPU
# Query with financial context
prompt = """You are a CFO assistant. Analyze this variance:
Budget: $100k Marketing, Actual: $150k (50% over)
GL entries: Invoice #827 ($30k), Invoice #912 ($45k), misc ($75k)
Explain the root cause and suggest corrective action."""
response = llm.generate(prompt,
SamplingParams(temperature=0.1, max_tokens=500))
# Log to audit trail
audit_entry = {
"model_version": "deepseek-r1-v2",
"input_tokens": len(prompt.split()),
"reasoning_trace": response.outputs[^2_0].text,
"confidence_score": 0.94
}
Integration with Avivatec:
- Expose DeepSeek as internal API (
/api/ai/analyze-variance) - .NET Core services call this instead of Azure OpenAI
- All AI outputs logged to immudb with model provenance
Phase 3: ELT Universalization (Months 7-9)
Replace custom ERP connectors with Airbyte:
# airbyte_config.yaml
connectors:
- name: quickbooks
type: source-quickbooks
config:
client_id: ${QB_CLIENT_ID}
client_secret: ${QB_CLIENT_SECRET}
realm_id: ${QB_REALM_ID}
start_date: "2024-01-01"
destination: postgres_fpa
- name: netsuite
type: source-netsuite
config:
account_id: ${NS_ACCOUNT}
consumer_key: ${NS_CONSUMER_KEY}
consumer_secret: ${NS_CONSUMER_SECRET}
token_id: ${NS_TOKEN_ID}
token_secret: ${NS_TOKEN_SECRET}
destination: postgres_fpa
- name: avivatec_legacy
type: source-postgres # Read from SQL Server via Airbyte
config:
host: avivatec-sqlserver.internal
database: FinancialSystem
username: ${AIRBYTE_USER}
schemas: ["dbo"]
destination: postgres_fpa
dbt Transformation Example (COA Harmonization):
-- models/staging/stg_unified_gl_transactions.sql
WITH quickbooks_gl AS (
SELECT
'quickbooks' AS source_system,
transaction_id,
account_number,
account_name,
amount,
transaction_date
FROM {{ source('quickbooks', 'general_ledger') }}
),
netsuite_gl AS (
SELECT
'netsuite' AS source_system,
internal_id AS transaction_id,
account_id AS account_number,
account_name,
amount,
transaction_date
FROM {{ source('netsuite', 'transactions') }}
),
unified AS (
SELECT * FROM quickbooks_gl
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM netsuite_gl
)
SELECT
*,
CASE
WHEN account_number LIKE '1%' THEN 'Assets'
WHEN account_number LIKE '2%' THEN 'Liabilities'
WHEN account_number LIKE '3%' THEN 'Equity'
WHEN account_number LIKE '4%' THEN 'Revenue'
WHEN account_number LIKE '5%' THEN 'Expenses'
END AS account_category
FROM unified
Phase 4: Policy-as-Code RBAC (Parallel to Phase 3)
Migrate .NET Identity to OpenFGA:
// openfga_schema.dsl
model
schema 1.1
type user
type organization
relations
define member: [user]
type financial_entity
relations
define owner: [organization]
define viewer: [user] or member from owner
define editor: [user] or member from owner
define approver: [user]
type budget
relations
define parent_entity: [financial_entity]
define can_view: viewer from parent_entity
define can_edit: editor from parent_entity and not approver
define can_approve: approver
Migration Strategy:
- Run OpenFGA alongside .NET Identity (dual-write for 1 month)
- .NET APIs check both systems:
if (openfga.Check() || netIdentity.Check()) - After validation period, remove .NET Identity checks
- AI agents get service accounts with least-privilege policies
Critical Decision Points
Should You Fork Avivatec or Build Parallel?
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fork & Migrate | Faster to market, reuse business logic | .NET/SQL Server baggage, harder to open-source | ✅ If you need to ship in <6 months |
| Parallel Build | Clean architecture, pure open-source | Longer development, duplicate features initially | ✅ If you can afford 12-18 months |
| Hybrid (Recommended) | Use Avivatec as "legacy system", new features in OSS stack | Complex dual-system management initially | ⭐ Best for production stability + innovation |
Hybrid Implementation:
Avivatec (Azure/.NET) New Open-Source Stack
↓ ↓
Existing Customers ←→ Data Sync ←→ New Customers
(Read-only mode) (Airbyte) (PostgreSQL)
↓
Unified API Gateway
(Routes by tenant)
Immediate Next Steps
Week 1-2: Proof of Concept
- Deploy Minimal Viable Stack:
# Docker Compose with core services
docker-compose up -d postgres airbyte dagster immudb openfga
- Replicate One Avivatec Module (e.g., Accounts Payable):
- Extract SQL Server schema for
AccountsPayabletables - Use Airbyte to sync to PostgreSQL
- Write dbt models to transform data
- Build FastAPI endpoint that reads from PostgreSQL
- Compare results with .NET API (should match 100%)
- Extract SQL Server schema for
- Test Local LLM:
ollama pull deepseek-r1:32b
curl http://localhost:11434/api/generate -d '{
"model": "deepseek-r1:32b",
"prompt": "Explain why Marketing exceeded budget by 50%",
"stream": false
}'
Month 1: Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
Document these critical choices:
- ADR-001: PostgreSQL over SQL Server (multi-tenancy, RLS, cost)
- ADR-002: Airbyte over custom connectors (vendor support, community)
- ADR-003: DeepSeek-R1 over Azure OpenAI (compliance, cost, explainability)
- ADR-004: OpenFGA over .NET Identity (policy-as-code, audit trail)
- ADR-005: Dagster over Azure Data Factory (asset lineage, open-source)
Compliance & Security Alignment
From your presentation's Risk Matrix (slide 13):
| Risk | Avivatec Mitigation | Open-Source Enhancement |
|---|---|---|
| Third-Party Integrations | Circuit breakers, SLA monitoring | + Airbyte built-in retry logic, connector health dashboard |
| LGPD Compliance | Continuous auditing | + immudb cryptographic proof, automated GDPR deletion workflows |
| Anti-Fraud | Behavioral monitoring | + PyOD anomaly detection models, real-time scoring |
Cost Comparison: Avivatec vs. Open-Source
Avivatec Azure Bill (estimated for 1000 users):
- Azure SQL Server: ~$500/month
- Azure OpenAI API: ~$2000/month (at 50M tokens)
- Azure DevOps: ~$200/month
- Azure Monitor: ~$300/month
- Total: ~$3000/month = $36k/year
Open-Source Stack (GCP/AWS):
- PostgreSQL (Cloud SQL): $150/month
- DeepSeek-R1 (self-hosted GPU): $400/month (A100 instance)
- GitLab CI (self-hosted): $0
- Prometheus/Grafana: $0
- Total: ~$550/month = $6.6k/year (82% cost reduction)
Final Recommendation
For your Coditect platform: Use the Hybrid Migration path:
- Keep Avivatec as-is for existing financial workflows (it's battle-tested for Brazilian compliance: BACEN, CVM)
- Build the open-source AI-first layer on top for:
- Universal ERP ingestion (QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite)
- Local LLM reasoning (DeepSeek-R1)
- Cryptographic audit trails (immudb)
- Multi-cloud portability (Kubernetes)
- Gradual migration: Move Avivatec modules to the OSS stack 1-2 per quarter
This gives you:
- ✅ Production stability (Avivatec proven with 40+ financial institutions)
- ✅ Innovation velocity (OSS stack for new features)
- ✅ Regulatory compliance (inherits Avivatec's BACEN/CVM approvals)
- ✅ Cost efficiency (82% reduction after full migration)
Would you like me to generate:
- The complete PostgreSQL schema for the unified FP&A data model?
- The Dagster workflow for Airbyte → dbt → AI reasoning pipeline?
- The OpenFGA authorization model with Brazilian regulatory roles (CVM, BACEN compliance)?
- The Docker Compose stack for local development environment?
LIST FP &A FEATURES AND FUNCTIONS
Based on the comprehensive documents analysis, here's the complete FP&A features and functions catalog for the Avivatec Financial System:
COMPREHENSIVE FP &A FEATURES & FUNCTIONS CATALOG
1. ARCHITECTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE (F-001)
Foundation Layer
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Multi-environment configuration (Dev/Staging/Prod) | Deployment flexibility |
| US-002 | Docker containerization support | Cloud-agnostic portability |
| US-003 | Automated CI/CD pipelines (Azure DevOps) | 60% faster deployment cycles |
| US-004 | Release management & versioning | Audit trail for compliance |
| US-005 | Wildcard SSL certificate management | Enterprise security |
| US-006 | Living architecture documentation | Knowledge continuity |
| US-007 | Backend architecture optimization (.NET Core) | Scalability to 10k+ users |
| US-008 | Centralized logging (Azure Log Analytics) | Real-time troubleshooting |
| US-009 | Transactional email integration (SendGrid) | Automated notifications |
2. ACCESS CONTROL & SECURITY (F-002)
Identity & Authorization Management
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | SSO authentication with MFA | LGPD/SOC 2 compliance |
| US-002 | Home dashboard & secure logout | User session management |
| US-003 | Self-service password reset | -40% helpdesk tickets |
| US-004 | User registration with email verification | Fraud prevention |
| US-005 | Advanced user directory search | Admin efficiency |
| US-006 | User profile edit/view with audit logs | Compliance trails |
| US-007 | Role-based profile creation | Separation of duties |
| US-008 | Profile permission matrix | Granular access control |
| US-009 | Profile editing with change tracking | Audit readiness |
3. SUBSCRIPTION & BILLING MANAGEMENT (F-003)
SaaS Revenue Operations
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Flexible subscription plan builder | Multi-tier pricing models |
| US-002 | Plan comparison matrix | Customer self-service |
| US-003 | Real-time plan modification | Revenue optimization |
| US-004 | Payment gateway integration (Stripe/PagSeguro) | Global payment support |
4. SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT (F-004)
Customer Lifecycle Administration
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Subscription & invoice history | Customer transparency |
| US-002 | Automated NF-e invoice generation (Brazil) | Tax compliance |
5. ONBOARDING & LANDING PAGE (F-005)
Customer Acquisition Layer
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Marketing landing page with A/B testing | Lead generation |
| US-002 | Gamified onboarding wizard | -50% setup time |
| US-003 | Integrated payment collection | Instant activation |
6. COMPETENCY VISION (F-006)
Multi-Period Financial Consolidation
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Period-based transaction entry | Accrual accounting |
| US-002 | Bulk transaction editing | Efficiency gains |
| US-003 | Delete with audit justification | Compliance |
| US-004 | Multi-format export (Excel/CSV/PDF) | Reporting flexibility |
| US-005 | Print with custom templates | Professional docs |
| US-006 | Contextual action menu | Workflow efficiency |
7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (F-007)
Vendor & Expense Management
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | AP dashboard with filtering | Cash visibility |
| US-002 | Multi-currency expense entry | Global operations |
| US-003 | Payment method routing (Boleto/Pix/Wire) | Payment optimization |
| US-004 | Installment scheduling with interest | Cash flow planning |
| US-005 | Manual NF-e/Invoice entry (BR/USA) | Dual jurisdiction support |
| US-006 | Automatic NF-e import from SEFAZ (Brazil) | -70% manual entry |
| US-007 | AI-powered expense extraction (email/PDF) | Automation |
| US-008 | Document attachment library | Audit trail |
| US-009 | Transaction editing with approval workflow | Control |
| US-010 | Delete with reason logging | Compliance |
| US-011 | Batch export for accounting | ERP integration |
| US-012 | AP aging reports (30/60/90 days) | Working capital mgmt |
8. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (F-008)
Revenue & Collections Management
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | AR dashboard with overdue alerts | DSO reduction |
| US-002 | Customer master data management | CRM integration |
| US-003 | Recurring revenue contracts | Predictable cash flow |
| US-004 | Customer segmentation & revenue categorization | Analytics |
| US-005 | Manual receipt entry | Flexibility |
| US-006 | AI-powered receipt import (PDF/email) | -80% manual work |
| US-007 | CSV import for POS systems | Retail integration |
| US-008 | Payment processor integration (Stone/Cielo/Rede) | Reconciliation |
| US-009 | MDR rate comparison (system vs. actual) | Fee optimization |
| US-010 | BR/USA payment reconciliation | Multi-currency accuracy |
| US-011 | Card receivables forecasting | Cash planning |
| US-012 | Receipt report export | Customer reporting |
| US-013 | Aging report (30/60/90 days) with collection workflow | Bad debt prevention |
9. CASH & BANK MANAGEMENT (F-009)
Treasury & Liquidity Management
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Multi-bank statement import (BR/USA) | Unified visibility |
| US-002 | Automated bank reconciliation | -90% manual matching |
| US-003 | Duplicate & variance detection | Error prevention |
| US-004 | Multi-format import (CSV/Excel/API/Data Lake) | System flexibility |
| US-005 | Investment portfolio tracking | Asset management |
| US-006 | Future rate of return projection | Planning accuracy |
| US-007 | Loan/financing tracking with amortization | Debt management |
| US-008 | Automatic installment calculation | Accuracy |
| US-009 | 🔥 Open Finance (Brazil) bank sync | Real-time balances |
10. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (F-010)
Employee Expense Management
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Employee reimbursement requests | T&E management |
| US-002 | Mobile OCR receipt capture | -60% processing time |
| US-003 | AI auto-fill from OCR | Data accuracy |
| US-004 | Per-employee expense tracking | Cost control |
| US-005 | AP integration for reimbursement payment | Workflow efficiency |
| US-006 | Corporate card integration | Real-time expense capture |
11. ACCOUNTING INTEGRATION (F-011)
ERP & Accounting System Sync
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Tactus integration (Brazil) | SMB accounting sync |
| US-002 | Conta Azul integration | Cloud accounting |
| US-003 | Omie integration | ERP connectivity |
| US-004 | Auto-share tax documents | Accountant collaboration |
| US-005 | GL entry export (compatible format) | Audit readiness |
| US-006 | Sync status monitoring & logs | Error resolution |
| US-007 | Scheduled data push | Automation |
12. REPORTS & DASHBOARDS (F-012)
Financial Intelligence & Analytics
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | DRE (Demonstração do Resultado do Exercício) | BR GAAP compliance |
| US-002 | P&L (Profit & Loss Statement) | Executive reporting |
| US-003 | Dual-currency cash flow (BRL/USD) | Multi-region visibility |
| US-004 | AP/AR aging summary | Working capital KPIs |
| US-005 | Default report (30/60/90 days) | Credit risk |
| US-006 | Expense & purchase analysis | Cost optimization |
| US-007 | Sales & inventory report | Operational metrics |
| US-008 | Reimbursement summary | T&E analytics |
| US-009 | Average selling price trends | Pricing strategy |
| US-010 | Dynamic & comparative charts | Visual analytics |
| US-011 | Multi-format export (PDF/Excel) | Stakeholder distribution |
| US-012 | Real-time dashboard refresh | Live decision support |
13. FINANCIAL AGENT / AI (F-013)
🤖 AI-Powered Financial Assistant
| Feature ID | Function | Business Value |
|---|---|---|
| US-001 | Conversational AI chat interface | Natural language queries |
| US-002 | Auto-categorization (income/expense) | -95% manual tagging |
| US-003 | Anomaly detection (transactions/reconciliations) | Fraud prevention |
| US-004 | Predictive cash flow insights | Proactive management |
| US-005 | OCR/AI data capture (PDF/email/invoice) | End-to-end automation |
| US-006 | Tax optimization suggestions | Cost savings |
FUTURE ROADMAP (Phase 2-3)
14. INVENTORY, PURCHASING & SUPPLIERS (F-014)
- Real-time inventory monitoring
- Auto-deduction on sales
- Low-stock alerts
- Product catalog management
- Purchase invoice import
- Supplier-linked AP
15. ELECTRONIC INVOICE ISSUANCE (F-015)
- NF-e/NFS-e/NFC-e generation (Brazil)
- Digital certificate import
- Auto-tax calculation by product/service
- Auto-send to customer & accountant
16. AUTOMATED BILLING (F-016)
- Boleto generation (Brazil)
- Pix Cobrança (QR Code)
- Card payment links
- Multi-channel sending (Email/WhatsApp/SMS)
- Auto-payment reconciliation
17. RECURRING CONTRACTS (F-017)
- Contract term management
- Auto-billing generation
- Recurrent NF-e
- Auto-application of fees/discounts
- Contract performance reports
KEY DIFFERENTIATORS: AI-FIRST FEATURES
🔥 Most Valuable Functions
| Function | Automation Level | ROI Impact |
|---|---|---|
| AI Document OCR (F-007/008/010) | 70-80% reduction in manual entry | High |
| Open Finance Sync (F-009) | Real-time bank data | Critical |
| AI Categorization (F-013) | 95% auto-tagging accuracy | High |
| Predictive Cash Flow (F-013) | Proactive alerts | Medium-High |
| Anomaly Detection (F-013) | Fraud prevention | High |
| Automated Reconciliation (F-009) | 90% matching automation | High |
TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES SUMMARY
Data Processing
- Multi-currency support (BRL/USD)
- Multi-entity consolidation
- Period-based accounting (competency vision)
- Real-time vs. batch processing modes
Integration Architecture
- RESTful API gateway
- Webhook support for real-time events
- Bulk import/export (CSV/Excel/PDF)
- Native accounting platform connectors
Security & Compliance
- LGPD (Brazil GDPR) compliant
- SOC 2 Type II controls
- BACEN/CVM regulatory approval (from case studies)
- Immutable audit logs
- Multi-factor authentication
User Experience
- Responsive Angular frontend
- Mobile-optimized (OCR capture)
- Gamified onboarding
- Real-time dashboard updates
- Multi-language support (PT-BR/EN-US)
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS: AVIVATEC vs. MARKET
| Feature | Avivatec | Mosaic | Drivetrain | Cube |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Financial Agent | ✅ (F-013) | ❌ | ✅ | Partial |
| Open Finance (Brazil) | ✅ (F-009) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Dual Jurisdiction (BR/USA) | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| OCR Invoice Processing | ✅ (F-007/008) | ❌ | Partial | ❌ |
| Brazilian Accounting Integration | ✅ (Tactus/Omie/Conta Azul) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Payment Processor Reconciliation | ✅ (F-008) | Partial | ❌ | ❌ |
Unique Value Proposition: Avivatec is the only FP&A platform purpose-built for Brazilian SMBs with dual BR/USA operations, featuring native SEFAZ integration and Open Finance connectivity.
IMPLEMENTATION METRICS (from Case Studies)
Scale Proven
- 40+ financial institutions using registration platform
- 15,000+ development hours (NÚCLEA/CRT4 case)
- 6 dedicated squads deployment model
- BACEN & CVM regulatory approval
- Thousands of daily operations
Performance Benchmarks
- 70-80% reduction in manual data entry (AI OCR)
- 90% automated matching (bank reconciliation)
- 60% faster deployment (CI/CD pipelines)
- 95% auto-categorization accuracy (AI)
Would you like me to generate:
- Feature-to-API mapping for developer handoff?
- User story acceptance criteria for QA testing?
- AI model specification for the Financial Agent (F-013)?
- Open Finance integration architecture (F-009 US-009)?
PHASE 1 IS FP &A STANDALONE ONLY DEFINE REQUIREMENTS, DO WEB SEARCH FOR EXTRACTION OF FEATURES AND FUNCTIONS FROM ALL FP &A PRODUCT COMPETITORS
Based on comprehensive web research of 20+ FP&A competitors, here's the definitive Phase 1 standalone FP&A requirements catalog for 2026:
PHASE 1: STANDALONE FP &A PLATFORM - COMPLETE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MARKET LANDSCAPE 2026
Key Finding: The FP&A market has consolidated around 5 core pillars with AI integration as the primary differentiator.9899
1. PREDICTIVE FORECASTING & PLANNING
1.1 AI-Powered Forecasting Engine
| Feature | Market Standard (2026) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Learning Forecasting | Time-series ML with 50%+ accuracy improvement over manual | Anaplan PlanIQ100, Planful Predict101 |
| Automated Seasonality Detection | Auto-identify business cycles without configuration | PlanIQ decomposition102 |
| External Driver Integration | Macroeconomic APIs (CPI, interest rates, unemployment, GDP, FX) | Anaplan macro data ingestion103 |
| Multi-Variate Forecasting | Include inflation, weather, market trends | IBM Planning Analytics104 |
| Probabilistic Forecasting | Confidence intervals (best/base/worst case scenarios) | Planful Predict: Signals105 |
| Algorithm Selection | Auto-select from ARIMA, Prophet, DeepAR, CNN-QR | Amazon Forecast backend (Anaplan)106 |
| Forecast Accuracy Metrics | MAPE, RMSE, MAE with quality scoring | Standard across all platforms102 |
| Continuous Learning | Models auto-retrain on new actuals | Workday ML optimization107 |
1.2 Scenario Modeling & What-If Analysis
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Unlimited Scenarios | Create/compare infinite versions without model duplication | Board on-the-fly modeling108, IBM104 |
| Real-Time Impact Calc | Instant P&L/BS/CF recalculation on driver changes | Board real-time engine108 |
| Driver-Based Planning | Link operational KPIs to financial outcomes | Prophix driver-based109 |
| Scenario Comparison Matrix | Side-by-side variance analysis | eMoney scenario explorer110 |
| Version Control | Track forecast evolution over time | Board version mgmt108 |
| Sensitivity Analysis | Auto-test assumption ranges | Standard feature98 |
1.3 Rolling Forecasts
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Forecasting | Auto-extend forecast horizon as periods close | Farseer rolling98 |
| Period Shifting | Automatic calendar management | Standard109 |
| Dynamic Time Horizons | 12/18/24-month flexible windows | Configurable98 |
2. BUDGETING & ANNUAL PLANNING
2.1 Collaborative Budget Building
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Top-Down & Bottom-Up | Dual planning modes with reconciliation | Abacum98, Vena111 |
| Departmental Budgets | Distributed ownership with approval workflows | Vena team budgets111 |
| Budget Templates | Pre-built by department (Sales, Marketing, Ops, HR) | Workday templates112 |
| Zero-Based Budgeting | Start from $0 with justification requirements | Advanced feature98 |
| Incremental Budgeting | Year-over-year with % adjustments | Standard109 |
| Multi-Year Planning | 3-5 year strategic plans | Long-range planning98 |
2.2 Budget Workflow Management
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Approval Routing | Multi-level hierarchical approvals | Vena automated routing113 |
| Budget Locking | Freeze submitted budgets | Board cell locking108 |
| Comments & Annotations | Threaded discussions on line items | Collaboration standard98 |
| Change Tracking | Audit log of all modifications | Version history109 |
| Email/Slack Notifications | Real-time alerts for pending actions | Modern standard114 |
2.3 Budget Allocation & Spreading
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Allocation | Rule-based distribution (revenue %, headcount, etc.) | Board allocation patterns108 |
| Calendar Spreading | Distribute annual to monthly with seasonality | Board calendarization108 |
| Driver-Based Allocation | Link to business metrics | Advanced capability109 |
3. VARIANCE ANALYSIS & REPORTING
3.1 Automated Variance Detection
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AI Variance Explanation | Natural language root cause analysis | Drivetrain AI Scan98, Datarails Genius98 |
| Anomaly Detection | Flag unusual patterns in seconds | Planful Predict: Signals105, Workday ML107 |
| Drill-Down to Transaction | Click variance → see source invoices | Drivetrain 1-click drill115, Lineos transactional98 |
| Threshold Alerts | Auto-notify when variance exceeds % or $ | Proactive monitoring114 |
| Risk Flagging | Identify at-risk revenue/cost items | Planful risk surfacing105 |
3.2 Financial Reporting
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Built Financial Statements | P&L, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow, DRE (Brazil) | Standard across platforms98 |
| Management Reporting | KPI dashboards, scorecards | IBM real-time reports104 |
| Consolidation | Multi-entity, multi-currency, intercompany elimination | Board consolidation108 |
| Segment Reporting | By department, region, product line | Dimensional reporting98 |
| Comparative Reports | Actual vs. Budget vs. Prior Year | Standard109 |
| Board Books | Executive summary packs with narrative | Automated generation98 |
3.3 Interactive Dashboards
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time KPI Tracking | Live data refresh (no delay) | Vena real-time viz116, Board108 |
| Custom Dashboards | Drag-drop widget builder | Standard114 |
| Drill-Anywhere | Click any chart to see underlying data | Interactive standard98 |
| Mobile Dashboards | Responsive design for tablet/phone | Modern requirement114 |
| Embedded Analytics | iFrame dashboards in other apps | API-driven109 |
4. DATA INTEGRATION & CONNECTIVITY
4.1 ERP & Accounting System Integration
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Native ERP Connectors | QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, SAP, Oracle, Dynamics | Drivetrain 800+ connectors115 |
| Real-Time Data Sync | Continuous (not batch) integration | Board ERP writeback108 |
| Pre-Built Data Models | Auto-map GL accounts to FP&A structure | Lineos pre-built views98 |
| Bi-Directional Sync | Push budgets back to ERP | Board ERP integration108 |
4.2 Data Warehouse & BI Integration
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Modern Data Stack | Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks | Lineos 200+ integrations98 |
| API Connectivity | RESTful APIs for custom sources | Open API standard115 |
| CSV/Excel Import | Bulk file upload | Universal feature114 |
| Data Lake Support | Connect to cloud storage (S3, Azure Blob) | Advanced capability98 |
4.3 Operational System Integration
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CRM Integration | Salesforce, HubSpot for pipeline forecasting | Standard SaaS requirement114 |
| HRIS Integration | Workday, BambooHR for headcount planning | Workday native117 |
| Expense Systems | Concur, Expensify for T&E data | Standard114 |
| Payment Processors | Stripe, Adyen for revenue actuals | Modern requirement98 |
5. MODELING & CALCULATION ENGINE
5.1 Financial Modeling Capabilities
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Dimensional Models | 20+ dimensions (time, entity, account, dept, product, customer, region) | Board unlimited dimensions118 |
| Formula Builder | Excel-like formula language | Vena Excel-native111 |
| Cross-Model References | Link P&L to BS to CF automatically | Integrated models98 |
| Currency Conversion | Multi-currency with live FX rates | Board real-time conversion108 |
| Intercompany Elimination | Auto-eliminate transfers | Consolidation standard108 |
| Tax Provisioning | Automated tax calculations | Vena tax module111 |
5.2 Calculation Performance
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| In-Memory Processing | Sub-second recalculation on 1M+ rows | Board HBMP engine108 |
| Parallel Processing | Multi-threaded calculation | Enterprise requirement109 |
| Incremental Calc | Only recalc changed cells | Performance optimization98 |
6. COLLABORATION & WORKFLOW
6.1 Planning Workflow Automation
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Task Assignment | Role-based to-dos | Vena routing113 |
| Deadline Management | Calendar with reminders | Standard114 |
| Progress Tracking | % complete by department | Visibility feature109 |
| Conditional Workflows | If-then approval rules | Board workflow engine108 |
6.2 Communication & Notes
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| In-App Messaging | Comments on cells/reports | Collaboration standard98 |
| @Mentions | Tag users for attention | Modern UX114 |
| Attachment Support | Upload supporting docs | Standard feature109 |
| Email Integration | Email summaries of activity | Notification standard114 |
7. AI & ADVANCED ANALYTICS
7.1 Generative AI Features (2026 Standard)
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Language Query | "Why did revenue drop in Q2?" → AI answers | Datarails Genius98, FarseerAI WhatsApp98 |
| AI Budget Assistant | Copilot completes budget sections | Prophix One Intelligence109 |
| Narrative Generation | Auto-write variance explanations | Reporting AI98 |
| Smart Recommendations | AI suggests budget adjustments | Jedox AIssisted Planning98 |
| AI Agents | Autonomous task completion | OneStream SensibleAI Agents119 |
7.2 Predictive Analytics
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Trend Detection | Identify patterns in historical data | Planful pattern recognition120 |
| Outlier Detection | Flag data quality issues | Workday anomaly detection107 |
| Churn Prediction | Forecast customer attrition | Advanced AI feature98 |
| Working Capital Optimization | Cash conversion cycle analysis | Treasury feature121 |
8. EXCEL INTEGRATION (CRITICAL FOR ADOPTION)
8.1 Native Excel Experience
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Excel Add-In | Work 100% in Excel interface | Vena Excel-native111, Cube spreadsheet-native122 |
| Bi-Directional Sync | Changes in Excel → database | Vena workflow113 |
| Formula Preservation | Keep Excel formulas live | Spreadsheet-first approach123 |
| PivotTable Support | Native Excel PivotTables on FP&A data | Vena capability116 |
| Power Query Integration | Use Excel's ETL tool | Modern requirement111 |
8.2 Google Sheets Support
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sheets Add-On | Google Workspace equivalent | Drivetrain (Mosaic lacks)115 |
| Collaborative Editing | Multi-user in Sheets | Modern standard114 |
9. SECURITY & GOVERNANCE
9.1 Access Control
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Role-Based Security | Pre-defined roles (CFO, Controller, Analyst, Viewer) | Board RBAC108 |
| Row-Level Security | User sees only their data (dept, region) | Standard enterprise109 |
| Cell-Level Locking | Protect specific data points | Board cell freezing108 |
| Multi-Factor Authentication | MFA for login | Security standard114 |
| SSO Integration | Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin | Enterprise requirement109 |
9.2 Audit & Compliance
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Full Audit Trail | Who changed what when | Universal requirement109 |
| Version History | Restore previous values | Board versioning108 |
| SOC 2 Type II | Platform certification | Enterprise standard114 |
| GDPR/LGPD Compliance | Data residency, right to delete | Regional requirement109 |
| Data Encryption | At-rest and in-transit (AES-256, TLS 1.3) | Security standard114 |
10. PLATFORM CAPABILITIES
10.1 Scalability & Performance
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-Native Architecture | Auto-scaling for concurrent users | Modern requirement114 |
| Multi-Tenant SaaS | Isolated data per customer | Standard delivery109 |
| 99.9% Uptime SLA | Guaranteed availability | Enterprise SLA114 |
| Support for 10,000+ Users | Large enterprise scale | Board/Anaplan capability124 |
10.2 Deployment Options
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Public Cloud | AWS, Azure, GCP | Multi-cloud standard114 |
| Private Cloud | VPC deployment | Enterprise option109 |
| On-Premises | Self-hosted (rare in 2026) | Legacy option109 |
10.3 Administration
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Service Admin | Business users manage without IT | Low-code requirement114 |
| User Provisioning | Bulk import, API-driven | Admin efficiency109 |
| Template Library | Pre-built models by industry | Quick start feature98 |
| Custom Branding | White-label UI | Enterprise feature109 |
11. INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC FEATURES
11.1 SaaS & Subscription Businesses
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ARR/MRR Tracking | Recurring revenue metrics | Mosaic SaaS focus125 |
| Churn Analysis | Customer retention metrics | SaaS KPIs98 |
| CAC/LTV Modeling | Unit economics | Standard SaaS metrics114 |
| Cohort Analysis | Revenue by signup month | Advanced analytics98 |
11.2 Manufacturing
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory Planning | Raw materials + finished goods | Board inventory118 |
| Production Capacity | Machine hours, labor constraints | Operational planning108 |
| Bill of Materials | Multi-level BOM costing | Advanced feature109 |
11.3 Retail
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Store-Level Planning | Location-based budgets | Retail requirement98 |
| Same-Store Sales | Comp store analysis | Retail KPI109 |
| Markdown Planning | Promotional modeling | Advanced retail98 |
12. REPORTING & DISTRIBUTION
12.1 Report Builder
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Drag-Drop Designer | No-code report creation | Standard114 |
| Crosstab Reports | Rows/columns with subtotals | Tabular reporting109 |
| Chart Library | 20+ chart types (waterfall, funnel, combo) | Drivetrain visualization115 |
| Conditional Formatting | Color-code by threshold | Excel-like feature109 |
12.2 Report Scheduling & Distribution
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Email | Daily/weekly/monthly schedules | Drivetrain PDF email115 |
| Report Subscriptions | Users subscribe to updates | Distribution feature109 |
| Export Formats | PDF, Excel, PowerPoint, CSV | Standard formats114 |
| Report Bursting | Send personalized reports by recipient | Advanced feature109 |
13. MOBILE & OFFLINE ACCESS
13.1 Mobile Apps
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| iOS/Android Apps | Native mobile experience | Modern requirement114 |
| Mobile Dashboards | Responsive KPI views | Standard109 |
| Mobile Data Entry | Input actuals on-the-go | Workflow efficiency114 |
| Push Notifications | Alert on approvals needed | Mobile UX109 |
13.2 Offline Mode
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Offline Planning | Work without internet, sync later | Board offline access108 |
| Conflict Resolution | Merge offline changes | Advanced capability108 |
14. EXTENDED PLANNING MODULES
14.1 Workforce Planning
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Headcount Planning | Hire plans with salary escalation | Workday headcount112 |
| Compensation Modeling | Bonus, commission, benefits | HR planning109 |
| Skills Tracking | Workforce capacity by role | Advanced HR98 |
14.2 Capital Planning
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CapEx Requests | Project approval workflow | Capital planning109 |
| Asset Depreciation | Auto-calculate depreciation schedules | Fixed asset mgmt98 |
| ROI Analysis | Payback period, NPV, IRR | Investment analytics109 |
14.3 Sales Planning
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Territory Planning | Quota allocation by rep | Workday sales planning112 |
| Pipeline Forecasting | CRM-driven revenue projection | Sales ops114 |
| Commission Calculation | Automated comp | Sales feature109 |
15. CUSTOMER SUCCESS & SUPPORT
15.1 Implementation Services
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Time | 30-90 days typical | Market standard114 |
| Pre-Built Templates | Jump-start with industry models | Quick deployment98 |
| Data Migration | Extract from legacy systems | Implementation service109 |
| Training | Online academy + live sessions | Customer success114 |
15.2 Ongoing Support
| Feature | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 24/7 Support | Global coverage | Enterprise SLA109 |
| Dedicated CSM | Customer Success Manager | Standard for enterprise114 |
| Community Forum | User peer support | Customer engagement109 |
| Product Updates | Quarterly releases | Continuous improvement114 |
COMPETITIVE FEATURE MATRIX: TOP 10 PLATFORMS
| Feature Category | Anaplan | Planful | OneStream | Vena | Board | Workday | Drivetrain | Cube | Datarails | Mosaic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Forecasting | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (PlanIQ) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Predict) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (SensibleAI) | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (AI Analyst) | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Genius) | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Excel Integration | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Native) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Native) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| # of Integrations | 100+ | 50+ | 35+ | 100+ | 200+ | 83+ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (800+) | 100+ | 100+ | 35 |
| Scenario Modeling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Unlimited) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ (Limited) |
| Enterprise Scale | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ (SMB) | ⭐⭐⭐ (SMB) | ⭐⭐⭐ (SMB) | ⭐⭐⭐ (Mid) |
| Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
MINIMUM VIABLE PRODUCT (MVP) - PHASE 1 PRIORITY
Must-Have (P0)
- ✅ Budgeting - Top-down/bottom-up with approval workflows
- ✅ Forecasting - Rolling 12-month with driver-based models
- ✅ Reporting - P&L, BS, CF with BvA variance
- ✅ Data Integration - QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite connectors
- ✅ Excel Integration - Bi-directional sync
- ✅ AI Forecasting - ML-based predictions
- ✅ Dashboards - Real-time KPI tracking
- ✅ Security - RBAC, audit logs, SOC 2
Should-Have (P1)
- ⚠️ Scenario Modeling - What-if analysis
- ⚠️ Variance Analysis - AI explanations
- ⚠️ Collaboration - Comments, workflows
- ⚠️ Mobile Access - iOS/Android apps
Nice-to-Have (P2)
- 💡 Extended Planning - Workforce, CapEx, Sales
- 💡 AI Copilot - Natural language queries
- 💡 Advanced Analytics - Predictive churn, WC optimization
BRAZILIAN MARKET-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Critical Additions for Brazil
- DRE (Demonstração do Resultado do Exercício) - Brazilian GAAP P&L format
- SEFAZ Integration - Import NF-e automatically
- Open Finance (Brazil) - Bank account sync via BACEN APIs
- Tactus/Omie/Conta Azul - Brazilian accounting platforms
- Boleto Support - Brazilian payment method
- Multi-Currency (BRL/USD) - Dual operations
Would you like me to:
- Generate the PostgreSQL schema for this complete FP&A platform?
- Create API specifications for the top 20 integrations?
- Design the AI forecasting architecture (ML models + training pipeline)?
- Build a feature prioritization matrix with effort estimates?
CROSS CHECK AGAINST ALL COMPETITORS AND WHAT IS EMERGING SO THAT WE HAVE THE BEST FEATURE SET IN THE MARKET AI FIRST AND INTEGRATION WITH ALL MAJOR FINANCE SYSTEMS
Based on comprehensive market research of emerging 2026 trends, here's the AI-FIRST + INTEGRATION-COMPLETE FP&A requirements specification:
🚀 NEXT-GENERATION AI-FIRST FP &A PLATFORM - 2026 MARKET-LEADING SPECIFICATION
STRATEGIC INSIGHT: 2026 MARKET SHIFTS
Key Findings from Trend Analysis
- Autonomous Finance is now the baseline expectation169
- Agentic AI (not just copilots) is redefining FP&A workflows170171
- Real-time continuous planning replaces monthly cycles172
- Integration depth > breadth - quality over quantity173
- Embedded AI workflows mandatory (not experimental)174172
PART A: AI-FIRST CAPABILITIES (2026 MARKET LEADERS)
1. AGENTIC AI SYSTEM (NOT JUST COPILOT)
Market Context: The shift from "AI assistance" to "AI agents" is the 2026 breakthrough171170
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous Forecast Agents | Self-executing AI that refreshes forecasts without human trigger, monitors model accuracy, and auto-retrains when MAPE >threshold | Anaplan Agentic Forecasting (2025 launch)171 | 171 |
| Task Completion Agents | AI completes entire workflows: "Close Q1 variance analysis" → AI pulls data, runs analysis, writes narrative, emails stakeholders | OneStream SensibleAI Agents175 | 176 |
| Ambiguity Resolution | Unlike RPA, agents interpret unclear instructions: "Why are we bleeding cash?" → AI determines scope, pulls data, diagnoses root cause | Beyond rules-based automation170 | 170 |
| Multi-Agent Orchestration | Agents collaborate: Data Agent → Model Agent → Narrative Agent → Distribution Agent (chained execution) | Next-gen architecture177 | 177 |
| Decision Autonomy | Agents make bounded decisions: Auto-approve budget changes <$10k, flag >$10k for human review | Guardrails + autonomy169 | 169 |
| Self-Healing Models | When forecast drifts, agent auto-adjusts parameters or switches algorithm (ARIMA→Prophet) | Continuous learning standard169 | 169 |
2. GENERATIVE AI FOR FINANCIAL NARRATIVES
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Summary Generation | One-click: Transform 50-page budget workbook → 2-page executive memo with key decisions, risks, opportunities | Datarails FP&A Genius178174 | 174 |
| Variance Explanation Engine | Natural language root cause: "Marketing overspent $50k due to unplanned influencer campaign (Invoice #827) + Q2 conference (Invoice #912)" | Drivetrain AI Scan179 | 174 |
| Board Book Automation | Auto-generate full board presentation: Title slides, variance charts, commentary, recommendations, appendices | Standard 2026 feature174 | 174 |
| Personalized Report Writing | Same data → different narrative by audience: CFO gets strategic implications, Controller gets reconciliation details, CEO gets 3 bullet points | Context-aware generation180 | 180 |
| Multi-Language Support | Generate reports in 20+ languages from same data | Global enterprises180 | 180 |
3. CONVERSATIONAL AI INTERFACE
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Language Queries | "What's driving the EBITDA decline in EMEA?" → AI returns chart + explanation + recommended actions | Datarails Genius, FarseerAI178174 | 178 |
| Voice-Activated Analysis | Speak queries via mobile: "Show me top 10 vendors by spend this quarter" | Mobile-first FP&A174 | 174 |
| WhatsApp Bot Integration | Finance team asks questions via WhatsApp → AI responds with data + charts | FarseerAI innovation178 | 178 |
| Slack/Teams Native Bots | Ask in Slack: "@FP&A_bot why did revenue miss?" → AI responds in-thread | Collaboration-first design177 | 177 |
| Contextual Follow-Ups | Multi-turn conversations: Q1: "Show Q2 revenue" → Q2: "Now break by region" → Q3: "Which region grew fastest?" | Conversational memory180 | 180 |
4. PREDICTIVE & PRESCRIPTIVE AI
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early Warning System | AI flags risks 60-90 days before impact: "Customer X churn risk 78% based on payment delays + support ticket volume" | Proactive finance174181 | 174 |
| Prescriptive Recommendations | Not just "revenue will decline" but "Increase marketing 15% in APAC, reduce 10% in EMEA for optimal ROI" | Action-oriented AI181 | 181 |
| Scenario Auto-Generation | AI creates 5 plausible scenarios based on current trajectory: Best case (20% prob), Base (55%), Worst (15%), Black Swan (10%) | Probabilistic planning172 | 172 |
| Risk Quantification | Convert qualitative risks to $ impact: "Supply chain disruption risk = $2M revenue impact (±$500k)" | Risk-adjusted planning181 | 181 |
| Opportunity Surfacing | AI identifies hidden opportunities: "Consolidating vendors X, Y, Z could save $120k annually" | Continuous improvement177 | 177 |
5. REAL-TIME CONTINUOUS PLANNING
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Benchmark | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Living Forecasts | Forecast updates hourly (not monthly) as new actuals arrive: CRM deal closes → revenue forecast auto-adjusts | Always-current forecasts169 | 169 |
| Event-Driven Replanning | External trigger → instant reforecast: Fed rate cut → debt service forecast updates in <1 min | Real-time finance172 | 172 |
| Streaming Data Integration | Connect to Kafka/Kinesis for real-time transaction feeds → instant BvA | Modern data stack172 | 172 |
| Continuous Model Training | Models retrain nightly on new actuals → improving accuracy daily (not quarterly) | Always-learning AI182 | 169 |
| Zero-Latency Dashboards | KPI dashboards show data <5 seconds old (not T+1 day) | Real-time ops172 | 172 |
PART B: INTEGRATION ECOSYSTEM (BEST-IN-CLASS 2026)
6. DEEP ERP INTEGRATION (NOT JUST API CONNECTIONS)
Critical Insight: 2026 trend is depth over breadth - 10 deep integrations > 100 shallow183173
6.1 Core Accounting Systems
| System | Integration Depth | Capabilities | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| NetSuite | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | Bi-directional sync, real-time GL push, custom segment mapping, saved search integration, SuiteScript extensibility | Enterprise standard173 |
| QuickBooks Online | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | Real-time actuals sync, class/location tracking, multi-entity consolidation, QB Payments integration | SMB standard184 |
| Xero | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | Live bank feeds, tracking categories, multi-currency, Xero Projects integration | International SMB184 |
| SAP S/4HANA | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | OData API, BAPI integration, cost center hierarchies, profit center mapping, SAP Analytics Cloud sync | Enterprise173 |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | Dataverse integration, Power Platform connectors, financial dimensions, workflow integration | Microsoft shops185 |
| Oracle ERP Cloud | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | REST APIs, FBDI imports, DFF/EFF custom fields, ADFdi integration | Large enterprise173 |
| Sage Intacct | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Tier 1 | Dimension mapping, location/department sync, multi-entity, project tracking | Mid-market184 |
6.2 Brazilian Accounting Systems (CRITICAL FOR BRAZIL)
| System | Integration Depth | Unique Capabilities | Market Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totvs Protheus | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ MUST-HAVE | Largest Brazil ERP, manufacturing focus, SPED integration | #1 Brazil (30%) |
| SAP Business One Brasil | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ MUST-HAVE | Localized tax engine, NF-e native, DI-API integration | #2 Brazil (20%) |
| Omie | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ MUST-HAVE | Cloud-native SMB, modern API, real-time sync | Fast-growing SMB |
| Conta Azul | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ MUST-HAVE | Brazilian QuickBooks equivalent, 100k+ customers | SMB leader |
| Tactus | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ MUST-HAVE | Accounting firm platform, client management | Accountant favorite |
| Senior Sistemas | ⭐⭐⭐ Important | Manufacturing/retail focus, legacy but large installed base | Enterprise Brazil |
7. BANKING & TREASURY INTEGRATIONS
7.1 Open Banking / Open Finance
| Region | Standard | Integration Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | BACEN Open Finance | Real-time account balance, transaction history, payment initiation, consent management, TPP registration | CRITICAL: Brazil mandates186187 |
| Europe | PSD2 / Open Banking | AISP (account info), PISP (payment initiation), multi-bank aggregation | EU regulation186 |
| UK | UK Open Banking | 9 major banks (Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC, etc.), real-time balance APIs | Standard188 |
| USA | Plaid / Yodlee | Bank account linking, transaction categorization, balance verification | De facto standard189 |
| Global | SWIFT APIs | Cross-border payments, FX rates, payment tracking | Enterprise treasury189 |
7.2 Payment Processors & Fintechs
| Provider | Use Case | Integration Depth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | Revenue actuals, subscription MRR/ARR, payment method analytics | Real-time webhooks, Stripe Sigma SQL queries | SaaS standard189 |
| Adyen | Multi-region payments, split payments, marketplace settlements | Unified commerce API | Global e-commerce189 |
| PayPal | Consumer payments, Venmo, BNPL (Pay in 4) | Transaction-level data | SMB standard189 |
| Square | POS transactions, Square Invoices, inventory sync | Retail/restaurants | Retail189 |
| Boleto (Brazil) | Brazilian invoice payment method, reconciliation | Payment status tracking | Brazil essential |
| Pix (Brazil) | Instant payments, QR code, payment splitting | Real-time confirmation | Brazil ubiquitous |
7.3 Treasury Management Systems
| System | Capability | Market |
|---|---|---|
| Kyriba | Cash visibility, FX hedging, payment factory, bank connectivity (SWIFT) | Enterprise treasury190 |
| GTreasury | Cash positioning, debt management, investments, intercompany netting | Mid-market enterprise |
| Reval (ION) | Hedge accounting, derivatives valuation, risk management | Complex derivatives |
8. CRM & REVENUE SYSTEMS
| System | Integration Purpose | Data Synced | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | Pipeline forecasting, ARR/MRR tracking, win/loss analysis | Opportunities, closed-won deals, forecasting categories | Standard183184 |
| HubSpot | Marketing spend → revenue attribution, CAC calculation | Deals, contacts, marketing campaigns | SMB standard183 |
| Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Sales pipeline, customer lifetime value | Accounts, opportunities, quotes | Microsoft ecosystem183 |
| Pipedrive | Sales velocity, deal stages | Deals, activities, pipeline value | SMB sales184 |
| Chargebee | Subscription revenue, MRR/ARR, churn metrics | Subscriptions, invoices, credits | SaaS billing178 |
| Zuora | Complex subscription models, usage-based billing | Revenue schedules, renewals | Enterprise SaaS178 |
9. HRIS & WORKFORCE PLANNING
| System | Integration Purpose | Data Synced | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workday HCM | Headcount planning, comp modeling, attrition forecasting | Employees, salaries, benefits, org structure | Enterprise HR191 |
| BambooHR | Headcount actuals, time-off accruals, org chart | Employees, departments, pay rates | SMB HR183 |
| ADP | Payroll actuals, benefits costs, tax withholdings | Payroll runs, deductions, taxes | Payroll standard183 |
| Gusto | Payroll + benefits for SMB, contractor payments | Payroll, 1099 contractors | SMB payroll184 |
| SAP SuccessFactors | Performance management, headcount planning | Compensation, performance ratings | Enterprise HR183 |
10. EXPENSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
| System | Integration Purpose | Data Synced | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concur | T&E actuals, policy compliance, corporate card integration | Expense reports, receipts, approvals | Enterprise T&E183 |
| Expensify | Receipt scanning, auto-categorization, reimbursements | Expenses, receipts (OCR), card transactions | SMB T&E184 |
| Brex | Corporate cards, spend management, budgets by department | Card transactions, merchant data, budgets | Startup/SMB178 |
| Ramp | Spend intelligence, vendor management, price benchmarking | Card spend, vendor contracts, savings | Modern CFO stack178 |
| Pleo | Employee cards, real-time spend tracking, receipt matching | Card transactions, receipts, categories | Europe T&E192 |
11. DATA WAREHOUSE & BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
| System | Integration Purpose | Architecture Pattern | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflake | Central data warehouse, dbt transformations, ML models | ELT via Fivetran/Airbyte → Snowflake → FP&A reads from marts schema | Modern data stack172 |
| BigQuery | GCP-native data lake, real-time streaming, ML integration | Pub/Sub → BigQuery → Looker + FP&A | GCP shops172 |
| Databricks | Lakehouse architecture, Delta Lake, MLflow for model management | Bronze/Silver/Gold medallion → FP&A consumes Gold tables | Data+AI platform172 |
| Redshift | AWS data warehouse, Spectrum for S3 data | Glue ETL → Redshift → QuickSight + FP&A | AWS ecosystem172 |
| Azure Synapse | Microsoft analytics platform, Power BI native integration | Azure Data Factory → Synapse → Power BI + FP&A | Microsoft stack172 |
12. MODERN DATA STACK CONNECTORS
| Tool | Purpose | Integration Count | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fivetran | Automated ELT, 500+ pre-built connectors | 500+ | Market leader172 |
| Airbyte | Open-source ELT, custom connector builder | 600+ | Open-source standard172 |
| Stitch | Lightweight ETL, Talend-owned | 130+ | Simple use cases172 |
| Meltano | CLI-first ELT, Singer spec, GitOps-friendly | 300+ | DevOps teams172 |
13. COLLABORATION & PRODUCTIVITY
| System | Integration Purpose | Capability | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slack | FP&A bot, alerts, approval workflows | AI chatbot answers finance questions in Slack channels | Modern workplace177 |
| Microsoft Teams | Budget approval flows, dashboard sharing | Adaptive cards for approvals, embedded Power BI | Microsoft 365177 |
| Google Workspace | Sheets integration, Drive storage, Calendar sync | Native Sheets add-on, export to Drive | Google shops179 |
| Notion | Financial wiki, process documentation | Embed dashboards, API for data push | Knowledge mgmt177 |
| Asana / Monday | FP&A project management, close calendar | Sync budget tasks to project management | Workflow integration177 |
PART C: EMERGING 2026 DIFFERENTIATORS
14. AUTONOMOUS FINANCE CAPABILITIES
Market Context: "Set it and forget it" finance operations169170
| Feature | Capability | Competitive Edge | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto-Close Assist | AI performs 80% of month-end close: runs reports, reconciles accounts, flags exceptions, drafts variance memo | OneStream Modern Financial Close175 | 175 |
| Intelligent Reconciliation | Match 1M+ bank transactions to GL in <5 min with 99%+ accuracy (vs. hours of manual work) | Autonomous matching169 | 169 |
| Smart Accruals | AI calculates accruals based on historical patterns: "December utilities usually 10% higher, auto-accrue $12k" | Pattern-based automation169 | 169 |
| Budget Rollover Automation | At fiscal year-end, AI auto-creates next year budget template with 5% growth assumption (editable) | Continuous planning172 | 172 |
| Anomaly Auto-Investigation | When variance detected, AI drills to root cause without human input: "Variance due to Invoice #912 + missed payroll entry" | Self-service analytics170 | 170 |
15. INTEGRATED BUSINESS PLANNING (IBP)
Market Trend: Finance integrates with Ops/Sales/HR in single platform172
| Module | Capability | Cross-Functional Benefit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales & Operations Planning | Demand forecast (Sales) → production plan (Ops) → COGS forecast (Finance) in linked models | Unified planning172 | 172 |
| Workforce Planning | HR headcount plan → Finance compensation expense → Ops capacity plan | People + $$ aligned191 | 172 |
| Supply Chain Planning | Ops inventory plan → Finance working capital forecast → Treasury cash positioning | E2E optimization172 | 172 |
| Capital Planning | IT CapEx requests → Finance approval workflow → Asset depreciation schedule | Integrated CapEx172 | 172 |
16. ESG & SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
Emerging Requirement: CFOs now own ESG reporting175
| Feature | Capability | Regulatory Alignment | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Accounting | Calculate Scope 1/2/3 emissions from spend data: Travel expense → kg CO2 calculation | CSRD, TCFD standards175 | 175 |
| ESG Metrics Dashboard | Track DEI hiring %, carbon intensity, water usage alongside financial KPIs | OneStream SensibleAI ESG175 | 175 |
| Sustainability Linked Finance | Model impact of ESG KPIs on loan covenants: "If carbon >target, interest rate +25bps" | Green finance175 | 175 |
17. EMBEDDED FINANCE CAPABILITIES
Trend: FP&A platforms become payment/banking platforms186193
| Feature | Capability | Business Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-App Payments | Pay vendor invoices directly from FP&A platform (no login to bank) | Payment efficiency186 | 186 |
| Virtual Card Issuance | Generate single-use cards for specific expenses: "Issue $5k card for AWS, auto-expire in 30 days" | Spend control193 | 193 |
| Multi-Bank Cash Visibility | See balances across 10+ banks in single dashboard (via Open Banking) | Treasury optimization186 | 186 |
| Automated AP Payment | When invoice approved, AI auto-schedules payment based on cash position + payment terms | Cash management193 | 193 |
PART D: TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENTS
18. INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE PATTERNS
Best Practice (2026): Hybrid approach based on use case173
| Pattern | When to Use | Advantages | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct API | Real-time critical data (CRM pipeline, bank balances) | <1 min latency, webhooks for instant updates | Modern standard173 |
| Data Warehouse Hub | High-volume historical data (5 years of GL transactions) | Single source of truth, dbt transformations | Scalable architecture173 |
| Reverse ETL | Push FP&A budgets back to operational systems (budget → Salesforce quotas) | Bi-directional sync, operational activation | Modern data stack173 |
| Event-Driven (Kafka) | Real-time operational data (POS transactions, website orders) | Stream processing, zero latency | High-scale operations172 |
| Batch Import | Non-time-sensitive data (monthly payroll actuals) | Reliable, simple, cost-effective | Legacy compatibility173 |
19. API DESIGN STANDARDS
| Requirement | Specification | Rationale | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| RESTful APIs | OpenAPI 3.0 spec, JSON payloads, OAuth 2.0 auth | Industry standard, developer-friendly | Universal189 |
| GraphQL Endpoint | Query-specific data retrieval, reduce over-fetching | Flexible data access | Modern API design177 |
| Webhook Support | Real-time event notifications (forecast_updated, variance_detected) | Event-driven integration | Standard173 |
| Rate Limiting | 100 requests/min per tenant (burst to 500), 429 error with Retry-After | Prevent abuse, fair usage | API best practice189 |
| API Versioning | /v1/, /v2/ in URL path, 12-month deprecation notice | Backward compatibility | Developer experience189 |
| Idempotency Keys | Prevent duplicate transactions on retry (POST /invoices with X-Idempotency-Key) | Financial data integrity | Financial APIs189 |
20. DATA GOVERNANCE & SECURITY
| Capability | Implementation | Compliance | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Residency | Store Brazilian customer data in São Paulo datacenter (GCP southamerica-east1) | LGPD requirement | Brazil mandatory173 |
| Encryption | AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, field-level encryption for PII | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | Security standard173 |
| Audit Logs | Immutable log of all data access: who, what, when, from where (IP) | Compliance, forensics | Regulatory requirement173 |
| Data Lineage | Track source of every number: "Revenue in P&L ← GL account 4000 ← NetSuite invoice #827" | Trust + debugging | Data quality172 |
| Master Data Management | Golden records for customers, vendors, accounts with duplicate detection | Data consistency173 | 173 |
PART E: COMPETITIVE POSITIONING MATRIX
21. AI-FIRST + INTEGRATION SCORECARD
| Platform | AI Maturity | Integration Depth | Brazilian Support | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Agentic) | ⭐⭐⭐ (100+ connectors) | ❌ No Brazil focus | Enterprise, AI leader |
| OneStream | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (SensibleAI Agents) | ⭐⭐⭐ (ERP-focused) | ❌ No Brazil | Complex consolidation |
| Planful | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Predict AI) | ⭐⭐⭐ (50+ integrations) | ❌ No Brazil | Enterprise mid-market |
| Drivetrain | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (AI Analyst) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (800+ connectors) | ❌ No Brazil | Integration champion |
| Vena | ⭐⭐⭐ (Basic AI) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excel-first) | ❌ No Brazil | Excel power users |
| Board | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Intelligent Planning) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Unlimited dimensions) | ❌ No Brazil | Complex modeling |
| Datarails | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (FP&A Genius) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excel-native) | ❌ No Brazil | Excel-centric SMB |
| Cube | ⭐⭐⭐ (Smart Forecasting) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Spreadsheet-native) | ❌ No Brazil | Spreadsheet UX |
| Mosaic | ⭐⭐⭐ (Basic ML) | ⭐⭐ (Limited 35) | ❌ No Brazil | SaaS metrics focus |
| 🔥 YOUR PLATFORM | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Agentic + Gen AI) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (800+ + Brazil-native) | ✅ ONLY SOLUTION | MARKET GAP OPPORTUNITY |
PART F: MINIMUM VIABLE PRODUCT (MVP) - PHASE 1 PRIORITIES
MUST-HAVE (P0) - LAUNCH BLOCKERS
AI Core
- ✅ Agentic Forecast Engine - Self-updating rolling forecasts
- ✅ Gen AI Narrative Writer - Auto-generate variance explanations
- ✅ Conversational Interface - Natural language queries
- ✅ Anomaly Detection - Flag unusual transactions/variances
Integration Core (Brazilian Focus)
- ✅ QuickBooks Online - Real-time sync
- ✅ Xero - Multi-currency support
- ✅ NetSuite - Enterprise ERP
- ✅ Omie (Brazil) - Cloud SMB leader
- ✅ Conta Azul (Brazil) - Brazilian QuickBooks
- ✅ Tactus (Brazil) - Accounting firm platform
- ✅ BACEN Open Finance - Brazilian bank sync
- ✅ SEFAZ Integration - Auto-import NF-e invoices
- ✅ Pix Payment Status - Brazilian instant payments
- ✅ Boleto Reconciliation - Brazilian invoice payment
FP &A Core
- ✅ Budgeting - Top-down/bottom-up workflows
- ✅ Rolling Forecasts - 12-month continuous
- ✅ Variance Analysis - AI-powered BvA
- ✅ Dashboards - Real-time KPIs
- ✅ Reports - P&L, BS, CF, DRE (Brazil)
- ✅ Security - RBAC, audit logs, SOC 2
KEY DIFFERENTIATORS: YOUR COMPETITIVE MOAT
1. ONLY AI-FIRST + BRAZIL-NATIVE SOLUTION
| Feature | Your Platform | All Competitors |
|---|---|---|
| Omie Integration | ✅ Deep native | ❌ None have it |
| Conta Azul Integration | ✅ Real-time sync | ❌ None have it |
| Tactus Integration | ✅ Accountant workflow | ❌ None have it |
| SEFAZ Auto-Import | ✅ One-click NF-e import | ❌ Manual only |
| BACEN Open Finance | ✅ Compliant TPP | ❌ No Brazil focus |
| DRE (Brazilian GAAP) | ✅ Native format | ❌ Must customize |
| Pix + Boleto | ✅ Native support | ❌ Add-on at best |
2. AGENTIC AI (NOT JUST COPILOT)
- Autonomous execution (not just suggestions)
- Multi-agent orchestration (not single-task)
- Self-healing models (not static)
- Continuous learning (not periodic retraining)
3. 800+ INTEGRATIONS (DRIVETRAIN PARITY)
- Match Drivetrain's connector count
- Add 7+ Brazil-specific systems they lack
- Total addressable integrations: 810+
Would you like me to:
- Generate the PostgreSQL schema for this complete AI-first platform?
- Design the multi-agent AI architecture (orchestration + agent definitions)?
- Create API specifications for top 50 integrations (OpenAPI 3.0)?
- Build implementation roadmap with effort estimates by sprint?
How to prioritize AI features for Phase 1 FP &A implementation
What integrations with SAP Oracle NetSuite are essential Roadmap for continuous planning in FP&A Phase 2 Implementation checklist for IBP in FP&ACreate API specifications for top 50 integrations (OpenAPI 3.0)? Build implementation roadmap with effort estimates by sprint?
Based on comprehensive research, here's your complete implementation guide for AI-first FP&A:
PHASE 1 FP &A IMPLEMENTATION: COMPLETE ROADMAP
A. AI FEATURES PRIORITIZATION FRAMEWORK
AI Feature Scoring Matrix (Value × Feasibility)
| AI Feature | Business Value (1-10) | Technical Complexity (1-10) | Priority Score | Phase | Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Variance Analysis | 10 | 4 | 40 | Phase 1 | Sprint 2 |
| Predictive Cash Flow | 9 | 6 | 36 | Phase 1 | Sprint 3 |
| Auto-Categorization | 8 | 3 | 32 | Phase 1 | Sprint 1 |
| Anomaly Detection | 9 | 5 | 27 | Phase 1 | Sprint 2 |
| Natural Language Queries | 8 | 7 | 24 | Phase 1 | Sprint 4 |
| Gen AI Narratives | 7 | 6 | 21 | Phase 2 | Sprint 6 |
| Agentic Forecasting | 10 | 9 | 11 | Phase 2 | Sprint 7 |
| Multi-Agent Orchestration | 9 | 10 | 9 | Phase 3 | Sprint 12 |
Phase 1 AI Features (MVP - Weeks 1-12)
Sprint 1-2 (Weeks 1-6): Foundation AI
1. Transaction Auto-Categorization231232
CAPABILITY: ML model classifies expenses/revenue by GL account
INPUT: Transaction description + amount + vendor
OUTPUT: Predicted account (95%+ accuracy)
TECH STACK:
- scikit-learn RandomForest (initial)
- Fine-tuned DistilBERT (upgrade)
- Training data: 50k+ labeled transactions
EFFORT: 2 weeks (1 data scientist + 1 engineer)
2. Variance Explanation Engine232231
CAPABILITY: Natural language root cause for BvA variances
INPUT: Variance amount + dimension (dept/product/region)
OUTPUT: "Marketing overspent $50k due to Q2 conference ($30k) + unplanned ad campaign ($20k)"
TECH STACK:
- OpenAI GPT-4 API (initial)
- Fine-tuned Llama 3.1 70B (cost optimization)
- Prompt engineering with few-shot examples
EFFORT: 3 weeks (2 AI engineers)
Sprint 3-4 (Weeks 7-12): Predictive AI
3. Predictive Cash Flow Forecasting233231
CAPABILITY: 13-week rolling cash forecast with confidence intervals
INPUT: Historical cash flow (24+ months) + seasonality + external drivers
OUTPUT: Weekly forecast with P10/P50/P90 scenarios
TECH STACK:
- Prophet (Facebook forecasting) for trend/seasonality
- ARIMA for stationary series
- XGBoost for driver-based adjustments
EFFORT: 4 weeks (1 data scientist + 1 engineer)
ACCURACY TARGET: MAPE <15% (industry standard)
4. Anomaly Detection System234235
CAPABILITY: Real-time flagging of unusual transactions
INPUT: Transaction stream (amount, date, vendor, account)
OUTPUT: Anomaly score (0-100) + explanation
TECH STACK:
- Isolation Forest for unsupervised detection
- LSTM autoencoder for time-series anomalies
- Threshold tuning per customer (avoid alert fatigue)
EFFORT: 3 weeks (1 data scientist)
B. ESSENTIAL ERP INTEGRATIONS (SAP/ORACLE/NETSUITE)
Integration Architecture Pattern236237
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FP&A PLATFORM │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Integration │ │ Transform │ │ Storage │ │
│ │ Layer │─▶│ Layer │─▶│ (Postgres) │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │ │
┌────▼────┐ ┌───▼───┐ ┌────▼────┐
│ SAP │ │ Oracle│ │NetSuite │
│S/4HANA │ │ ERP │ │ │
└─────────┘ └───────┘ └─────────┘
1. SAP S/4HANA Integration238239240
Essential APIs & Data Flows
| Data Entity | SAP API | Direction | Frequency | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL Balances | API_GENERALLEDGER_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Hourly | P0 |
| Cost Centers | API_COSTCENTER_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Daily | P0 |
| Profit Centers | API_PROFITCENTER_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Daily | P0 |
| Actuals (ACDOCA) | API_FINANCIALACCDOC_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Hourly | P0 |
| Budget Data | API_BUDGETARYENTRY_SRV | FP&A → SAP | On-demand | P1 |
| Cash Position | API_BANKSTATEMENT_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Real-time | P0 |
| Vendor Master | API_BUSINESS_PARTNER | SAP → FP&A | Daily | P1 |
| WBS Elements | API_WORKBREAKDOWNSTRUCT_SRV | SAP → FP&A | Daily | P2 |
Technical Implementation239240241
# SAP S/4HANA Connection Spec
connection:
type: OData v4
base_url: https://{tenant}.s4hana.cloud.sap/sap/opu/odata4/
auth:
method: OAuth 2.0
token_url: https://{tenant}.s4hana.cloud.sap/oauth/token
client_id: ${SAP_CLIENT_ID}
client_secret: ${SAP_CLIENT_SECRET}
scope: API_GENERALLEDGER_SRV
data_sync:
gl_actuals:
endpoint: /API_GENERALLEDGER_SRV/A_GLAccountBalance
method: GET
schedule: "0 */1 * * *" # Hourly
incremental_field: LastChangeDateTime
filters:
CompanyCode: ['1000', '2000'] # Multi-entity
FiscalYear: [2024, 2025, 2026]
cost_centers:
endpoint: /API_COSTCENTER_SRV/A_CostCenter
method: GET
schedule: "0 2 * * *" # Daily at 2 AM
mapping:
CostCenter: cost_center_code
CostCenterName: cost_center_name
ValidityEndDate: end_date
error_handling:
retry_policy:
max_attempts: 3
backoff: exponential
base_delay: 60s
alert_channels:
- slack: #fpa-integrations
- email: ops@avivatec.com
SAP-Specific Challenges & Solutions242237
| Challenge | Solution | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Rate Limiting | Connection pooling + queue | Max 100 req/min per tenant |
| Large Dataset (10M+ rows) | Pagination + incremental sync | Fetch 5000 rows/request, filter by LastChangeDateTime |
| Custom Fields (Z-fields) | OData $select extensions | Map custom fields in config YAML |
| Multiple Company Codes | Parallel requests | Async fetch per CompanyCode |
| BAPI vs. OData | Prefer OData (RESTful) | Use BAPI only for writes (budget posting) |
2. Oracle ERP Cloud Integration243244245
Essential REST APIs
| Data Entity | Oracle REST Endpoint | Direction | Frequency | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL Balances | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/generalLedgerBalances | Oracle → FP&A | Hourly | P0 |
| Chart of Accounts | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/chartOfAccountsStructureInstances | Oracle → FP&A | Daily | P0 |
| Journals | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/journalEntries | Bi-directional | Real-time | P0 |
| Budget Versions | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/budgets | FP&A → Oracle | On-demand | P1 |
| AP Invoices | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/invoices | Oracle → FP&A | Hourly | P1 |
| AR Invoices | /fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/receivablesInvoices | Oracle → FP&A | Hourly | P1 |
Technical Implementation246243
# Oracle ERP Cloud Integration (Python)
import requests
from requests.auth import HTTPBasicAuth
class OracleERPConnector:
def __init__(self, base_url, username, password):
self.base_url = base_url
self.auth = HTTPBasicAuth(username, password)
self.headers = {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'REST-Framework-Version': '4'
}
def get_gl_balances(self, fiscal_period):
"""
Fetch GL balances for specified period
Ref: https://docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/saas/financials/25a/
"""
endpoint = f"{self.base_url}/fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/generalLedgerBalances"
params = {
'q': f'PeriodName={fiscal_period}',
'limit': 500,
'totalResults': 'true'
}
response = requests.get(
endpoint,
auth=self.auth,
headers=self.headers,
params=params,
timeout=30
)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
def post_budget(self, budget_data):
"""
Push budget from FP&A → Oracle ERP
"""
endpoint = f"{self.base_url}/fscmRestApi/resources/11.13.18.05/budgets"
response = requests.post(
endpoint,
auth=self.auth,
headers=self.headers,
json=budget_data,
timeout=30
)
return response.json()
# Usage
connector = OracleERPConnector(
base_url='https://your-instance.oraclecloud.com',
username='integration_user',
password='secure_password'
)
balances = connector.get_gl_balances('01-2026')
3. NetSuite Integration247248236233
Essential SuiteTalk APIs
| Data Entity | NetSuite Record Type | Direction | Frequency | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL Accounts | account | NetSuite → FP&A | Daily | P0 |
| Transactions | transaction (search) | NetSuite → FP&A | Hourly | P0 |
| Budgets | budget | Bi-directional | On-demand | P0 |
| Departments | department | NetSuite → FP&A | Daily | P1 |
| Subsidiaries | subsidiary | NetSuite → FP&A | Daily | P0 |
| Saved Searches | savedSearch (custom) | NetSuite → FP&A | Configurable | P1 |
Technical Implementation248236
// NetSuite SuiteScript 2.1 Integration
/**
* @NApiVersion 2.1
* @NScriptType ScheduledScript
*/
define(['N/search', 'N/https', 'N/record'],
(search, https, record) => {
function execute(context) {
// Sync GL balances to FP&A platform
const glBalances = search.create({
type: search.Type.TRANSACTION,
filters: [
['trandate', 'within', 'thismonth'],
'AND',
['mainline', 'is', 'T']
],
columns: [
'account',
'subsidiary',
'department',
'class',
'amount',
'trandate',
'type'
]
});
const results = [];
glBalances.run().each(result => {
results.push({
accountId: result.getValue('account'),
subsidiary: result.getText('subsidiary'),
department: result.getText('department'),
class: result.getText('class'),
amount: result.getValue('amount'),
date: result.getValue('trandate'),
type: result.getValue('type')
});
return true; // Continue iteration
});
// POST to FP&A API
const response = https.post({
url: 'https://api.avivatec.com/v1/integrations/netsuite/sync',
body: JSON.stringify({
data: results,
syncType: 'gl_balances',
timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
}),
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': 'Bearer ' + runtime.getCurrentScript().getParameter('apiToken')
}
});
log.audit('Sync Complete', `Synced ${results.length} transactions`);
}
return { execute };
}
);
NetSuite Integration Best Practices236247
| Pattern | Implementation | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Saved Searches | Create custom saved searches for FP&A data needs | Governance control (NetSuite admin owns) |
| SuiteScript Scheduling | Daily/hourly scheduled scripts push data | Reliable, native execution |
| SuiteTalk REST API | Pull data via REST (not SOAP) | Modern, easier to maintain |
| CSV Import (fallback) | NetSuite → CSV → SFTP → FP&A | Legacy compatibility |
| Real-Time Webhooks | Workflow triggers → HTTP POST to FP&A | Event-driven (budget approval) |
C. PHASE 2: CONTINUOUS PLANNING ROADMAP
Continuous Planning vs. Traditional Planning249
| Aspect | Traditional (Annual) | Continuous Planning |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle | Once per year (Q4) | Monthly rolling forecasts |
| Horizon | 12 months fixed | Always 12-18 months ahead |
| Trigger | Calendar-driven | Event-driven (deal closed, macro change) |
| Ownership | Finance-only | Cross-functional (Sales/Ops/HR) |
| Scenarios | 3 scenarios (Best/Base/Worst) | Unlimited on-the-fly |
| Update Frequency | Annual | Weekly/Daily |
Phase 2 Implementation Steps (Months 4-9)231249
Month 4-5: Enable Rolling Forecasts
1. Auto-Extending Forecast Horizon249
CAPABILITY: When Jan actuals close, Feb forecast auto-extends to +13 months
LOGIC:
- Trigger: Month-end close completion
- Action: Copy M12 → M13 with growth assumptions
- Manual override: Yes (editable by Finance)
EFFORT: 2 weeks (backend + workflow)
2. Driver-Based Forecasting250231
BUSINESS DRIVERS → FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Revenue Drivers:
- Sales pipeline (from Salesforce)
- Win rate % (historical analysis)
- Average deal size
Formula: Revenue = Pipeline × Win Rate × Avg Deal Size
Expense Drivers:
- Headcount (from HRIS)
- Cost per employee (salary + benefits + taxes)
Formula: Payroll Expense = Headcount × Cost Per Employee × (1 + Payroll Tax Rate)
EFFORT: 4 weeks (model design + validation)
Month 6-7: Event-Driven Replanning251249
3. Real-Time Forecast Triggers
triggers:
- name: large_deal_won
condition: salesforce.opportunity.stage = 'Closed Won' AND amount > $100k
action: update_revenue_forecast
scope: [current_quarter, next_quarter]
- name: headcount_change
condition: workday.employee.status IN ['hired', 'terminated']
action: update_payroll_forecast
scope: remaining_fiscal_year
- name: macro_event
condition: fred_api.interest_rate.change > 0.5%
action: update_debt_service_forecast
scope: all_periods
Month 8-9: Collaborative Planning Workflows252249
4. Distributed Planning Model252
WORKFLOW:
1. Finance sets top-down targets (revenue goal: $10M)
2. Sales plans bottom-up (by rep, by territory)
3. System flags variance: Sales plan = $9.2M (gap: $800k)
4. Collaborative reconciliation:
- Option A: Increase marketing spend to boost pipeline
- Option B: Adjust target to $9.5M (realistic)
5. Finance approves final plan
6. Plan published to operational systems (Salesforce quotas updated)
TECH STACK:
- Workflow engine (Temporal.io or Camunda)
- Notification system (Slack/Email)
- Approval UI (web + mobile)
D. IBP (INTEGRATED BUSINESS PLANNING) IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
Phase 3 Roadmap (Months 10-18)253254252
Pre-Implementation (Month 10)253252
- Executive Sponsorship253
- CFO + COO co-sponsor IBP initiative
- Define clear objectives (e.g., "Reduce planning cycle time from 30 days → 7 days")
- Allocate budget ($200k-$500k for enterprise)
- Cross-Functional Team Formation254252
- Finance: CFO, Controller, FP&A Manager
- Sales: VP Sales, Sales Ops
- Operations: VP Ops, Supply Chain Manager
- HR: HRBP, Workforce Planning Lead
- IT: Solution Architect, Integration Engineer
- Current State Assessment255
- Map existing planning processes (Finance, Sales, Ops, HR)
- Identify disconnects (e.g., "Sales forecasts revenue, Finance forecasts separately → never reconcile")
- Document pain points (manual handoffs, Excel version control issues)
IBP Design (Month 11-12)252253
- Define IBP Process Flow253
MONTHLY IBP CYCLE (7 days):
Day 1-2: Demand Review (Sales-led)
- Sales updates pipeline forecast
- Marketing updates campaign impact
Day 3-4: Supply Review (Ops-led)
- Operations validates capacity
- Procurement updates material availability
Day 5: Financial Impact (Finance-led)
- Finance consolidates revenue/cost forecast
- Variance analysis vs. targets
Day 6: Integrated Reconciliation (Cross-functional)
- Resolve gaps (demand > supply? → hiring plan)
- Scenario planning (what if deal X closes early?)
Day 7: Management Review (Executive-led)
- Present integrated plan to leadership
- Approve final plan
- Publish to operational systems
- Technology Integration255252
- Connect FP&A ↔ CRM (Salesforce) for demand planning
- Connect FP&A ↔ ERP (NetSuite) for supply/operations
- Connect FP&A ↔ HRIS (Workday) for workforce planning
- Build unified dashboard (all functions view same data)
IBP Pilot (Month 13-15)249252
- Pilot Department Selection249
- Choose 1-2 business units (e.g., Sales + Operations)
- Run parallel: Old process vs. IBP process
- Measure: Cycle time, forecast accuracy, stakeholder satisfaction
- Pilot Execution
- Month 13: First IBP cycle (expect issues, learn)
- Month 14: Second cycle (refine workflows)
- Month 15: Third cycle (validate improvements)
- Pilot Evaluation
- Did cycle time improve? (Target: 50% reduction)
- Did forecast accuracy improve? (Target: +10% MAPE improvement)
- Stakeholder feedback: Thumbs up/down?
IBP Rollout (Month 16-18)252
- Organization-Wide Deployment
- Expand to all departments (Finance, Sales, Marketing, Ops, HR, IT)
- Training: 100+ users across functions
- Change management: Weekly all-hands updates
- Governance Framework254
- IBP Council: Monthly meetings (CFO + functional VPs)
- RACI Matrix: Who is Responsible/Accountable/Consulted/Informed
- Escalation process: How to resolve cross-functional conflicts
- Continuous Improvement255
- Quarterly retrospectives: What's working? What's not?
- KPI tracking: Forecast accuracy, cycle time, user adoption
- Roadmap: Next modules (CapEx planning, ESG reporting)
E. TOP 50 INTEGRATIONS: API SPECIFICATION (OpenAPI 3.0)
Integration Priority Tiers
| Tier | Count | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (P0) | 10 | Mission-critical, MVP blockers | QuickBooks, NetSuite, SAP, Oracle, BACEN Open Finance |
| Tier 2 (P1) | 20 | High-value, Phase 1 enhancers | Salesforce, Workday, Stripe, Omie, Conta Azul |
| Tier 3 (P2) | 20 | Nice-to-have, Phase 2+ | HubSpot, Concur, Brex, BambooHR |
OpenAPI 3.0 Specification Template
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
title: Avivatec FP&A Platform - Integration API
version: 1.0.0
description: |
RESTful API for integrating external financial systems with Avivatec FP&A platform.
Supports ERP, CRM, HRIS, banking, and payment processors.
contact:
email: integrations@avivatec.com
url: https://docs.avivatec.com
servers:
- url: https://api.avivatec.com/v1
description: Production
- url: https://api-staging.avivatec.com/v1
description: Staging
security:
- bearerAuth: []
paths:
/integrations/netsuite/sync:
post:
summary: Sync data from NetSuite
description: |
Receive GL balances, transactions, and master data from NetSuite.
Called by NetSuite SuiteScript scheduled workflows.
tags:
- NetSuite
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/NetSuiteSyncRequest'
responses:
'200':
description: Sync successful
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/SyncResponse'
'400':
description: Invalid request
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
/integrations/sap/actuals:
get:
summary: Query SAP S/4HANA actuals
description: Fetch GL actuals from SAP via OData API
tags:
- SAP
parameters:
- name: company_code
in: query
required: true
schema:
type: string
example: "1000"
- name: fiscal_year
in: query
required: true
schema:
type: integer
example: 2026
- name: fiscal_period
in: query
required: true
schema:
type: string
example: "001"
responses:
'200':
description: Actuals retrieved
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/SAPActualsResponse'
/integrations/oracle/budgets:
post:
summary: Push budgets to Oracle ERP Cloud
description: Write FP&A budgets back to Oracle for operational use
tags:
- Oracle
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/OracleBudgetRequest'
responses:
'201':
description: Budget created in Oracle
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/OracleBudgetResponse'
/integrations/bacen/accounts:
get:
summary: Fetch bank accounts via BACEN Open Finance
description: |
Retrieve list of bank accounts authorized by customer via Open Finance Brazil.
Requires TPP registration with BACEN.
tags:
- BACEN (Brazil)
parameters:
- name: customer_id
in: query
required: true
schema:
type: string
format: uuid
responses:
'200':
description: Accounts retrieved
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/BACENAccountsResponse'
components:
securitySchemes:
bearerAuth:
type: http
scheme: bearer
bearerFormat: JWT
schemas:
NetSuiteSyncRequest:
type: object
required:
- syncType
- data
- timestamp
properties:
syncType:
type: string
enum: [gl_balances, transactions, master_data]
data:
type: array
items:
type: object
timestamp:
type: string
format: date-time
SyncResponse:
type: object
properties:
status:
type: string
example: "success"
recordsProcessed:
type: integer
example: 1523
errors:
type: array
items:
type: string
SAPActualsResponse:
type: object
properties:
companyCode:
type: string
fiscalYear:
type: integer
fiscalPeriod:
type: string
actuals:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
glAccount:
type: string
costCenter:
type: string
amount:
type: number
format: double
currency:
type: string
ErrorResponse:
type: object
properties:
error:
type: string
message:
type: string
code:
type: integer
F. SPRINT-BASED IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
12-Month Phased Rollout (3-week sprints)256231
| Sprint | Weeks | Focus Area | Deliverables | Team Size | Effort (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sprint 0 | -2 to 0 | Discovery & Setup | Architecture design, data audit, stakeholder interviews | 5 | 400 |
| Sprint 1 | 1-3 | Core Data Model | PostgreSQL schema, COA mapping, dimension setup | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 2 | 4-6 | ERP Integration (Tier 1) | QuickBooks, NetSuite, SAP connectors | 4 | 640 |
| Sprint 3 | 7-9 | AI Foundation | Auto-categorization, anomaly detection | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 4 | 10-12 | Budgeting Module | Top-down/bottom-up workflows, approval routing | 4 | 640 |
| Sprint 5 | 13-15 | Forecasting Module | Rolling forecasts, driver-based models | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 6 | 16-18 | Reporting & Dashboards | P&L/BS/CF, KPI dashboards, real-time refresh | 4 | 640 |
| Sprint 7 | 19-21 | AI Predictive Analytics | Predictive cash flow, variance explanation | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 8 | 22-24 | CRM/HRIS Integration (Tier 2) | Salesforce, Workday connectors | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 9 | 25-27 | Brazilian Systems | Omie, Conta Azul, Tactus, SEFAZ, BACEN | 4 | 640 |
| Sprint 10 | 28-30 | Scenario Planning | What-if analysis, unlimited scenarios | 3 | 480 |
| Sprint 11 | 31-33 | Mobile & Collaboration | iOS/Android apps, Slack bot, approval workflows | 4 | 640 |
| Sprint 12 | 34-36 | UAT & Hardening | Security audit, performance tuning, training | 5 | 600 |
| Sprint 13 | 37-39 | Go-Live & Hypercare | Production cutover, parallel run, bug fixes | 6 | 720 |
Total Effort: 7,280 hours (≈ 4 FTE × 9 months)
Quick Reference: Implementation Checklist
Week 1-4: Foundation
- Kickoff meeting with stakeholders232231
- Data audit (COA, dimensions, historicals)231
- Scope lock (MVP features defined)232
- Environment setup (Dev/Staging/Prod)231
Week 5-12: Core Build
- ERP integrations (QuickBooks, NetSuite, SAP)257231
- Import 24+ months of historical actuals231
- Build P&L/BS/CF models231
- AI auto-categorization live234
Week 13-24: Advanced Features
- Rolling forecasts operational249231
- Dashboards with real-time refresh251
- AI variance analysis235234
- Brazilian integrations (Omie, BACEN)258
Week 25-36: Polish & Deploy
- User training (Finance, Ops, Sales)257231
- UAT with 20+ users231
- Security audit (SOC 2 prep)232
- Go-live with parallel run231
Next Steps - Which do you want first?
- PostgreSQL schema DDL for all 15 modules?
- Terraform IaC for GCP deployment (Cloud Run + Firestore + GKE)?
- Python integration SDK for top 10 ERPs?
- AI model training pipeline (MLflow + Vertex AI)?
LIST THE RECOMMENDED TECH STACK AND EXPLAIN WHY. Next Steps - Which do you want first?
PostgreSQL schema DDL for all 15 modules? Terraform IaC for GCP deployment (Cloud Run + Firestore + GKE)? Python integration SDK for top 10 ERPs? AI model training pipeline (MLflow + Vertex AI)?
Based on comprehensive research and your agentic multi-agent platform requirements, here's the definitive tech stack with architectural reasoning:
🏗️ RECOMMENDED TECH STACK: AI-FIRST FP &A PLATFORM
A. CORE TECHNOLOGY STACK
1. APPLICATION LAYER
Backend API Framework: FastAPI (Python 3.12+)292293294
WHY FastAPI:
- Native async support → Critical for AI model inference (LLM calls don't block)293292
- Automatic OpenAPI generation → Your 50+ integrations get docs for free292
- Type safety with Pydantic → Validates integration payloads (SAP/Oracle/NetSuite)294
- WebSocket support → Real-time dashboard updates + AI streaming responses293
- Production-proven for AI → Used by Hugging Face, Netflix ML platforms294
Alternative Considered: Go (faster) - Rejected: Python ecosystem for AI/ML is unmatched
# FastAPI Architecture for FP&A
from fastapi import FastAPI, WebSocket
from pydantic import BaseModel
import asyncio
app = FastAPI(
title="Avivatec FP&A API",
version="1.0.0",
docs_url="/api/docs" # Auto-generated API docs
)
# Async AI inference (non-blocking)
@app.post("/ai/variance-analysis")
async def analyze_variance(request: VarianceRequest):
# Call OpenAI/Claude while serving other requests
explanation = await llm_client.generate(request.variance_data)
return {"explanation": explanation}
# WebSocket for real-time dashboards
@app.websocket("/ws/dashboard")
async def dashboard_stream(websocket: WebSocket):
await websocket.accept()
while True:
# Push updates every 5 seconds
kpi_data = await get_latest_kpis()
await websocket.send_json(kpi_data)
await asyncio.sleep(5)
Frontend Framework: React 18 + TypeScript295
WHY React:
- Largest ecosystem → UI component libraries (AG Grid for financial tables)295
- TypeScript → Type-safe integration with OpenAPI-generated client
- Concurrent rendering → Smooth UX for real-time dashboard updates
- Mobile support → React Native for iOS/Android apps
Key Libraries:
- Recharts → Financial charts (waterfall, P&L variance)
- AG Grid → Excel-like grids for budgeting (1M+ rows)
- TanStack Query → Server state management (caching, optimistic updates)
- Zustand → Client state (lightweight vs. Redux)
Alternative Considered: Angular - Rejected: Steeper learning curve, heavier
2. DATA LAYER
Primary Database: PostgreSQL 16 (with TimescaleDB extension)296297
WHY PostgreSQL (NOT Snowflake for operational DB):297296
| Requirement | PostgreSQL | Snowflake | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP (transactions/second) | ✅ 10,000+ TPS | ❌ 100 TPS (not designed for this) | PostgreSQL |
| Latency | ✅ <10ms reads | ❌ 100-500ms (cold start) | PostgreSQL |
| Cost (10k users) | ✅ $500/month (RDS) | ❌ $5,000+/month (min compute) | PostgreSQL |
| Row-level security | ✅ Native RLS | ❌ Manual views | PostgreSQL |
| JSONB support | ✅ Fast indexing | ⚠️ VARIANT (slower) | PostgreSQL |
| Full-text search | ✅ Built-in FTS5 | ❌ Needs external tool | PostgreSQL |
Use Case Fit:
- ✅ User sessions, budgets, forecasts → Need <50ms latency (PostgreSQL wins)296
- ❌ Multi-year historical analytics → Snowflake better (but Phase 2+)297
PostgreSQL Extensions:
-- Enable critical extensions
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS timescaledb; -- Time-series optimization
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_trgm; -- Fuzzy search (vendor matching)
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS btree_gin; -- Multi-column indexes
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_stat_statements; -- Query performance
-- Time-series table for actuals
CREATE TABLE actuals (
time TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
account_id UUID NOT NULL,
amount NUMERIC(15,2),
currency VARCHAR(3)
);
SELECT create_hypertable('actuals', 'time'); -- Auto-partitioning
Analytical Database: Snowflake (Phase 2)298296
WHY Defer to Phase 2:
- PostgreSQL handles 0-50M rows (first 3 years of growth)296
- Snowflake cost → $2k-$10k/month minimum (overkill for MVP)297
- Hybrid pattern → PostgreSQL (OLTP) + Snowflake (OLAP) best practice298296
Phase 2 Migration Path:
┌──────────────┐
│ PostgreSQL │ ← Live operational data (budgets, forecasts)
│ (OLTP) │
└──────┬───────┘
│ Fivetran ETL (nightly)
▼
┌──────────────┐
│ Snowflake │ ← Historical analytics (5+ years actuals)
│ (OLAP) │ BI tool queries (Looker, Tableau)
└──────────────┘
3. CACHING & SESSION STORE
Redis 7.x (Valkey fork)
WHY Redis:
- Session storage → JWT token blacklist, user sessions
- Real-time dashboards → Cache KPI calculations (avoid DB on every load)
- Rate limiting → API throttling (100 req/min per tenant)
- Pub/Sub → Real-time notifications (budget approved → notify Slack)
# Redis caching pattern
import redis.asyncio as redis
cache = redis.Redis(host='redis', decode_responses=True)
@app.get("/dashboard/kpis")
async def get_kpis(user_id: str):
# Check cache first (TTL 60 seconds)
cached = await cache.get(f"kpis:{user_id}")
if cached:
return json.loads(cached)
# Cache miss → query DB
kpis = await db.fetch_kpis(user_id)
await cache.setex(f"kpis:{user_id}", 60, json.dumps(kpis))
return kpis
4. MESSAGE QUEUE & ORCHESTRATION
Temporal.io (Workflow Engine)293
WHY Temporal (vs. Celery/RabbitMQ):
- Durable workflows → Month-end close takes 2 days? Temporal handles it
- Visibility → See every workflow execution in UI (debugging integrations)
- Retry logic → Auto-retry failed SAP API calls (exponential backoff)
- Versioning → Change workflow logic without breaking in-flight processes
Use Cases:
- Data sync workflows → Fetch SAP actuals every hour (with retry)
- AI agent orchestration → Multi-step agent chains (data → analysis → narrative)
- Month-end close → 20-step process with human approvals
# Temporal workflow example
from temporalio import workflow, activity
import asyncio
@workflow.defn
class MonthEndCloseWorkflow:
@workflow.run
async def run(self, month: str) -> str:
# Step 1: Pull actuals from ERP
await workflow.execute_activity(
sync_erp_actuals,
args=[month],
start_to_close_timeout=timedelta(minutes=30)
)
# Step 2: AI variance analysis
variances = await workflow.execute_activity(
ai_variance_analysis,
args=[month]
)
# Step 3: Wait for CFO approval (human in loop)
approved = await workflow.wait_condition(
lambda: self.cfo_approved
)
# Step 4: Publish reports
await workflow.execute_activity(publish_reports, args=[month])
return "Month-end close complete"
Alternative Considered: Celery - Rejected: No durable state, poor visibility
5. FILE STORAGE
Google Cloud Storage (GCS)
WHY GCS:
- Integrates with GCP (your infra is on GCP)
- Signed URLs → Secure file uploads (user uploads Excel → direct to GCS)
- Lifecycle policies → Auto-delete temp files after 7 days
- Cost → $0.02/GB/month (vs. S3 $0.023)
6. AI/ML INFRASTRUCTURE
LLM Provider: OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo + Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet
WHY Dual-Provider:
- OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo → Structured output (JSON forecasts, variance analysis)
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet → Long context (200k tokens for board book generation)
- Fallback strategy → If OpenAI hits rate limit → route to Claude
# LLM abstraction layer
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from anthropic import AsyncAnthropic
class LLMClient:
def __init__(self):
self.openai = AsyncOpenAI()
self.claude = AsyncAnthropic()
async def generate(self, prompt: str, model: str = "gpt-4-turbo"):
try:
if model.startswith("gpt"):
response = await self.openai.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.choices[^7_0].message.content
else: # Claude
response = await self.claude.messages.create(
model="claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022",
max_tokens=4096,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.content[^7_0].text
except Exception as e:
# Fallback to alternative provider
return await self._fallback_generate(prompt)
ML Training: Vertex AI (GCP)
WHY Vertex AI:
- Auto-categorization models → Train on customer's historical data
- Managed notebooks → Data scientists use JupyterLab
- Model registry → Version ML models (v1.2.3 → production)
- Batch predictions → Categorize 100k transactions overnight
Alternative Considered: AWS SageMaker - Rejected: You're on GCP
ML Tracking: MLflow
WHY MLflow:
- Experiment tracking → Compare 10 forecast models (ARIMA vs. Prophet vs. XGBoost)
- Model registry → Promote model to production with approval
- Open source → No vendor lock-in
# MLflow experiment tracking
import mlflow
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
mlflow.set_experiment("transaction-categorization")
with mlflow.start_run():
# Train model
model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Log metrics
accuracy = model.score(X_test, y_test)
mlflow.log_metric("accuracy", accuracy)
# Log model
mlflow.sklearn.log_model(model, "model")
# Register for production
mlflow.register_model(
f"runs:/{mlflow.active_run().info.run_id}/model",
"transaction-categorizer"
)
7. AUTHENTICATION & AUTHORIZATION
Auth0 (by Okta)
WHY Auth0:
- SSO support → Integrate with customer's Azure AD, Google Workspace
- MFA built-in → 2FA/TOTP for security
- RBAC → Assign roles (CFO, Analyst, Viewer)
- Social login → Google, Microsoft OAuth
Alternative: AWS Cognito - Rejected: Worse developer experience
8. DEPLOYMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE
Platform: Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
WHY GCP (vs. AWS/Azure):
- BigQuery native → Easy Phase 2 migration (PostgreSQL → BigQuery)
- Vertex AI → Best ML platform for custom models
- Cloud Run → Serverless containers (FastAPI auto-scales 0→1000 instances)
- Cost → 20% cheaper than AWS for equivalent workload
Container Orchestration: Cloud Run (NOT GKE for MVP)
WHY Cloud Run (vs. GKE):293
| Factor | Cloud Run | GKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ops complexity | Zero (serverless) | High (manage nodes) | Cloud Run |
| Scale to zero | Yes (save $$$) | No (always running) | Cloud Run |
| Cold start | <500ms | N/A | Acceptable |
| Cost (low traffic) | $5/month | $75/month (min) | Cloud Run |
| When to switch | >100 req/sec sustained | Any time | GKE for scale |
Migration Path: Cloud Run (Months 1-12) → GKE (Month 13+ if needed)
# Cloud Run deployment (via Terraform)
resource "google_cloud_run_service" "api" {
name = "fpa-api"
location = "southamerica-east1" # São Paulo (LGPD compliance)
template {
spec {
containers {
image = "gcr.io/avivatec/fpa-api:latest"
resources {
limits = {
cpu = "2"
memory = "2Gi"
}
}
env {
name = "DATABASE_URL"
value = "postgresql://..."
}
}
# Auto-scale settings
container_concurrency = 80
timeout_seconds = 300
}
metadata {
annotations = {
"autoscaling.knative.dev/minScale" = "1" # Always warm
"autoscaling.knative.dev/maxScale" = "100" # Max instances
}
}
}
traffic {
percent = 100
latest_revision = true
}
}
IaC: Terraform (with Terragrunt)
WHY Terraform:
- Multi-cloud → If you switch from GCP, same tooling
- State management → Track infra changes (who changed what?)
- Modules → Reusable (dev/staging/prod from same code)
# Terraform module structure
terraform/
├── modules/
│ ├── cloud-run/ # FastAPI service
│ ├── cloud-sql/ # PostgreSQL
│ ├── redis/ # Memorystore
│ ├── gcs/ # File storage
│ └── pubsub/ # Event bus
├── environments/
│ ├── dev/
│ ├── staging/
│ └── prod/
└── terragrunt.hcl # DRY config
9. OBSERVABILITY
Monitoring: Datadog (or GCP Operations Suite)
WHY Datadog:
- APM → Trace requests across FastAPI → PostgreSQL → OpenAI
- Log aggregation → Centralized logs from 100+ Cloud Run instances
- Alerts → Slack notification when API latency >500ms
- Cost → $15/host/month (cheaper than New Relic)
Alternative: GCP Operations Suite (free tier) - Use for MVP, upgrade to Datadog later
# Datadog tracing (automatic)
from ddtrace import tracer
@app.get("/forecast")
@tracer.wrap(service="fpa-api", resource="forecast")
async def get_forecast():
# Datadog auto-traces this function
return await db.fetch_forecast()
10. CI/CD
GitHub Actions
WHY GitHub Actions:
- Native to GitHub → Where your code lives
- Free → 2000 minutes/month (enough for MVP)
- Matrix builds → Test on Python 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 in parallel
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
name: Deploy to Cloud Run
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Set up Cloud SDK
uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@v1
- name: Build Docker image
run: |
docker build -t gcr.io/${{ secrets.GCP_PROJECT }}/fpa-api:${{ github.sha }} .
docker push gcr.io/${{ secrets.GCP_PROJECT }}/fpa-api:${{ github.sha }}
- name: Deploy to Cloud Run
run: |
gcloud run deploy fpa-api \
--image gcr.io/${{ secrets.GCP_PROJECT }}/fpa-api:${{ github.sha }} \
--region southamerica-east1
B. COMPLETE TECH STACK SUMMARY
Architecture Diagram
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ USERS │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Web App │ │ Mobile │ │ Slack │ │ WhatsApp │ │
│ │ (React) │ │(RN/Swift)│ │ Bot │ │ Bot │ │
│ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ │
└───────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────────────┘
│ │ │ │
└─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
│
┌───────▼────────┐
│ Cloud CDN │ ← GCP CDN (static assets)
└───────┬────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ API Gateway │ ← Cloud Endpoints
│ (Rate limiting, Auth) │
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ FastAPI Backend │ ← Cloud Run (auto-scale)
│ (Python 3.12) │
└─┬────────┬────────┬───────┘
│ │ │
┌─────▼─┐ ┌──▼───┐ ┌─▼──────┐
│Redis │ │Temp │ │ OpenAI │ ← External AI
│Cache │ │.io │ │Claude │
└───────┘ └──┬───┘ └────────┘
│
┌────────▼────────┐
│ Temporal │ ← Workflow engine
│ Workflows │
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
│ │ │
┌───▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐
│Postgres│ │ GCS │ │ Vertex │
│(Cloud │ │ (Files) │ │ AI │
│ SQL) │ │ │ │ (ML) │
└───┬────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│
│ (Phase 2)
▼
┌────────────┐
│ Snowflake │ ← Analytics warehouse
│ (OLAP) │
└────────────┘
Tech Stack Comparison Table
| Layer | Technology | Why Chosen | Alternative Rejected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backend | FastAPI (Python) | Async + AI ecosystem | Go (less AI libs) |
| Frontend | React 18 + TS | Largest ecosystem | Angular (complex) |
| Database | PostgreSQL 16 | OLTP optimized, cost | Snowflake (too expensive) |
| Cache | Redis 7 | Speed + Pub/Sub | Memcached (no Pub/Sub) |
| Orchestration | Temporal.io | Durable workflows | Celery (no visibility) |
| File Storage | GCS | GCP native | S3 (different cloud) |
| AI | GPT-4 + Claude | Dual-provider HA | Single provider (risk) |
| ML Training | Vertex AI | GCP native | SageMaker (AWS) |
| Auth | Auth0 | SSO + MFA | Cognito (worse DX) |
| Cloud | GCP | BigQuery + Vertex AI | AWS (no BigQuery) |
| Compute | Cloud Run | Serverless, cheap | GKE (overkill for MVP) |
| IaC | Terraform | Multi-cloud | CloudFormation (AWS-only) |
| CI/CD | GitHub Actions | Free, native | GitLab CI (more $$$) |
| Monitoring | GCP Ops Suite | Free tier | Datadog (paid only) |
C. COST ANALYSIS (PHASE 1 - FIRST 12 MONTHS)
Monthly Infrastructure Costs
| Component | Specs | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) | db-custom-4-16GB (HA) | $350 | High availability |
| Cloud Run (API) | 10M requests/month | $180 | Auto-scales |
| Redis (Memorystore) | 5GB Standard | $90 | Caching layer |
| GCS (Storage) | 500GB + 1M ops | $15 | User files |
| Vertex AI (ML) | 100 training hrs/month | $200 | Custom models |
| OpenAI API | 10M tokens/month | $200 | GPT-4 Turbo |
| Anthropic API | 5M tokens/month | $75 | Claude fallback |
| Auth0 | 7500 MAU | $240 | SSO + MFA |
| Temporal Cloud | 10k workflow exec/month | $200 | Managed service |
| Datadog | 5 hosts | $75 | Monitoring (Phase 2) |
| Total | $1,625/month | $19,500/year |
Per-Customer Economics:
- Assume 50 customers in Year 1
- Infrastructure: $1,625 ÷ 50 = $32.50/customer/month
- Target price: $200/customer/month (SaaS standard)
- Gross margin: 84% (healthy SaaS)
D. NEXT STEPS: IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY
Recommended Build Order:
- ✅ PostgreSQL Schema DDL (Week 1) - START HERE
- ✅ Terraform IaC (Week 2) - Deploy infrastructure
- ✅ Python Integration SDK (Week 3-4) - Connect to ERPs
- ✅ AI Model Training Pipeline (Week 5-6) - ML workflows
DETAILED DELIVERABLES
1. PostgreSQL Schema DDL for All 15 Modules ⭐ START HERE
What You'll Get:
-- Complete schema (5000+ lines)
CREATE TABLE tenants (...);
CREATE TABLE users (...);
CREATE TABLE budgets (...);
CREATE TABLE forecasts (...);
CREATE TABLE actuals (...);
CREATE TABLE integrations (...);
-- + 50+ tables with:
-- - Row-level security (RLS)
-- - Multi-tenancy isolation
-- - Audit triggers
-- - Indexes for performance
-- - Foreign keys for integrity
Why First: Database is foundation - everything depends on it
2. Terraform IaC for GCP Deployment
What You'll Get:
# Complete infrastructure as code
- Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) with HA
- Cloud Run (FastAPI)
- Redis (Memorystore)
- GCS buckets (with lifecycle policies)
- Cloud Endpoints (API gateway)
- IAM roles and service accounts
- Secrets Manager integration
- Monitoring dashboards
Why Second: Reproducible infrastructure (dev/staging/prod identical)
3. Python Integration SDK for Top 10 ERPs
What You'll Get:
# Unified SDK for all integrations
from avivatec_integrations import (
NetSuiteConnector,
SAPConnector,
OracleConnector,
QuickBooksConnector,
# ... 6 more
)
# Same interface for all
connector = NetSuiteConnector(credentials)
actuals = await connector.fetch_actuals(period="2026-01")
Why Third: Integration is Phase 1 blocker
4. AI Model Training Pipeline (MLflow + Vertex AI)
What You'll Get:
# End-to-end ML pipeline
1. Data extraction (PostgreSQL → training dataset)
2. Model training (scikit-learn, XGBoost, Prophet)
3. Hyperparameter tuning (Vertex AI)
4. Model evaluation (accuracy, MAPE metrics)
5. Model registry (MLflow)
6. Deployment (Vertex AI Endpoints)
7. Monitoring (drift detection)
Why Fourth: AI features differentiate you from competitors
FINAL RECOMMENDATION
Build in this order:
- PostgreSQL Schema (Foundation) - 1 week
- Terraform IaC (Infrastructure) - 1 week
- FastAPI + React Skeleton (Boilerplate) - 1 week
- Integration SDK (Connect to ERPs) - 2 weeks
- AI Pipeline (Differentiation) - 2 weeks
Total: 7 weeks to MVP deployment
Which deliverable do you want first?
- [A] PostgreSQL schema DDL (all 15 modules, 5000+ lines)
- [B] Terraform IaC (GCP deployment, production-ready)
- [C] Python integration SDK (top 10 ERPs, unified interface)
- [D] AI training pipeline (MLflow + Vertex AI, end-to-end)
Or do you want ALL FOUR in a single mega-response? 🚀
Sample FastAPI code for FP &A budgeting endpoint
GCP cost estimates for Cloud Run Firestore GKE FP&A PostgreSQL schema example for FP&A forecasting module Terraform modules best practices for GCP FP&A deployment How to integrate FP&A app with ERP systems using this stack [A] PostgreSQL schema DDL (all 15 modules, 5000+ lines) [B] Terraform IaC (GCP deployment, production-ready) [C] Python integration SDK (top 10 ERPs, unified interface) [D] AI training pipeline (MLflow + Vertex AI, end-to-end) Or do you want ALL FOUR in a single mega-response
Based on your comprehensive query covering all aspects, here's the COMPLETE MEGA-RESPONSE with all four deliverables plus architectural samples:
🚀 COMPLETE FP &A PLATFORM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
PART 1: SAMPLE FASTAPI CODE - BUDGETING ENDPOINT
A. Project Structure
fpa-backend/
├── app/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main.py # FastAPI app entry
│ ├── config.py # Settings (DB, Redis, Auth)
│ ├── models/ # SQLAlchemy models
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── budget.py
│ │ ├── forecast.py
│ │ └── user.py
│ ├── schemas/ # Pydantic schemas (API contracts)
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ └── budget.py
│ ├── routers/ # API endpoints
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── budgets.py
│ │ ├── forecasts.py
│ │ └── integrations.py
│ ├── services/ # Business logic
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── budget_service.py
│ │ └── ai_service.py
│ ├── database.py # DB connection pool
│ └── dependencies.py # Dependency injection
├── tests/
├── alembic/ # DB migrations
├── requirements.txt
└── Dockerfile
B. Core FastAPI Application
# app/main.py
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends, HTTPException
from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware
from fastapi.middleware.gzip import GZipMiddleware
from contextlib import asynccontextmanager
import uvicorn
from .config import settings
from .database import engine, Base
from .routers import budgets, forecasts, integrations
from .middleware import TimingMiddleware, TenantIsolationMiddleware
@asynccontextmanager
async def lifespan(app: FastAPI):
"""Startup/shutdown logic"""
# Startup
print("🚀 FP&A API starting...")
async with engine.begin() as conn:
await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all)
yield
# Shutdown
print("👋 FP&A API shutting down...")
await engine.dispose()
app = FastAPI(
title="Avivatec FP&A API",
version="1.0.0",
description="AI-first Financial Planning & Analysis Platform",
docs_url="/api/docs",
redoc_url="/api/redoc",
lifespan=lifespan
)
# Middleware
app.add_middleware(
CORSMiddleware,
allow_origins=settings.CORS_ORIGINS,
allow_credentials=True,
allow_methods=["*"],
allow_headers=["*"],
)
app.add_middleware(GZipMiddleware, minimum_size=1000)
app.add_middleware(TimingMiddleware)
app.add_middleware(TenantIsolationMiddleware)
# Routers
app.include_router(budgets.router, prefix="/api/v1/budgets", tags=["Budgets"])
app.include_router(forecasts.router, prefix="/api/v1/forecasts", tags=["Forecasts"])
app.include_router(integrations.router, prefix="/api/v1/integrations", tags=["Integrations"])
@app.get("/health")
async def health_check():
return {"status": "healthy", "version": "1.0.0"}
if __name__ == "__main__":
uvicorn.run(
"app.main:app",
host="0.0.0.0",
port=8000,
reload=settings.DEBUG,
workers=4 if not settings.DEBUG else 1
)
C. Budgeting Endpoint Implementation
# app/routers/budgets.py
from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, HTTPException, Query, BackgroundTasks
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
from typing import List, Optional
from uuid import UUID
from ..database import get_db
from ..dependencies import get_current_user, check_permissions
from ..schemas.budget import (
BudgetCreate,
BudgetUpdate,
BudgetResponse,
BudgetLineItemCreate,
BudgetApprovalRequest
)
from ..services.budget_service import BudgetService
from ..services.ai_service import AIService
from ..models.user import User
router = APIRouter()
@router.post("/", response_model=BudgetResponse, status_code=201)
async def create_budget(
budget: BudgetCreate,
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""
Create a new budget
- **tenant_id**: Organization identifier
- **fiscal_year**: Budget year (2026, 2027, etc.)
- **name**: Budget name (e.g., "FY2026 Annual Budget")
- **type**: budget_type (annual, quarterly, rolling)
"""
service = BudgetService(db)
# Check permissions
if not current_user.has_permission("budget:create"):
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Insufficient permissions")
# Create budget
new_budget = await service.create_budget(
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id,
user_id=current_user.id,
budget_data=budget
)
return new_budget
@router.get("/{budget_id}", response_model=BudgetResponse)
async def get_budget(
budget_id: UUID,
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""Retrieve budget by ID"""
service = BudgetService(db)
budget = await service.get_budget(
budget_id=budget_id,
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id
)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
return budget
@router.get("/", response_model=List[BudgetResponse])
async def list_budgets(
fiscal_year: Optional[int] = Query(None),
status: Optional[str] = Query(None, regex="^(draft|submitted|approved|rejected)$"),
department_id: Optional[UUID] = Query(None),
skip: int = Query(0, ge=0),
limit: int = Query(100, le=1000),
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""
List budgets with filtering and pagination
Filters:
- fiscal_year: 2026, 2027, etc.
- status: draft, submitted, approved, rejected
- department_id: Filter by department
"""
service = BudgetService(db)
budgets = await service.list_budgets(
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id,
fiscal_year=fiscal_year,
status=status,
department_id=department_id,
skip=skip,
limit=limit
)
return budgets
@router.patch("/{budget_id}", response_model=BudgetResponse)
async def update_budget(
budget_id: UUID,
budget_update: BudgetUpdate,
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""Update budget (partial update)"""
service = BudgetService(db)
# Check if user owns budget or has admin permission
budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
if budget.created_by_id != current_user.id and not current_user.has_permission("budget:admin"):
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized to update this budget")
# Check if budget is locked
if budget.status in ["approved", "locked"]:
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Cannot update approved/locked budget")
updated_budget = await service.update_budget(
budget_id=budget_id,
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id,
update_data=budget_update
)
return updated_budget
@router.post("/{budget_id}/line-items", status_code=201)
async def add_budget_line_items(
budget_id: UUID,
line_items: List[BudgetLineItemCreate],
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""Add line items to budget"""
service = BudgetService(db)
# Verify budget exists and user has access
budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
# Add line items
created_items = await service.add_line_items(
budget_id=budget_id,
line_items=line_items,
user_id=current_user.id
)
return {
"budget_id": budget_id,
"items_created": len(created_items),
"line_items": created_items
}
@router.post("/{budget_id}/approve", response_model=BudgetResponse)
async def approve_budget(
budget_id: UUID,
approval: BudgetApprovalRequest,
background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""
Approve or reject budget
Triggers:
- Email notification to budget owner
- Slack notification (if configured)
- AI variance analysis (background)
"""
service = BudgetService(db)
ai_service = AIService()
# Check approval permissions
if not current_user.has_permission("budget:approve"):
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Insufficient permissions to approve budgets")
# Get budget
budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
if budget.status != "submitted":
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Budget must be in 'submitted' state to approve")
# Approve/reject
updated_budget = await service.update_budget_status(
budget_id=budget_id,
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id,
status="approved" if approval.approved else "rejected",
approved_by_id=current_user.id,
approval_notes=approval.notes
)
# Background tasks
background_tasks.add_task(
service.send_approval_notification,
budget=updated_budget,
approver=current_user
)
if approval.approved:
background_tasks.add_task(
ai_service.generate_budget_summary,
budget_id=budget_id
)
return updated_budget
@router.get("/{budget_id}/variance", response_model=dict)
async def budget_variance_analysis(
budget_id: UUID,
compare_to: str = Query(..., regex="^(prior_year|prior_quarter|forecast)$"),
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""
AI-powered variance analysis
Compares budget to:
- prior_year: Last year's actuals
- prior_quarter: Previous quarter
- forecast: Current forecast
"""
service = BudgetService(db)
ai_service = AIService()
budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
# Get comparison data
comparison_data = await service.get_comparison_data(
budget_id=budget_id,
compare_to=compare_to
)
# AI analysis
variance_explanation = await ai_service.explain_variance(
budget_data=budget,
comparison_data=comparison_data
)
return {
"budget_id": budget_id,
"compare_to": compare_to,
"variances": comparison_data["variances"],
"ai_explanation": variance_explanation,
"key_drivers": variance_explanation.get("key_drivers", []),
"recommendations": variance_explanation.get("recommendations", [])
}
@router.post("/{budget_id}/copy", response_model=BudgetResponse)
async def copy_budget(
budget_id: UUID,
fiscal_year: int,
apply_growth_rate: Optional[float] = Query(None, ge=-1.0, le=1.0),
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""
Copy existing budget to new fiscal year
- **fiscal_year**: Target year for new budget
- **apply_growth_rate**: Optional growth rate (0.05 = 5% increase)
"""
service = BudgetService(db)
source_budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not source_budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Source budget not found")
# Copy budget
new_budget = await service.copy_budget(
source_budget_id=budget_id,
tenant_id=current_user.tenant_id,
fiscal_year=fiscal_year,
created_by_id=current_user.id,
growth_rate=apply_growth_rate
)
return new_budget
@router.delete("/{budget_id}", status_code=204)
async def delete_budget(
budget_id: UUID,
db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)
):
"""Soft delete budget"""
service = BudgetService(db)
budget = await service.get_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Budget not found")
# Only owner or admin can delete
if budget.created_by_id != current_user.id and not current_user.has_permission("budget:admin"):
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized to delete this budget")
# Cannot delete approved budgets
if budget.status == "approved":
raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Cannot delete approved budget")
await service.soft_delete_budget(budget_id, current_user.tenant_id)
return None
D. Pydantic Schemas
# app/schemas/budget.py
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, validator
from typing import Optional, List, Dict, Any
from uuid import UUID
from datetime import datetime
from decimal import Decimal
class BudgetLineItemBase(BaseModel):
account_id: UUID
department_id: Optional[UUID] = None
cost_center_id: Optional[UUID] = None
amount: Decimal = Field(..., ge=0, decimal_places=2)
currency: str = Field(default="BRL", regex="^[A-Z]{3}$")
notes: Optional[str] = None
class BudgetLineItemCreate(BudgetLineItemBase):
pass
class BudgetLineItemResponse(BudgetLineItemBase):
id: UUID
budget_id: UUID
created_at: datetime
class Config:
from_attributes = True
class BudgetBase(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=255)
fiscal_year: int = Field(..., ge=2020, le=2100)
budget_type: str = Field(..., regex="^(annual|quarterly|rolling)$")
department_id: Optional[UUID] = None
description: Optional[str] = None
class BudgetCreate(BudgetBase):
line_items: Optional[List[BudgetLineItemCreate]] = []
class BudgetUpdate(BaseModel):
name: Optional[str] = Field(None, min_length=1, max_length=255)
description: Optional[str] = None
status: Optional[str] = Field(None, regex="^(draft|submitted|approved|rejected)$")
class BudgetResponse(BudgetBase):
id: UUID
tenant_id: UUID
status: str
total_amount: Decimal
created_by_id: UUID
approved_by_id: Optional[UUID] = None
created_at: datetime
updated_at: datetime
line_items_count: int
class Config:
from_attributes = True
class BudgetApprovalRequest(BaseModel):
approved: bool
notes: Optional[str] = Field(None, max_length=2000)
E. Business Logic Service
# app/services/budget_service.py
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
from sqlalchemy import select, and_, func
from typing import Optional, List
from uuid import UUID
from decimal import Decimal
from ..models.budget import Budget, BudgetLineItem
from ..schemas.budget import BudgetCreate, BudgetUpdate, BudgetLineItemCreate
class BudgetService:
def __init__(self, db: AsyncSession):
self.db = db
async def create_budget(
self,
tenant_id: UUID,
user_id: UUID,
budget_data: BudgetCreate
) -> Budget:
"""Create new budget with line items"""
# Create budget
budget = Budget(
tenant_id=tenant_id,
name=budget_data.name,
fiscal_year=budget_data.fiscal_year,
budget_type=budget_data.budget_type,
department_id=budget_data.department_id,
description=budget_data.description,
status="draft",
created_by_id=user_id
)
self.db.add(budget)
await self.db.flush() # Get budget.id
# Add line items if provided
if budget_data.line_items:
for item_data in budget_data.line_items:
line_item = BudgetLineItem(
budget_id=budget.id,
**item_data.dict()
)
self.db.add(line_item)
await self.db.commit()
await self.db.refresh(budget)
return budget
async def get_budget(
self,
budget_id: UUID,
tenant_id: UUID
) -> Optional[Budget]:
"""Get budget by ID with tenant isolation"""
query = select(Budget).where(
and_(
Budget.id == budget_id,
Budget.tenant_id == tenant_id,
Budget.deleted_at.is_(None) # Soft delete check
)
)
result = await self.db.execute(query)
return result.scalar_one_or_none()
async def list_budgets(
self,
tenant_id: UUID,
fiscal_year: Optional[int] = None,
status: Optional[str] = None,
department_id: Optional[UUID] = None,
skip: int = 0,
limit: int = 100
) -> List[Budget]:
"""List budgets with filters"""
query = select(Budget).where(
and_(
Budget.tenant_id == tenant_id,
Budget.deleted_at.is_(None)
)
)
if fiscal_year:
query = query.where(Budget.fiscal_year == fiscal_year)
if status:
query = query.where(Budget.status == status)
if department_id:
query = query.where(Budget.department_id == department_id)
query = query.offset(skip).limit(limit).order_by(Budget.created_at.desc())
result = await self.db.execute(query)
return result.scalars().all()
async def update_budget(
self,
budget_id: UUID,
tenant_id: UUID,
update_data: BudgetUpdate
) -> Budget:
"""Update budget fields"""
budget = await self.get_budget(budget_id, tenant_id)
if not budget:
raise ValueError("Budget not found")
# Update fields
for field, value in update_data.dict(exclude_unset=True).items():
setattr(budget, field, value)
await self.db.commit()
await self.db.refresh(budget)
return budget
async def add_line_items(
self,
budget_id: UUID,
line_items: List[BudgetLineItemCreate],
user_id: UUID
) -> List[BudgetLineItem]:
"""Add line items to budget"""
created_items = []
for item_data in line_items:
line_item = BudgetLineItem(
budget_id=budget_id,
**item_data.dict()
)
self.db.add(line_item)
created_items.append(line_item)
await self.db.commit()
# Recalculate budget total
await self._recalculate_budget_total(budget_id)
return created_items
async def _recalculate_budget_total(self, budget_id: UUID):
"""Recalculate total_amount for budget"""
query = select(func.sum(BudgetLineItem.amount)).where(
BudgetLineItem.budget_id == budget_id
)
result = await self.db.execute(query)
total = result.scalar() or Decimal("0.00")
# Update budget
budget_query = select(Budget).where(Budget.id == budget_id)
budget = (await self.db.execute(budget_query)).scalar_one()
budget.total_amount = total
await self.db.commit()
async def copy_budget(
self,
source_budget_id: UUID,
tenant_id: UUID,
fiscal_year: int,
created_by_id: UUID,
growth_rate: Optional[float] = None
) -> Budget:
"""Copy budget to new fiscal year with optional growth rate"""
source = await self.get_budget(source_budget_id, tenant_id)
if not source:
raise ValueError("Source budget not found")
# Create new budget
new_budget = Budget(
tenant_id=tenant_id,
name=f"{source.name} - FY{fiscal_year}",
fiscal_year=fiscal_year,
budget_type=source.budget_type,
department_id=source.department_id,
description=f"Copied from {source.name}",
status="draft",
created_by_id=created_by_id
)
self.db.add(new_budget)
await self.db.flush()
# Copy line items
line_items_query = select(BudgetLineItem).where(
BudgetLineItem.budget_id == source_budget_id
)
source_items = (await self.db.execute(line_items_query)).scalars().all()
for item in source_items:
new_amount = item.amount
if growth_rate is not None:
new_amount = item.amount * Decimal(1 + growth_rate)
new_item = BudgetLineItem(
budget_id=new_budget.id,
account_id=item.account_id,
department_id=item.department_id,
cost_center_id=item.cost_center_id,
amount=new_amount,
currency=item.currency,
notes=item.notes
)
self.db.add(new_item)
await self.db.commit()
await self.db.refresh(new_budget)
return new_budget
PART 2: GCP COST ESTIMATES
A. Detailed Cost Breakdown (Monthly)
Scenario 1: Startup (0-100 Users, 10 Customers)
| Service | Specs | Monthly Cost | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Run (API) | 1M requests, 2 CPU, 4GB RAM | $50 | Serverless, scales to zero |
| Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) | db-custom-2-8GB | $150 | High availability not needed |
| Memorystore (Redis) | 1GB Basic | $30 | Caching layer |
| Cloud Storage (GCS) | 50GB + 100k ops | $3 | User file uploads |
| Cloud Pub/Sub | 1M messages | $5 | Event-driven workflows |
| Vertex AI Workbench | 10 hours/month | $20 | ML training (occasional) |
| OpenAI API | 1M tokens | $20 | GPT-4 Turbo usage |
| Load Balancer | Minimal traffic | $20 | HTTPS + SSL |
| Cloud Monitoring | Basic metrics | $0 | Free tier |
| Total | $298/month | $3,576/year |
Per-Customer Economics:
- $298 ÷ 10 customers = $29.80/customer/month
- Target price: $200/customer → 85% gross margin ✅
Scenario 2: Growth (100-1,000 Users, 50 Customers)
| Service | Specs | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Run (API) | 10M requests, 4 CPU, 8GB RAM | $200 | Auto-scales to 50 instances |
| Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) | db-custom-4-16GB (HA) | $350 | High availability enabled |
| Memorystore (Redis) | 5GB Standard | $90 | HA with failover |
| Cloud Storage (GCS) | 500GB + 1M ops | $15 | Document storage |
| Cloud Pub/Sub | 10M messages | $10 | Event streaming |
| Vertex AI | 100 training hours | $200 | Custom ML models |
| OpenAI API | 10M tokens | $200 | Increased AI usage |
| Anthropic API | 5M tokens | $75 | Claude fallback |
| Cloud CDN | 500GB egress | $40 | Frontend assets |
| Load Balancer | Premium tier | $50 | Regional LB |
| Cloud Monitoring | 5 hosts | $25 | APM + logs |
| Total | $1,255/month | $15,060/year |
Per-Customer Economics:
- $1,255 ÷ 50 customers = $25.10/customer/month
- Target price: $200/customer → 87% gross margin ✅
Scenario 3: Scale (1,000-10,000 Users, 200 Customers)
| Service | Specs | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GKE Cluster | 10 nodes (n2-standard-8) | $2,400 | Kubernetes for control |
| Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL) | db-custom-16-64GB (HA) | $1,200 | Enterprise DB |
| Memorystore (Redis) | 25GB Standard (HA) | $350 | Session + cache |
| Cloud Storage (GCS) | 5TB + 10M ops | $120 | User files + backups |
| Cloud Pub/Sub | 100M messages | $40 | High-volume events |
| Vertex AI | 500 training hours | $1,000 | Continuous ML training |
| OpenAI API | 50M tokens | $1,000 | Heavy AI usage |
| Anthropic API | 25M tokens | $375 | Fallback provider |
| Cloud CDN | 5TB egress | $400 | Global distribution |
| Load Balancer | Global LB | $200 | Multi-region |
| Cloud Monitoring | 50 hosts | $250 | Full observability |
| Snowflake | 200 compute credits | $800 | Analytics warehouse |
| Total | $8,135/month | $97,620/year |
Per-Customer Economics:
- $8,135 ÷ 200 customers = $40.68/customer/month
- Target price: $200/customer → 80% gross margin ✅
B. Cloud Run vs. Firestore vs. GKE Decision Matrix
| Factor | Cloud Run | Firestore | GKE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use Case | Stateless API | Real-time DB | Stateful workloads |
| Best For | REST APIs, batch jobs | Mobile apps, IoT | Complex microservices |
| Scaling | Auto (0→1000 instances) | Auto-managed | Manual/HPA |
| Ops Complexity | ⭐ (Serverless) | ⭐ (Fully managed) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (DIY) |
| Cold Start | 500ms | N/A | N/A |
| Min Cost | $0 (scales to zero) | $0 (free tier) | $75/month (always on) |
| Max Throughput | 1000 req/sec/instance | 10k writes/sec | Unlimited |
| When to Use | MVP Phase 1 | Real-time dashboards | Phase 2+ (scale) |
Recommendation:
- Phase 1 (Months 1-12): Cloud Run + PostgreSQL + Redis
- Phase 2 (Year 2+): Migrate to GKE if traffic >1000 req/sec sustained
Why NOT Firestore for FP&A:
- ❌ SQL required → Complex financial queries (JOINs, aggregations)
- ❌ ACID transactions → Critical for budgets (atomicity)
- ❌ Row-level security → Multi-tenancy isolation
- ✅ PostgreSQL wins for transactional financial data
PART 3: POSTGRESQL SCHEMA DDL (ALL 15 MODULES)
A. Core Schema Design Principles
- Multi-tenancy: Every table has
tenant_idfor isolation - Soft deletes:
deleted_atinstead of hard DELETE - Audit trails:
created_at,updated_at,created_by_id - Row-level security (RLS): Enforce tenant boundaries at DB level
- JSONB flexibility: Store flexible metadata without schema changes
B. Complete Schema (5000+ lines condensed to key modules)
-- =====================================================
-- EXTENSION SETUP
-- =====================================================
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "uuid-ossp";
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pg_trgm"; -- Fuzzy search
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "btree_gin"; -- Multi-column indexes
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "timescaledb"; -- Time-series optimization
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pg_stat_statements";
-- =====================================================
-- CUSTOM TYPES
-- =====================================================
CREATE TYPE budget_status AS ENUM ('draft', 'submitted', 'approved', 'rejected', 'locked');
CREATE TYPE forecast_type AS ENUM ('rolling', 'static', 'driver_based');
CREATE TYPE transaction_type AS ENUM ('debit', 'credit');
CREATE TYPE approval_status AS ENUM ('pending', 'approved', 'rejected');
CREATE TYPE integration_status AS ENUM ('active', 'error', 'paused', 'deleted');
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 1: CORE - TENANTS & USERS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE tenants (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
subdomain VARCHAR(63) UNIQUE NOT NULL, -- avivatec.fpa.app
plan VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'starter',
max_users INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 5,
settings JSONB DEFAULT '{}',
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ
);
CREATE INDEX idx_tenants_subdomain ON tenants(subdomain) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE TABLE users (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
email VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
full_name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
password_hash VARCHAR(255), -- NULL if SSO-only
role VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'analyst',
permissions JSONB DEFAULT '[]',
department_id UUID,
is_active BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
last_login_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
UNIQUE(tenant_id, email)
);
CREATE INDEX idx_users_tenant_email ON users(tenant_id, email) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE INDEX idx_users_department ON users(department_id) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
-- Row-Level Security for users
ALTER TABLE users ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
CREATE POLICY tenant_isolation_policy ON users
USING (tenant_id = current_setting('app.current_tenant_id')::UUID);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 2: CHART OF ACCOUNTS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE accounts (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
account_number VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
account_name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
account_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- asset, liability, equity, revenue, expense
parent_account_id UUID REFERENCES accounts(id),
level INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
is_active BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
description TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
UNIQUE(tenant_id, account_number)
);
CREATE INDEX idx_accounts_tenant ON accounts(tenant_id) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE INDEX idx_accounts_parent ON accounts(parent_account_id) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE INDEX idx_accounts_type ON accounts(tenant_id, account_type) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 3: DIMENSIONS (DEPARTMENTS, COST CENTERS, ETC)
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE departments (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
code VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
parent_department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
manager_user_id UUID REFERENCES users(id),
is_active BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
UNIQUE(tenant_id, code)
);
CREATE TABLE cost_centers (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
code VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
is_active BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
UNIQUE(tenant_id, code)
);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 4: BUDGETS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE budgets (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
fiscal_year INTEGER NOT NULL,
budget_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- annual, quarterly, rolling
status budget_status NOT NULL DEFAULT 'draft',
department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
total_amount NUMERIC(15,2) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0.00,
currency VARCHAR(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'BRL',
description TEXT,
created_by_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id),
approved_by_id UUID REFERENCES users(id),
approved_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
approval_notes TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ
);
CREATE INDEX idx_budgets_tenant_year ON budgets(tenant_id, fiscal_year) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE INDEX idx_budgets_status ON budgets(tenant_id, status) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE INDEX idx_budgets_department ON budgets(department_id) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE TABLE budget_line_items (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
budget_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES budgets(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
account_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES accounts(id),
department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
cost_center_id UUID REFERENCES cost_centers(id),
period_start DATE NOT NULL, -- Month/quarter start
period_end DATE NOT NULL,
amount NUMERIC(15,2) NOT NULL,
currency VARCHAR(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'BRL',
notes TEXT,
metadata JSONB DEFAULT '{}', -- Flexible storage
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE INDEX idx_budget_line_items_budget ON budget_line_items(budget_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_budget_line_items_account ON budget_line_items(account_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_budget_line_items_period ON budget_line_items(period_start, period_end);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 5: FORECASTS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE forecasts (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
forecast_type forecast_type NOT NULL DEFAULT 'rolling',
start_date DATE NOT NULL,
end_date DATE NOT NULL,
version INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
is_active BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT TRUE,
model_config JSONB DEFAULT '{}', -- ML model settings
created_by_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id),
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ
);
CREATE INDEX idx_forecasts_tenant_active ON forecasts(tenant_id, is_active) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
CREATE TABLE forecast_line_items (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
forecast_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES forecasts(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
account_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES accounts(id),
department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
period_date DATE NOT NULL, -- Monthly forecast point
forecasted_amount NUMERIC(15,2) NOT NULL,
confidence_lower NUMERIC(15,2), -- P10 (pessimistic)
confidence_upper NUMERIC(15,2), -- P90 (optimistic)
driver_values JSONB DEFAULT '{}', -- {"headcount": 50, "avg_sale": 1000}
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE INDEX idx_forecast_line_items_forecast ON forecast_line_items(forecast_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_forecast_line_items_period ON forecast_line_items(period_date);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 6: ACTUALS (TIME-SERIES OPTIMIZED)
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE actuals (
time TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
account_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES accounts(id),
department_id UUID REFERENCES departments(id),
cost_center_id UUID REFERENCES cost_centers(id),
amount NUMERIC(15,2) NOT NULL,
currency VARCHAR(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'BRL',
transaction_type transaction_type NOT NULL,
source_system VARCHAR(50), -- 'netsuite', 'sap', 'manual'
source_id VARCHAR(255), -- External transaction ID
notes TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
-- Convert to TimescaleDB hypertable (automatic partitioning)
SELECT create_hypertable('actuals', 'time', chunk_time_interval => INTERVAL '1 month');
-- Indexes for query performance
CREATE INDEX idx_actuals_tenant_time ON actuals(tenant_id, time DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_actuals_account ON actuals(account_id, time DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_actuals_source ON actuals(tenant_id, source_system, source_id);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 7: VARIANCE ANALYSIS (MATERIALIZED VIEW)
-- =====================================================
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_budget_variance AS
SELECT
b.tenant_id,
b.id AS budget_id,
b.fiscal_year,
bli.account_id,
bli.department_id,
DATE_TRUNC('month', bli.period_start) AS period_month,
bli.amount AS budget_amount,
COALESCE(SUM(a.amount), 0) AS actual_amount,
(COALESCE(SUM(a.amount), 0) - bli.amount) AS variance_amount,
CASE
WHEN bli.amount = 0 THEN NULL
ELSE ((COALESCE(SUM(a.amount), 0) - bli.amount) / bli.amount * 100)
END AS variance_percent
FROM budget_line_items bli
JOIN budgets b ON bli.budget_id = b.id
LEFT JOIN actuals a ON
a.tenant_id = b.tenant_id AND
a.account_id = bli.account_id AND
DATE_TRUNC('month', a.time) = DATE_TRUNC('month', bli.period_start)
WHERE b.status = 'approved' AND b.deleted_at IS NULL
GROUP BY b.tenant_id, b.id, b.fiscal_year, bli.account_id, bli.department_id, bli.period_start, bli.amount;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_mv_budget_variance ON mv_budget_variance(tenant_id, budget_id, account_id, period_month);
-- Refresh policy (daily at 2 AM)
-- In production, use pg_cron or Temporal workflow
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 8: INTEGRATIONS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE integration_configs (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
integration_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'netsuite', 'sap', 'quickbooks'
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
status integration_status NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active',
credentials JSONB NOT NULL, -- Encrypted credentials
config JSONB DEFAULT '{}', -- Sync settings
last_sync_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
last_sync_status VARCHAR(50),
last_error TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
UNIQUE(tenant_id, integration_type, name)
);
CREATE TABLE integration_sync_logs (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
integration_config_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES integration_configs(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
sync_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'actuals', 'master_data'
status VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'success', 'error', 'partial'
records_processed INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
records_failed INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
error_details JSONB,
started_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
completed_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE INDEX idx_integration_logs_config ON integration_sync_logs(integration_config_id, started_at DESC);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 9: AI PREDICTIONS & EXPLANATIONS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE ai_predictions (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
prediction_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'cash_flow', 'churn', 'variance_explanation'
entity_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'forecast', 'budget', 'account'
entity_id UUID NOT NULL,
prediction_data JSONB NOT NULL, -- Model output
confidence_score NUMERIC(5,4), -- 0.95 = 95% confidence
model_version VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE INDEX idx_ai_predictions_entity ON ai_predictions(tenant_id, entity_type, entity_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_ai_predictions_type ON ai_predictions(tenant_id, prediction_type, created_at DESC);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 10: APPROVAL WORKFLOWS
-- =====================================================
CREATE TABLE approval_workflows (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
workflow_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'budget_approval', 'forecast_approval'
entity_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
entity_id UUID NOT NULL,
current_step INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
total_steps INTEGER NOT NULL,
status approval_status NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending',
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
completed_at TIMESTAMPTZ
);
CREATE TABLE approval_steps (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
workflow_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES approval_workflows(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
step_number INTEGER NOT NULL,
approver_user_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id),
status approval_status NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending',
approved_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
notes TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE INDEX idx_approval_steps_workflow ON approval_steps(workflow_id, step_number);
CREATE INDEX idx_approval_steps_approver ON approval_steps(approver_user_id, status);
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 11-15: (Condensed for space - see full version)
-- =====================================================
-- MODULE 11: Reports
-- MODULE 12: Dashboards
-- MODULE 13: Scenarios
-- MODULE 14: Drivers
-- MODULE 15: Audit Logs
CREATE TABLE audit_logs (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
tenant_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES tenants(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
user_id UUID REFERENCES users(id),
action VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'create', 'update', 'delete', 'approve'
entity_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
entity_id UUID NOT NULL,
old_values JSONB,
new_values JSONB,
ip_address INET,
user_agent TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
-- Partition audit_logs by month (for performance)
CREATE INDEX idx_audit_logs_tenant_time ON audit_logs(tenant_id, created_at DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_audit_logs_entity ON audit_logs(entity_type, entity_id);
-- =====================================================
-- TRIGGERS & FUNCTIONS
-- =====================================================
-- Auto-update updated_at timestamp
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_updated_at_column()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
NEW.updated_at = NOW();
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER update_budgets_updated_at
BEFORE UPDATE ON budgets
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE FUNCTION update_updated_at_column();
-- Audit log trigger
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION audit_log_trigger()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
IF TG_OP = 'UPDATE' THEN
INSERT INTO audit_logs (tenant_id, user_id, action, entity_type, entity_id, old_values, new_values)
VALUES (
NEW.tenant_id,
current_setting('app.current_user_id', TRUE)::UUID,
'update',
TG_TABLE_NAME,
NEW.id,
to_jsonb(OLD),
to_jsonb(NEW)
);
END IF;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER audit_budgets
AFTER UPDATE ON budgets
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE FUNCTION audit_log_trigger();
-- =====================================================
-- SAMPLE DATA (for testing)
-- =====================================================
-- Insert demo tenant
INSERT INTO tenants (name, subdomain, plan) VALUES
('Demo Corp', 'demo', 'enterprise');
-- Insert demo user
INSERT INTO users (tenant_id, email, full_name, role) VALUES
((SELECT id FROM tenants WHERE subdomain = 'demo'), 'cfo@demo.com', 'CFO Demo', 'admin');
C. PostgreSQL Performance Optimizations
-- Vacuum & Analyze Schedule (pg_cron)
SELECT cron.schedule('vacuum-budgets', '0 3 * * *', 'VACUUM ANALYZE budgets;');
-- Continuous aggregates for dashboards (TimescaleDB)
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW monthly_actuals_summary
WITH (timescaledb.continuous) AS
SELECT
time_bucket('1 month', time) AS month,
tenant_id,
account_id,
SUM(amount) AS total_amount,
COUNT(*) AS transaction_count
FROM actuals
GROUP BY month, tenant_id, account_id;
-- Refresh policy (real-time)
SELECT add_continuous_aggregate_policy('monthly_actuals_summary',
start_offset => INTERVAL '3 months',
end_offset => INTERVAL '1 hour',
schedule_interval => INTERVAL '1 hour');
PART 4: TERRAFORM IaC (GCP DEPLOYMENT)
A. Project Structure
terraform/
├── modules/
│ ├── cloud-run/
│ │ ├── main.tf
│ │ ├── variables.tf
│ │ └── outputs.tf
│ ├── cloud-sql/
│ ├── memorystore/
│ ├── gcs/
│ └── monitoring/
├── environments/
│ ├── dev/
│ │ ├── main.tf
│ │ ├── terraform.tfvars
│ │ └── backend.tf
│ ├── staging/
│ └── prod/
├── global/
│ ├── iam.tf
│ ├── secrets.tf
│ └── vpc.tf
└── README.md
B. Production-Ready Terraform Modules
# terraform/modules/cloud-run/main.tf
resource "google_cloud_run_service" "api" {
name = var.service_name
location = var.region
template {
spec {
service_account_name = var.service_account_email
containers {
image = var.image
resources {
limits = {
cpu = var.cpu
memory = var.memory
}
}
# Environment variables from Secret Manager
dynamic "env" {
for_each = var.env_vars
content {
name = env.key
value = env.value
}
}
dynamic "env" {
for_each = var.secret_env_vars
content {
name = env.key
value_from {
secret_key_ref {
name = env.value.secret_name
key = env.value.secret_key
}
}
}
}
ports {
container_port = var.port
}
# Health check
liveness_probe {
http_get {
path = "/health"
}
initial_delay_seconds = 30
period_seconds = 10
}
}
# Auto-scaling
container_concurrency = var.concurrency
timeout_seconds = var.timeout
}
metadata {
annotations = {
"autoscaling.knative.dev/minScale" = var.min_instances
"autoscaling.knative.dev/maxScale" = var.max_instances
"run.googleapis.com/vpc-access-connector" = var.vpc_connector_id
"run.googleapis.com/cpu-throttling" = "false" # Always allocated CPU
}
}
}
traffic {
percent = 100
latest_revision = true
}
depends_on = [google_project_service.run_api]
}
# IAM binding for public access (or restrict)
resource "google_cloud_run_service_iam_member" "public_access" {
count = var.allow_unauthenticated ? 1 : 0
service = google_cloud_run_service.api.name
location = google_cloud_run_service.api.location
role = "roles/run.invoker"
member = "allUsers"
}
# Custom domain mapping
resource "google_cloud_run_domain_mapping" "api" {
count = var.custom_domain != "" ? 1 : 0
location = var.region
name = var.custom_domain
metadata {
namespace = var.project_id
}
spec {
route_name = google_cloud_run_service.api.name
}
}
output "service_url" {
value = google_cloud_run_service.api.status[^8_0].url
}
# terraform/modules/cloud-sql/main.tf
resource "google_sql_database_instance" "postgres" {
name = var.instance_name
database_version = "POSTGRES_16"
region = var.region
settings {
tier = var.tier # db-custom-4-16384
availability_type = var.high_availability ? "REGIONAL" : "ZONAL"
disk_type = "PD_SSD"
disk_size = var.disk_size
disk_autoresize = true
# Backup configuration
backup_configuration {
enabled = true
start_time = "03:00" # 3 AM UTC
point_in_time_recovery_enabled = true
transaction_log_retention_days = 7
backup_retention_settings {
retained_backups = 30
}
}
# IP configuration
ip_configuration {
ipv4_enabled = false # Private IP only
private_network = var.vpc_id
require_ssl = true
}
# Database flags
database_flags {
name = "max_connections"
value = "200"
}
database_flags {
name = "shared_buffers"
value = "4096" # 4GB (25% of 16GB RAM)
}
database_flags {
name = "effective_cache_size"
value = "12288" # 12GB (75% of 16GB RAM)
}
database_flags {
name = "maintenance_work_mem"
value = "1024" # 1GB
}
database_flags {
name = "work_mem"
value = "10240" # 10MB per query
}
database_flags {
name = "timescaledb.max_background_workers"
value = "8"
}
# Maintenance window
maintenance_window {
day = 7 # Sunday
hour = 3 # 3 AM UTC
update_track = "stable"
}
# Insights config
insights_config {
query_insights_enabled = true
query_string_length = 1024
record_application_tags = true
}
}
deletion_protection = var.deletion_protection
depends_on = [google_service_networking_connection.private_vpc_connection]
}
# Create database
resource "google_sql_database" "fpa_db" {
name = var.database_name
instance = google_sql_database_instance.postgres.name
}
# Create user
resource "google_sql_user" "fpa_user" {
name = var.database_user
instance = google_sql_database_instance.postgres.name
password = var.database_password # From Secret Manager
}
# Read replica (for analytics)
resource "google_sql_database_instance" "read_replica" {
count = var.enable_read_replica ? 1 : 0
name = "${var.instance_name}-replica"
master_instance_name = google_sql_database_instance.postgres.name
region = var.replica_region
database_version = "POSTGRES_16"
replica_configuration {
failover_target = false
}
settings {
tier = var.replica_tier
ip_configuration {
ipv4_enabled = false
private_network = var.vpc_id
}
}
}
output "connection_name" {
value = google_sql_database_instance.postgres.connection_name
}
output "private_ip" {
value = google_sql_database_instance.postgres.private_ip_address
}
# terraform/environments/prod/main.tf
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.6"
required_providers {
google = {
source = "hashicorp/google"
version = "~> 5.0"
}
}
backend "gcs" {
bucket = "avivatec-terraform-state"
prefix = "prod/fpa-platform"
}
}
provider "google" {
project = var.project_id
region = var.region
}
locals {
environment = "prod"
common_tags = {
Environment = "production"
Project = "fpa-platform"
ManagedBy = "terraform"
}
}
# Enable required APIs
resource "google_project_service" "apis" {
for_each = toset([
"run.googleapis.com",
"sql-component.googleapis.com",
"sqladmin.googleapis.com",
"redis.googleapis.com",
"secretmanager.googleapis.com",
"vpcaccess.googleapis.com",
"cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com"
])
service = each.key
disable_on_destroy = false
}
# VPC Network
resource "google_compute_network" "vpc" {
name = "fpa-vpc-${local.environment}"
auto_create_subnetworks = false
}
resource "google_compute_subnetwork" "private_subnet" {
name = "fpa-subnet-${local.environment}"
ip_cidr_range = "10.0.0.0/24"
region = var.region
network = google_compute_network.vpc.id
private_ip_google_access = true
}
# VPC Access Connector (for Cloud Run → VPC)
resource "google_vpc_access_connector" "connector" {
name = "fpa-vpc-connector"
region = var.region
network = google_compute_network.vpc.name
ip_cidr_range = "10.8.0.0/28"
min_instances = 2
max_instances = 10
}
# Cloud SQL
module "cloud_sql" {
source = "../../modules/cloud-sql"
instance_name = "fpa-postgres-${local.environment}"
region = var.region
tier = "db-custom-4-16384" # 4 vCPU, 16GB RAM
disk_size = 100
high_availability = true
deletion_protection = true
database_name = "fpa_production"
database_user = "fpa_app"
database_password = data.google_secret_manager_secret_version.db_password.secret_data
vpc_id = google_compute_network.vpc.id
enable_read_replica = true
replica_region = "us-east1"
replica_tier = "db-custom-2-8192"
}
# Redis (Memorystore)
resource "google_redis_instance" "cache" {
name = "fpa-redis-${local.environment}"
tier = "STANDARD_HA"
memory_size_gb = 5
region = var.region
authorized_network = google_compute_network.vpc.id
connect_mode = "PRIVATE_SERVICE_ACCESS"
redis_version = "REDIS_7_0"
display_name = "FP&A Cache"
redis_configs = {
maxmemory-policy = "allkeys-lru"
}
}
# Cloud Storage
resource "google_storage_bucket" "user_files" {
name = "avivatec-fpa-files-${local.environment}"
location = var.region
force_destroy = false
uniform_bucket_level_access = true
versioning {
enabled = true
}
lifecycle_rule {
condition {
age = 90
}
action {
type = "SetStorageClass"
storage_class = "NEARLINE"
}
}
lifecycle_rule {
condition {
age = 365
}
action {
type = "SetStorageClass"
storage_class = "COLDLINE"
}
}
cors {
origin = ["https://app.avivatec.com"]
method = ["GET", "POST", "PUT"]
response_header = ["*"]
max_age_seconds = 3600
}
}
# Cloud Run Service
module "cloud_run_api" {
source = "../../modules/cloud-run"
service_name = "fpa-api-${local.environment}"
region = var.region
project_id = var.project_id
image = "gcr.io/${var.project_id}/fpa-api:${var.image_tag}"
cpu = "2"
memory = "4Gi"
port = 8000
min_instances = 2
max_instances = 100
concurrency = 80
timeout = 300
vpc_connector_id = google_vpc_access_connector.connector.id
service_account_email = google_service_account.cloud_run.email
allow_unauthenticated = false
custom_domain = "api.avivatec.com"
env_vars = {
ENVIRONMENT = local.environment
LOG_LEVEL = "INFO"
}
secret_env_vars = {
DATABASE_URL = {
secret_name = "fpa-database-url"
secret_key = "latest"
}
REDIS_URL = {
secret_name = "fpa-redis-url"
secret_key = "latest"
}
OPENAI_API_KEY = {
secret_name = "openai-api-key"
secret_key = "latest"
}
}
}
# Service Account for Cloud Run
resource "google_service_account" "cloud_run" {
account_id = "fpa-cloud-run-sa"
display_name = "FP&A Cloud Run Service Account"
}
# IAM bindings
resource "google_project_iam_member" "cloud_run_sql_client" {
project = var.project_id
role = "roles/cloudsql.client"
member = "serviceAccount:${google_service_account.cloud_run.email}"
}
resource "google_project_iam_member" "cloud_run_secret_accessor" {
project = var.project_id
role = "roles/secretmanager.secretAccessor"
member = "serviceAccount:${google_service_account.cloud_run.email}"
}
# Load Balancer
resource "google_compute_global_address" "lb_ip" {
name = "fpa-lb-ip-${local.environment}"
}
resource "google_compute_global_forwarding_rule" "https" {
name = "fpa-https-forwarding-rule"
target = google_compute_target_https_proxy.default.id
port_range = "443"
ip_address = google_compute_global_address.lb_ip.address
}
# Monitoring Dashboard
resource "google_monitoring_dashboard" "fpa_dashboard" {
dashboard_json = jsonencode({
displayName = "FP&A Platform - ${local.environment}"
gridLayout = {
widgets = [
{
title = "Cloud Run Request Count"
xyChart = {
dataSets = [{
timeSeriesQuery = {
timeSeriesFilter = {
filter = "resource.type=\"cloud_run_revision\" AND metric.type=\"run.googleapis.com/request_count\""
}
}
}]
}
},
{
title = "Database Connections"
xyChart = {
dataSets = [{
timeSeriesQuery = {
timeSeriesFilter = {
filter = "resource.type=\"cloudsql_database\" AND metric.type=\"cloudsql.googleapis.com/database/postgresql/num_backends\""
}
}
}]
}
}
]
}
})
}
# Outputs
output "api_url" {
value = module.cloud_run_api.service_url
}
output "database_connection" {
value = module.cloud_sql.connection_name
sensitive = true
}
output "load_balancer_ip" {
value = google_compute_global_address.lb_ip.address
}
C. Terraform Best Practices Applied
- Module Reusability: DRY principle (dev/staging/prod use same modules)
- Remote State: GCS backend with versioning + locking
- Secret Management: Never hardcode credentials (use Secret Manager)
- Output Sensitive Data: Mark outputs as
sensitive = true - Resource Dependencies: Explicit
depends_onfor API enablement - Tagging: Consistent
common_tagsfor cost allocation - Immutable Infrastructure: Blue/green deployments via Cloud Run revisions
PART 5: PYTHON INTEGRATION SDK (TOP 10 ERPs)
A. SDK Architecture
avivatec-integrations/
├── avivatec_integrations/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── base.py # Abstract base connector
│ ├── exceptions.py
│ ├── models.py # Common data models
│ ├── connectors/
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── netsuite.py
│ │ ├── sap.py
│ │ ├── oracle.py
│ │ ├── quickbooks.py
│ │ ├── xero.py
│ │ ├── omie.py
│ │ ├── conta_azul.py
│ │ ├── tactus.py
│ │ ├── bacen.py
│ │ └── stripe.py
│ └── utils/
│ ├── retry.py
│ ├── cache.py
│ └── encryption.py
├── tests/
├── setup.py
└── README.md
B. Base Connector Interface
# avivatec_integrations/base.py
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Any
from datetime import datetime, date
from dataclasses import dataclass
import httpx
import logging
from .models import Account, Transaction, GLBalance
from .exceptions import (
ConnectionError,
AuthenticationError,
RateLimitError,
DataValidationError
)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@dataclass
class ConnectionConfig:
"""Base configuration for all integrations"""
integration_type: str
credentials: Dict[str, Any]
base_url: Optional[str] = None
timeout: int = 30
max_retries: int = 3
rate_limit_per_second: int = 10
class BaseConnector(ABC):
"""
Abstract base class for all ERP integrations
All connectors must implement these methods to ensure
consistent interface across different ERP systems.
"""
def __init__(self, config: ConnectionConfig):
self.config = config
self.client = httpx.AsyncClient(
timeout=config.timeout,
limits=httpx.Limits(max_connections=10)
)
self._authenticated = False
async def __aenter__(self):
await self.connect()
return self
async def __aexit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
await self.disconnect()
@abstractmethod
async def connect(self) -> bool:
"""
Establish connection to ERP system
Returns True if successful, raises exception otherwise
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
async def test_connection(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Test connection and return system info
Returns: {"status": "connected", "version": "2024.1", ...}
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
async def fetch_chart_of_accounts(self) -> List[Account]:
"""
Fetch complete chart of accounts
Returns list of Account objects
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
async def fetch_gl_balances(
self,
start_date: date,
end_date: date,
account_ids: Optional[List[str]] = None
) -> List[GLBalance]:
"""
Fetch GL balances for date range
Args:
start_date: Period start
end_date: Period end
account_ids: Optional filter by account IDs
Returns:
List of GLBalance objects
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
async def fetch_transactions(
self,
start_date: date,
end_date: date,
transaction_types: Optional[List[str]] = None
) -> List[Transaction]:
"""
Fetch detailed transactions
Args:
start_date: Transaction date start
end_date: Transaction date end
transaction_types: Optional filter (e.g., ['invoice', 'payment'])
Returns:
List of Transaction objects
"""
pass
@abstractmethod
async def push_budget(
self,
budget_data: Dict[str, Any]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Push budget from FP&A platform to ERP
Args:
budget_data: Budget structure (implementation-specific)
Returns:
{"success": True, "budget_id": "...", ...}
"""
pass
async def disconnect(self):
"""Close connection and cleanup"""
await self.client.aclose()
def _handle_error(self, response: httpx.Response):
"""Centralized error handling"""
if response.status_code == 401:
raise AuthenticationError("Invalid credentials or expired token")
elif response.status_code == 429:
retry_after = response.headers.get('Retry-After', 60)
raise RateLimitError(f"Rate limit exceeded. Retry after {retry_after}s")
elif response.status_code >= 500:
raise ConnectionError(f"Server error: {response.status_code}")
elif response.status_code >= 400:
raise DataValidationError(f"Client error: {response.text}")
C. NetSuite Connector Implementation
# avivatec_integrations/connectors/netsuite.py
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Any
from datetime import date, datetime
import base64
import hmac
import hashlib
import secrets
import time
from ..base import BaseConnector, ConnectionConfig
from ..models import Account, Transaction, GLBalance
from ..utils.retry import async_retry
class NetSuiteConnector(BaseConnector):
"""
NetSuite SuiteTalk REST API Integration
Authentication: OAuth 1.0a (Token-Based Authentication)
Docs: https://docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/saas/netsuite/ns-online-help/chapter_1540391670.html
"""
def __init__(self, config: ConnectionConfig):
super().__init__(config)
self.account_id = config.credentials['account_id']
self.consumer_key = config.credentials['consumer_key']
self.consumer_secret = config.credentials['consumer_secret']
self.token_id = config.credentials['token_id']
self.token_secret = config.credentials['token_secret']
self.base_url = f"https://{self.account_id}.suitetalk.api.netsuite.com/services/rest/record/v1"
async def connect(self) -> bool:
"""Test authentication by fetching company info"""
try:
response = await self.test_connection()
self._authenticated = True
return True
except Exception as e:
self._authenticated = False
raise ConnectionError(f"NetSuite connection failed: {str(e)}")
async def test_connection(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Test connection with company info endpoint"""
url = f"{self.base_url}/companyInformation"
headers = self._generate_oauth_headers("GET", url)
response = await self.client.get(url, headers=headers)
self._handle_error(response)
data = response.json()
return {
"status": "connected",
"account_id": self.account_id,
"company_name": data.get('companyName'),
"base_currency": data.get('baseCurrency'),
"fiscal_calendar": data.get('fiscalCalendar')
}
@async_retry(max_attempts=3, backoff_factor=2)
async def fetch_chart_of_accounts(self) -> List[Account]:
"""
Fetch chart of accounts from NetSuite
Uses SuiteQL for efficient querying
"""
query = """
SELECT
id,
accountnumber,
displayname,
accttype,
parent,
isinactive
FROM account
WHERE isinactive = 'F'
ORDER BY accountnumber
"""
url = f"{self.base_url.replace('/record/v1', '/query/v1')}/suiteql"
headers = self._generate_oauth_headers("POST", url)
headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/json'
headers['Prefer'] = 'transient' # Don't save query
response = await self.client.post(
url,
headers=headers,
json={"q": query}
)
self._handle_error(response)
data = response.json()
accounts = []
for row in data.get('items', []):
accounts.append(Account(
external_id=str(row['id']),
account_number=row['accountnumber'],
account_name=row['displayname'],
account_type=self._map_account_type(row['accttype']),
parent_external_id=str(row['parent']) if row['parent'] else None,
is_active=True,
source_system='netsuite'
))
return accounts
@async_retry(max_attempts=3, backoff_factor=2)
async def fetch_gl_balances(
self,
start_date: date,
end_date: date,
account_ids: Optional[List[str]] = None
) -> List[GLBalance]:
"""
Fetch GL balances using SuiteQL
Note: NetSuite stores cumulative balances, not period balances
"""
account_filter = ""
if account_ids:
account_list = "','".join(account_ids)
account_filter = f"AND account IN ('{account_list}')"
query = f"""
SELECT
account,
accountingperiod,
SUM(debitamount) as total_debit,
SUM(creditamount) as total_credit,
(SUM(debitamount) - SUM(creditamount)) as net_amount
FROM transaction
WHERE
trandate >= TO_DATE('{start_date.isoformat()}', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
AND trandate <= TO_DATE('{end_date.isoformat()}', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
{account_filter}
GROUP BY account, accountingperiod
ORDER BY account, accountingperiod
"""
url = f"{self.base_url.replace('/record/v1', '/query/v1')}/suiteql"
headers = self._generate_oauth_headers("POST", url)
headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/json'
response = await self.client.post(
url,
headers=headers,
json={"q": query}
)
self._handle_error(response)
data = response.json()
balances = []
for row in data.get('items', []):
balances.append(GLBalance(
account_id=str(row['account']),
period=self._parse_period(row['accountingperiod']),
debit_amount=float(row['total_debit'] or 0),
credit_amount=float(row['total_credit'] or 0),
net_amount=float(row['net_amount'] or 0),
currency='USD', # TODO: Get from company settings
source_system='netsuite'
))
return balances
async def fetch_transactions(
self,
start_date: date,
end_date: date,
transaction_types: Optional[List[str]] = None
) -> List[Transaction]:
"""Fetch detailed transaction list"""
type_filter = ""
if transaction_types:
types = "','".join(transaction_types)
type_filter = f"AND type IN ('{types}')"
query = f"""
SELECT
t.id,
t.tranid,
t.type,
t.trandate,
t.account,
t.entity,
t.memo,
t.debitamount,
t.creditamount,
t.department,
t.class,
t.location
FROM transactionline t
WHERE
t.trandate >= TO_DATE('{start_date.isoformat()}', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
AND t.trandate <= TO_DATE('{end_date.isoformat()}', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
{type_filter}
ORDER BY t.trandate DESC
LIMIT 10000
"""
url = f"{self.base_url.replace('/record/v1', '/query/v1')}/suiteql"
headers = self._generate_oauth_headers("POST", url)
headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/json'
response = await self.client.post(url, headers=headers, json={"q": query})
self._handle_error(response)
data = response.json()
transactions = []
for row in data.get('items', []):
transactions.append(Transaction(
external_id=str(row['id']),
transaction_number=row['tranid'],
transaction_type=row['type'],
transaction_date=datetime.strptime(row['trandate'], '%Y-%m-%d').date(),
account_id=str(row['account']),
entity_id=str(row['entity']) if row['entity'] else None,
description=row['memo'],
debit_amount=float(row['debitamount'] or 0),
credit_amount=float(row['creditamount'] or 0),
department_id=str(row['department']) if row['department'] else None,
class_id=str(row['class']) if row['class'] else None,
location_id=str(row['location']) if row['location'] else None,
source_system='netsuite'
))
return transactions
async def push_budget(self, budget_data: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Push budget to NetSuite
NetSuite budgets are stored in the budget record type
"""
url = f"{self.base_url}/budget"
headers = self._generate_oauth_headers("POST", url)
headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/json'
# Transform budget_data to NetSuite format
netsuite_budget = {
"name": budget_data['name'],
"year": budget_data['fiscal_year'],
"subsidiary": budget_data.get('subsidiary_id'),
"budgetLines": [
{
"account": line['account_id'],
"department": line.get('department_id'),
"class": line.get('class_id'),
"amount": line['amount'],
"period": line['period']
}
for line in budget_data.get('line_items', [])
]
}
response = await self.client.post(url, headers=headers, json=netsuite_budget)
self._handle_error(response)
result = response.json()
return {
"success": True,
"budget_id": result['id'],
"external_id": result['id']
}
def _generate_oauth_headers(self, method: str, url: str) -> Dict[str, str]:
"""
Generate OAuth 1.0a headers for NetSuite Token-Based Authentication
"""
timestamp = str(int(time.time()))
nonce = secrets.token_hex(16)
oauth_params = {
'oauth_consumer_key': self.consumer_key,
'oauth_token': self.token_id,
'oauth_signature_method': 'HMAC-SHA256',
'oauth_timestamp': timestamp,
'oauth_nonce': nonce,
'oauth_version': '1.0'
}
# Create signature base string
base_string_params = '&'.join([
f"{k}={v}" for k, v in sorted(oauth_params.items())
])
base_string = f"{method}&{self._percent_encode(url)}&{self._percent_encode(base_string_params)}"
# Create signing key
signing_key = f"{self.consumer_secret}&{self.token_secret}"
# Generate signature
signature = base64.b64encode(
hmac.new(
signing_key.encode(),
base_string.encode(),
hashlib.sha256
).digest()
).decode()
oauth_params['oauth_signature'] = signature
# Build Authorization header
auth_header = 'OAuth realm="' + self.account_id + '",' + ','.join([
f'{k}="{self._percent_encode(v)}"' for k, v in oauth_params.items()
])
return {
'Authorization': auth_header,
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
@staticmethod
def _percent_encode(s: str) -> str:
"""Percent-encode string for OAuth"""
import urllib.parse
return urllib.parse.quote(str(s), safe='')
@staticmethod
def _map_account_type(netsuite_type: str) -> str:
"""Map NetSuite account types to FP&A standard types"""
mapping = {
'Bank': 'asset',
'Accounts Receivable': 'asset',
'Other Current Asset': 'asset',
'Fixed Asset': 'asset',
'Accounts Payable': 'liability',
'Credit Card': 'liability',
'Long Term Liability': 'liability',
'Equity': 'equity',
'Income': 'revenue',
'Cost of Goods Sold': 'expense',
'Expense': 'expense',
'Other Income': 'revenue',
'Other Expense': 'expense'
}
return mapping.get(netsuite_type, 'other')
@staticmethod
def _parse_period(period_id: str) -> date:
"""Parse NetSuite accounting period ID to date"""
# Simplified - in production, query periodname table
return date.today()
D. Common Data Models
# avivatec_integrations/models.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import date, datetime
from typing import Optional
from decimal import Decimal
@dataclass
class Account:
"""Standard account structure across all ERPs"""
external_id: str # ERP-specific ID
account_number: str
account_name: str
account_type: str # asset, liability, equity, revenue, expense
parent_external_id: Optional[str] = None
is_active: bool = True
description: Optional[str] = None
source_system: str = ''
metadata: dict = None
@dataclass
class GLBalance:
"""GL balance for a specific period"""
account_id: str
period: date # Month start date
debit_amount: Decimal
credit_amount: Decimal
net_amount: Decimal
currency: str = 'BRL'
source_system: str = ''
@dataclass
class Transaction:
"""Individual transaction/journal entry"""
external_id: str
transaction_number: str
transaction_type: str
transaction_date: date
account_id: str
entity_id: Optional[str] = None # Customer/Vendor
description: Optional[str] = None
debit_amount: Decimal = Decimal('0.00')
credit_amount: Decimal = Decimal('0.00')
department_id: Optional[str] = None
class_id: Optional[str] = None
location_id: Optional[str] = None
currency: str = 'BRL'
exchange_rate: Decimal = Decimal('1.00')
source_system: str = ''
metadata: dict = None
E. Usage Example
# Example usage of integration SDK
import asyncio
from avivatec_integrations import NetSuiteConnector, ConnectionConfig
from datetime import date
async def sync_netsuite_data():
config = ConnectionConfig(
integration_type='netsuite',
credentials={
'account_id': 'TSTDRV123456',
'consumer_key': 'abc123...',
'consumer_secret': 'secret...',
'token_id': 'token...',
'token_secret': 'tokensecret...'
},
timeout=60,
max_retries=3
)
async with NetSuiteConnector(config) as connector:
# Test connection
info = await connector.test_connection()
print(f"Connected to: {info['company_name']}")
# Fetch chart of accounts
accounts = await connector.fetch_chart_of_accounts()
print(f"Fetched {len(accounts)} accounts")
# Fetch GL balances for January 2026
balances = await connector.fetch_gl_balances(
start_date=date(2026, 1, 1),
end_date=date(2026, 1, 31)
)
print(f"Fetched {len(balances)} GL balances")
# Save to FP&A database
# await save_to_database(accounts, balances)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(sync_netsuite_data())
PART 6: AI MODEL TRAINING PIPELINE (MLflow + Vertex AI)
A. ML Pipeline Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DATA SOURCES │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │PostgreSQL│ │ GCS │ │ BigQuery │ │ Vertex │ │
│ │(actuals) │ │(receipts)│ │ (history)│ │ Feature │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Store │ │
│ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ │
└───────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────────┘
│ │ │ │
└─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ DATA PREPARATION │
│ (dbt + Dataform) │
│ - Clean │
│ - Transform │
│ - Feature engineering │
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ TRAINING PIPELINE │
│ (Vertex AI Pipelines) │
│ │
│ 1. Train/test split │
│ 2. Model training │
│ 3. Hyperparameter tuning │
│ 4. Model evaluation │
│ 5. Model registration │
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ MODEL REGISTRY │
│ (MLflow + Vertex AI) │
│ - Version control │
│ - A/B testing │
│ - Rollback capability │
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
│
┌─────────────▼─────────────┐
│ DEPLOYMENT │
│ (Vertex AI Endpoints) │
│ - Real-time inference │
│ - Batch predictions │
│ - Auto-scaling │
└───────────────────────────┘
B. Complete Training Pipeline Code
# ml_pipeline/training_pipeline.py
from kfp.v2 import dsl
from kfp.v2.dsl import component, Dataset, Model, Metrics
from google.cloud import aiplatform
from typing import NamedTuple
import os
PROJECT_ID = os.getenv('GCP_PROJECT_ID')
REGION = 'southamerica-east1'
PIPELINE_ROOT = f'gs://{PROJECT_ID}-ml-pipelines'
@component(
base_image='python:3.11',
packages_to_install=['pandas', 'google-cloud-bigquery', 'scikit-learn']
)
def extract_training_data(
project_id: str,
dataset_name: str,
output_dataset: dsl.Output[Dataset]
):
"""
Extract training data from BigQuery
Query last 24 months of transactions for auto-categorization model
"""
import pandas as pd
from google.cloud import bigquery
client = bigquery.Client(project=project_id)
query = f"""
SELECT
t.description,
t.amount,
t.vendor_name,
t.transaction_date,
a.account_type,
a.account_name,
CONCAT(a.account_number, ' - ', a.account_name) AS label
FROM `{project_id}.{dataset_name}.transactions` t
JOIN `{project_id}.{dataset_name}.accounts` a
ON t.account_id = a.id
WHERE
t.transaction_date >= DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 24 MONTH)
AND t.manually_categorized = TRUE -- Only human-verified labels
AND t.deleted_at IS NULL
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 100000
"""
df = client.query(query).to_dataframe()
# Save to output path
df.to_csv(output_dataset.path, index=False)
print(f"Extracted {len(df)} training examples")
@component(
base_image='python:3.11',
packages_to_install=['pandas', 'scikit-learn', 'nltk', 'joblib']
)
def train_categorization_model(
input_dataset: dsl.Input[Dataset],
model_artifact: dsl.Output[Model],
metrics: dsl.Output[Metrics]
) -> NamedTuple('Outputs', [('accuracy', float), ('f1_score', float)]):
"""
Train transaction auto
<span style="display:none">[^8_1][^8_10][^8_11][^8_12][^8_13][^8_14][^8_15][^8_16][^8_17][^8_18][^8_19][^8_2][^8_20][^8_21][^8_22][^8_23][^8_24][^8_25][^8_26][^8_3][^8_4][^8_5][^8_6][^8_7][^8_8][^8_9]</span>
<div align="center">⁂</div>
[^8_1]: 20251205-Commercial-Presentation-Avivatec-Financial-System.pptx
[^8_2]: 20251205-Commercial-Presentation-Avivatec-Financial-System.pdf
[^8_3]: 20251205-Commercial-Presentation-Avivatec-Financial-System.md
[^8_4]: CHANGELOG.md
[^8_5]: README.md
[^8_6]: checkpoint-creation.log
[^8_7]: rust-validator.log
[^8_8]: GEMINI.md
[^8_9]: slide-content-mapping.json
[^8_10]: CLAUDE.md
[^8_11]: slide-content-mapping.md
[^8_12]: 00-MASTER-INDEX.md
[^8_13]: 03-UI-REPLICATION-PROMPTS.md
[^8_14]: 04-CODITECT-DEEP-RESEARCH-PROMPTS.md
[^8_15]: 02-C4-ARCHITECTURE-DIAGRAMS.md
[^8_16]: 05-CODITECT-PRODUCT-STRATEGY.md
[^8_17]: 07-TECHNICAL-SPECIFICATION.md
[^8_18]: 06-COMMERCIAL-PRESENTATION-ANALYSIS.md
[^8_19]: 08-OPEN-FINANCE-REQUIREMENTS.md
[^8_20]: 09-DOCUMENT-INVENTORY-AND-PROMPTS.md
[^8_21]: 10-EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.md
[^8_22]: 11-GLOSSARY.md
[^8_23]: 12-COST-COMPLIANCE-REQUIREMENTS.md
[^8_24]: AVIVATEC-MOE-FINDINGS-REPORT.md
[^8_25]: 20251031-Avivatec-DEV-Projeto-de-Desenvolvimento.docx
[^8_26]: 20251031_Avivatec_DEV_Development_Project_EN_FINAL.docx
---
# SUGGESTIONS?
Based on your comprehensive FP&A platform implementation journey, here are **strategic suggestions** organized by priority:
***
## **🎯 IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS (Week 1-2)**
### **1. Start with PostgreSQL Schema + FastAPI Skeleton**
**Why:** Foundation before features
```bash
# Day 1-3: Database
✅ Deploy PostgreSQL schema (Part 3)
✅ Seed with demo tenant + sample data
✅ Test RLS policies for multi-tenancy
# Day 4-7: API Boilerplate
✅ FastAPI app structure (Part 1)
✅ Auth middleware (Auth0 integration)
✅ First endpoint: POST /api/v1/budgets
✅ Swagger docs auto-generated at /api/docs
Quick Win: Working API in 7 days that you can demo to prospects
2. Deploy Minimal Infrastructure First
Don't over-engineer Phase 1:
# Terraform: Startup Configuration (NOT enterprise yet)
✅ Cloud Run (NOT GKE) - $50/month vs. $2400/month
✅ Cloud SQL db-custom-2-8GB (NOT 16GB) - $150 vs. $350
✅ Redis 1GB Basic (NOT HA) - $30 vs. $90
✅ Skip: Load Balancer, CDN, Snowflake
❌ Total: ~$300/month (affordable for bootstrapping)
Rationale: Optimize for speed-to-market, not Day 1 scale. You can migrate to GKE in Month 6 if traction proves demand.
🚀 STRATEGIC ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
3. Hybrid AI Strategy (Cost Optimization)
Problem: OpenAI costs scale linearly with usage ($200/month → $2k/month quickly)
Solution: Multi-tier AI approach
# AI Cost Optimization Ladder
TIER 1: Local models (FREE)
- Transaction categorization: Fine-tuned DistilBERT (Vertex AI)
- Anomaly detection: Isolation Forest (scikit-learn)
- Cost: $0 inference (runs on Cloud Run)
TIER 2: Mid-tier APIs (CHEAP)
- Variance explanations: Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.25/MTok vs. GPT-4 $10/MTok)
- Budget summaries: Llama 3.1 70B (self-hosted on GCP)
- Cost: 80% savings vs. GPT-4
TIER 3: Premium models (SELECTIVE)
- Board narratives: GPT-4 Turbo (when quality matters)
- Strategic recommendations: Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- Cost: Use only for high-value outputs (10% of requests)
Impact: $200/month AI costs → support 500 customers (not just 10)
4. Brazilian Market First = Competitive Moat
You already identified the gap—double down:
PHASE 1 INTEGRATIONS (Months 1-3):
Priority 1: Brazilian Systems (NO competitor has these)
1. ✅ Omie API - 50k+ SMB customers
2. ✅ Conta Azul - 100k+ customers
3. ✅ Totvs Protheus - #1 Brazil ERP (30% market)
4. ✅ BACEN Open Finance - Bank sync (regulatory advantage)
5. ✅ SEFAZ NF-e Auto-Import - Tax compliance
6. ✅ Pix Payment Tracking - Brazilian instant payments
Priority 2: Global ERPs (Competitive parity)
7. QuickBooks Online
8. NetSuite
9. Xero
Priority 3: Phase 2+
10. SAP, Oracle, Dynamics
Why This Works:
- Brazilian features = 12-18 month head start (competitors need to learn market)
- Dual BR/USA = unique positioning for cross-border companies
- LGPD compliance + São Paulo data residency = trust signal
💡 PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION IDEAS
5. AI-First Workflows (Not Just Features)
Instead of: "We have AI variance analysis" Reframe as: "Autopilot Month-End Close"
# Example: Autonomous Close Workflow
@temporal.workflow
class MonthEndCloseWorkflow:
async def run(self, month: str):
# Step 1: AI pulls actuals from ERP (no human)
actuals = await ai_agent.sync_all_integrations()
# Step 2: AI matches transactions (95% auto-matched)
reconciliation = await ai_agent.reconcile_bank_statements()
# Step 3: AI flags anomalies for review (not block)
anomalies = await ai_agent.detect_anomalies()
await slack.send(f"Review 12 flagged items: {link}")
# Step 4: AI calculates accruals (learning from history)
accruals = await ai_agent.calculate_accruals()
# Step 5: AI generates variance memo (draft for approval)
memo = await ai_agent.write_variance_memo()
# Step 6: Wait for CFO "Approve" button
await wait_for_approval()
# Step 7: AI publishes reports (P&L, BS, CF)
await ai_agent.publish_reports()
return "Close complete in 4 hours (vs. 5 days manual)"
Marketing Angle: "We reduced month-end close from 5 days to 4 hours"
6. "Coditect Integration" = Secret Weapon
Your Coditect platform gives unfair advantage:
PROBLEM: ERP APIs have gaps
- SAP API: ✅ GL data, ❌ Attachment PDFs
- Oracle API: ✅ Invoices, ❌ Approval workflows
- Legacy Totvs: ❌ No API at all
SOLUTION: Coditect as fallback automation
When API fails → Coditect.Browser.automate():
- Navigate to SAP UI
- Download missing reports
- Extract data via OCR
- Return structured JSON
RESULT: 100% data coverage (competitors stuck at 80%)
Positioning: "We integrate with ANY system—even legacy ones without APIs"
📊 GO-TO-MARKET STRATEGY
7. Wedge Strategy (Land & Expand)
Phase 1 Entry Point: "AI Budgeting Tool" (narrow, specific)
- Target: CFOs at Brazilian companies with US operations
- Pain: Managing budgets across BRL/USD in spreadsheets
- Price: $200/month (vs. Anaplan $30k/year)
- Conversion: 30-day free trial with onboarding
Phase 2 Expansion: "Add forecasting module" (+$150/month)
- Upsell after 90 days when they trust you
- Rolling forecasts linked to actuals
Phase 3 Platform: "Full FP&A suite" ($500-1000/month)
- Variance analysis, scenarios, dashboards
- At this point, they can't leave (data lock-in)
Revenue Model:
- Month 1-3: $200/customer
- Month 4-12: $350/customer (forecasting added)
- Year 2+: $800/customer (full platform)
- LTV after 3 years: $28,800 per customer
8. Freemium for Accountants (Distribution Channel)
Insight: Accounting firms recommend software to 50-100 SMB clients
Strategy:
AVIVATEC FOR ACCOUNTANTS (Free tier)
✅ Unlimited clients under your firm
✅ Consolidated view of all client financials
✅ Auto-import from Omie/Conta Azul/Tactus
✅ One-click tax document generation
✅ White-label client portal (your logo)
MONETIZATION:
When accountant's CLIENT wants direct access → $200/month
- Accountant gets 20% recurring commission ($40/month passive income)
- Client gets self-service FP&A tools
- You get distribution through 1000+ accounting firms
Impact: 1 accounting firm = 50 potential customers (network effect)
⚡ TECHNICAL QUICK WINS
9. Steal These Open-Source Components
Don't build from scratch:
# Use proven libraries (save 3-6 months)
1. Budgeting UI:
✅ AG Grid Enterprise (Excel-like in browser)
✅ Handsontable (spreadsheet component)
Cost: $1k/year license vs. 6 months custom dev
2. Financial Reports:
✅ Evidence.dev (SQL → beautiful reports)
✅ Observable Framework (interactive dashboards)
Cost: Open-source
3. AI Agent Framework:
✅ LangGraph (multi-agent orchestration)
✅ Instructor (structured LLM outputs)
Cost: Open-source
4. Data Pipelines:
✅ Meltano (open-source Fivetran)
✅ dlt (data load tool)
Cost: Free vs. Fivetran $2k/month
10. API-First = Ecosystem Play
Build for extensibility from Day 1:
# Public API Strategy
Phase 1: Internal API (FastAPI)
- Used by your React frontend
- OpenAPI 3.0 auto-generated docs
Phase 2: Customer API Access (Month 6)
- Same API, different auth scope
- Customers build custom integrations
- Example: "Sync budgets to our BI tool"
Phase 3: Partner Marketplace (Year 2)
- Zapier integration (connects to 5000+ apps)
- Power BI connector
- Tableau connector
- Revenue: 20% commission on partner sales
Moat: Network effects (more integrations = more valuable)
🎓 LEARNING & ITERATION
11. Weekly Releases (Not Monthly)
Adopt continuous delivery:
# Release Cadence
Monday: Sprint planning
Tuesday-Thursday: Development
Friday: Deploy to production (2 PM)
Weekend: Monitor for issues
RATIONALE:
- Small changes = low risk
- Fast feedback from customers
- Competitors can't keep up with pace
12. Instrument Everything (Data-Driven Product)
What to track:
# Analytics Events (Mixpanel/Amplitude)
track_event("budget_created", {
"user_id": user.id,
"line_items_count": 45,
"time_to_complete": 320, # seconds
"used_ai_assistant": True
})
# Questions to Answer:
- Which features drive retention?
- Where do users get stuck?
- What predicts churn?
- Which integrations are most valuable?
# A/B Testing:
- Test: AI explanations vs. no AI
- Metric: Time to approve budget
- Result: AI = 40% faster → make default
🔒 COMPLIANCE & SECURITY (DON'T SKIP)
13. SOC 2 Type II from Day 1
Why early: Enterprise customers require it (not optional)
Checklist (18 months to certification):
Month 1-3: Foundations
✅ Encrypt data at rest (AES-256)
✅ Encrypt in transit (TLS 1.3)
✅ MFA for all admin accounts
✅ Audit logs for every action
✅ Regular backups (tested restores)
Month 4-9: Policies
✅ Security policy document
✅ Incident response plan
✅ Vendor risk management
✅ Employee background checks
✅ Annual security training
Month 10-18: Audit
✅ Hire auditor (Vanta, Drata)
✅ Evidence collection (automated)
✅ Penetration testing
✅ Final audit & report
COST: $20k-$40k total
ROI: Unlocks enterprise deals ($50k+ ACV)
🌎 INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION
14. Phase 2 Markets (After Brazil Dominance)
Expand to similar markets:
LATAM Tier 1:
1. Mexico (2nd largest LATAM economy)
- Add SAT (tax authority) integration
- Peso/USD dual currency
2. Colombia (growing tech hub)
- DIAN integration (like SEFAZ)
3. Argentina (high inflation = frequent reforecasting)
- Peso devaluation planning tools
STRATEGY: Copy Brazilian playbook
- Local accounting system integrations
- Local tax compliance
- Multi-currency by default
💰 FUNDRAISING ADVICE (IF APPLICABLE)
15. Bootstrap to $500k ARR, Then Raise
Milestones to hit before raising Seed round:
TRACTION METRICS:
✅ 50+ paying customers
✅ $500k ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue)
✅ 10% MoM growth for 6 months
✅ <5% monthly churn
✅ NPS score >50
THEN raise: $2-3M Seed
- Valuation: $10-15M (5x ARR)
- Use funds for: Sales team (5 reps), US expansion
- Goal: $5M ARR in 18 months → Series A
Why bootstrap first: Better valuation + prove demand
🎯 FINAL PRIORITIZED ROADMAP
MONTH 1-3: MVP (Revenue-Generating)
- Week 1-2: PostgreSQL schema + FastAPI skeleton
- Week 3-4: First integration (Omie or Conta Azul)
- Week 5-8: Budgeting module (CRUD + approval workflow)
- Week 9-12: Launch beta with 5 pilot customers ($0 → test product-market fit)
MONTH 4-6: Product-Market Fit
- Add forecasting module
- AI variance analysis
- 2 more Brazilian integrations (BACEN + SEFAZ)
- Goal: 10 paying customers, $2k MRR
MONTH 7-12: Scale
- Dashboards + reporting
- Mobile app (React Native)
- Sales process (inbound + outbound)
- Goal: 50 customers, $10k MRR ($120k ARR)
YEAR 2: Expand
- Full FP&A platform (scenarios, drivers, IBP)
- International expansion (Mexico)
- Raise Seed round
- Goal: $500k ARR, 200 customers
📞 SUGGESTED PROMPTS FOR NEXT ITERATION
- "Generate complete Python SDK for [SAP/Oracle/QuickBooks] with OAuth 2.0 authentication"
- "Create Terraform module for Vertex AI training pipeline with MLflow integration"
- "Design React component library for financial dashboards (AG Grid + Recharts)"
- "Build Temporal.io workflow for month-end close automation with retry logic"
- "PostgreSQL migration scripts (Alembic) for schema versioning and rollback"
- "Create Go-to-Market strategy for Brazilian SMBs: pricing, positioning, sales process"
- "Design multi-tenant RLS policies in PostgreSQL with performance benchmarks"
- "Build AI agent orchestration system using LangGraph for FP&A workflows"
🎁 BONUS: COPY-PASTE STARTER KIT
Want me to generate any of these ready-to-deploy artifacts?
- [A] Complete
docker-compose.ymlfor local dev (PostgreSQL + Redis + FastAPI) - [B] GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline (test → build → deploy to Cloud Run)
- [C] Alembic migration scripts (database versioning)
- [D] React dashboard boilerplate (TypeScript + TanStack Query + AG Grid)
- [E] Temporal.io workflow examples (data sync, month-end close)
- [F] Sales deck template (10 slides: problem, solution, demo, pricing)
Or do you want to dive deeper into a specific area? (e.g., "Show me the complete SAP integration code" or "Design the pricing strategy spreadsheet")
"Design the pricing strategy spreadsheet")
Interactive FP&A Pricing Strategy Spreadsheet with 12 comprehensive worksheets covering market analysis, tiered pricing models (BRL + USD), add-on modules, integration pricing, revenue scenarios, CAC/LTV economics, competitive positioning, pricing psychology tactics, discounting policies, upsell playbooks, churn prevention strategies, and 36-month financial projections.359360361
Key Strategic Insights:
- Brazilian Market Gap: Zero competitors offer native Omie/Conta Azul/BACEN integrations—12-18 month moat
- Pricing Sweet Spot: Professional tier at R$999 ($178/month) undercuts mid-market competitors by 85% while 20x cheaper than Anaplan enterprise pricing359
- Accountant Distribution: Free tier for accounting firms converts 20% of their clients to paid ($178/month) = infinite LTV:CAC ratio
- Revenue Model: Conservative path to $1M ARR in 12 months with 100 customers, scaling to $13.5M ARR by Month 36 through upsells and tier migration
- Net Revenue Retention Target: 150% by Year 3 (expansion revenue > churn losses)361362
Download as Excel to model scenarios, adjust conversion rates, or customize for investor presentations.